Search

Background: Gain and amplification of 1q21 (1q21+) are adverse chromosomal aberrations of multiple myeloma (MM) that lead to refractoriness to a variety of therapies. While it is known that daratumumab, an anti-cancer monoclonal antibody, cannot overcome the disadvantage of 1q21+in relapsed/refractory MM patients, its benefit in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with 1q21+has not been clarified., Patients: We retrospectively evaluated 11 (55%) 1q21+patients (3 copies: 6, > 4 copies: 5) among 20 NDMM patients (median age, 74 years) who received daratumumab-containing regimens at Shibukawa Medical Center from October 2019 to October 2022., Results: The overall response rate was 82% for patients with 1q21+and 78% for patients without 1q21+. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were not reached in either group. Neither 1q21 copy number nor co-existence of other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities significantly affected PFS or OS., Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggests that outcomes of daratumumab treatment in NDMM 1q21+patients might be non-inferior to those in non-1q21+patients., (© 2024. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

The incidence of second primary malignancies (SPM) in long-term survivors of multiple myeloma (MM) is increasing because of increased life expectancy. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for SPM in patients with MM after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) before and after the introduction of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). In total, 2,340 patients newly diagnosed with MM who underwent ASCT between 1995 and 2016 were enrolled in this study. Forty-three patients developed SPM (29 solid, 12 hematological, and 2 unknown tumors), with cumulative incidence rates of 0.8% and 2.5% at 24 and 60 months, respectively. The cumulative incidence rates of hematological and solid SPM at 60 months were 0.8% and 1.8%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate at 60 months after ASCT was 62.9% and the OS rates after the diagnosis of SPM at 24 months were 72.2% for hematological SPM and 70.9% for solid SPM. Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of IMiDs (P=0.024) and radiation (P=0.002) were significant independent risk factors for SPM. The probabilities of developing SPM and death due to other causes (mainly MM) at 60 months were 2.5% and 36.5%, respectively, indicating that the risk of SPM was lower than that of death from MM. Furthermore, SPM between the pre-novel and novel agent eras (ASCT between 2007 and 2016) groups significantly increased (1.9% vs. 4.3% at 60 months; P=0.022). The early occurrence of SPM after ASCT should be monitored cautiously.

Background: Multiple myeloma remains incurable, and heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory disease have few good treatment options. Belantamab mafodotin showed promising results in a phase 2 study of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma at second or later relapse and a manageable adverse event profile. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin in a phase 3 setting., Methods: In the DREAMM-3 open-label phase 3 study, conducted at 108 sites across 18 countries, adult patients were enrolled who had confirmed multiple myeloma (International Myeloma Working Group criteria), ECOG performance status of 0-2, had received two or more previous lines of therapy, including two or more consecutive cycles of both lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, and progressed on, or within, 60 days of completion of the previous treatment. Participants were randomly allocated using a central interactive response technology system (2:1) to receive belantamab mafodotin 2·5 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days, or oral pomalidomide 4·0 mg daily (days 1-21) and dexamethasone 40·0 mg (20·0 mg if >75 years) weekly in a 28-day cycle. Randomisation was stratified by previous anti-CD38 therapy, International Staging System stage, and number of previous therapies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in all patients who were randomly allocated. The safety population included all randomly allocated patients who received one or more doses of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04162210, and is ongoing. Data cutoff for this analysis was Sept 12, 2022., Findings: Patients were recruited between April 2, 2020, and April 18, 2022. As of September, 2022, 325 patients were randomly allocated (218 to the belantamab mafodotin group and 107 to the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group); 184 (57%) of 325 were male and 141 (43%) of 325 were female, 246 (78%) of 316 were White. Median age was 68 years (IQR 60-74). Median follow-up was 11·5 months (5·5-17·6) for belantamab mafodotin and 10·8 months (5·6-17·1) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Median progression-free survival was 11·2 months (95% CI 6·4-14·5) for belantamab mafodotin and 7·0 months (4·6-10·6) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 1·03 [0·72-1·47]; p=0·56). Most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (49 [23%] of 217) and anaemia (35 [16%]) for belantamab mafodotin, and neutropenia (34 [33%] of 102) and anaemia (18[18%]) for pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Serious adverse events occurred in 94 (43%) of 217 and 40 (39%) of 102 patients, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths in the belantamab mafodotin group and one (1%) in the pomalidomide-dexamethasone group due to sepsis., Interpretation: Belantamab mafodotin was not associated with statistically improved progression-free survival compared with standard-of-care, but there were no new safety signals associated with its use. Belantamab mafodotin is being tested in combination regimens for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Funding: GSK (study number 207495)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MAD has received fees from speaker's bureau participation from Amgen, Beigene, BMS, Janssen, and Takeda. VTMH has received fees for consulting from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. AR has received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, AbbVie, Swixx, SOBI, and Novartis; consulting or advisory fees from Roche, Swixx, SOBI. SD has received honoraria from Amgen, GSK, Janssen, and Takeda. GM has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Roche, and Richter; has received consulting or advisory fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Roche; research funding from AbbVie; and fees for travel, accommodations, and expenses from BMS, Janssen, and Takeda. TM has received fees for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. MC has received speaker's bureau participation fees from Sanofi, BMS, and Janssen; and fees for travel, accommodations, and expenses Sanofi, BMS, and Janssen. AM reports honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. VP reports research funding from Genesis Pharma SA. XL has received honoraria from Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Oncopeptide, Karyopharm, Roche, AbbVie, Carsgen, GSK, and Harpoon Therapeutics. NS is an employee of GSK and holds stocks and shares in GSK, Pfizer, and BMS. MaL is an employee of GSK and holds stocks and shares in GSK and Astra Zeneca. AMK is an employee of, and holds stocks and shares in GSK, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. WH was an employee of GSK at the time this analysis was completed, and holds stocks and shares in GSK. SB, BC, SP, JB, and SR-G are all employees of and hold stocks and shares in GSK. JO is an employee of and holds stocks, patents, and shares in GSK. KW has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, Astra Zeneca, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, GSK, Karyopharm, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche Pharma, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; consulting or advisory fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, GSK, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche Pharma, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, GSK, and Sanofi. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Vitamin D plays a crucial role in skeletal metabolism and holds significant importance in the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma (MM). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Japanese MM patients and its correlation with clinical outcomes., Methods: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were assessed in 68 MM patients at a single institution in Japan, analyzing their association with clinical status, laboratory parameters including procollagen type 1 N-propeptide (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) scores, and overall survival. Additionally, patients with suboptimal 25(OH)D levels received cholecalciferol supplementation (1000 IU/day), and changes in laboratory parameters were monitored., Results: The median 25(OH)D level was 22 ng/ml, with 32% and 51% of patients exhibiting vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/ml) and insufficiency (20-29 ng/ml), respectively. The 25(OH)D levels were unrelated to sex, age, MM stage, or bone lesions, but the vitamin D-deficient group showed a tendency towards lower HR-QOL scores. Among patients achieving complete remission, vitamin D supplementation increased P1NP, while TRACP-5b remained unchanged. Overall survivals from vitamin D measurement and from MM diagnosis were significantly worse in the vitamin D-deficient group compared to the vitamin D-insufficient/-sufficient group., Conclusion: The study identified a considerable number of Japanese MM patients with insufficient serum vitamin D levels, with one-third being deficient. Additionally, vitamin D deficiency predicted poor overall survival in Japanese MM patients. Further investigation is required to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can improve the frailty and survival of vitamin D-deficient MM patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The primary analysis of the phase 1/2 ISLANDs study in Japanese individuals with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) showed that isatuximab monotherapy was well tolerated and effective, even in participants with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Here, we report a prespecified second analysis conducted 20 months after the first dosing of the last participant (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02812706). The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in phase 1 and to evaluate the efficacy of isatuximab, including assessment of overall response rate (ORR) at the recommended dose (RD), in phase 2. In phase 1, three participants received isatuximab 10 mg/kg every week (QW) for 4 weeks/cycle followed by every 2 weeks (Q2W) and five participants received 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W. Since no dose-limiting toxicities occurred in phase 1, 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W was identified as the RD for the phase 2 study (n = 28). At the time of data cut-off, three participants (one in phase 1 and two in phase 2) continued to receive isatuximab; disease progression and treatment-related adverse events were the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation. The overall safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis. One death, not related to isatuximab treatment, was reported since the first analysis. The ORR and clinical benefit rate remained unchanged from the primary analysis at 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.4%-54.9%) and 54.5% (95% CI: 36.4%-71.9%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months, longer than the median PFS reported in the primary analysis (4.7 months), whereas median overall survival was not reached. Overall, isatuximab 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and showed promising antitumor activity in Japanese individuals with RRMM., (© 2022 Sanofi and the Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Elotuzumab and lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (ERd) is a standard salvage chemotherapy for multiple myeloma, and elotuzumab is commonly administered every 2 weeks after cycle 3 (conventional ERd). Alternatively, elotuzumab may often be used every 4 weeks (monthly ERd) in real-world practice. The purpose of this multicenter observational study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of monthly ERd., Methods: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability between conventional and monthly ERd regimens for the myeloma patients in six institutes retrospectively., Results: Seventy-five patients were included in this study. The median patient age was 68 years. The median number of prior chemotherapies was two (1-5). The number of patients with prior lenalidomide exposure was 57 (76.0%). The numbers of progressive disease (PD) and non-PD before ERd were 23 (30.7%) and 52 (69.3%), respectively. The frequency of PD before ERd was significantly lower in the monthly ERd group than in the conventional ERd group. In 26.9 months of median follow-up period, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate in the monthly ERd group was significantly longer than that in the conventional ERd group (95.0% and 62.0%, hazard ratio 0.082, p = 0.002). However, no significant difference in PFS between these two ERd groups was found using multivariate analysis. The complete response rates were similar between the monthly and conventional ERd groups (55.0% and 32.7%, p = 0.109). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the monthly and conventional ERd groups (35.0% and 54.5%, p = 0.192). There was no significant difference in the kinetics of the mean absolute lymphocyte count, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD56, and CD57 positive lymphocyte counts, and CD4 to CD8 ratio between the monthly and conventional ERd groups., Discussion: The efficacy and tolerability of monthly ERd were similar to those of conventional ERd. Thus, monthly ERd might be a reasonable option, considering the quality of life of patients and convenience., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: In the pivotal phase III, randomized, multicenter ICARIA-MM study (NCT02990338), isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) improved progression-free survival and overall response rate versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in the overall population of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma., Patients and Methods: In this predefined subgroup analysis, efficacy, and safety between East Asian patients and the overall population were assessed., Results: In total, 36 East Asian patients were included (Japanese, n = 13; Korean, n = 9; Taiwanese, n = 14). At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, median progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.80-not calculable) in the Isa-Pd arm and was 7.9 months (95% CI 2.90-not calculable) in the Pd arm. The hazard ratio for the between-group difference was 0.52 (95% CI 0.19-1.39), which was similar to the overall population (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.82). No new safety signals were observed, except that a higher proportion of patients in the East Asian population experienced Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia compared with the overall population., Conclusion: These results confirm the efficacy of Isa-Pd in East Asian patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, and the related safety data are consistent with those observed in the overall population and are manageable., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

