Search

We characterized the safety and efficacy of the bispecific antibody teclistamab in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients were pretreated with a proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb). The primary endpoint was frequency and type of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in phase 1, and overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response [PR]) in phase 2. In phase 1, 14 patients received once-weekly (QW) subcutaneous teclistamab (0.72 mg/kg [n = 5]; 1.5 mg/kg [n = 5]; 3 mg/kg [n = 4]). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. As of April 2024, 26 phase-2 patients received the recommended phase-2 dose (QW) (RP2D: 1.5 mg/kg) of teclistamab. Biweekly (Q2W) dosing was allowed after maintaining response for ≥ 6 months. At a median follow-up of 14.32 months, ORR was 76.9% (≥ very good PR: 76.9%; ≥ complete response: 65.4%). Median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not reached. Common TEAEs included CRS (grade ≤ 2), neutropenia, and infections. No patient had immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and dose reductions. Teclistamab demonstrated deep and durable responses in Japanese patients with RRMM, consistent with the global pivotal MajesTEC-1 study, supporting the potential for a new standard of care for Japanese RRMM patients., Competing Interests: Declaration. Conflict of interest: Tadao Ishida: Research funding received from Alexion pharma, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, Prothena, Sanofi, and Takeda. Honoraria received from BMS, CSL Behring, Janssen, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. Yoshiaki Kuroda: Payment or honoraria received from Amgen, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astrazeneca, BMS, Janssen, Ono, Sanofi, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Kosei Matsue: Grants or contract received from Astrazeneca. Takuya Komeno: Grants or contracts received from Abbvie, BMS, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and Sanofi. Takuro Ishiguro: Payment or honoraria received from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Sanofi, BMS, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and Novartis. Jun Ishikawa: None. Toshiro Ito: None. Hiroshi Kosugi: Payment or honoraria received from Abbvie G.K., Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astrazeneca K.K., Beckton Dickinson K.K., BMS K.K., Chugai, GSK K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan Blood Products Organization, Kyowa Kirin, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Nippon Shinyaku, Novartis Pharma K.K., Novo Nordisk Pharma Japan, Ono, Sanofi K.K., and Takeda. Kazutaka Sunami: Research funding received from: Abbvie, Beigene, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Ono, Otsuka, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Honoraria received from BMS, Janssen, and Sanofi. Kazuko Nishikawa: Employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. Kazuhiro Shibayama: Employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Kensuke Aida: Employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. Hiroshi Yamazaki: Employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., own stocks or stock options in Kameya Shoji Co., Ltd. Mitsuo Inagaki: Employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and own stocks or stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Hisanori Kobayashi: Employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and own stocks or stock options in Johnson and Johnson. Shinsuke Iida: All support for the present manuscript received from Janssen. Grants received from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Ono, Otsuka, Pfizer Sanofi, Shionogi, and Takeda. Consulting fees received from Abbvie, Astrazeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Payment or honoraria received from Astrazeneca, BMS, Janssen, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda. Other financial or non-financial interests received from Chugai. Ethical approval: The study protocol and associated study documents were approved by the Institutional Review Board. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, established by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH), and all relevant regulatory requirements were followed during the conduct of this study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Some treatments are associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (CMVRA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, no reports exist on the association between elotuzumab and CMVRA. Therefore, we assessed the incidence of CMVRA in patients with MM who received elotuzumab therapy., Methods: The medical records of 85 patients who underwent elotuzumab therapy were included in the retrospective analysis for CMV positivity., Results: Thirty patients were tested for CMV antigenemia during elotuzumab therapy, and 16 were positive for CMV antigenemia; the cumulative incidence rate of CMVRA 6 months after elotuzumab initiation was 18.4%. The history of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was significantly more common in the CMVRA group (31.2%) than that of the group without CMVRA (8.7%). However, even among patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence rate of CMVRA at 6 months was 15.1%. During CMVRA, the symptoms included fever in 8 cases, while retinitis was observed in 1 case. Five patients required antiviral therapy and CMV antigenemia resolved in all but 1 case., Conclusion: Although the patient population was heterogeneous, CMVRA cannot be underestimated during elotuzumab therapy, and evaluation of CMVRA, especially in symptomatic cases, is clinically important., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Whether the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab to the VRd regimen would reduce the risk of disease progression or death among patients ineligible to undergo transplantation is unclear., Methods: In an international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation to receive either isatuximab plus VRd or VRd alone. