Search

Background: The echocardiographic parameter E/e' has been associated with cardiovascular (CV) events. However, few studies have analyzed multiple associated CV outcomes using E/e' in a diverse population of both inpatients and outpatients with and without cardiac diseases and risk factors., Methods: Medical records of 75,393 patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) with first available E/e' were retrieved from our hospital database. Patients with mitral valve disease were excluded, and the remainder were studied in protocol 1 (70,819 patients). Patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, CV diseases, prior CV events, CV surgeries, and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% or missing left ventricular ejection fraction were further excluded, and the remaining patients were studied in protocol 2 (14,665 patients). The study outcomes are major adverse CV events (MACE), which included myocardial infarction (MI), AF, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke (IHS), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and cardiac death. The primary outcomes were MACE and each of the MACE components., Results: At the end of maximal 5-year follow-up (median 22.18 months with interquartile range 7.20-49.08 months for MACE in protocol 1 and 23.46 months with interquartile range 8.15-49.02 months for MACE in protocol 2), compared with an E/e' value of <8, an intermediate value of E/e' 8 to 15 and a high value of E/e' >15 were significantly associated with MACE, MI, AF, IHS, HHF, and cardiac death in protocol 1 (all P < .0001). In protocol 2, an intermediate E/e' value of 8 to 15 and a high value of E/e' >15 were significantly associated with MACE, MI, AF, IHS, HHF, and CV death (all P < .05), except an intermediate value E/e' 8 to 15 was not associated with AF., Conclusions: In a diverse population of inpatients and outpatients with and without cardiac diseases and risk factors, the echocardiographic parameter E/e' was associated with CV events and is a useful marker of risk., (Copyright © 2022 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between day-1 urine cadmium excretion and 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at two centers., Methods: A total of 286 patients (222 males and 64 females) with AMI from Huashan Hospital, Shanghai and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan were enrolled. Basic vital signs, history, laboratory results, and day-1 urine excretion of cadmium (D1UECd) were recorded. Disease severity was assessed during the first hospitalization using Killip score, APACHE II score, and SOFA score. The main endpoint was 30-day mortality., Results: Among the 286 patients, 218 were from Chung Gung Memorial Hospital and 68 were from Huashan Hospital with an average age of 64.2 years. Forty (14%) patients died within 30 days after AMI. The average 24-h urine cadmium level among the Chung Gung Memorial Hospital cohort was 1.5 ± 2.4 μg compared to 1.7 ± 1.7 μg among Huashan Hospital cohort, both higher than the local populations. A higher D1UECd level was significantly associated with a greater risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.30-2.16) after controlling for a number of covariates. The ability of D1UECd to discriminate 30-day mortality was excellent, with a very high area under the curve (87.2%, 95% CI 82.0-92.5%)., Conclusion: D1UECd was positively correlated and an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in the enrolled AMI patients. D1UECd may be a simple, objective prognostic scoring system in AMI patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Liver cirrhotic predisposes patients to coagulopathy and bleeding. Little is known about outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in cirrhotic patients.Data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2001 to 2013 were retrieved for patients admitted with cirrhosis and AMI. We excluded patients with missing information, <20 years old, previous AMI, previous coronary intervention, and liver transplant. Patients were separated into cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: recurrent MI, revascularization, ischemic stroke, and heart failure), and liver outcomes (hepatic encephalopathy, ascites tapping, spontaneous peritonitis, and esophageal varices bleeding).A total of 3217 cirrhotic patients and 6434 non-cirrhotic patients were analyzed, with a mean follow up of 2.8 ± 3.3 years. In cirrhotic patients with AMI, subsequent coronary and cerebrovascular events were lower in comparison to non-cirrhotic patients, with higher all-cause mortality observed from adverse liver related outcomes and bleeding. There were significantly lower cumulative incidence of both recurrent MI and MACCE in cirrhotic patients with AMI compared with non-cirrhotic patients with AMI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.94, P = .006 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, P < .001, respectively). There was significantly higher cumulative incidence of liver related outcome in cirrhotic patients with AMI compared with non-cirrhotic patients with AMI (HR 2.27, 95% CI 2.06-2.51, P < .001). And there was significantly higher all-cause mortality in cirrhotic patients with AMI compared with non-cirrhotic patients with AMI (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.38, P < .001).In cirrhotic cohort with AMI, a decreased in coronary and cerebrovascular events were observed. However, these patients also had higher all-cause mortality due to adverse liver outcomes and bleeding.