In cohort C of the phase 2 MM-014 trial, the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab therapy were investigated in 18 Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after their most recent regimen of lenalidomide-based therapy (NCT01946477). Patients received oral pomalidomide (4 mg daily), oral dexamethasone (20-40 mg weekly), and intravenously infused daratumumab (16 mg/kg). Median age was 67.5 years. All patients received prior lenalidomide per protocol; 89% received prior bortezomib. Twelve patients (67%) had lenalidomide-refractory disease, and 6 (33%) had lenalidomide-relapsed disease. Ten patients (56%) had only 1 prior treatment line. As of August 3, 2020, 15 patients (83%) were still on treatment; median follow-up was 8.1 months. Three patients (17%) discontinued treatment (2 for adverse events; 1 for major protocol deviation). Overall response rate (primary endpoint) was 83% (very good partial response or better, 61%). All patients had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (78%; febrile, 6%), leukopenia (28%), and lymphopenia (22%). Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 17%; 11% had pneumonia. In Japanese patients with RRMM, a triplet regimen of pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab after early-line lenalidomide treatment failure showed high efficacy and safety consistent with the known safety profile., (© 2022. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

The global, randomized, open-label KEYNOTE-183 phase 3 study was closed early after an interim analysis showed unfavorable risk-benefit when pembrolizumab was added to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This subgroup analysis reported outcomes in 27 Japanese patients randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (n = 15) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone (n = 12). Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). After a median (range) follow-up of 9.6 (1.4-15.3) months in Japanese patients, median PFS [6.5 vs 2.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.16 (95% CI 0.03-0.83)] and OS [not reached vs 14.8 months; HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.05-4.20)] seemed to favor the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone arm. Objective response rate was numerically higher in this group (47%) than in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (25%). The safety profile was consistent with that of the overall study population. No deaths were attributed to a study drug by the investigators. Although adding pembrolizumab to pomalidomide and dexamethasone did not show unfavorable risk-benefit in the Japanese subgroup of KEYNOTE-183, the analysis is limited by short follow-up and small sample size, which affects the generalizability of the results.

Subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC; daratumumab co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20) is administered in ~ 5 min and demonstrates safety and efficacy comparable to intravenous daratumumab, with low infusion-related reaction (IRR) rates in global populations. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study is the first evaluation of DARA SC in Japanese patients. Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug). Patients (N = 6) received DARA SC 1,800 mg until progression (weekly for Cycles 1-2; every 2 weeks for Cycles 3-7; monthly for Cycles 7 + [28-day cycles]). The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Secondary objectives included efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Median time of administration was 3-4 min for all injections. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred, and no treatment-emergent adverse events were serious or led to discontinuation. No IRRs were observed; 4 (67%) patients had injection-site reactions (all grade 1). Overall response rate was 67%. Pharmacokinetics of DARA SC in Japanese patients were similar to findings from the global phase 1b PAVO study (NCT02519452). DARA SC at a flat dose of 1,800 mg was well tolerated in Japanese RRMM patients with comparable efficacy and pharmacokinetics to intravenous daratumumab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03242889.

