Search

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of flow during the isovolumetric relaxation period and to analyze the relation between these flow patterns and standard hemodynamic indexes., Background: Outward motion of the left ventricle during the isovolumetric relaxation period has been observed by cineangiography. However, there is little information about blood flow during this period., Methods: Seventy-nine patients with ischemic heart disease were examined by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. All patients were classified into three groups according to the observed patterns of isovolumetric relaxation flow: group I (n = 41), flow directed toward the apex; group II (n = 21), flow directed toward the base, and group III (n = 17), low velocity flow (< 12 cm/s) without a dominant direction. Patients in group I were further classified into group Ia (n = 19) with normal ventriculograms and group Ib (n = 22) with asynergy., Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction and negative first derivative of left ventricular pressure were significantly lower in group II (49 +/- 9% and 1,274 +/- 212 mm Hg/s, respectively) and group III (38 +/- 8% and 1,147 +/- 280 mm Hg/s, respectively) than in group Ia (68 +/- 7% and 1,727 +/- 358 mm Hg/s), each p < 0.01. Time constant was significantly prolonged in group II (49 +/- 6 ms) and group III (48 +/- 6 ms) compared with that in group Ia (41 +/- 6 ms), p < 0.05. On left ventriculography, patterns of outward wall motion during the isovolumetric relaxation period were associated with the patterns of isovolumetric relaxation flow., Conclusions: Changes in left ventricular relaxation are accompanied by alterations in isovolumetric relaxation flow. It is therefore useful to evaluate isovolumetric relaxation flow when investigating early diastolic ventricular function.

Left ventricular relaxation property was evaluated by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. The indices obtained from Doppler signals within the left ventricle (LV) during the isovolumic relaxation period (IRF) were compared with the hemodynamic parameters obtained from cardiac catheterization studies. Subjects of this study were four patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, four with hypertensive heart disease, three with angina pectoris, and seven normal subjects. All of them had no wall motion abnormalities and their ejection fractions were more than 0.60. The three indices of IRF were the time interval from the start of IRF to the time immediately before the rapid filling flow (isovolumic relaxation time; IRT), the time interval from the start to the peak (acceleration time; AcT), and the slope from the start to the peak (acceleration rate; AcR). The peak pressure (peak P) was measured at the same time. The positive and negative deflections of the first derivative of left ventricular (LV) pressure (+dp/dt and -dp/dt) and the time constant of LV pressure fall (time constant T) were calculated from LV pressure using a micromanometer-tipped angiocatheter. The end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated from the LV angiogram. There were no significant correlations between the three IRF indices (IRT, AcT and AcR) and the hemodynamic parameters (peak P, EDVI, +dp/dt and -dp/dt). However, the time constant T, which is a good index of LV relaxation property and which is relatively free from afterload and preload, correlated well with IRT (r = 0.75, p less than 0.001), AcT (r = 0.60, p less than 0.01), and AcR (r = -0.66, p less than 0.01). It was concluded that the indices obtained from the blood flow patterns of the left ventricle during isovolumic relaxation were useful for estimating left ventricular relaxation property non-invasively and quantitatively.