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points included a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in patients with a complete response., Results: A total of 446 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the estimated progression-free survival at 60 months was 63.2% in the isatuximab-VRd group, as compared with 45.2% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.60; 98.5% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was significantly higher in the isatuximab-VRd group than in the VRd group (74.7% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.01), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status and a complete response (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.003). No new safety signals were observed with the isatuximab-VRd regimen. The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment and the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Isatuximab-VRd was more effective than VRd as initial therapy in patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation. (Funded by Sanofi and a Cancer Center Support Grant; IMROZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03319667.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Despite advances, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience relapse and repeat multiple treatment lines, highlighting an unmet need for patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Bispecific antibodies are a new option, but their efficacy and safety in Japanese patients are unknown., Methods: This was an analysis of Japanese patients receiving elranatamab monotherapy in MagnetisMM-2 (NCT04798586) and MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359). Both studies evaluated a priming dose regimen of elranatamab followed by weekly subcutaneous doses, in patients with disease progression while receiving or who were intolerant to ≥3 prior therapies (≥1 proteasome inhibitor, ≥1 immunomodulatory drug and ≥1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody). The primary endpoints were dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in MagnetisMM-2 and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in MagnetisMM-3. In both, key secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival and overall survival., Results: In MagnetisMM-2 (N = 4) and MagnetisMM-3 (n = 12), median ages were 68.5 and 66.5 years, respectively. No DLTs were observed in MagnetisMM-2. ORRs were 50.0% (95% CI, 6.8-93.2) and 58.3% (95% CI, 27.7-84.8) in MagnetisMM-2 and MagnetisMM-3, respectively. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events in MagnetisMM-2 (grade 3/4: 75.0%) and MagnetisMM-3 (grade 3/4: 100%); cytokine release syndrome occurred in 100% (grade 3/4: 25.0%) and 58.3% (no grade 3/4) of patients, respectively. Neither study reported immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome., Conclusions: No new safety signals were observed, and ORRs were similar to that of the overall MagnetisMM-3 trial population, supporting further studies of elranatamab in Japanese patients with RRMM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04798586 (MagnetisMM-2), NCT04649359 (MagnetisMM-3)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objective: To estimate the comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) versus idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with 2-4 prior lines of therapy., Methods: Matching adjusted indirect comparison (MAICs) were performed using individual patient-level data (IPD) for cilta-cel from CARTITUDE-1 and CARTITUDE-4 and published aggregated data for ide-cel from KarMMa-3. Cilta-cel patients who met inclusion criteria from KarMMa-3 were selected, and outcomes were compared against data for ide-cel using simulated IPD derived from aggregate-level data from KarMMa-3. Patient characteristics were adjusted by reweighting cilta-cel IPD to match the distribution of prognostic factors in KarMMa-3. Comparative efficacy was estimated for response outcomes using a weighted logistic regression analysis and for progression-free survival using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model., Results: Patients treated with cilta-cel were 1.2 times more likely to achieve overall response (relative response ratio [RR]: 1.18 [95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.34]; p  = 0.04), 1.3 times more likely to achieve very good partial response or better (RR: 1.34 [1.15-1.57]; p  = 0.003), and 1.9 times more likely to achieve complete response or better (RR: 1.91 [1.54-2.37]; p  < 0.0001) versus ide-cel patients from KarMMa-3. Cilta-cel was associated with a significant 49% reduction in risk of disease progression or death versus ide-cel (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% confidence interval: 0.31, 0.84]; p  = 0.0078)., Conclusion: For patients with triple-class exposed RRMM treated with 2-4 prior lines of treatment, cilta-cel was found to provide superior clinical benefit over ide-cel in terms of response and progression-free survival.