Introduction: Panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in the PANORAMA-1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we present data from a phase II study (NCT02290431) of this combination in Japanese patients with relapsed or relapsed-and-refractory MM., Methods: Patients received 3-week cycles of 20-mg oral panobinostat (weeks 1 and 2), 1.3-mg/m2 subcutaneous bortezomib (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and 20-mg oral dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib administration) for a total of 8 cycles (24 weeks; treatment phase 1). Patients with treatment benefit had an option to enter the extension phase to receive 6-week (42-day) cycles of panobinostat (weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5) plus bortezomib (days 1, 8, 22, and 29) and dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib treatment) for 24 weeks. The primary objective was complete response (CR) + near CR (nCR) rate after treatment phase 1 as per the modified European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria., Results: Of the 31 patients, 4 (12.9%) completed the treatment and 27 (87.1%) discontinued; 17 (54.8%) entered the extension phase. In total, 24 patients (77.4%) entered the survival follow-up phase and followed until study closure when the last patient was treated for 1 year after treatment phase 1. The CR + nCR rate was 48.4% (90% CI: 33.6-63.2). The overall response rate (CR + nCR + partial response) was 80.6%. The median PFS, duration of response, time to response, and time to progression were 15.3, 22.7, 1.4, and 15.3 months, respectively. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with diarrhea (80.6%), decreased appetite (58.1%), and thrombocytopenia (54.8%) being the most frequent, regardless of relationship to the study treatment. Thrombocytopenia (48.4%), fatigue (25.8%), diarrhea (22.6%), neutrophil count decrease (22.6%), platelet count decrease (22.6%), and lymphocyte count decrease (22.6%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 AEs., Conclusion: The study met the primary objective with 48.4% CR + nCR rate. The AEs associated with the combination treatment were safely managed using the existing AE management guidelines, including dose interruption/modification and/or supportive medical intervention. This treatment regimen is an effective option with a favorable benefit/risk profile for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM., (The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, targets cells that strongly express CD38 including malignant plasma cells. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 1/2 trial investigated the tolerability/safety and efficacy of isatuximab monotherapy in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In Phase 1, patients were sequentially assigned to receive isatuximab once weekly (QW) in cycle 1 (4 weeks) and every 2 weeks (Q2W) in subsequent cycles. Cohort 1 (n = 3) received 10 mg/kg QW/Q2W; cohort 2 (n = 5) received 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; the recommended dose for the single-arm phase 2 study (n = 28) was 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W. The overall safety profile was consistent with the current knowledge of isatuximab. The most common adverse events were infusion reactions (42.9%; 12/28); all were grade 1/2 and generally occurred during the first infusion. The overall response rate with 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W isatuximab was 36.4% (12/33); patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities had comparable results. In phase 2, the median progression-free survival was 4.7 (95% confidence interval, 3.75 to not reached) months. Median overall survival was not reached. Isatuximab monotherapy was well tolerated and effective in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM including high-risk cytogenetic patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02812706., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

The global, randomized, open-label KEYNOTE-185 study closed early after an interim analysis showed an unfavorable benefit-risk profile with pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) versus Rd alone in treatment-naive, transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. This subgroup analysis reported outcomes in the Japanese population. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab plus Rd or Rd alone, stratified by age and International Staging System. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Fifty-two Japanese patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus Rd (n = 27) or Rd (n = 25). The median follow-up was 7.2 months (range, 0.4-13.8). The median PFS was not reached (NR); 6-month PFS was 91.2% versus 86.2% with pembrolizumab plus Rd versus Rd [hazard ratio (HR), 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06-1.63]. The median overall survival (OS) was NR; 6-month OS was 96.2% versus 95.7% with pembrolizumab plus Rd versus Rd (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.03-3.72). With pembrolizumab plus Rd versus Rd, grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 70.4% versus 69.6% of patients; serious adverse events occurred in 40.7% versus 52.5%. Although in the Japanese subgroup of KEYNOTE-185 adding pembrolizumab to Rd did not show an unfavorable risk-benefit, the analysis is limited by short follow-up and small sample size, affecting generalizability of the results.

Prolonging overall survival (OS) remains an unmet need in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In ELOQUENT-2 (NCT01239797), elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ERd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with RRMM and 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LoTs). We report results from the pre-planned final OS analysis after a minimum follow-up of 70.6 months, the longest reported for an antibody-based triplet in RRMM. Overall, 646 patients with RRMM and 1-3 prior LoTs were randomized 1:1 to ERd or Rd. PFS and overall response rate were co-primary endpoints. OS was a key secondary endpoint, with the final analysis planned after 427 deaths. ERd demonstrated a statistically significant 8.7-month improvement in OS versus Rd (median, 48.3 vs 39.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.82 [95.4% Cl, 0.68-1.00]; P = 0.0408 [less than allotted α of 0.046]), which was consistently observed across key predefined subgroups. No additional safety signals with ERd at extended follow-up were reported. ERd is the first antibody-based triplet regimen shown to significantly prolong OS in patients with RRMM and 1-3 prior LoTs. The magnitude of OS benefit was greatest among patients with adverse prognostic factors, including older age, ISS stage III, IMWG high-risk disease, and 2-3 prior LoTs.

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the programmed cell death protein-1 (PDCD1), programmed cell death protein-1 ligand-1 (PDCD1LG1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) genes are implicated in the pathogenesis of some cancers. We investigated the role of PDCD1, PDCD1LG1, and CTLA4 SNPs in MM pathogenesis and the susceptibility to and clinical features of multiple myeloma (MM). We obtained genomic DNA from 124 patients with MM and 211 healthy controls and detected PDCD1 (rs36084323, rs41386349, and rs2227982), PDCD1LG1 (rs2297136 and rs4143815), and CTLA4 (rs733618, rs11571316, rs231775, and rs3087243) genotypes using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method or the TaqMan allelic discrimination real-time PCR method. The patients with MM had a significantly higher frequency of the PDCD1 GCC/GCC haplotype (rs36084323/rs41386349/rs2227982) compared with the healthy controls. PDCD1 rs2227982 CC genotype was associated significantly with a higher frequency of bone lesions. Patients with PDCD1LG1 rs2297136 TT and TC types (high-expression types) showed lower albumin level than those with CC genotype. In addition, the PDCD1LG1 rs4143815 CC and CG types (high-expression types) were associated significantly with higher frequency of patients who were treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib. However, there was no statistical significance between CTLA4 polymorphisms and clinical variables of patients with MM. There were no significant differences between all the polymorphisms and OS. Our study indicates that the PDCD1 haplotype is associated with a susceptibility to MM. The PDCD1 rs2227982 and PDCD1LG1 rs2297136 affect the clinical features of multiple myeloma patients.

