Search

Background: Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a neuroaxonal cytoskeletal protein released into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and eventually into blood upon neuronal injury. Its detection in serum (sNFL) makes it a promising marker in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of a single dosage of sNFL in clinical practice., Methods: 626 consecutive relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients treated with disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for at least 12 months underwent a single sNFL dosage. 553 patients had NEDA-3 status (no relapses, no disability progression, no new/enlarging or contrast-enhancing lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging) in the 12 months prior blood sampling. sNFL levels were measured by single molecule array (Simoa™). Association between sNFL levels and NEDA-3 status at 12, 24, and 36 months was evaluated with logistic regression models adjusted for sex, EDSS, disease duration, and type of DMTs., Results: 469 out of the 553 NEDA-3 patients had normal sNFL level, whereas 42 had elevated level. The two groups did not differ regarding baseline characteristics. A very strong association between elevated sNFL levels and loss of NEDA-3 status within 12 months was found, with an odds ratio [OR] of 10.74 (95% CI 4.34-26.57); 15 and 10 patients with normal and elevated sNFL, respectively lost NEDA-3 (p < 0.001). The effect was not detected during the subsequent 13-24 and 25-36 months., Conclusions: A single elevated sNFL is strongly associated with NEDA-3 loss within 1 year. Elevated sNFL in apparently stable patients suggests an ongoing disease activity below the detection threshold of standard parameters., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of interest: Malucchi Simona received compensation for speaking and consulting from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche. Valentino Paola received speaker honoraria from Roche, research support from Merck, grant support from Quanterix. Bava Cecilia Irene: nothing to discose. Martire Serena: nothing to disclose. Di Sapio Alessia received compensation for speaking and consulting by Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Alexion, Sandoz and reimbursement by Merck, Biogen, Genzyme and Roche for attending conferences. Lo Re Marianna received compensation for consulting by Novartis. Bertolotto Antonio served on the scientific advisory board of Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme; received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, grant support from Almiral, Biogen, Associazione San Luigi Gonzaga ONLUS, Fondazione per la Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS, Mylan, Novartis and the Italian Multiple sclerosis Society. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the ethical committee of San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital (approvals number 7262/2019 and 18,390/2019). All participants provided informed consent., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Neurofilament light chains (NfL) are cytoskeletal biomarkers of axonal damage, about 40-fold higher in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compared to serum, and requiring ultrasensitive techniques to be measured in this latter fluid., Objectives: To compare CSF and serum NfL levels in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using different platforms., Methods: 60 newly diagnosed relapsing-remitting MS patients (38 females; median age: 36.5 years, range: 15-60) were enrolled before steroid or disease-modifying treatments. CSF and serum NfL were measured with: the commercial Ella™ microfluidic platform (Bio-Techne), the Lumipulse™ Chemiluminescent Enzyme ImmunoAssay (Fujirebio), and the SIMOA™ on the SR-X instrument using NF-light assays (Quanterix)., Results: CSF and serum NfL absolute levels strongly correlated between assays, although being more elevated with Ella™. Passing-Bablok regression showed high agreement in measuring CSF NfL between assays (with greater proportional difference using Ella™), and very high agreement for serum comparing SIMOA™ and Lumipulse™. Similarly, the Bland-Altman comparison evidenced lower biases for Lumipulse™ for both fluids., Conclusions: CSF and serum NfL in naïve MS patients are reliably measured with all assays. Although not interchangeable, SIMOA™ and Lumipulse™ showed high agreement for serum and CSF values., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: none for all authors for this work; Ethics approval: local Ethical Committee approvals (Comitato Etico Interaziendale AOU "Maggiore della Carità" di Novara, ASL BI, ASL NO, ASL VCO): CE 060/2022 and 260/2022). Consent to participate/consent for publication: written consent obtained from all