Search

Corticosteroids are the accepted primary therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but durable responses are seen in only about half of the patients. Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0802, a phase 3 multicenter randomized double-blinded trial, was designed to test whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus corticosteroids was superior to corticosteroids alone as initial therapy for acute GVHD. Patients with newly diagnosed acute GVHD were eligible if they required systemic therapy. Patients were randomized to receive prednisone with either MMF or placebo. The primary end point was acute or chronic GVHD-free survival at day 56 after initiation of therapy. A futility rule for GVHD-free survival at day 56 was met at a planned interim analysis after 235 patients (of 372) were enrolled: 116 MMF, 119 placebo. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups including grade and organ distribution of GVHD. GVHD-free survival at day 56, cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 12 months, overall survival, Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, severe, life-threatening infections, relapse at 12 months, and quality of life were similar. The addition of MMF to corticosteroids as initial therapy for acute GVHD does not improve GVHD-free survival compared with corticosteroids alone. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01002742., (© 2014 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Current treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) with prednisone (PSE) alone or with added cyclosporine or tacrolimus still has a very high failure and complication rate, and new treatment approaches are needed for both primary and salvage therapy. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent currently in use for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. To determine whether MMF had activity in the treatment of cGVHD, we added MMF to standard cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and/or PSE as salvage/second-line (n = 24) or first-line (n = 10) therapy in 34 patients. Nine (90%) of 10 patients receiving first-line and 18 (75%) of 24 receiving second-line MMF therapy responded. Twelve (35%) patients had a complete remission, 15 (44%) had a partial remission, 5 (15%) had stable disease, and only 2 (6%) had progressive disease. Out of 30 patients receiving PSE, 22 (73%) were able to decrease PSE doses (median decrease of 50%; range, 25%-100%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 6-28 months), 29 (85%) patients are alive. Three patients had to discontinue MMF because of abdominal cramps within 3 months of starting treatment. These data suggest that MMF is an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of cGVHD and may have a beneficial effect on the survival of patients with this complication.

We studied adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after haploidentical (n=192) and 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (n=1982), transplantation. Data were obtained from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Haploidentical recipients received calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis; 104 patients received myeloablative and 88, reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Matched unrelated donor transplant recipients received CNI with mycophenolate or methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis; 1245 patients received myeloablative and 737, reduced intensity conditioning regimens. In the myeloablative setting, day-30 neutrophil recovery was lower after haploidentical compared to matched unrelated donor transplants (90% versus 97%, p=0.02). Corresponding rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplants were 93% and 96%, (p=0.25). In the myeloablative setting, 3-month acute grade 2-4 (16% versus 33%, p<0.0001) and 3-year chronic GVHD (30% versus 53%, p<0.0001) were lower after haploidentical compared to matched unrelated donor transplants. Similar differences were observed after reduced intensity conditioning transplants, 19% versus 28%, (p=0.05) and 34% versus 52%, (p=0.002). Among patients receiving myeloablative regimens, 3-year probabilities of overall survival were 45% (95% CI 36-54) and 50% (95% CI 47-53) after haploidentical and matched unrelated donor transplants (p=0.38). Corresponding rates after reduced intensity conditioning transplants were 46% (95% CI 35-56) and 44% (95% CI 0.40-47) (p=0.71). Although statistical power is limited, these data suggests that survival for patients with AML after haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide is comparable with matched unrelated donor transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite of the continuous increase in the number of volunteer donors available through the registry, many patients who require an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cannot find a fully-matched donor. While a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is frequently available, it is associated with inferior outcomes and increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been effective in haploidentical HCT, and increasingly used in matched donor HCTs. However, limited data exist in MMUD setting. We conducted a prospective single center trial (NCT 03128359) of PTCy for MMUD HCT with the primary objective of estimating 1-year GvHD-free relapse/progression-free survival (GRFS). As of October 2019, all planned 39 patients have been enrolled with a median follow up of 11 months (range: 1-23). Here we present the preliminary estimate of 1-year GRFS and other HCT outcomes in two strata; myeloablative conditioning (n=19) using Fludarabine (90 mg/m2) and FTBI (1200 cGy) or reduced intensity conditioning (n=19) using Fludarabine (100 mg/m2) and Melphalan (140 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 if >60 years old). Patients between 0 to 75 years of age and KPS of ≥70% with hematologic malignancies undergoing HCT from a 7/8 HLA-matched (A-, B-, C-, and DR-) donor were eligible. Patients with donor specific antibodies to the mismatched HLA-locus were excluded. All patient received PBMCs (3-5 × 106/kg) followed by GVHD prophylaxis consisting of PTCy (50 mg/kg for 2 days), Tacrolimus (1 mg), and mycophenolate mofetil (1 gr 3 × a day). Median age at the time of HCT was 53 years (range: 21-72), and 50% of patients were male. Disease risk was low in 47% (n=18), intermediate in 37% (n=14), and high in 16% of the patients (n=6). At transplant, 29 patients were in complete remission, and 9 had active disease. HCT-CI was 0 in six (16%) and 1-2 in 15 (39%) and >2 in 17 (45%) patients. Donors' median age was 32 years (range: 19-53) and donors were mismatched at HLA-A (n=14), -B (n=12), -C (n=8), or DR-loci (n=5). Median number of mismatches was 2 of 12 (range: 1-4). Female to male donor HCT was in 11% of recipients. Neutrophil engraftment occurred in all patients (median time to engraft: 16 days; range 13-35). One-year overall survival (OS) and GRFS were 92% (95% CI: 70-98) and 70% (95% CI: 51-83), respectively. Non-relapse mortality and relapse rate at 1 year were at 8% (95% CI: 2-29) and 13% (95% CI: 5-34), respectively. Cumulative incidence of day 100 acute GvHD grade 2-4 was 50% (95% CI: 35-71) and 1-year chronic GvHD was 56% (95% CI: 39-81). No severe chronic GvHD by the NIH criteria was observed. In conclusion, the data from our phase II trial of PTCy showed highly promising OS/GRFS in patients receiving 7/8 MMUD HCT, and that PTCy in MMUD setting offers an alternative and effective HCT approach for patients who do not have an available matched donor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]