Novel therapies are needed for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ELd) is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This phase 2 study in Japan evaluated ELd vs lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Ld) in patients with NDMM who were ineligible for stem cell transplantation. Elotuzumab infusion was accelerated to 5 mL/min by dose 3, cycle 1, allowing most subsequent infusions to be completed within 1 h. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the ELd arm. Secondary endpoints were the difference in ORR between treatments, and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were randomized to ELd (n = 40) or Ld (n = 42); median number of treatment cycles was 13 (ELd) and 12 (Ld). In the ELd arm, ORR was 88% [70% confidence interval (CI) 80-93]. The estimated difference in ORR between treatments was 13% (95% CI  - 4, 30) in favor of ELd. Progression-free survival data were immature. Safety was consistent with previous findings of ELd in Japanese patients with RRMM. No infusion reactions occurred at the maximum rate of 5 mL/min, which was used in 89% of elotuzumab infusions. ELd may be an effective, well-tolerated frontline treatment for patients with NDMM ineligible for stem cell transplantation.

Background: Pomalidomide and dexamethasone is a standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma in whom bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment has failed. KEYNOTE-183 assessed efficacy and safety of pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we present the findings of an unplanned, ad-hoc interim analysis at the request of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)., Methods: KEYNOTE-183 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at 97 medical centres across 11 countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, and USA). Patients aged at least 18 years with multiple myeloma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1, previously treated with at least two lines of therapy (excluding pomalidomide) and refractory to the last line were randomly assigned 1:1 to the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group or the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group via an interactive voice response or integrated web response system. Patients received oral pomalidomide 4 mg daily on days 1-21 and oral low-dose dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in 28-day cycles, with or without intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. Efficacy was assessed in all randomly assigned patients and safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02576977, and it is closed for accrual., Findings: Between Jan 18, 2016, and June 7, 2017, 249 patients were randomly assigned to either the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (n=125) or the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (n=124). On July 3, 2017, the FDA established that risks associated with the triple combination outweighed benefits and halted the study. Median follow-up was 8·1 months (IQR 4·5-10·9). Median progression-free survival was 5·6 months (95% CI 3·7-7·5) in the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 8·4 months (5·9-not reached) in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group; progression-free survival estimates at 6 months were 48% (95% CI 37-58) versus 60% (49-69) at 6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1·53; 95% CI 1·05-2·22; p=0·98). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 12·9-not reached) versus 15·2 months (12·7-not reached; HR 1·61; 95% CI 0·91-2·85; p=0·95); overall survival estimates at 6 months were 82% (95% CI 74-88) versus 90% (82-95). Serious adverse events occurred in 75 (63%) of 120 patients in the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 56 (46%) of 121 patients in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group. Four (3%) treatment-related deaths occurred in the pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone group (one each of unknown cause, neutropenic sepsis, myocarditis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome); myocarditis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome were considered related to pembrolizumab. No treatment-related deaths were reported in the pomalidomide and dexamethasone group., Interpretation: The results from this unplanned, FDA-requested, interim analysis showed that the benefit-risk profile of pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone is unfavourable for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co (Kenilworth, NJ, USA)., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 study evaluated single-agent carfilzomib in 50 heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (median of five prior treatments). In phase 1, patients were dosed at three levels: 15, 20, or 20/27 mg/m 2 . Maximum tolerated dosage was not reached at the tolerability evaluation. Patients in phase 2 were treated with 20/27 mg/m 2 carfilzomib. Median duration of exposure to carfilzomib in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group at this final analysis was 4.7 months (range: 0.3-39.4). Overall response rate in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group, primary endpoint of the study, was 22.5% (n = 9) (95% confidence interval, 12.3-37.5) with 2.5% (n = 1) stringent complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group were 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-13.6) and 22.9 months (95% CI, 14.1-not estimable), respectively. Frequently occurring grade ≥3 adverse events in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group included lymphopenia (72.5%), neutropenia (40.0%), and leukopenia (32.5%). Giving long-term carfilzomib monotherapy led to long-term overall survival for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients with a favorable safety profile. Carfilzomib monotherapy can be a good option for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: The Japan Study Group for Cell Therapy and Transplantation (JSCT) organized a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a treatment protocol (JSCT-MM12) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who were previously untreated and transplantation-eligible. Since bortezomib-based therapy is known to be effective for MM, the protocol is intensified more than the previous protocol (JSCT-MM10) and comprised the subsequent treatments: bortezomib + cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone (VCD) induction; bortezomib + high-dose-melphalan (B-HDM) conditioning with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone (VTD) consolidation; and lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance., Methods: Sixty-four symptomatic patients aged between 20 and 65 years were enrolled for treatment and received three cycles of VCD, followed by cyclophosphamide administration for autologous stem cell harvest and B-HDM/ASCT, and subsequently two cycles of VTD, after that LEN for 1 year., Results: Complete response (CR)/stringent CR (sCR) rates for induction, ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance therapies were 20, 39, 52, and 56%, respectively. The grade 3/4 toxicities (≥ 10%) with VCD treatment included neutropenia (27%), anemia (19%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). There was no treatment-related mortality. After median follow-up of 41 months, estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 64% and 88%, respectively. The high-risk group revealed lower CR/sCR, PFS, and OS than the standard-risk group., Conclusions: The study revealed that the treatment protocol consisting of VCD induction, B-HDM/ASCT followed by VTD consolidation, and LEN maintenance could produce highly beneficial responses and favorable tolerability in newly diagnosed MM. However, future study is required for improving treatment in the high-risk group.

In spite of recent development in the treatment armamentarium for multiple myeloma, overall survival (OS) still depends on risk status and sensitivity to treatment of each patient. We have evaluated the clinical relevance of the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) by comparing it with the original ISS in 718 Japanese patients. The distribution of patients according to response was similar between the ISS and R-ISS stages. Treatment response was greatly influenced by initial treatment modalities and deeper response was observed more frequently in transplanted patients. The R-ISS discriminated the difference in OS between the stages more distinctly than the ISS (p = 9.0 × 10 -15 and p = 4.0 × 10 -10 , respectively). Differences in OS were clarified by both R-ISS and ISS in non-transplanted patients (p = 2.4 × 10 -12 and p = 1.4 × 10 -8 , respectively), but the ISS failed to distinguish the difference between the stages in transplanted patients (p = 0.13). In contrast, the R-ISS could at least discriminate the excellent prognosis of stage I patients whereas the distinction between stage II and III was not that clear (p = 0.033). The R-ISS stage II encompassed a large number of patients, and the prognosis was heterogeneous depending on the fulfillment of prognostic factors such as LDH and adverse cytogenetics. These results suggest that treatment factors and prognostic factors greatly affect the therapeutic response and outcome, and the R-ISS is superior to ISS in prognostication of both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients in our current clinical practice.