participants; Availability of data and material: data available on request., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: EASIER is a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study investigating the consumption of healthcare resources, including healthcare professional (HCP) active working time, the costs associated with the current natalizumab intravenous (IV) administration, and the potential impact of the adoption of subcutaneous (SC) route., Methods: The EASIER study has three parts: (1) time and motion study to measure healthcare resources and working time needed for natalizumab IV administration using a digital data collection tool operated directly by HCPs; (2) HCP structured questionnaire-based estimation of the potential impact of natalizumab SC vs. IV administration; and (3) patient survey on the burden of natalizumab administration., Results: Nine Italian multiple sclerosis (MS) centers measured 404 IV natalizumab administration procedures and administered 26 HCP questionnaires and 297 patient questionnaires. Patients had a mean of 52 (range 1-176) previous IV administrations and spent a mean (median, IQR) of 152 (130, 94-184) minutes in the center per each IV procedure, with IV infusion covering 50% of the total. Including patient travel time, an average of 5 h was dedicated to each IV administration. Active working time by HCP amounted to 29 min per IV administration procedure, 70% of which by nursing staff. With adoption of the SC route, HCPs estimated a 50% reduction in patient procedure time and 55% lower HCP active working time. This translated into a 63% cost reduction for the MS center per natalizumab administration procedure., Conclusions: SC natalizumab administration will consistently reduce consumption of patient and HCP times per procedure and associated costs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a prevalent and debilitating manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, it is not included in the widely used concept of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3). We expanded the NEDA-3 concept to NEDA-3 + by encompassing CI assessed through the Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) and evaluated the effect of teriflunomide on NEDA3 + in patients treated in a real-world setting. The value of NEDA-3 + in predicting disability progression was also assessed., Methods: This 96-weeks observational study enrolled patients already on treatment with teriflunomide for ≥ 24 weeks. The predictiveness of NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + at 48 weeks on the change in motor disability at 96 weeks was compared through a two-sided McNemar test., Results: The full analysis set (n = 128; 38% treatment naïve) featured relatively low level of disability (baseline EDSS = 1.97 ± 1.33). NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + statuses were achieved by 82.8% and 64.8% of patients, respectively at 48 weeks vs. baseline, and by 57.0% and 49.2% of patients, respectively at 96 weeks vs. baseline. All patients except one were free of disability progression at Week 96, and NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + were equally predictive. Most patients were free of relapse (87.5%), disability progression (94.5%) and new MRI activity (67.2%) comparing 96 weeks with baseline. SDMT scores were stable in patients with baseline score ˃35 and improved significantly in those with baseline score ≤ 35. Treatment persistence was high (81.0% at Week 96)., Conclusion: Teriflunomide confirmed its real-world efficacy and was found to have a potentially beneficial effect on cognition., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Extended interval dosing (EID) of Natalizumab (NAT) has been proposed to reduce progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk associated with standard interval dosing (SID) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous studies have suggested that NAT effectiveness is maintained in the great majority of patients who switch from SID to EID; monitoring of disease activity is currently based exclusively on clinical and MRI parameters. Frequent MRI are expensive and not always applicable, underlining the need for biological markers able to detect central nervous system lesions. Serum Neurofilament-light chain (sNFL) currently represents the most promising biomarker of disease activity, prognosis and treatment response in MS, and their clinical suitability is increasingly evident. The objective of the present study is to assess the applicability of sNFL as additional/alternative measure of treatment efficacy during EID regimen., Methods: We measured sNFL by Simoa technology in longitudinal samples from 63 Relapsing Remitting (RR) MS patients switched from SID to EID., Inclusion Criteria: diagnosis of