In atrial fibrillation, it is known that hemodynamics vary according to the preceding R-R intervals. However, the informations of blood flow dynamics have not been available because of the methodological limitations. In this study, blood flow dynamics of atrial fibrillation were assessed using pulsed Doppler echocardiography. The subjects were 160 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation and without left ventricular asynergy. Using a commercially-available pulsed Doppler instrument (Aloka SSD-910), blood flow patterns in the left ventricle were investigated from the apical long-axis view. The results were as follows: 1. In 22 of the 160 cases (14%), systolic blood flow in the central or apical region of the left ventricle directed towards the apex (termed "back flow"). 2. In the cardiac cycle with "back flow", the preceding R-R interval was shorter; whereas it was longer when "back flow" was absent (591 +/- 103 vs 817 +/- 179 msec, p less than 0.01). Moreover, when a long R-R interval (PPI) followed by a short R-R interval (PI) was observed (greater PPI/PI ratios), the next beat showed distinct "back flow". 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased significantly in patients with "back flow" compared to those without it (42 +/- 15 vs 66 +/- 12%, p less than 0.01). 4. On left ventriculography, the motion of the base of the heart was preserved; however, with "back flow", the motion of the apical area was abnormal, extending towards the apex along the longitudinal axis. 5. Left ventricular ejection flow at the outflow tract disappeared in 13 of the 22 cases with "back flow" in cardiac cycles with short preceding R-R intervals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We have already reported that, in atrial fibrillation (Af) "back flow" in the left ventricular (LV) central or apical area may occur in the cardiac cycle with a short preceding R-R interval, especially in cases with impaired LV pump function. This abnormal flow was considered to be caused by LV asynchrony. Analysis of LV wall motion abnormalities, however, is a less established procedure. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the relationship between LV blood flow dynamics and LV wall motion using pulsed Doppler echocardiography and left ventriculography. The results were as follows: 1. In seven of 15 cases "back flow" was observed in the LV central or apical area. 2. On left ventriculography in the seven cases, the apical area showed a backward movement in a longitudinal direction in the cardiac cycle with a short preceding R-R interval. 3. The % shortening of the long-axis dimension was significantly decreased in the seven cases with back flow, and three of them had negative values. 4. Ejection fractions (EF) of both the apical and basal halves were significantly decreased in cases with back flow, and the difference in the ejection rate of the apical and basal halves tended to decrease in cases with back flow. 5. LVEF was also significantly decreased in the cases with back flow. These results indicate that left ventricular "back flow" observed in Af is caused by the LV asynchrony due to localized wall motion abnormalities in the apical area.

The blood flow recorded in the center of the left ventricle (LV) during the isovolumic relaxation period, i.e., isovolumic relaxation flow (IRF), was evaluated by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. The subjects consisted of 17 normal persons, 12 patients with angina pectoris (AP), 63 with old myocardial infarction (OMI), 16 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 16 with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). In the normal subjects, the IRF showed a laminar flow and it was directed from the center of the LV toward the apex. The maximum velocity of the IRF coincided with the second heart sound. In the patients with heart diseases, the IRF was classified into three patterns. Type A, in which the IRF was directed toward the apex of the LV: This pattern was observed in two different patient groups from the standpoint of LV wall motion and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). One group had either a normal LVEF without wall motion abnormalities or normal LVEF with a small area of abnormal wall motion in the anterior and/or apical portions. The other group had various LVEF with abnormalities of wall motion in the posterior and/or inferior portions. The duration of the IRF in type A was prolonged in AP (142 +/- 35 msec), OMI (152 +/- 14 msec), HCM (166 +/- 33 msec) and DCM (171 msec) when compared with those of the normal subjects (119 +/- 35 msec). The acceleration time (time interval from the beginning of the IRF to the point of the maximum flow velocity) in the normal subjects was 25 +/- 8 msec, but they were prolonged in AP (37 +/- 12 msec), OMI (59 +/- 22 msec), HCM (64 +/- 18 msec) and DCM (58 msec). The acceleration rate (increment of the flow velocities per sec) was significantly decreased in AP (8.9 +/- 3.2 m/sec2), OMI (4.5 +/- 2.7 m/sec2), HCM (4.5 +/- 1.1 m/sec2) and DCM (3.7 m/sec2) when compared with those of the normal subjects (12.6 +/- 4.0 m/sec2). Type B, in which the IRF was directed away from the LV center to the base of the LV: The patients with this type had slightly depressed LVEF with moderately extended abnormalities of wall motion in the anterior and/or apical portions. Type C without discernible IRF: The patients with this type had severely depressed LVEF with generalized abnormalities of wall motion. It was concluded that the patterns of the IRF are affected by regional wall motion and the IRF seems to be caused by LV relaxation.