The efficacy and safety of lenalidomide (LEN) consolidation therapy and subsequent LEN maintenance therapy after high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) were evaluated in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Forty-one patients were enrolled and received high-dose dexamethasone (DEX) therapy as an initial induction. The patients who did not respond to the DEX therapy were further treated with four cycles of bortezomib plus DEX (BD) induction therapy. For patients who responded to BD, PBSC harvesting was scheduled following high-dose cyclophosphamide and filgrastim administration. After PBSC harvesting, high-dose chemotherapy of melphalan with auto-PBSCT was performed. One hundred days after auto-PBSCT, patients received consolidation therapy consisting two cycles of LEN plus low-dose DEX (Ld) and LEN maintenance therapy. Only one death occurred during mobilization therapy, but the protocol developed in this study was considered generally safe to provide. Overall response rates after consolidation and maintenance therapies were 73.7% and 81.6%, respectively. Two-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 76.3% and 92.1%, respectively. These observations suggest that LEN consolidation and maintenance therapy are effective and safe, and provide favorable response rates in patients with MM.

In the era of novel therapeutic agents for multiple myeloma (MM), both the significance of achieving the plateau phase and the efficacy of subsequent maintenance therapy remain unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance therapy (biweekly for 1 year) in transplant-ineligible MM patients who plateaued after bortezomib-based induction therapy. Of 36 evaluable patients, the overall response rate during induction therapy was 61%, with a stringent complete response in 6%, a complete response in 6%, a very good partial response in 17%, and a partial response in 33%. Twenty patients achieved the plateau phase and subsequently received bortezomib maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival from the induction and maintenance therapies was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4-23.7 months) and 10.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7-10.7 months), respectively. During maintenance therapy, there were no cases with grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy, nor was there any improvement in the quality of the response. In conclusion, although maintenance therapy with biweekly bortezomib for up to 1 year was feasible, plateau-oriented bortezomib induction therapy followed by bortezomib maintenance therapy was not adequate in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM patients.

In the phase 3 POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) significantly reduced the risk of progression/death and induced deeper responses vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report a subgroup analysis of East Asian (Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese) patients from POLLUX based on a longer follow-up of 24.7 months. Median progression-free survival was not reached (NR) for DRd vs. 13.8 months for Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.76), and overall response rates were higher for DRd vs. Rd (90.2 vs. 72.1%). DRd extended the median duration of response vs. Rd (NR vs. 20.2 months), and minimal residual disease-negative rates at the 10 -5 sensitivity threshold were 21.2 vs. 9.1% for DRd vs. Rd. No new safety signals were observed. Similar efficacy and safety were observed in the smaller subgroup of Japanese patients treated with DRd vs. Rd. These results demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety of DRd vs. Rd in East Asian patients and also in the Japanese-only patient subgroup that are consistent with findings in the overall patient population of POLLUX.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in interleukin 17 (IL17A) and IL-23 receptor (IL23R) are involved in the pathogenesis of many cancers and autoimmune diseases. We investigated the influence of IL17A and IL23R SNPs on the risk of developing multiple myeloma (MM) and its clinical features. We obtained genomic DNA from 120 patients with MM and 201 healthy controls and detected IL17A -197 G/A (rs2275913) and IL23R H3Q (rs1884444) genotypes using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. There were no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies of IL17A -197 G/A and IL23R H3Q between the controls and patients with MM. Compared with the GG and GA genotypes, the IL17A AA genotype was significantly associated with lower hemoglobin levels. The IL23R HH genotype was significantly associated with higher frequency of bone lesions and plasmacytoma than the HQ and QQ genotypes. We observed significant differences in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib and those treated conventionally. Therefore, we also examined the effect of IL17A and IL23R polymorphisms on the clinical variables and OS in patients treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib. We observed that the IL23R HH genotype was significantly associated with poor survival compared with the QH and HH genotypes in these patients. Our findings indicate that IL17A -197 G/A and IL23R H3Q are not associated with susceptibility to MM. However, IL-17 and IL-23R polymorphisms may affect severity, bone lesions, and extra-medullary disease in patients with MM. Moreover, IL23R polymorphisms may contribute to poor prognosis in patients with MM treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib., (Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) and IL-10 receptor (IL-10R) single nucleotide polymorphisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many cancers. We investigated the influence of IL-10 -592C/A, IL-10RA I224V, and IL-10RB K47E on the risk of developing multiple myeloma (MM) and the clinical features of MM. We extracted the genomic DNA from 128 MM patients and 202 healthy controls and used polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method to detect IL-10 promoter -592C/A (rs1800872), IL-10RA (rs2228055), and IL-10RB K47E (rs2834167) genotypes. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or last clinical appointment. No statistically significant difference was observed in the genotype and allele frequencies of IL-10 -592C/A, IL-10RA I224V, and IL-10RB K47E between MM patients and healthy controls. IL-10RA II genotype was significantly associated with a hemoglobin level lower than that of IV and VV genotypes (mean ± standard deviation, 9.21 ± 2.46 vs 10.3 ± 2.33 g/dL; P = .021). IL-10 -592 AA genotype was significantly associated with OS better than that of CA and CC genotypes (median OS, 74.5 vs 46.3 months; P = .047). We observed significant differences in survival between patients treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib and those treated with conventional treatments (median OS, 74.5 vs 38.2 months; P = .021). Therefore, we also examined the effect of IL-10 and IL-10R polymorphisms on the clinical variables and OS of patients treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib. In addition, IL-10RB EE genotype was significantly associated with poorer survival than KK and KE genotypes (median OS, 46.3 vs 78.8 months; P = .015). Our findings indicate that IL-10 and IL-10R gene polymorphisms may not contribute to the susceptibility to MM but may be associated with the severity and prognosis of MM. In particular, IL-10RB K47E polymorphism may contribute to the poor prognosis of MM patients treated with thalidomide and/or bortezomib., (Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Extramedullary myeloma (EMM) occurs when myeloma develops outside the bone marrow; it often develops after chemotherapy and is associated with the acquisition of chemo-resistance and a fatal course. The mechanisms underlying extramedullary spread have not yet been fully elucidated. MALAT1 is a highly abundantly and ubiquitously expressed long non-coding RNA that plays important roles in cancer metastasis. The aims of this study were to clarify the association of MALAT1 with EMM and to elucidate the underlying mechanism of EMM formation under chemotherapeutic pressure. MALAT1 expression was significantly higher in multiple myeloma (MM) than in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Furthermore, MALAT1 expression was markedly higher in EMM compared with that in corresponding intramedullary myeloma cells. A higher MALAT1 level was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival. MALAT1 expression level was positively correlated with expression of HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1 and HSP90B1 but not with TP53 expression. MALAT1 was significantly upregulated by bortezomib and doxorubicin. Considering the known functions of MALAT1, our results suggest that it acts as a stress response gene that is upregulated by chemotherapy, thereby linking chemotherapy to EMM formation. Elucidating the biological implication of long non-coding RNA contributes to deeper understanding concerning the pathogenesis and investigation of novel therapeutic targets for MM., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) attenuates DNA damage response (DDR) through gene repression and facilitates tolerance to genomic instability during immunoglobulin affinity maturation in germinal center (GC) B cells. Although BCL6 expression is repressed through normal differentiation of GC B cells into plasma cells, a recent study showed the ectopic expression of BCL6 in primary multiple myeloma (MM) cells. However, the functional roles of BCL6 in MM cells are largely unknown. Here, we report that overexpression of BCL6 in a MM cell line, KMS12PE, induced transcriptional repression of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a DDR signaling kinase, which was associated with a reduction in γH2AX formation after DNA damage. In contrast, transcription of known targets of BCL6 in GC B cells was not affected, suggesting a cell type-specific function of BCL6. To further investigate the effects of BCL6 overexpression on the MM cell line, we undertook mRNA sequence analysis and found an upregulation in the genomic mutator activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) with alteration in the gene expression profile, which is suggestive of de-differentiation from plasma cells. Moreover, interleukin-6 exposure to KMS12PE led to upregulation of BCL6 and AID, downregulation of ATM, and attenuation of DDR, which were consistent with the effects of BCL6 overexpression in this MM cell line. Taken together, these results indicated that overexpression of BCL6 alters gene expression profile and confers decreased DDR in MM cells. This phenotypic change could be reproduced by interleukin-6 stimulation, suggesting an important role of external stimuli in inducing genomic instability, which is a hallmark of MM cells., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant side effect in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving high-dose melphalan treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a triple antiemetic combination of palonosetron, aprepitant, and low-dose dexamethasone in 24 MM patients who received melphalan conditioning (100 mg/m 2 on days 1-2) before ASCT (on day 4). Intravenous palonosetron (0.75 mg on day 1), oral aprepitant (125 mg on day 1; 80 mg on days 2-4), and intravenous dexamethasone (6.6 mg on days 1-4) were administered for prevention of CINV. Complete response (no emesis and no rescue antiemetic) and complete control (no emesis, no rescue antiemetic, and no more than mild nausea) rates were 75 and 68% during the overall phase (0-120 h), while they were 88 and 86% in the acute phase (0-48 h), 75 and 68% in the delayed phase (48-120 h), and 67 and 59% in the extended phase (120-168 h), respectively. There were no serious adverse events related to the antiemetic therapy. In conclusion, the three-antiemetic regimen consisting of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone was safe and effective for controlling CINV due to high-dose melphalan treatment, especially during the delayed phase.

