Search

Background: Patients with acute myocardial infarction might benefit from the addition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to fibrinolytic or mechanical reperfusion strategies. We compared two strategies, stenting and fibrinolysis, both combined with abciximab, in terms of their ability to salvage myocardium in patients with acute myocardial infarction., Methods: We enrolled 162 patients with acute myocardial infarction within 12 h of onset of symptoms, assigning 81 stenting plus abciximab and 81 alteplase plus abciximab. Technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy was done at admission and after a median of 11 days to calculate initial perfusion defect, final infarct size, and degree of myocardial salvage. The primary endpoint was the salvage index (the ratio of the degree of myocardial salvage to the initial perfusion defect). Major adverse clinical events within 6 months from randomisation were also compared between the two treatments., Findings: Paired scintigraphic measurements were available for 70 patients in the stent group and 71 in the alteplase group. Stenting was associated with greater myocardial salvage than alteplase (median 13.6% [IQR 5.9-23.9] vs 8.0% [2.5-16.0] of the left ventricle; p=0.007). Salvage index was greater in the stent group than in the alteplase group (median 0.60 [0.37-0.82] vs 0.41 [0.13-0.58]; p=0.001). The 6-month mortality rate was 5% (four deaths) in the stent group and 9% (seven deaths) in the alteplase group (relative risk 0.56 [95% CI 0.17-1.88]; p=0.35)., Interpretation: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, a reperfusion strategy based on stenting with abciximab produced more myocardial salvage than the combination of fibrinolysis plus abciximab. Larger studies are needed to assess whether these effects translate into clinical benefit.

Context: A higher mortality risk for women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common finding in studies that compare the postinfarction outcome of women vs men. It is not clear, however, whether sex is an independent predictor of death among patients systematically treated with aggressive reperfusion and medical strategies., Objective: To assess the impact of patient's sex on outcome in a consecutive series of patients with AMI treated with a reperfusion strategy largely based on percutaneous coronary interventions., Design, Setting, and Patients: Inception cohort of 1937 patients (502 women and 1435 men) who were admitted with a diagnosis of AMI to a tertiary referral institution between January 1995 and December 2000., Main Outcome Measures: Mortality at 1 year after AMI., Results: Compared with men, women were older (70 vs 61 years; P<.001) and had known diabetes or hypertension more often. Both men and women received essentially identical therapy with the majority of patients (86%) receiving reperfusion therapy via percutaneous coronary interventions. There were no significant differences in 1-year Kaplan-Meier death rates with 13.8% (68 cases) among women and 12.9% (184 cases) among men (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.39; P =.70). After age adjustment, women had a lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.87; P =.004)., Conclusion: Despite their more advanced age and greater prevalence of diabetes or hypertension, women with AMI who were treated with a reperfusion strategy largely based on percutaneous coronary interventions show a similar outcome as men.

Objectives: In the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-2 trial (ISAR-2), we sought to investigate the effect of abciximab on angiographic and clinical restenosis after stenting following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We also intended to assess the impact of abciximab on clinical outcome in this setting., Background: It is unclear whether abciximab reduces neointima formation after stenting. Such an effect may be particularly prominent in thrombus-containing lesions., Methods: Patients undergoing stenting within 48 h after onset of AMI were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose heparin or abciximab plus reduced-dose heparin. Of 401 patients randomized, 366 without 30-day adverse events were eligible for six-month angiographic follow-up. Scheduled angiography was performed in 80% of these patients., Results: By 30 days, the composite clinical end point of death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was reached in 5.0% of the abciximab group and in 10.5% of the control group (p = 0.038). At one year, absolute reduction in the composite clinical end point by abciximab was still 5.7% but had lost its statistical significance. Our primary end point, late lumen loss, was 1.26+/-0.85 mm with abciximab and 1.21+/-0.74 mm with standard heparin (p = 0.61), and binary angiographic restenosis rates were 31.1% and 30.6%, respectively (p = 0.92)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing stenting following AMI, abciximab exerted beneficial effects by substantially reducing the 30-day rate of major adverse cardiac events. During one-year follow-up, there was no additional benefit from a reduction in TLR nor did abciximab reduce angiographic restenosis.