RRMS, age 18-60 years; NAT SID for at least 12 months; NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity) for at least 12 months; availability of at least 2 serum samples collected 6 months apart. Patients' follow-up time during EID was at least 12 months and 2 blood samples were collected after at least 6 and 12 months. Clinical examination was performed before each infusion, while MRI 6 and 12 months after NAT initiation and according to PML risk during the whole study., Results: No patients showed clinical or MRI activity during the whole follow-up. sNFL levels measured during SID and EID were comparable, without significant difference between groups. The effect of EID on NFL levels did not show significant effects (LMM, p> 0.05) and sNFL levels did not vary with time during SID or EID protocols (LMM, p> 0.05). Intra-individual sNFL levels demonstrated overall stability during SID and EID (median CV=11% between SID and EID samples). According to our previously published reference values, sNFL levels were in the normal range in all samples, both during SID and EID., Conclusions: Our results suggest that sNFL quantification can be used as an alternative/additional approach to MRI in managing individual patients. The present work provides a new clinical application of sNFL to monitor NAT efficacy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Valentino Paola received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis and Roche, research support from Merck and grant support from Quanterix. Malucchi Simona received speaker honoraria from Biogen. Martire Serena received speaker honoraria from Biogen and Novartis and served on the advisory boards of Biogen and Novartis Bava Cecilia Irene: nothing to discose Capobianco Marco served on the scientific advisory board of Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, and Bayer Schering and received speaker honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. Bertolotto Antonio served on the scientific advisory board of Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, and Genzyme; received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi and grant support from Almiral, Biogen, Associazione San Luigi Gonzaga ONLUS, Fondazione per la Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS, Mylan, Novartis and the Italian Multiple sclerosis Society., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Fingolimod (FTY) induces sequestration of lymphocytes in secondary lymphoid organs and the average lymphocyte recovery following discontinuation takes 1-2 months. It has been hypothesized that the therapeutic effects of subsequent cell-depleting agents may be compromised if initiated before lymphocyte recovery has occurred., Objective: To assess the risk of relapses following FTY discontinuation and the initiation of a B/T cell-depleting agent in relation to washout duration using data from the Italian MS Register., Methods: The risk of relapses was assessed in relation to different washout durations (< 6, 6-11, 12-17 and > / = 18 weeks) in patients starting alemtuzumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab or cladribine following FTY discontinuation., Results: We included 329 patients in the analysis (226F, 103 M; mean age 41 ± 10 years). During the cell-depleting treatment, the incidence rate ratio for a relapse was significantly greater in patients with a washout period of 12-17 and > / = 18 weeks compared to the reference period (< 6 weeks). The risk of a relapse was significantly influenced by the occurrence of relapses during FTY treatment and by washout length, with hazard ratios markedly increasing with the washout duration., Conclusion: The risk of relapses increases with the washout duration when switching from FTY to lymphocyte-depleting agents., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) has a highly active and aggressive course, which can have a devastating effect on the physical and cognitive functioning of a child if not treated appropriately with effective disease-modifying drugs. The optimal treatment strategy of pediatric MS is currently unknown and debate continues as to whether treatment escalation or initiation of a highly active therapy provides a better outcome. Here, we present the case of a 16-year-old female diagnosed with highly active relapsing-remitting MS (age at onset: 14 years) who received first-line treatment with fingolimod within 1 year of the first recorded symptom. Since starting fingolimod, the course of the disease has essentially been stable. No new or active lesions were observed in magnetic resonance imaging scans performed at 3 and 12 months after starting fingolimod, and treatment was well tolerated. These data suggest that, in this case, early treatment with first-line fingolimod was able to slow disease progression.