In a Japanese phase II study (MM-025), the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) were confirmed at a median follow-up of 14.2 months in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the present report, we analyzed the follow-up data from the abovementioned study. Treatment was stopped for all 26 patients after a median follow-up of 31.3 months, and the median treatment duration was approximately 25 months. The overall response rate was 87.5%, and the complete response rate was 20.8%. The median duration of response and progression-free survival were 30.7 and 31.6 months, respectively. The median overall survival has not yet been reached. At least one grade 3/4 adverse event was experienced by 23 patients (88.5%), and 18 patients (69.2%) experienced serious adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of Rd were confirmed in transplant-ineligible Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma at the present follow-up period.

There are some reports regarding hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with myeloma who are HBV carriers or who have had a resolved HBV infection, and there is no standard prophylaxis strategy for these patients. We performed a retrospective multicenter study to determine the incidence and characteristics of HBV reactivation in patients with multiple myeloma. We identified 641 patients with multiple myeloma who had been treated using novel agents and/or autologous stem cell transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy between January 2006 and June 2014 at nine Japanese hospitals. The patients' characteristics, laboratory data, and clinical courses were retrieved and statistically analyzed. During a median follow-up of 101 weeks, one of eight (12.5 %) HBV carriers developed hepatitis and 9 of 99 (9.1 %) patients with resolved HBV infection experienced HBV reactivation; the cumulative incidences of HBV reactivation at 2 years (104 weeks) and 5 years (260 weeks) were 8 and 14 %, respectively. The nine cases of reactivation after resolved HBV infection had received entecavir as preemptive therapy or were carefully observed by monitoring their HBV DNA levels, and none of these cases developed hepatitis. Among patients with multiple myeloma, HBV reactivation was not rare. Therefore, long-term monitoring of HBV DNA levels is needed to prevent hepatitis that is related to HBV reactivation in these patients.

In the FIRST trial (MM-020), lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) reduced the risk of disease progression or death compared with combination melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide. As the FIRST trial did not include any Japanese patients, the efficacy and safety of continuous treatment with Rd was evaluated in 26 Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in a single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase II trial (MM-025). Patients received lenalidomide on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, with a starting dose of 25 mg/day (dose adjusted for renal impairment), and 40 mg/day dexamethasone (dose adjusted for age) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or discontinuation for any reason. In the efficacy evaluable population, overall response rate was 87.5%, including 29.2% of patients who achieved a complete response/very good partial response. Median durations of response, progression-free survival and overall survival have not been reached. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (23%) and anemia (19%). The efficacy and safety of Rd were consistent with data from larger studies, including the FIRST trial, thereby supporting the use of Rd continuous in Japanese patients with NDMM who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation., (© 2016 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

We conducted a phase 1/2 study of single-agent carfilzomib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carfilzomib were examined in phase 1. The primary endpoint in phase 2 was the overall response rate (ORR). Carfilzomib was administered in a twice-weekly, consecutive-day dosing schedule. In Phase 1, doses of 15 or 20 mg/m(2) were administered on this schedule or 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 2 of Cycle 1 and then 27 mg/m(2) in the 20/27 mg/m(2) cohort. Patients had a median of five prior therapies, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent. The dose level did not reach the maximum tolerated dose. The most common adverse events were haematological. Notably, carfilzomib either induced new hypertension (n = 4) or aggravated previously existing hypertension (n = 6) in 10 of 50 patients. Four of the eight patients who previously experienced peripheral neuropathy (PN) experienced a recurrence with carfilzomib use, but no new cases of PN occurred. The ORR of the 20/27 mg/m(2) 40 patient cohort was similar to that in the pivotal US study. The dose was efficacious and tolerable in heavily pre-treated Japanese patients; however, meticulous control of hypertension may be necessary for further carfilzomib use., (© 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The phase I/II study of melphalan-prednisolone-bortezomib (MPB) therapy in Japanese patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (JPN-102 trial) (registered between July 2008 and March 2011) showed an overall response rate in the MPB arm equivalent to that of the VISTA trial. In this study, we followed up the clinical data of 92 of the 101 patients registered in the JPN-102 trial to clarify the long-term outcomes of MPB therapy. The median follow-up period was 50.8 (0.9-66.1) months. The median age of this cohort was 72 (48-84) years. The median progression-free survival was 25.7 (95%CI: 21.3-33.9) months and the overall survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 98, 86 and 76%, respectively. There was no significant difference in either progression-free survival or overall survival when comparing a total bortezomib amount of 39 mg/m 2 or more being administered versus less than 39 mg/m 2 . The outcomes of the JPN-102 cohort appeared, at a minimum, to not be inferior to those of the MPB cohort in the VISTA trial. A prospective trial is needed to establish the MPB regimen as being suitable for Japanese patients with multiple myeloma.