To retrospectively analyze whether the second revision of the international staging system (R2-ISS) influenced prognosis at treatment initiation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving anti-CD38 antibody-based triplet treatments. High-risk chromosomal abnormalities were examined from diagnosis to treatment initiation and considered positive if detected once. R2-ISS was recalculated at the initiation of treatment and defined as "dynamic R2-ISS." Data from 150 patients who underwent the defined treatments were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 36.5 months. Dynamic R2-ISS significantly stratified prognoses for both PFS and OS. The median PFS for patients with dynamic R2-ISS IV was 3.3 months, and the median OS was 11.7 months, indicating extremely poor outcomes. Although the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) calculated at the initiation of treatment significantly stratified treatment outcomes, the patients classified as R-ISS could be further stratified by R2-ISS to provide better prognostic information. Dynamic R2-ISS showed potential as a prognostic tool in patients with MM who are treated with anti-CD38 antibody-based triplet therapies., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The introduction of daratumumab has improved treatment outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM). However, infectious complications are a concern in patients receiving daratumumab. Although some reports have explored the association between daratumumab and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, most of these have focused on relapsed or refractory cases, and few describe patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed CMV infections in 53 patients with NDMM who received daratumumab as induction therapy. CMV infection was defined as CMV antigenemia positivity. The median age at treatment initiation was 71 years (range, 50-82 years), and 50.9% of the patients were female. The median duration of daratumumab administration was 10.0 months (range, 0.3-63.8 months). Nine patients developed CMV infection, and the cumulative incidence rate at six months was 18.1% (95% confidence interval: 8.9-30.1%). One patient experienced CMV retinitis and required antiviral therapy, while the remaining eight patients did not require treatment and could be managed through observation. Few cases of CMV infection during daratumumab treatment for NDMM required treatment. However, the incidence of CMV infection was not negligible, suggesting that regular monitoring for CMV is worth considering to ensure more appropriate management during daratumumab treatment., (© 2024. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

Abstract: It remains elusive how driver mutations, including those detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), affect prognosis in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we performed targeted-capture sequencing using bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) and ctDNA of 261 RRMM cases uniformly treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in a multicenter, prospective, observational study. We detected 24 and 47 recurrently mutated genes in BMPC and ctDNA, respectively. In addition to clonal hematopoiesis-associated mutations, varying proportion of driver mutations, particularly TP53 mutations (59.2% of mutated cases), were present in only ctDNA, suggesting their subclonal origin. In univariable analyses, ctDNA mutations of KRAS, TP53, DIS3, BRAF, NRAS, and ATM were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). BMPC mutations of TP53 and KRAS were associated with inferior PFS, whereas KRAS mutations were prognostically relevant only when detected in both BMPC and ctDNA. A total number of ctDNA mutations in the 6 relevant genes was a strong prognostic predictor (2-year PFS rates: 57.3%, 22.7%, and 0% for 0, 1, and ≥2 mutations, respectively) and independent of clinical factors and plasma DNA concentration. Using the number of ctDNA mutations, plasma DNA concentration, and clinical factors, we developed a prognostic index, classifying patients into 3 categories with 2-year PFS rates of 57.9%, 28.6%, and 0%. Serial analysis of ctDNA mutations in 94 cases revealed that TP53 and KRAS mutations frequently emerge after therapy. Thus, we clarify the genetic characteristics and clonal architecture of ctDNA mutations and demonstrate their superiority over BMPC mutations for prognostic prediction in RRMM. This study is a part of the C16042 study, which is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03433001., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Real-world studies permit inclusion of a more diverse patient population and provide more information on the effectiveness of treatments used in routine clinical practice. This prospective, multicenter, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) in 295 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in routine clinical practice in Japan. Patients had a median age of 74 years, 80.0% were aged ≥ 65 years, 42.0% had received ≥ 3 lines of prior treatment, and 28.5% were "frail" according to the International Myeloma Working Group frailty score. After a median follow-up of 25.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.3 (95% CI 12.4-19.5) months, while median overall survival was not reached. The overall response rate was 53.9%, and 31.5% of patients had a very good partial response or better. In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was better in patients with 1 versus 2 or ≥ 3 lines of prior treatment (29.0 vs 19.2 or 6.9 months) and paraprotein versus clinical relapse (16.0 vs 7.9 months), but median PFS was not notably affected by frailty score or age group. Dose adjustment was more frequent among patients aged > 75 years, especially early after IRd treatment initiation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in 84.4% of patients and 24.7% of patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs; no new safety concerns were found. These findings suggest that oral IRd triplet regimen is an effective and tolerable treatment option for RRMM patients in real-world settings outside of clinical trials.