Search

Objective: To ascertain the changes of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) values in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with ocrelizumab and their association with treatment response., Methods: Multicenter prospective study including 115 RRMS patients initiating ocrelizumab treatment between February 2020 and March 2022 followed during a year. Serum samples were collected at baseline and every 3 months to measure sNfL and sGFAP levels using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology. Based on age and body mass index, sNfL values were standardized using z-score. NEDA (non-evidence of disease activity)-3 status was defined for patients free of disease activity after a year of follow-up. Inflammation (INFL) was considered when new relapses occurred during follow-up or new MRI lesions were found at 1-year exploration. PIRA (progression independent of relapse activity) was defined as disability progression occurring in the absence of relapses or new MRI activity., Results: After a year on ocrelizumab, 85 patients (73.9%) achieved NEDA-3. Thirty patients did not achieve NEDA: 20 (17.4%) because of INFL and 10 (8.7%) because of PIRA. Of INFL patients, 6 (30.0%) had relapses, and 17 (85.0%) had at least one new MRI lesion at the 12-month examination. At baseline, INFL patients had higher sNfL (p = 0.0003) and sGFAP (p = 0.03) than the NEDA-3 group. PIRA patients mostly exhibited low sNfL and heterogeneous sGFAP levels. After a year, NEDA-3 and INFL patients showed similar decreases in sNfL (p < 0.0001) and sGFAP (p < 0.0001 for NEDA-3 and p = 0.001 for INFL ones). However, the decrease occurred earlier in NEDA-3 patients. Accordingly, sNfL > 1.5 z-score 3 months after ocrelizumab initiation indicated a higher risk of inflammation (OR = 13.6; p < 0.0001). Decrease in sGFAP values occurred later in both groups, with significant reductions observed at 12 months for INFL and 6 and 12 months for NEDA-3. No significant changes in sNfL or sGFAP were observed in PIRA patients., Conclusion: Ocrelizumab induced normalization of sNfL and sGFAP in the majority of NEDA-3 and inflammatory patients but did not cause changes in the PIRA group. Our data suggest that normalization of sNfL and sGFAP is associated with the lack of inflammatory-associated disease progression but it may not affect non-inflammatory PIRA., Competing Interests: FR-J received research grants and travel support for speaking engagements from Janssen, Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Merck. JG-G received research support, compensation for participating on advisory boards, lecture fees, and/or travel support from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme‐Sanofi, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. EF received research support, compensation for participating on advisory boards, speaking fees, and/or funding for travel from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme‐Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, and Roche. VM-L received consulting and speaking fees from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Terumo, Sanofi, Teva, and Bristol Myers Squibb. CD-P received funding for training and scientific meetings from Sanofi, Merck, Novartis and Roche. SS received research grants, travel support or honoraria for speaking engagements from Almirall, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. AQ is funded by a grant from the Fundación Francisco Soria y Melguizo and has received funding from Merck, Novartis, and Horizon Therapeutics to attend conferences. LR-T received compensation for consulting services and speaking fees from Biogen, Novartis, Bayer, Merck, Sanofi, Genzyme, Roche, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, TEVA, and Horizon. SM-Y received honoraria for participating on advisory boards and for collaborations as consultant and scientific communications and also received research support as well as funding for travel and congress expenses from Roche, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA, Merck, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall, and Bristol Myers Squibb. EM received research grants, travel support, or honoraria for speaking engagements from Almirall, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibbb, Biogen, Janssen, and Novartis. AL-R received speaker and consultation fees from Biogen, Janssen, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi, and congress travel support from Roche. LBo received research grants and travel support from Merck, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Horizon and Bristol Myer Squibb. JC-G received speaker fees, travel support, and/or served on advisory boards by Biogen, Sanofi, Bayer, Janssen, BMS, and Bial. FB received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Bristol Myer Squibb, Genzyme, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva. MM-G received compensation for consulting services and speaking fees from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, BMS, Janssen, Roche, Horizon, and Viatris. JG-D received honoraria as speaker, advisor and researcher from Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi. MM-M received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche. JM-L received honoraria as a consultant, lecturer in meetings and has participated in clinical trials and other research projects promoted by Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Neuraxpharm, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. LC-F received speaker fees, travel support, and/or served on advisory boards by Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Celgene, Ipsen, Biopas, Almirall. LV received research grants and personal fees from Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, and Novartis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Rodríguez-Jorge, Fernández-Velasco, Villarrubia, Gracia-Gil, Fernández, Meca-Lallana, Díaz-Pérez, Sainz de la Maza, Pacheco, Quiroga, Ramió-Torrentà, Martínez-Yélamos, Bau, Monreal, López-Real, Rodero-Romero, Borrega, Díaz, Eguía, Espiño, Chico-García, Barrero, Martínez-Ginés, García-Domínguez, De la Fuente, Moreno, Sainz-Amo, Mañé-Martínez, Caminero, Castellanos, Gómez López, Labiano-Fontcuberta, Ayuso, Abreu, Hernández, Meca-Lallana, Martín-Aguilar, Muriel García, Masjuan, Costa-Frossard and Villar.)