Lenalidomide treatment in combination with dexamethasone and/or chemotherapy is associated with a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, the incidence of asymptomatic VTE in lenalidomide-treated MM patients remains unclear. A total of 80 relapsed and refractory MM patients treated with lenalidomide-containing regimens in a single institution between July 2010 and July 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, eight patients had asymptomatic VTE before starting lenalidomide. The remaining 72 patients received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin (100 mg daily) and monitoring of plasma D-dimer levels on each visit. During the median follow-up time of 7.3 months (range 1.0-43.5 months), 29 patients (40.3 %) showed an elevation of D-dimer (≥2.5 μg/mL), and 13 (18.1 %) showed asymptomatic VTE in a lower extremity. Median time to asymptomatic VTE events from initiation of lenalidomide treatment was 3.0 months (range 1.0-13.1 months). All patients having an asymptomatic VTE continued lenalidomide treatment on warfarinization (target international normalized ratio 1.5-2.5), and none of them developed symptomatic VTE. In conclusion, an asymptomatic VTE event occurred in 18 % of Japanese MM patients receiving lenalidomide-containing therapy despite aspirin prophylaxis. Serial monitoring of plasma D-dimer levels and early intervention may help to prevent symptomatic or lethal VTE events.

Background: Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7), showed activity in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in a phase 1b-2 study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Methods: In this phase 3 study, we randomly assigned patients to receive either elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (elotuzumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and the overall response rate. Final results for the coprimary end points are reported on the basis of a planned interim analysis of progression-free survival., Results: Overall, 321 patients were assigned to the elotuzumab group and 325 to the control group. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the rate of progression-free survival at 1 year in the elotuzumab group was 68%, as compared with 57% in the control group; at 2 years, the rates were 41% and 27%, respectively. Median progression-free survival in the elotuzumab group was 19.4 months, versus 14.9 months in the control group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the elotuzumab group, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.85; P<0.001). The overall response rate in the elotuzumab group was 79%, versus 66% in the control group (P<0.001). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the two groups were lymphocytopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, and pneumonia. Infusion reactions occurred in 33 patients (10%) in the elotuzumab group and were grade 1 or 2 in 29 patients., Conclusions: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received a combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone had a significant relative reduction of 30% in the risk of disease progression or death. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie Biotherapeutics; ELOQUENT-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01239797.).

Various prognostic markers for multiple myeloma (MM) have been identified, and stratification using these markers is considered important to optimize treatment strategies. The international staging system (ISS) is now a widely accepted prognostic staging system for MM patients; however, its validity is controversial in the era of new therapeutic regimens, since ISS had been established before introduction of new agents. We retrospectively reviewed prognostic factors in order to seek out an alternative staging system more suitably applied to MM patients treated with novel agents. We analyzed 178 newly diagnosed MM patients who received either conventional chemotherapy without novel agents (CT; n = 79) or chemotherapy with novel agents (NT; n = 99). Although median overall survival (OS) of patients treated with CT is significantly different depending on stages of ISS, ISS had no effect on OS among patients treated with NT. Meanwhile, we identified hemoglobin (Hb) and plasmacytoma as independent risk factors for OS in patients who received NT. Using these two parameters, we stratified NT patients into three stages; stage 1 (Hb≥10 g/dL and absence of plasmacytoma), stage 2 (not stage 1 or 3), and stage 3 (Hb <10 g/dL and presence of plasmacytoma). We found that there were significant differences in median OS among the three stages (8.13, 5.95, and 2.45 yr for stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively). This preliminary study suggests that this alternative staging system based on Hb and plasmacytoma is a simple and useful way to predict prognosis of MM patients in the novel agent era., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

L-type amino-acid transporter 1 (LAT1) plays a key role in cell growth and survival. To determine the prognostic significance of LAT1 in multiple myeloma (MM), we investigated the expression of LAT1 and its functional subunit, 4Fc heavy chain (CD98), on myeloma cells by immunohistochemistry in 100 newly diagnosed MM patients. High expression (moderate or strong staining intensity) of LAT1 and CD98 was detected in 56% and 45% of patients, respectively. The LAT1 expression score was positively correlated with Ki-67 index (r = 0.631, P < 0.001), and there was a statistically significant difference in Durie-Salmon stage between patients with high and low LAT1 expression (P = 0.03). In 43 patients treated with melphalan and prednisolone, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the high LAT1 expression group (60.0%) than in the low LAT1 expression group (17.6%) (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis confirmed that high expression of LAT1 was a significant prognostic factor for predicting poor overall survival independently from the International Staging System (both P = 0.01). Here, we show that the overexpression of LAT1 is significantly associated with high proliferation and poor prognosis in newly diagnosed MM patients. Thus, LAT1 may be a promising pathological marker for identifying high-risk MM., (© 2014 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: The aim of this study was to develop a model able to predict the area under the lenalidomide plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients using a limited sampling strategy., Methods: Forty-six hospitalized Japanese MM patients (25 men and 21 women) participated in this study. On days 3-10 of lenalidomide therapy, whole-blood samples were collected just before oral lenalidomide administration, and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours thereafter. Plasma concentrations of lenalidomide were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry., Results: The AUC0-24 predicted from a single lenalidomide plasma concentration measured 8 hours after the administration (C8h) showed the highest correlation with the measured AUC0-24 of lenalidomide (AUC0-24 = 13.0 × C8h + 1305.0; r = 0.832). To enhance the correlation between the predicted and the actual AUC0-24 of lenalidomide, we included information regarding lenalidomide elimination by entering creatinine clearance (CCr) data in the predictive formula of lenalidomide AUC0-24. Predicting the AUC0-24 of lenalidomide using data from 2 time points, C0h and C4h, along with CCr data further strengthened the correlation with the measured AUC0-24 of lenalidomide [AUC0-24 = 37.1 × C0h + 6.4 × C4h - 32.1 × CCr + 3265.6; r = 0.842]., Conclusions: The AUC0-24 of lenalidomide can be predicted using plasma concentrations measured at only 2 time points, C0h and C4h, in combination with CCr. Our study also suggests that the limited sampling strategy approach might help to identify patients with renal function impairment and who, despite dose adjustments, accumulate the drug, leading to a high AUC.