Background: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody leading to B lymphocyte depletion, is increasingly used as an off-label treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting (RR) and progressive MS., Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study on consecutive MS patients treated off-label with rituximab in 22 Italian and 1 Swiss MS centers. Relapse rate, time to first relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, incidence of adverse events, and radiological outcomes from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed., Results: A total of 355/451 enrolled subjects had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Annualized relapse rate significantly decreases after rituximab initiation versus the pre-rituximab start year in RRMS (from 0.86 to 0.09, p  < .0001) and in secondary-progressive (SP) MS (from 0.34 to 0.06, p  < .0001) and had a slight decrease in primary-progressive (PP) MS patients (from 0.12 to 0.07, p  = 0.45). After 3 years from rituximab start, the proportion of patients with a confirmed EDSS progression was 14.6% in the RRMS group, 24.7% in the SPMS group, and 41.5% in the PPMS group. No major safety concerns arose., Conclusion: Consistently with other observational studies, our data show effectiveness of rituximab in reducing disease activity in patients with MS.

Background: clinical factors and frequency of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) changes/interruptions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to describe reasons of MS treatment modifications in a large cohort of Italian MS patients., Methods: this multicenter, cross-sectional non interventional study (SWITCH) conducted at 28 Italian MS centers, screened, by visit/telephone contact between June 2016 and June 2017, all RRMS patients receiving stable DMT treatment and enrolled patients with change in DMT treatment., Results: out of 13,657 recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%), met the study criteria and were considered eligible. Among 303 (90.2% of 336) patients switching, the most common reason was "lack of efficacy" (58.4% of 303). Among 30 (8.9%) patients who interrupted treatment temporarily, the most common reason was pregnancy (40.0% of 30). Out of 3 (0.9%) patients who discontinued treatment permanently, 2 (66.7%) had as first reason as "patient decision". Multivariate analysis showed that EDSS was the only variable with statistically significant effect on changing treatments (r = 8.33; p-value of Type III Sum of Squares = 0.016)., Conclusion: in our study, 303 (90.2% of eligible patients) switched treatment, 30 (8.9%) interrupted treatment temporarily, and 3 (0.9%) discontinued treatment permanently. Efficacy remains the main driving force behind switching behavior, as the primary aim of treatment is to be disease free or reduce disease activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: F.P. has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.G.C. has received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. E.D'A. has received grants for speaking activities from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, TEVA and grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.A. has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.B. has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. R.B: has received honoraria for lectures, travel and registration coverage for attending several national or international congresses or symposia from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. R.C. has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Meck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. M.C. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. A.C. has received speaker honoraria, travel grants, advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. R.F. has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA. M.Fi. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. M.Fr. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, TEVA, and Sanofi Genzyme. M.G. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. P.I. has received speaking honoraria, consulting fees, advisory board honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA S.L. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. S.M. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. G.M. has received honoraria for public speaking and advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck Serono. G.A.M. is an Advisory Board member of Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Actelion, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. D.P. has received honoraria for consultancy and/or speaking from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.S. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. P.P. has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.S. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, and travel grants from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. R.T. has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Alfa Wasserman, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. G.T. has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. P.V. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. M.Z. has received honoraria for lecturing or participating for advisory boards or travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.Z. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. D.C. is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. His preclinical and clinical research was supported by grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In this independent, multicenter, retrospective study, we investigated the short-term persistence to treatment with first-line self-injectable or oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Data of patients regularly attending 21 Italian MS Centres who started a self-injectable or an oral DMT in 2015 were collected to: (1) estimate the proportion of patients discontinuing the treatment; (3) explore reasons for discontinuation; (3) identify baseline predictors of treatment discontinuation over a follow-up period of 12 months. We analyzed data of 1832 consecutive patients (1289 women, 543 men); 374 (20.4%) of them discontinued the prescribed DMT after a median time of 6 months (range 3 days to 11.5 months) due to poor tolerability (n = 163; 43.6%), disease activity (n = 95; 25.4%), adverse events (n = 64; 17.1%), convenience (i.e. availability of new drug formulations) and pregnancy planning (n = 21; 1.1%). Although the proportion of discontinuers was higher with self-injectable (n = 107; 22.9%) than with oral DMT (n = 215; 16.4%), the Cox regression model revealed no significant between-group difference (p = 0.12). Female sex [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.39, p = 0.01] and previous exposure to ≥ 3 DMTs (HR = 1.71, p = 0.009) were two independent risk factors for treatment discontinuation, regardless of prescribed DMTs. Our study confirms that persistence to treatment represents a clinical challenge, irrespective of the route of administration.