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03433001; Date of registration: 14 February 2018., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM), but few patients are eligible due to its high risk of treatment-related toxicity and relapse. Here, we report the feasibility and efficacy of allo-SCT after myeloablative conditioning with 8 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI) for reducing relapse of MM. We retrospectively analyzed data from 30 consecutive patients who received allo-SCT for MM after 8 Gy of TBI at Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between 2012 and 2021. Median age at allo-SCT was 47 (range 31-61) years. Stem-cell sources were peripheral blood from an HLA-matched related donor (MRD, n=5), bone marrow from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=5), bone marrow from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, n=13), and cord blood (n=7). All patients received conditioning with 8 Gy of TBI combined with Flu/Mel (n=28) or others (n=2). Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 36.7% and 46.2%, respectively. Sixteen patients died during the observation period (12 of primary disease and 4 of treatment-related toxicity). Patients with VGPR or better before allo-SCT had significantly better PFS (p=0.009) and OS (p=0.01) than others. Patients who received MMUD cells tended to have better PFS than those with other cell sources. Our report showed that allo-SCT for MM after 8 Gy of TBI is feasible, and the better PFS of MMUD suggests graft-versus-myeloma effects.

Bortezomib (Velcade), thalidomide, dexamethasone, platinum (cisplatin), adriamycin (doxorubicin), cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VTD-PACE) are commonly used as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, its outcomes in the era of monoclonal antibodies remain unclear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of 60 patients with RRMM (median four prior treatment lines) administered VTD-PACE. The median follow-up period was 11.1 months, during which they received a median of two cycles of VTD-PACE. The overall response rate (ORR) was 66.7%; ORRs of 53.1 and 82.1% were noted in patients with ≥ 4 and ≤ 3 prior lines (P = 0.027), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.8 months. Using the 3-month time point after VTD-PACE treatment as a landmark, 54 patients were still alive. Landmark analysis was conducted for PFS and OS of patients who received or did not receive HSCT or CART after VTD-PACE treatment. Patients who underwent subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) following VTD-PACE showed a trend of longer PFS and OS than those who did not undergo subsequent HSCT or CART. The median OS in patients with and without renal dysfunction was 10.7 months and 21.5 months, respectively (P = 0.0091). Therefore, VTD-PACE is useful as a bridging therapy for HSCT or CART, as a response can be expected regardless of organ damage, disease risk, or history of anti-CD38 antibody use., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) compared with Kd. A post-hoc analysis of East Asian patients in IKEMA evaluated the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd versus Kd in this population and was previously published., Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed MM who had received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 3:2 to receive Isa-Kd or Kd. The primary endpoint was PFS, and key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), complete response (CR) rate, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Of the IKEMA overall population, 46 patients were of East Asian descent. This is an updated analysis of the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd in East Asian patients, including data through 14 January 2022., Results: Isa-Kd continued to demonstrate improved efficacy and safety versus Kd in East Asian patients with relapsed MM, with improved PFS, rate of ≥VGPR, CR rate, and MRD negativity, that was consistent with the overall IKEMA population. The rate of Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events was also consistent with the prior analysis and overall IKEMA population., Conclusion: Based on the results of this analysis, Isa-Kd is a novel treatment option for East Asian patients with relapsed MM., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T-cell therapy, is effective in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We investigated cilta-cel in earlier treatment lines in patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease., Methods: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we assigned patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma to receive cilta-cel or the physician's choice of effective standard care. All the patients had received one to three previous lines of treatment. The primary outcome was progression-free survival., Results: A total of 419 patients underwent randomization (208 to receive cilta-cel and 211 to receive standard care). At a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range, 0.1 to 27.3), the median progression-free survival was not reached in the cilta-cel group and was 11.8 months in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.38; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 12 months was 75.9% (95% CI, 69.4 to 81.1) in the cilta-cel group and 48.6% (95% CI, 41.5 to 55.3) in the standard-care group. More patients in the cilta-cel group than in the standard-care group had an overall response (84.6% vs. 67.3%), a complete response or better (73.1% vs. 21.8%), and an absence of minimal residual disease (60.6% vs. 15.6%). Death from any cause was reported in 39 patients and 46 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2). Most patients reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment. Among the 176 patients who received cilta-cel in the as-treated population, 134 (76.1%) had cytokine release syndrome (grade 3 or 4, 1.1%; no grade 5), 8 (4.5%) had immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), 1 had movement and neurocognitive symptoms (grade 1), 16 (9.1%) had cranial nerve palsy (grade 2, 8.0%; grade 3, 1.1%), and 5 (2.8%) had CAR-T-related peripheral neuropathy (grade 1 or 2, 2.3%; grade 3, 0.6%)., Conclusions: A single cilta-cel infusion resulted in a lower risk of disease progression or death than standard care in lenalidomide-refractory patients with multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies. (Funded by Janssen and Legend Biotech; CARTITUDE-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04181827.