This phase I/II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone in Japanese patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. One hundred and one patients were enrolled, and 99 patients received up to nine 6-week cycles of bortezomib (0.7/1.0/1.3 mg/m²) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 in cycles 1-4 and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 in cycles 5-9, with melphalan (9 mg/m²) and prednisolone (60 mg/m²) on days 1-4 of each cycle. The recommended dose was determined in the phase I portion, and the overall response rate and safety of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone at the recommended dose were assessed in the phase II portion. The recommended dose of bortezomib was determined to be 1.3 mg/m². Grade 3 or higher non-hematological adverse events included diarrhea (12%) and peripheral neuropathy (10%); grade 4 hematological adverse events included lymphopenia (41%), neutropenia (30%), and thrombocytopenia (22%). Eleven patients had lung injury associated with bortezomib; two had grade 3 disease, and the other nine had grade 1 or 2 disease. Of the 86 patients treated with 1.3-mg/m² bortezomib in phases I and II, the median number of treatment cycles was 4.5, and the overall response rate was 70% (95% confidence interval: 59-79%). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone with 1.3-mg/m² bortezomib was considered to be tolerable and effective in Japanese patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. However, further investigation is needed to refine the administration schedule., (© 2013 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objective: L-[3-(18)F]-alpha-methyltyrosine ((18)F-FAMT) is an amino-acid tracer for positron emission tomography (PET), with uptake related to overexpression of L-type amino-acid transporter 1 and proliferative activity in tumour cells. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FAMT PET compared with 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)., Methods: Eleven patients with MM (newly diagnosed, n = 3; relapsed after treatment, n = 8) underwent whole-body (18)F-FAMT and (18)F-FDG PET within a 2-week interval. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine was also performed to assess patterns of bone marrow infiltration. Tracer uptake was semi-quantitatively evaluated using maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)). Mean SUV was also determined for normal bone marrow and the aortic arch as mediastinal background SUV to calculate lesion-to-bone marrow (L/B) and lesion-to-mediastinum (L/M) ratios, respectively. Those values were statistically compared using Student's t test., Results: In 8 patients showing focal infiltration on MRI, 34 FDG-avid bone lesions were identified, with each showing increased FAMT uptake. Mean SUV(max) and L/B ratio of FDG (3.1 ± 1.2 and 3.3 ± 1.9, respectively) were significantly higher than those of FAMT (2.0 ± 1.0 and 2.6 ± 1.1, respectively; p < 0.05 each). In contrast, the L/M ratio of FDG showed no significant difference to that of FAMT (2.2 ± 1.0 and 2.4 ± 1.2, respectively; p = 0.3)., Conclusions: Clear (18)F-FAMT PET uptake was seen in most (18)F-FDG-avid lesions among patients with MM, and an equivalent semi-quantitative value was obtained using L/M ratio. Our preliminary data suggest that (18)F-FAMT PET provides a useful imaging modality for detecting active myelomatous lesions.

Vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone (VAD) regimen with intermittent high-dose dexamethasone (HD) has been used as primary chemotherapy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are candidates for high-dose therapy or present with renal failure. However, dexamethasone increases the risk of infection in MM patients. We retrospectively evaluated treatment efficacy and infectious events in MM patients undergoing VAD with or without HD. Seventy-seven consecutive patients who received VAD without HD (n = 37) or VAD-HD (n = 40) at our institution were assessed. Characteristics of patients and VAD regimens were retrospectively analyzed to detect correlations with the incidence of infections. During 218 VAD cycles, 48 infectious episodes were documented in 39 patients. Of these, 32 episodes in 26 patients were severe (grade ≥ 3). By analyzing each patient, VAD-HD was associated with risk of all-grade and severe bacterial infection, while International Staging System stage ≥ 2 was independently correlated with severe bacterial infection. Response rates after two cycles were comparable between the 2 VAD regimens. In conclusion, risk of infection is lower in VAD without HD than in VAD-HD, and the clinical response is equivalent. VAD-HD should thus be avoided for MM patients with high risk of infection.

To determine the clinical significance of the T helper 1(Th1)/T helper 2 (Th2) ratio in multiple myeloma, the intracellular IFN-gamma and IL-4 were analyzed by flow cytometry in 56 patients with multiple myeloma. The mean Th1/Th2 ratio of cases in the initial diagnosis phase and the refractory phase were higher than that of the control group. The mean serum beta-2-microglobulin in the high Th1/Th2 subgroup was significantly higher than that in the normal Th1/Th2 subgroup (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the Th1/Th2 ratio was closely related to the disease status of multiple myeloma.

Twenty patients with relapsing myeloma were treated with combination chemotherapy of ranimustine, doxorubicine, and dexamethasone (RAD) between July 1996 and March 2000. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 5 (26.3%) achieved partial response after the first round of RAD therapy and 10 (52.6%) achieved partial response after the second round of RAD therapy. Of 10 evaluable patients who had previously received high-dose dexamethasone therapy including VAD therapy, 2 (20%) achieved partial response after the first round of RAD therapy and 3 (30%) achieved partial response after the second round of RAD therapy. The median survival was 10.5 months and the progression-free survival was 9.3 months. Patients who responded to RAD therapy had a survival rate at 43 months of 59.3%. Toxicity and adverse events during RAD therapy were tolerable. This pilot study demonstrated that RAD therapy is useful for the treatment o frefractory myeloma.

We investigated the treatment and outcome of Japanese patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) in the era of novel agents and analyzed the risk factors affecting survival. Among 3,318 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM), 38 patients were diagnosed with pPCL. The median overall survival (OS) of the pPCL patients was 2.85 years, which was significantly extended compared with that in previous reports. The proportion of patients treated with novel agents was 61%. The OS of the patients treated with novel agents was significantly extended compared with that of patients treated without novel agents according to the generalized Wilcoxon test (2.85 vs. 1.16 years, p = 0.049). This statistical finding suggests that treatment with novel agents could have prevented early death in the patients with pPCL. Age was the only statistically significant prognostic factor associated with an inferior OS (hazard ratio 4.57). Five patients received maintenance therapy with novel agents, and their OS tended to be longer than that of the other patients without maintenance (4.45 vs. 2.85 years). Unlike MM, OS for pPCL has not been improved significantly over the last decade, especially in elderly patients. Therefore, it is important to establish the treatment strategy, particularly after induction treatment. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: l-[3-F]-alpha-methyltyrosine (F-FAMT) is an amino-acid tracer for positron emission tomography (PET), with uptake related to overexpression of L-type amino-acid transporter 1 and proliferative activity in tumour cells. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of F-FAMT PET compared with 2-[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy- d-glucose (F-FDG) PET in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Eleven patients with MM (newly diagnosed, n = 3; relapsed after treatment, n = 8) underwent whole-body F-FAMT and F-FDG PET within a 2-week interval. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine was also performed to assess patterns of bone marrow infiltration. Tracer uptake was semi-quantitatively evaluated using maximal standardized uptake value (SUV). Mean SUV was also determined for normal bone marrow and the aortic arch as mediastinal background SUV to calculate lesion-to-bone marrow (L/B) and lesion-to-mediastinum (L/M) ratios, respectively. Those values were statistically compared using Student's t test. Results: In 8 patients showing focal infiltration on MRI, 34 FDG-avid bone lesions were identified, with each showing increased FAMT uptake. Mean SUV and L/B ratio of FDG (3.1 ± 1.2 and 3.3 ± 1.9, respectively) were significantly higher than those of FAMT (2.0 ± 1.0 and 2.6 ± 1.1, respectively; p < 0.05 each). In contrast, the L/M ratio of FDG showed no significant difference to that of FAMT (2.2 ± 1.0 and 2.4 ± 1.2, respectively; p = 0.3). Conclusions: Clear F-FAMT PET uptake was seen in most F-FDG-avid lesions among patients with MM, and an equivalent semi-quantitative value was obtained using L/M ratio. Our preliminary data suggest that F-FAMT PET provides a useful imaging modality for detecting active myelomatous lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]