Besides the impact of disease per se, the use of immunomodulatory therapies in adolescents with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may have an effect on quality of life (QL). The FUTURE (Quality of liFe in adolescent sUbjecTs affected by mUltiple sclerosis treated with immunomodulatoRy agEnt using self-injecting device) study was designed to evaluate the changes in QL of Italian adolescents with RRMS receiving treatment with IFN-β1a (Rebif; 22 μg), administered subcutaneously three times weekly using the RebiSmart™ electronic autoinjection device over a 52-week period. Fifty adolescents with RRMS were enrolled and 40 completed the study. Changes from baseline to end of treatment (EoT) in adolescent self-reported and parent-reported QL were assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL), which has been validated for use in pediatric MS and for which an Italian version is available. The adolescent self-reported total PedsQL4.0 score and all of its subscales tended to increase from baseline to EoT, the only exception being "Emotional functioning." In parent-reported measures, the total PedsQL4.0 score increased significantly from baseline to EoT (+ 5.27 points, p = 0.041). Significant increases were also evident for parent-reported "Psychosocial health summary score" (+ 5.90 points; p = 0.015) and "School functioning" (+ 7.84 points; p = 0.029). Our results indicate that adolescents with RRMS using the electronic injection device RebiSmart™ for self-administration of Rebif® can experience long-term improvements in QL.

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a widely used treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), with incompletely defined mechanism of action. Short-term studies suggested its involvement in the modulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines and regulatory T cells (Treg), while long-term effect is still unknown. To investigate this aspect, we analyzed by flow-cytometry peripheral-blood Treg, natural killer (NK), CD4 and CD8 T-cells and anti-inflammatory CD14 + CD163 + monocytes from 37 healthy donor and 90 RRMS patients divided in untreated, treated with GA for 12months and from 34 to 192months. While NK, CD4 and CD8 T-cells did not show any significant differences among groups over time, we demonstrated that GA increased the anti-inflammatory monocytes and restored the Treg level in both GA-treated groups. Both these effects are a characteristic of responder patients and are observed not just in short-term but even after as long as a decade of GA treatment., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The TRACER multicenter retrospective study aimed to collect data on treatment adherence in a real-life setting, in order to identify predictors of adherence at baseline., Methods: We recruited 384 relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis patients with at least 12 months of use of RebiSmart®. This electronic device records the performed injections and assesses adherence as the percentage of 'not missing doses', through the connection to the iMed database. Subjects with at least 80% of completed doses at the 12 month of therapy were defined 'treatment adherents'., Results: After 12 months, 89.3% of patients were adherent; 93.2% of patients aged 26-40 years at baseline were adherent (vs 79% of the ≤25 and 87.5% of the ≥41 year olds; p = 0.006). Furthermore, 90.5% of patients with a baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <4 showed ≥80% adherence (vs 71.4% in those with EDSS score ≥4; p = 0.016). Fifty-four percent of the patients who were not adherent after 3 months were also not adherent after 12 months (OR 16.8; CI 95%:7.1-39.8)., Conclusions: Patients aged 26-40 years and with an EDSS score <4 at baseline were the most adherent. The status of 'treatment adherent' in the first 3 months was predictive of higher adherence in the long term.

Background and Purpose: Natalizumab discontinuation induces the recurrence of multiple sclerosis disease activity: currently no therapeutic approach has been found able to abolish disease reactivation., Methods: The recurrence of disease activity after natalizumab discontinuation was retrospectively evaluated in 79 patients who had been treated with immunomodulating agents, other first-line therapies, fingolimod or not treated., Results: No differences have been found in clinical or magnetic resonance imaging recurrence of disease activity amongst the groups. Interestingly, no disease reactivation was observed only in one patient treated for 6 months with monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide., Conclusion: Disease modifying treatment or 'no treatment' is unable to abolish disease activity reactivation after natalizumab discontinuation., (© 2014 The Author(s) European Journal of Neurology © 2014 EAN.)

Few long-term follow-up data are available on thyroid dysfunction (TD) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with glatiramer acetate (GA) or with interferon-beta (IFNb). In a cohort of 787 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients whom were followed up for 8 years, we observed an increased prevalence of TD and thyroid autoimmunity (TA) within the first year of IFNb treatment, regardless of the dose or frequency of administration, while no change was observed with GA treatment. The increased prevalence of TD and TA within the first year of IFNb treatment suggested the need for close monitoring of thyroid function and autoimmunity, though only during the first year of IFNb treatment., (© The Author(s) 2014.)

