Search

As the most frequent cause of acquired myopathy, toxic myopathies are characterised by clinicopathological features that vary depending on the mode of action of the drugs or toxins involved. Although a large number of substances can induce myotoxicity, the main culprits are statins, alcohol, and corticosteroids. A rigorous, well-organised diagnostic approach is necessary to obtain a rapid diagnosis. For early diagnosis and management, it is important for clinicians to be aware that most toxic myopathies are potentially reversible, and the goal of treatment should be to avoid serious muscle damage., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Diagnosis of myopathies is challenged by the high genetic heterogeneity and clinical overlap of the various etiologies. We previously reported a Next-Generation Sequencing strategy to identify genetic etiology in patients with undiagnosed Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies, Congenital Myopathies, Congenital Muscular Dystrophies, Distal Myopathies, Myofibrillar Myopathies, and hyperCKemia or effort intolerance, using a large gene panel including genes classically associated with other entry diagnostic categories. In this study, we report the comprehensive clinical-biological strategy used to interpret NGS data in a cohort of 156 pediatric and adult patients, that included Copy Number Variants search, variants filtering and interpretation according to ACMG guidelines, segregation studies, deep phenotyping of patients and relatives, transcripts and protein studies, and multidisciplinary meetings. Genetic etiology was identified in 74 patients, a diagnostic yield (47.4%) similar to previous studies. We identified 18 patients (10%) with causative variants in different genes ( ACTA1, RYR1, NEB, TTN, TRIP4, CACNA1S, FLNC, TNNT1, and PAPBN1 ) that resulted in milder and/or atypical phenotypes, with high intrafamilial variability in some cases. Mild phenotypes could mostly be explained by a less deleterious effect of variants on the protein. Detection of inter-individual variability and atypical phenotype-genotype associations is essential for precision medicine, patient care, and to progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of myopathies.

Scleromyxedema is a chronic, idiopathic disorder associated with monoclonal gammopathy, and characterized by dermal mucin deposition. However, systemic manifestations are frequent, including neuromuscular symptoms. We herein present a 71-year-old man who developed a vacuolar myopathy in a context of a known scleromyxedema, and we compare our observation with the nineteen other cases found in the medical literature. Such an association (especially with suggestive skin abnormalities) has to be known for two reasons. First, this diagnosis might be quite challenging because the myopathy may precede the typical skin changes. Secondly, conversely to other forms of vacuolar myopathy, some of the symptoms may respond (even partially) to immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressant therapeutics.

The wide spectrum of hereditary muscular disorders leads to unavoidable difficulties in their classification, even for specialists. For this reason, new proposals are required that would ultimately replace our current rather complex classifications by a simpler structure. Our proposal will be limited to dystrophic and non-dystrophic myopathies (excluding metabolic disorders, mitochondriopathies, and channelopathies) for which similar proposals would also be relevant. Various genes (encoding structural proteins associated with the sarcolemma, nuclear membrane proteins, and proteins involved in myofiber metabolism have now been sequenced and mutations ascribed to specific forms of inherited muscular disorders. Based on our observations and our recent proposals in other neurogenetic conditions and informal discussions with specialists of neuromuscular disorders, the prerequisite for a simple and sound classification for inherited muscular disorders should encompass the clinical and pathological phenotypes (described in a simple and clear manner), the mode of inheritance, and the mutated gene. We think that the denomination of the different subtypes could be simplified considerably, although any new proposal of classification of muscular disorders will need to be discussed in the neurological and genetic communities., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)