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Isatuximab and daratumumab are anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies used to treat refractory multiple myeloma. Isatuximab is often used after unsuccessful daratumumab treatment; however, the clinical benefits of receiving isatuximab after daratumumab treatment have not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of 39 patients with multiple myeloma who were administered isatuximab after daratumumab. The median follow-up period was 8.7 months (range 0.1-25.0 months). The overall response rate was 46.2% (18 patients). The 1-year overall survival was 53.9%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.6 months. The median progression-free survival in patients with high and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was 4.5 and 9.6 months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival in patients with and without triple-class refractory disease was 5.1 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.001). The median overall survival in patients with high and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was not reached and 9.3 months, respectively (P = 0.001). The median overall survival in patients with and without triple-class refractory disease was 9.9 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.038). Our findings provide insight into the optimal use and timing of anti-CD38 antibody therapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In the phase 2 KarMMa trial, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) achieved deep and durable responses with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Here we report a sub-analysis of the Japanese cohort of KarMMa., Methods: Adult patients with RRMM who had received  ≥ 3 prior treatment regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 antibody, and had disease refractory to last treatment received ide-cel at a target dose of 450 × 10 6 CAR positive T cells., Results: Nine patients were treated with ide-cel. The overall response rate was 89% (median follow-up, 12.9 months). The best overall response was stringent complete response in 5 patients (56%), very good partial response in 3 (33%), and stable disease in 1. Median duration of response was not reached. All patients experienced grade ≤ 2 cytokine release syndrome and one patient experienced grade 2 neurotoxicity, but all resolved. Two patients died, one each from plasma cell myeloma and general health deterioration., Conclusion: Ide-cel yielded deep, durable responses with a tolerable and predictable safety profile in Japanese patients with RRMM. These results are similar to those of the non-Japanese population in KarMMa., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Multiple myeloma therapy has made remarkable progress with the advent of new drugs. We explored the treatment pattern and outcomes in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma using the Medical Data Vision database. Patients were categorized as per the initial diagnosis period (2003-2015 and 2016-2020), considering the adoption of these new agents and then based on stem cell transplantation. Overall, 6438 patient data were extracted as eligible for data analysis, and the median age at the index diagnosis date was 72.0 years. Bortezomib/dexamethasone was the most common regimen for induction therapy in patients requiring stem cell transplantation from 2003-2015, and the use of bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone increased from 2016-2020. Lenalidomide/dexamethasone was the most commonly used post-transplant therapy. In the non-stem cell transplantation group, bortezomib/dexamethasone was mainly used for both periods, while lenalidomide/dexamethasone was primarily used from 2016-2020. There was a trend toward shorter first-line treatment duration and a shift to additional treatment patterns with new drugs at the following lines. The time to inpatient death period suggested an improvement between the two periods. Thus, this study revealed that recent diversification of treatment options is preferred and contributes to improved outcomes in the clinical practice of multiple myeloma in Japan., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests. HH received consulting fees and honoraria from Janssen, Ono, and Takeda; grants from Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, and BMS. TI received consulting fees and honoraria from Ono, Takeda, BMS, Janssen, and Sanofi; research fundings support from Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, and BMS. SO has nothing to declare. AM is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. KK was an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K and is currently affiliated with Kite Japan Gilead Sciences, Tokyo, Japan, and have share in Gilead Science. SI is the current editor in Cancer Science journal and received consulting fees and honoraria from BMS, Janssen, Takeda, Ono, Sanofi, and Pfizer; research funding support from BMS, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Ono, AbbVie GK, GSK, Eli Lilly, Caelum Biosciences, Inc., Pfizer, Takeda, and Sanofi; grants from Chugai, Takeda, Ono, and Sanofi., (Copyright: © 2023 Handa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

A 36-year-old man developed polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome after conversion from solitary plasmacytoma of bone to multiple myeloma. Twenty-four days following the neurological onset, he lost his independent walking ability. The level of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) at diagnosis was 5,250 pg/mL. Three months after initiating treatment, he regained his independent walking ability in line with a reduction in the elevated serum VEGF level. Due to their genomic instability gained during conversion, myeloma cells may overproduce humoral factors and cytokines, possibly contributing to the development of neuropathy as well as the production of VEGF.