Background: Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) affect efficacy of interferon-beta (IFN-b) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. NAbs evolve in up to 44% of treated patients, usually between 6-18 months on therapy., Objectives: To investigate whether early binding antibody (BAb) titers or different IFN-b biomarkers predict NAb evolution., Methods: We included patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) receiving de novo IFN-b treatment in this prospective European multicenter study. Blood samples were collected at baseline, before and after the first IFN-b administration, and again after 3, 12 and 24 months on that therapy; for determination of NAbs, BAbs, gene expression of MxA and protein concentrations of MMP-9, TIMP-1, sTRAIL, CXCL-10 and CCL-2., Results: We found that 22 of 164 (13.4%) patients developed NAbs during a median time of 23.8 months on IFN-b treatment. Of these patients, 78.9% were BAb-positive after 3 months. BAb titers ≥ 1:2400 predicted NAb evolution with a sensitivity of 74.7% and a specificity of 98.5%. Cross-sectionally, MxA levels were significantly diminished in the BAb/NAb-positive samples; similarly, CXCL-10 and sTRAIL concentrations in BAb/NAb-positive and BAb-positive/NAb-negative samples, respectively, were also diminished compared to BAb/NAb-negative samples., Conclusions: BAb titers reliably predict NAbs. CXCL-10 is a promising sensitive biomarker for IFN-b response and its abrogation by anti-IFN-b antibodies.

Background: Glatiramer acetate (GA) in multiple sclerosis acts through the induction of GA-specific T-helper 2 cells. Nevertheless, the phenomenon is not universal in patients, explaining individual differences in clinical response., Objective: The objective of this article was to categorize GA-treated patients., Method: An enhanced quantitative PCR assay was used for measuring ex-vivo GA-induced IFNγ and IL4 mRNA responses in mononuclear cells from 23 healthy donors, 27 untreated patients, 33 short-term (≤6 months) and 77 long-term (>6 months) GA-treated patients. Thresholds for IFNγ and IL4 transcriptional response were calculated by ROC analysis and long-term treated patients were compared in terms of prognostic stratification., Results: Thresholds for IFNγ and IL4 transcriptional response were calculated at 5.36 and 1.41 relative expression (RE). Finally, 67% of long-term treated patients scored above both response thresholds. These patients had a higher proportion of relapse-free subjects (74% vs 40% when compare to patients who scored below both thresholds) and a significantly better relapse-free survival rate (p=0.006; CI 0.29-0.75). The negative predictive value to predict adverse clinical outcome was 79% (CI 0.63-0.90), meaning that by a positive response, there is a 79% chance that the patient will not experience a negative outcome at 3 years., Conclusions: Our enhanced quantitative PCR assay produced clinically significant results for GA-treated patients. As such, if patients have a positive response, it means they have less chance of a relapse, while patients with a negative response have a greater probability of a worse outcome.

Neutralising antibodies develop in 15% of interferon-beta (IFNbeta)-treated patients, causing the reduction of the clinical effects of the treatment. This is the first study that shows that switching patients from IFNbeta to glatiramer acetate (GA) in case of neutralising antibodies (NAb) positivity is effective in reducing relapse rate and in delaying the time to first relapse. In conclusion, our data suggest the use of GA in NAb-positive patients.

Biological activity of interferon-beta (IFNbeta) can be assessed by measuring IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). Among them, myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) appears to have the highest specificity, but it has no role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). To investigate the reliability of MxA as a biomarker, we compared its expression to that of two other ISGs: TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis factor-1 (XAF-1). Both were shown to be involved in immunoregulatory mechanisms and might play a role in MS. Quantitative-PCR measurements were performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 73 MS patients after short-term and long-term treatment with IFNbeta. A time-dependent response for multiple ISGs was observed in all patients after short-term treatment. In contrast, long-term treatment induced concurrent inhibition of ISGs in 12.3% (9/73) of patients, in whom neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detectable. Besides, 22% (16/73) of chronically treated patients showed a non-NAbs-related abrogation of TRAIL expression. In summary, 1) MxA expression was significantly higher than both TRAIL and XAF-1, and 2) MxA was the most sensitive gene to detect decreased bioavailability due to NAbs. These findings identify MxA as an appropriate biomarker for IFNbeta, although there is no evidence for a functional role of it in MS.

