Search

For many years there has been a dearth of effective treatment options for the severe wasting and secondary consequences of motor nerve injury. In recent years, however, an intensive regime of electrical stimulation has been shown to have considerable therapeutic benefits. This article reviews the results of an extensive study designed to address the clinically relevant issues in an appropriate animal model. The study reveals both the benefits and the limitations of the technique, but strongly endorses the therapeutic advantages of introducing a program of stimulation during the initial, nondegenerative phase of the muscle response to nerve or root injury.

We investigated the extent to which activity induced by chronic electrical stimulation could restore the mass and contractile function of rabbit tibialis anterior (TA) muscles that had undergone atrophy as a result of prolonged denervation. Denervation was carried out by selectively interrupting the motor nerve branches to the ankle dorsiflexors in one hind limb. Stimulators were implanted, with electrodes on the superficial and deep surfaces of the denervated TA muscle. Ten weeks later, the mass and mid-belly cross-sectional area (CSA) of TA muscles subjected to denervation alone had fallen to approximately 40% of normal. At this stage, stimulators in the other rabbits were activated for 1 h/day to deliver 20-ms rectangular bipolar constant-current pulses of 4 mA amplitude at 20 Hz with a duty cycle of 1s ON/2s OFF, a total of 24,000 impulses/day. The animals were examined after a further 2, 6 or 10 weeks. Stimulation restored the wet weight of the denervated muscles to values not significantly different to those of normal, innervated controls. It increased CSA from 39% to 66% of normal, and there was a commensurate increase in maximum isometric tetanic force from 27% to 50% of normal. Light and electron microscopic examination revealed a marked improvement in the size, packing, and internal organization of the stimulated-denervated muscle fibres, suggestive of an ongoing process of restoration. Excitability, contractile speed, power, and fatigue resistance had not, however, been restored to normal levels after 10 weeks of stimulation. Similar results were found for muscles that had been denervated for 39 weeks and then stimulated for 12 weeks. The study demonstrates worthwhile benefits of long-term electrical stimulation in the treatment of established denervation atrophy.

Although denervating injuries produce severe atrophic changes in mammalian skeletal muscle, a degree of functional restoration can be achieved through an intensive regime of electrical stimulation. An implantable stimulator was developed so that the long-term effects of different stimulation protocols could be compared in rabbits. The device, which is powered by two lithium thionyl chloride batteries, is small enough to be implanted in the peritoneal cavity. All stimulation parameters can be specified over a wide range, with a high degree of resolution; in addition, up to 16 periods of training (10-180 min) and rest (1-42 h) can be set in advance. The microcontroller-based device is programmed through a bidirectional radiofrequency link. Settings are entered via a user-friendly computer interface and annotated to create an individual study protocol for each animal. The stimulator has been reliable and stable in use. Proven technology and rigorous quality control has enabled 55 units to be implanted to date, for periods of up to 36 weeks, with only two device failures (at 15 and 29 weeks). Changes in the excitability of denervated skeletal muscles could be followed within individual animals. Chronaxie increased from 3.24 +/- 0.54 ms to 15.57 +/- 0.85 ms (n = 55, p < 0.0001) per phase in the 2 weeks following denervation.

Denervating injuries result in flaccid paralysis and severe atrophy of the affected muscles. This work reviews the potential for functional restoration of such muscles by electrical stimulation, focusing on the basic scientific issues.

We investigated the restorative potential of intensive electrical stimulation in a patient with long-standing quadriceps denervation. Stimulation started 18 months after injury. After 26 months, the thighs were visibly less wasted. Muscle cross-sectional areas, measured by computerized tomography, increased from 36.0 cm(2) to 57.9 cm(2) (right) and from 36.1 cm(2) to 52.4 cm(2) (left). Knee torque had become sufficient to maintain standing without upper extremity support. Biopsies revealed evidence of both growth and regeneration of myofibers. The results suggest that electrical stimulation may offer a route to the future development of mobility aids in patients with lower motor neuron lesions.

Our understanding of the effects of long-term denervation on skeletal muscle is heavily influenced by an extensive literature based on the rat. We have studied physiological and morphological changes in an alternative model, the rabbit. In adult rabbits, tibialis anterior muscles were denervated unilaterally by selective section of motor branches of the common peroneal nerve and examined after 10, 36, or 51 wk. Denervation reduced muscle mass and cross-sectional area by 50–60% and tetanic force by 75%, with no apparent reduction in specific force (force per cross-sectional area of muscle fibers). The loss of mass was associated with atrophy of last fibers and an increase in fibrous and adipose connective tissue; the diameter of slow fibers was preserved. Within fibers, electron microscopy revealed signs of ultrastructural disorganization of sarcomeres and tubular systems. This, rather than the observed transformation of fiber type from IIx to IIa, was probably responsible for the slow contractile speed of the muscles. The muscle groups denervated for 10, 36, or 51 wk showed no significant differences. At no stage was there any evidence of necrosis or regeneration, and the total number of fibers remained constant. These changes are in marked contrast to the necrotic degeneration and progressive decline in mass and force that have previously been found in long-term denervated rat muscles. The rabbit may be a better choice for a model of the effects of denervation in humans, at least up to 1 yr after lesion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]