Background: Patients with cirrhosis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) present dilemma whether dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be used., Methods: Electronic medical records between 2001-2013 were retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients were excluded for missing information, age <20 years old, history of AMI, liver transplant, autoimmune disease, coagulopathy, taking DAPT 3 months before index date, follow-up <3 months, anticoagulation user, without DAPT, and events of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and heart failure within 3-month of enrollment. Primary outcomes were 1-year all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding., Results: A total of 150,887 patients with AMI retrieved. After exclusion criteria and propensity score-matching, 914 cirrhotic and 3,656 non-cirrhotic patients with AMI on DAPT were studied. During 1-year follow-up, there was significantly increased mortality in cirrhotic patients compared to non-cirrhotic patients (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.28-1.74). There was significantly decreased recurrent MI in cirrhotic patients compared to non-cirrhotic patients (subdistribution HR [SHR] = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.92). However, non-significantly increased major bleeding (SHR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.87-1.73) and significantly increased gastrointestinal bleeding (SHR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.31-1.70)., Conclusions: In cirrhotic patients with AMI, DAPT offers benefit with decreased recurrent MI at the expense of increased gastrointestinal bleeding., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: This study investigated the predictors of subsequent cardiovascular events in stable post-myocardial infarction patients in Taiwan., Methods: A total of 11,183 patients were recruited who had survived one year post-myocardial infarction without subsequent events of recurrent myocardial infarction or stroke from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Their composite cardiovascular event rates were identified., Results: The composite cardiovascular events rate in three year follow-up in the post-myocardial infarction population was 13.8%. Corresponding event rates were 5.8% recurrent myocardial infarction, 5.0% stroke, and 5.2% death. Independent factors associated with a higher risk of ischemic events or death included heart failure (hazard ratio (HR)=1.19), hypertension (HR=1.16), age (65-75 vs <65 years: HR=1.29; 75-85 vs <65 years: HR=1.50; >85 vs <65 years: HR=1.70), diabetes (HR=1.33), prior stroke (HR=1.24), chronic kidney disease (HR=1.4), atrial fibrillation (HR=1.27), and underutilization of guideline-based medication (HR=1.73). Composite risk for myocardial infarction, stroke and death increased progressively from 4.9% in patients with zero risk factor to 100.0% in patients with eight risk factors., Conclusions: For acute myocardial infarction patients surviving one year without subsequent events of recurrent myocardial infarction or stroke, the risk of cardiovascular events remained high. Eight predictors identified patients at increased risk for subsequent cardiovascular events within the next three years. These results suggest an unmet need, particularly in patients with additional risk factors.