Introduction: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective pulsed immune reconstitution therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS)., Aim: To evaluate serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who have been treated with Alemtuzumab over the course of 2 years., Methods: This prospective study involved MS patients treated with Alemtuzumab at a referral MS center. Both sNfL and sGFAP were analyzed at baseline and then again at 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment using the single molecule array (SiMoA) technique. We also recruited matched healthy controls (HCs) for comparison., Results: The study included 46 patients (with a median age of 34.2 [Interquartile range (IQR), 28.7-42.3] years, 27 of which were women [58%]) and 76 HCs. No differences in demographic characteristics were observed between patients and HC. The median disease duration was 6.22 (IQR, 1.56-10.13) years. The median annualized relapse rate before treatment was 2 (IQR, 1-3). At baseline, sNfL and sGFAP levels were higher in MS patients (median of 18.8 [IQR, 10.7-52.7] pg/ml and 158.9 [IQR, 126.9-255.5] pg/ml, respectively) when compared to HC (6.11 [IQR, 2.03-8.54] pg/ml and 91.0 [72.6-109] pg/ml, respectively) (p<0.001 for both comparisons). The data indicates that 80% of patients had high (≥10 pg/ml) sNfL values at baseline. We observed a significant decrease in sNfL levels at 6 (65%, p = 0.02), 12 (70.8%, p<0.001), and 24 (78.1%, p<0.001) months. sNfL reached similar levels to HC only after 24 months of Alemtuzumab treatment. During the follow-up period, no changes were identified in the sGFAP values., Conclusion: Alemtuzumab leads to the normalization of sNfL values in MS patients after 2 years of treatment, with no apparent effect on sGFAP values., Competing Interests: RS-A reported receiving research travel support from Roche and Janssen outside the submitted work. EM reported receiving research grants, travel support, or honoraria for speaking engagements from Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen outside the submitted work. JF reported receiving research travel support from Roche and Janssen outside the submitted work. SM reported receiving personal fees from Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Teva outside the submitted work and receiving compensation for lectures or travel expenses from Merck Serono, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, Janssen, and Novartis. JC reported receiving personal fees from Sanofi outside the submitted work and receiving speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec and Sanofi. FR reported receiving personal fees from Sanofi outside the submitted work and receiving speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec and Sanofi. LF reported receiving speaker fees and travel support and/or serving on advisory boards for Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Celgene, Ipsen, Biopas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Almirall. LV reported receiving grants and personal fees from Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Biogen, and Novartis outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Sainz-Amo, Rodero Romero, Monreal, Chico García, Fernández Velasco, Villarrubia, Veiga González, Sainz de la Maza, Rodríguez Jorge, Masjuan, Costa-Frossard and Villar.)