Background: Apart from its established effects on vessel patency after percutaneous coronary revascularization, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade by abciximab may improve myocardial perfusion by inhibition of the interaction of platelets and platelet aggregates with the microvasculature. We investigated the effect of abciximab with stent placement in acute myocardial infarction., Methods and Results: In a prospective randomized trial, patients undergoing stenting in acute myocardial infarction within 48 hours after onset of symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose heparin or abciximab plus low-dose heparin. Immediately after the procedure and at 14-day angiographic follow-up, we assessed flow velocity in the recanalized vessel with the Doppler wire and regional wall motion by the centerline method. End points were changes in papaverine-induced peak flow velocities and in wall motion indices. We assigned 98 patients to standard heparin and 102 to abciximab. We obtained 152 paired flow measurements and 151 paired left ventricular function studies. Residual stenoses of the treated lesions did not differ between the 2 groups. Improvement of peak flow velocity (mean [95% CI]: 18.1 cm/s [13.6 to 22.6 cm/s], n=80, versus 10.4 cm/s [5.4 to 15.4 cm/s], n=72, P=0.024) and wall motion index (0.44 SD/chord [0.29 to 0.59 SD/chord], n=79 versus 0. 15 SD/chord [0.00 to 0.30 SD/chord], n=72, P=0.007) was significantly greater in patients assigned to abciximab than in those on heparin alone. At follow-up, the abciximab group had a higher global left ventricular ejection fraction than the heparin group (62% [59% to 65%] versus 56% [53% to 59%], P=0.003)., Conclusions: Abciximab had important effects beyond the maintenance of large-vessel patency. It improved the recovery of microvascular perfusion and concomitantly enhanced the recovery of contractile function in the area at risk.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate changes in myocardial perfusion after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction (MI)., Background: After initially successful recanalization of the infarct-related artery, coronary perfusion may deteriorate as a result of reocclusion, distal embolization of platelet aggregates formed at the dilated plaque or microvascular reperfusion injury. This change could offset the benefit from early intervention., Methods: The study included 19 patients in whom the infarct-related artery was successfully recanalized by PTCA with Palmaz-Schatz stent placement within 24 h after the onset of pain. Basal and papaverine-induced coronary blood flow were assessed by Doppler flow velocity measurements and quantitative coronary angiography. In addition, basal and adenosine-induced myocardial blood flow were measured by nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET)., Results: Immediately after completion of the intervention, the average coronary flow reserve (CR) in the recanalized vessel was 1.56 +/- 0.51; it increased to 2.04 +/- 0.65 at 1 h (p = 0.013) and to 2.66 +/- 0.72 at 2 weeks after reperfusion (p = 0.008, n = 16). PET studies in 12 patients revealed that perfusion defect size and CR in the infarct region (2.19 +/- 0.89 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.86) did not change significantly between day 2 after recanalization and 2 weeks. However, we found significant (p < 0.03) increases in basal (by 26%) and adenosine-induced (by 40%) blood flow in the infarct region., Conclusions: Despite the persistence of a perfusion defect after successful recanalization of the occluded artery in acute MI, CR of the infarct region improves in most patients within 1 h and further improves within 2 weeks.

Objectives: The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen (ISAR) trial is a randomized comparison of combined antiplatelet with anticoagulant therapy after coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent placement. The objective of this study was to compare early and late clinical and angiographic outcome in a subgroup of patients with stent placement for acute myocardial infarction., Background: Stenting has become a treatment option for acute myocardial infarction, but it is not known which antithrombotic regimen is more adequate after stent implantation., Methods: One hundred twenty-three patients with successful stenting after acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive aspirin plus ticlopidine (n = 61) or intense anticoagulant therapy (n = 62). Six-month repeat angiography was performed in 101 (86.3%) eligible patients., Results: During the first 30 days after stenting, patients with antiplatelet therapy had a significantly lower clinical event rate (3.3% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.005) and stent vessel occlusion rate (0% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.03) and a trend to fewer cardiac events (1.6% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.12). After 6 months, the survival rate free of recurrent myocardial infarction was higher in patients with antiplatelet therapy (100% vs. 90.3%, p = 0.03), and the rate of stent vessel occlusion was lower (1.6% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.02). Both groups had comparable restenosis rates (26.5% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.87)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that combined antiplatelet therapy after stent placement in patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with an overall better clinical and angiographic outcome than anticoagulant therapy.