Objective: Whether the cardiovascular (CV) outcomes of second-generation limus-eluting stents (LESs) differ from those of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is still unclear., Methods: We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to analyse data of 516 patients with AMI and CS diagnosed from January 2007 to December 2011. We used propensity score matching to adjust for the imbalance in covariate baseline values between these two groups. We evaluated clinical outcomes by comparing 197 subjects who used second-generation LESs to 319 matched subjects who used PESs., Results: The risk of the primary composite outcomes (i.e., myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation or CV death) was significantly lower in the second-generation LES group than in the PES group [37.3% vs. 51.8%; hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56-0.95] at the 12-month follow-up. The patients who received second-generation LESs had a lower risk of coronary revascularisation (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41-0.93) than those who used PESs. However, the risks of myocardial infarction (HR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.26-1.24), ischemic stroke (HR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.23-2.35), or CV death (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.63-1.28) were not significantly different between the two groups., Conclusions: Among patients with CS-complicating AMI, second-generation LES implantation significantly reduced the risk of coronary revascularisation and composite CV events compared to PES implantation at the 12-month follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background It is not clear whether β 1 -selective or nonselective β-blockers should be used in patients with cirrhosis and acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Medical records were retrieved from Taiwan NHIRD (National Health Insurance Research Database) during 2001-2013. Patients were excluded for age <20, previous acute myocardial infarction, contraindication to β-blockers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or atrioventricular conduction disease. Patients who died during index admission, had a follow-up <6 months, had a medication ratio of either β 1 -selective or nonselective β-blocker <80%, or who switched between β-blockers were also excluded. Patients on β 1 -selective blockers and nonselective β-blockers were propensity score matched and compared for outcome. Primary outcomes were 1- and 2-year cardiovascular events, liver adverse outcomes, and all-cause mortality. A total of 203 595 patients with acute myocardial infarction were enrolled, of whom 6355 had cirrhosis. After screening for exclusion criteria, 1769 patients (655 patients on β-blockers and 1114 patients not on β-blockers) were eligible for analysis. Among patients on β-blockers, propensity score matching was performed, and 218 patients on β 1 -selective blockers and 218 patients on nonselective β-blockers were studied. During a 2-year follow-up, patients on β 1 -selective blockers had significantly fewer major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio=0.62; 95% confidence interval=0.42-0.91; P=0.014), a trend toward lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=0.66; 95% confidence interval=0.38-1.14; P=0.135), and nonworsening liver outcome (hazard ratio=0.66; 95% confidence interval=0.38-1.14; P=0.354). Conclusions In patients with cirrhosis and acute myocardial infarction, selecting a β-blocker is a clinical dilemma. Our study showed that the use of β 1 -selective blockers is associated with lower risks of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Objectives: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) entails thickening of the myocardium and an increased risk of ischaemia. However, the prognosis of patients with HCM with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is incompletely understood., Methods: Medical information was retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database in 1997-2011. The exclusion criteria were patients <18 years old, and history of AMI, coronary intervention, aortic valve disease, disease of the pericardium, heart surgery, device implantation, venous thromboembolism, cardiac transplant, congenital heart disease and end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Patients with HCM with AMI were compared with propensity score (PS)-matched patients with AMI without HCM. The primary endpoints were in-hospital and 1-year cardiovascular events., Results: In total, 201 166 patients were admitted for AMI. There were 177 058 patients with new-onset AMI, 257 with HCM and 176 801 without HCM after exclusion criteria. Using 1:4 PS matching, the study population consisted of patients with AMI, 257 with HCM and 1028 without HCM. Patients with AMI with HCM received significantly less coronary intervention (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.65; p<0.001), coronary intervention with stenting (OR=0.33; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.57; p<0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR=0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.90; p=0.036), and fewer episodes of shock (OR=0.64; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86; p=0.003) and in-hospital death (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.70; p<0.001), compared with patients with AMI without HCM. Specifically, for patients with HCM with AMI, AMI occurred predominantly (82.5%) in the form of ischaemia without requiring coronary stenting. Patients with AMI with HCM had significantly better survival than patients without HCM (HR=0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.85; p=0.001) during the 1-year follow-up., Conclusions: This is the first PS-matched study to compare the prognosis of patients with AMI with and without HCM. Compared with patients with AMI without HCM, patients with HCM had significantly better in-hospital and within 1-year outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

In this study we aimed to directly compare the short and long-term prognosis of nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis patients, and patients with preserved renal function after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).AMI in patients with CKD is a catastrophic event associated with high medical expenditures and dismal survival. However, there is little research comparing post-AMI outcomes between patients with CKD who were and were not receiving dialysis.The retrospective cohort study included patients with AMI (n = 158,125) in the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database who were treated March 1998 and December 2009. Patients were classified into a nondialysis CKD group (n = 6300), dialysis group (n = 5140), and a control group (n = 146,685). The clinical characteristics, in-hospital events, and long-term outcomes of these 3 groups were compared separately using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.The risks of in-hospital death and 2-year all-cause mortality were the highest in the dialysis group, followed by the nondialysis CKD group, and were the lowest in the control group. The 1-year risk of myocardial infarction did not differ among the 3 study groups, but the 2-year risk of myocardial infarction was higher in the dialysis group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.24; P = .010).Patients with CKD experienced adverse short- and long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Patients with CKD, especially those who are dialysis dependent, may require more intensive management to improve their post-AMI clinical outcomes.

Background: To investigate the cardiovascular (CV) outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS)., Methods: Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was analyzed between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. A total of 3051 AMI patients in CS were selected as the study cohort. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated by comparing 1017 subjects who used DESs to 2034 matched subjects who used BMSs., Results: The risk of the primary composite outcome (i.e., death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization) was significantly lower in the DES group compared with the BMS group [56.1% vs. 66.2%, hazard ratio (HR), 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.81] with a mean follow-up of 1.35years. The patients who received DESs had a lower risk of coronary revascularization (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91) and death (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79) than those who used BMSs. However, the risks of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.66-1.18), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.67-1.53) and major bleeding (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.14) were similar between the two groups., Conclusions: Among patients with CS complicating AMI, DES implantation significantly reduced the risk of percutaneous coronary revascularization and death compared to BMS implantation., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