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) has a very fluctuating course and responsiveness to interferon beta (IFN-beta) treatment in each patient is extremely difficult. Agreement exists about the negative role of neutralising antibodies (NAbs) on clinical efficacy and markers of IFN-beta bioavailability have been studied; no guidelines exist yet about what to do when a patient becomes NAbs positive or IFN biological activity is lost. In this study 405 MS patients have been longitudinally studied for NAbs and MxA expression. A spontaneous disappearance of NAbs was observed in a few patients with low antibody titre; according to the clinical course, a therapeutic modification has been made in patients persistently NAbs positive; in these patients NAbs persisted over time despite the interruption of IFN therapy.

Objective: To analyze the impact of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) on the clinical efficacy of IFNbeta., Methods: This was an open-label study involving 78 patients with multiple sclerosis treated with Betaferon 8 million IU (MIU) subcutaneously (SC) every other day (n = 20), Rebif 22 micro g SC 3 times weekly (n = 25), or Avonex 30 micro g IM once weekly (n = 33). Every 3 months, blood samples were collected and sera were analyzed for NAbs using an antiviral cytopathic effect assay. Patients were categorized according to their NAb status: NAb negative (NAb-); isolated NAb positive (NAb+), patients with > or =1 positive sample (titer > or = 20); and persistent NAb+, patients with > or =2 consecutive positive samples (titer > or = 20). Patients who were NAb- and persistent NAb+ were compared for relapse rate, time between first and second relapse, percentage of relapse-free patients, and percentage of patients who had a sustained progression of > or =1 point on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)., Results: The incidence of persistent NAb+ patients was 35% for Betaferon, 20% for Rebif, and 3% for Avonex. During IFNbeta treatment, both NAb+ and NAb- patients showed a reduction in relapse rate; this reduction (25%) was not significant in NAb+ patients but was significant (67%; p < 0.0001) in NAb- patients. In addition, the mean relapse rate was higher (p = 0.039), mean time between first and second relapse was shorter (13 vs 21 months; p = 0.0064), and there was a trend suggesting that NAbs affected the probability of remaining relapse free (p = 0.08). A higher percentage of NAb+ patients versus NAb- patients had worsening of EDSS scores during follow-up (p = 0.013)., Conclusion: Persistent NAbs significantly reduce the clinical efficacy of IFNbeta.

Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against interferon-beta (IFN-beta) develop in about a third of treated multiple sclerosis patients and are believed to reduce therapeutic efficacy of IFN-beta on clinical and MRI measures. The expression of the interferon acute-response protein, myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a sensitive measure of the biological activity of therapeutically applied IFN-beta and of its reduced bioavailability due to NAb. However, MxA may not be operative in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis or the therapeutic effect of IFN-beta. Instead, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are increased in brain tissue, CSF and blood circulation of multiple sclerosis patients and function as effector molecules in several steps of multiple sclerosis pathogenesis. One of the molecular mechanisms by which IFN-beta exerts its beneficial effect in multiple sclerosis is reduction of MMP-9 expression and increase of its endogenous tissue inhibitor, TIMP-1. Quantitative PCR measurements of MMP-2 and MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, and MxA were performed in peripheral mononuclear cells from clinically stable multiple sclerosis patients with relapsing remitting disease course after short-term and long-term treatment with IFN-beta. IFN-beta therapy down-regulated the expression of MMP-9 and abolished that of MMP-2 in long-term, but not short-term treated multiple sclerosis, while levels of MxA were increased in both instances. The presence of NAb reversed these effects, i.e. led to reduced MxA and increased MMP-2/MMP-9 expression levels compared with NAb- patients. In contrast, expression of TIMPs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells remained unaffected by IFN-beta therapy and the presence of NAb. While MxA is able to detect the biological action and reduced bioavailability of IFN-beta on the basis of single injections, only MMP-9 shows quantitative correlation with the NAb titre. Together with evidence that an imbalance between MMP and TIMP expression is a crucial pathogenetic feature in multiple sclerosis, these findings support the concept of a significant role of NAb in reducing the therapeutic efficacy of IFN-beta.