Background: Alemtuzumab is a high-efficacy treatment approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Although clinical trials and observational studies are consistent in showing its efficacy and manageable safety profile, further studies under clinical practice conditions are needed to further support its clinical use., Objective: The aim of this observational retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab to add to the current real-world evidence on the drug., Methods: A cohort of 115 adult patients with RRMS treated with alemtuzumab between 2014 and 2020 was retrospectively followed up in five centers in Spain. Analysis included annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening (CDW), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI), radiological activity, no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3), and safety signals. Given the different follow-up periods among participants, ARR was calculated using the person-years method. CDI was defined as a ≥ 1.0-point decrease in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score assessed in patients with a baseline EDSS score ≥ 2.0 confirmed 6 months apart. CDW was defined as a ≥ 1.0-point increase in EDSS score assessed in patients with a baseline EDSS score ≥ 1.0 (≥ 1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0), confirmed 6 months apart., Results: ARR decreased from 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.60-2.33) in the year prior to alemtuzumab initiation to 0.28 (0.17-0.37) after 1 year of treatment (87% reduction), and to 0.22 (0.13-0.35) after the second year. Over the entire follow-up period, ARR was 0.24 (0.18-0.30). At year 1, 75% of patients showed no signs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and 70% at year 5. One percent of patients experienced 6-month CDW at year 1, 2.6% at year 2, 7.4% at year 3, and no patients over years 4 and 5. A total of 7.7% of patients achieved 6-month CDI in year 1, 3.6% in year 2, and maintained it at years 3 and 4. Most patients achieved annual NEDA-3: year 1, 72%; year 2, 79%; year 3, 80%; year 4, 89%; year 5, 75%. Infusion-related reactions were observed in 95% of patients and infections in 74%. Thyroid disorders occurred in 30% of patients, and only three patients developed immune thrombocytopenia. No cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported., Conclusions: This study shows that alemtuzumab reduced the relapse rate and disability worsening in real-world clinical practice, with many patients achieving and sustaining NEDA-3 over time. The safety profile of alemtuzumab was consistent with previous findings, and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed. As this was an observational and retrospective study, the main limitation of not having all variables comprehensively available for all patients should be considered when interpreting results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Rituximab is extensively used for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. However, the best dosage remains to be established. It has been proposed that retreatment could be guided by B lymphocyte (BL) percentages., Objective: To establish the best BL value for retreatment with rituximab in MS and to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach., Methods: A prospective study was done with an exploratory cohort and a confirmatory cohort of MS patients treated with rituximab between 2017 and 2021. The first one comprised 10 MS patients with BL assessed every 3 months after rituximab infusion and retreatment done when BL values were ≥0.5%. The confirmatory cohort included 41 MS patients (41.5% women, 87.8% with secondary progressive MS, median age = 46.3 (interquartile range: 41.3-52.1) years, disease duration = 14.1 (9-19.6) years, EDSS score = 5.5 (4.0-6.5)). The confirmatory cohort was treated with rituximab following the pattern established in the exploratory cohort., Results: In the exploratory cohort, ≥0.2% BL was established as the best value for retreatment because in most cases, a substantial increase of BL counts was preceded by initial values of 0.2-0.3%. In the confirmatory cohort, rituximab reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR 0.56 vs. 0.125, p < 0.001), proportion of patients with appearance of new/enlarged T2 lesions (63.4% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001), gadolinium-enhancing lesions (39% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), and confirmed disability progression (55% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.037). There were 22 patients (53.7%) who achieved NEDA-3. No patients had severe infections, and 10.7% cases had reduced IgG levels., Conclusion: Rituximab treatment guided by BL showed high effectiveness and a good safety profile for MS patients after one year of treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JLCG has received honorary for speaking engagements or consulting services from Bayer, Bial and Sanofi-Genzyme. FRJ has received honorary for speaking engagements or consulting services from Bial and Sanofi-Genzyme. EM received research grants, travel support or honoraria for speaking engagements from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. LC-F received speaker fees, travel support, and/or served on advisory boards by Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Celgene, Ipsen, Biopas, Almirall. SSM has received honorary for speaking engagements or consulting services from Almirall, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. LMV received research grants, travel support or honoraria for speaking engagements from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Bristol-Myers. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The potential influence of the timing of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs) on processing speed (PS) performance is critically lacking in current literature., Objective: To assess the extent to which early commencement of heDMTs would be associated with a better PS evolution as compared to moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapies (meDMTs) and delayed commencement of heDMTs., Methods: In this ongoing prospective longitudinal study, the 695 MS patients that have received a PS evaluation at 12-month of follow-up measured by the iPad®-based Processing Speed Test (PST) were retained for the analysis. All patients who had ever been prescribed a high efficacy disease-modifying therapy (heDMT) were classified in tertiles according to the proportion of their disease duration that had been on heDMTs. Based on these tertiles and the time to the first heDMT from the disease onset, patients were divided into the early heDMT group and the delayed heDMT group. Between-group differences in mean PST standardized (Z-score) change from baseline were analyzed using a linear mixed model., Results: In the multivariable model, each year of delay in starting a heDMT was associated with increased odds of cognitive worsening at 12-month (OR = 1.0324, 95% CI = 1.014-1.062, p<0.05). MeDMT-treated patients were at a significantly higher risk for cognitive worsening than early heDMT patients (OR= 2.57, 95%CI = 1.02-6.17). Linear mixed model-based adjusted mean change in PST Z-score from baseline was significantly better in those patients with the longest proportion of their disease duration treated with heDMT (highest tertile) compared to the lowest tertile (difference 0.37 [95%CI 0.02-0.92;p=0.036) and medium tertile (difference 0.39 [95%CI 0.06-0.31;p=0.037)., Conclusion: Early he-DMT-treated patients are at significantly lower risk for cognitive worsening. Early administration of heDMTs is associated with greater cognitive functioning improvements than delayed commencement or meDMTs., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)