1. The present study was designed to examine the cardiovascular effects of intravenously administered pcDNA3.1AM, a recombinant non-virus vector carrying a rat adrenomedullin (AM) gene translation fragment, in rats with chronic cardiac dysfunction induced by ligation of the left descending coronary artery. 2. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded by intraventricular catheterization. In situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed to identify the distribution of the introduced vector. The concentration of AM was determined by radioimmunoassay. 3. Progressive cardiac dysfunction was observed following coronary artery ligation, as indicated by a significant reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and increases in both central venous pressure (CVP) and end-diastolic pressure of the left ventricle (LVEDP; P < 0.01). Administration of pcDNA3.1AM significantly attenuated the progressive cardiac dysfunction and lowered the elevated CVP and LVEDP. The introduced vector was widely distributed in different organs, including the lungs, kidney, heart, liver, spleen and brain. However, intense staining of pcDNA3.1 AM was observed in the lungs and kidneys. The introduced vector was localized mainly in the endothelial cells of blood vessels. Radioimmunoassay showed elevated levels of AM in the plasma and lung and heart after surgery, but there was no significant further increase in the concentration of AM after pcDNA3.1AM delivery. 4. The present study has provided some novel findings on the potential beneficial effects of AM gene delivery on chronic cardiac function in rats. Expression of AM by a non-virus vector may also have therapeutic value against cardiac dysfunction in vivo.

Background and Aims Studies on the impact of syphilis on the cardiovascular system in large populations are limited. This study investigated the effects of syphilis on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods Medical records from 2010 to 2015 were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, linked to the Notifiable Infectious Diseases database from the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. Patients with syphilis were identified, excluding those with missing information, under 20 years of age, or with a history of human immunodeficiency virus infection, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, aortic regurgitation, replacement of the aortic valve, aneurysm and/or dissection of the aorta, atrial fibrillation, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, and venous thromboembolism. Primary outcomes included new-onset acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, aortic regurgitation, aneurysm and dissection of the aorta, atrial fibrillation, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 28 796 patients with syphilis were identified from 2010 to 2015. After exclusions and frequency matching, 20 601 syphilis patients and 20 601 non-syphilis patients were analysed. The relative rate (RR) was utilized in the analysis, as the competing risk of death was not considered. Compared with patients without syphilis, patients with syphilis had increased risks of acute myocardial infarction (RR 38%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–1.60, P <.001), heart failure (RR 88%, 95% CI 1.64–2.14, P <.001), aortic regurgitation (RR 81%, 95% CI 1.18–2.75, P =.006), atrial fibrillation (RR 45%, 95% CI 1.20–1.76, P <.001), ischaemic stroke (RR 68%, 95% CI 1.52–1.87, P <.001), haemorrhagic stroke (RR 114%, 95% CI 1.74–2.64, P <.001), venous thromboembolism (RR 67%, 95% CI 1.23–2.26, P =.001), cardiovascular death (RR 155%, 95% CI 2.11–3.08, P <.001), and all-cause death (RR 196%, 95% CI 2.74–3.19, P <.001) but not for aneurysm and dissection of the aorta. Conclusions This study demonstrates that patients with syphilis have a higher risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared with those without syphilis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the early detection of kidney injury, previous studies of adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery have reported only moderate discrimination. The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a preoperative validated risk model with satisfactory accuracy for predicting AKI following cardiac surgery. It remains unknown whether combining preoperative risk assessment through ACEF scores followed by urinary NGAL test in a population of high-risk individuals is an optimal approach with improved predictive performance. Material and methods: A total of 177 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, prognostic model scores, and outcomes were assessed. Urinary NGAL were examined within 6 hours after cardiac surgery. Patients were stratified according to preoperative ACEF scores, and comparisons were made using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for the prediction of AKI. Results: A total of 45.8% (81/177) of the patients had AKI. As expected, patients with ACEF scores ≥ 1.1 were older and more likely to have class III or IV heart failure. They were also more likely to have diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, and peripheral arterial disease. Urinary NGAL alone moderately predicted AKI, with an AUROC of 0.732. Risk stratification by ACEF scores ≥ 1.1 substantially improved the AUROC of urinary NGAL to 0.873 (95% confidence interval, 0.784–0.961; P < .001). Conclusions: Risk stratification by preoperative ACEF scores ≥ 1.1, followed by postoperative urinary NGAL, provides more satisfactory risk discrimination than does urinary NGAL alone for the early detection of AKI after cardiac surgery. Future studies should investigate whether this strategy could improve the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of care in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]