The IFM/DFCI group reported that VRD induction followed by up-front autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and maintenance therapy led to median PFS of 50 months, which established up-front ASCT as the standard of care even in the era of novel agents. We conducted a retrospective analysis on outcomes of patients who received triplet induction therapy followed by up-front ASCT at our institution. A total of 124 patients received ASCT between November 2016 and December 2021 at Japanese Red Cross Medical Center. Patient characteristics, treatment response before and after ASCT, and PFS and OS were retrospectively analyzed. VRD-based induction therapy was used for 94%. Among 118 evaluable patients, 116 (98%) received either consolidation and/or maintenance therapy. Best responses were ≥CR 77% and ≥VGPR 94%, respectively. Sixty-eight out of 104 patients achieved MRD-negativity by multiparameter FCM (<10 -5 ). Five-year estimated PFS and OS were 54.7% and 80.2%, respectively. Age ≥65, high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, and

Aims: This study estimated the "process utilities" of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Japan using the time trade-off (TTO) method. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy is available for patients with RRMM who are triple-class exposed (TCE) after treatment with immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. However, the impact of available treatment options on health state utilities has not been well characterized, particularly in relation to process utilities., Methods: Eight vignettes of health states and daily activity restrictions related to each of the following RRMM therapies were prepared: no treatment, CAR T cell therapy with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), regular intravenous infusion, and oral administration. A face-to-face survey of healthy Japanese adults who were representative of the general population was conducted. The TTO method was used to evaluate each vignette and to generate utility scores for each treatment regimen., Results: Three hundred and nineteen respondents participated in the survey (mean age: 44 years [range: 20-64]; female: 50%). Utility scores for no treatment, ide-cel, oral pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (Pd) therapy ranged from ∼0.7 to 0.8. Utility scores for regular intravenous infusion regimens ranged from 0.50 to 0.56. There was a difference of ∼0.2 between the utility scores for no treatment/ide-cel/oral administration and regular intravenous infusions., Conclusions: Differences in treatment administration across RRMM therapies showed a substantial impact on health state utilities. When quantifying the value of treatments, process utility gains should be considered as an independent factor in health technology assessments.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen have shown positive responses in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 2 portion of the CARTITUDE-1 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) included a cohort of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Following a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m 2 ) and fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 ), patients received a single cilta-cel infusion at a target dose of 0.75 × 10 6 (range, 0.5-1.0 × 10 6 CAR-positive viable T cells/kg). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; defined as partial response or better) by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A key secondary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (defined as VGPR, complete response, stringent complete response). This first analysis was performed at 6 months after the last patient received cilta-cel. Thirteen patients underwent apheresis, nine of whom received cilta-cel infusion. Eight patients who received cilta-cel at the target dose responded, yielding an ORR of 100%. Seven of eight (87.5%) patients achieved a VGPR or better. One additional patient who received a below-target dose of cilta-cel also achieved a best response of VGPR. MRD negativity (10 -5 threshold) was achieved in all six evaluable patients. Eight of nine (88.9%) patients who received cilta-cel infusion experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event, and eight (88.9%) patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2). No CAR-T cell neurotoxicity was reported. A positive benefit/risk profile for cilta-cel was established for heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory MM., (© 2022 Janssen Research and Development, LLC. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) can involve apheresis to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for later autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which can become costly over time. This retrospective claims database study examined healthcare resource use and medical costs associated with plerixafor, a selective CXCR4 inhibitor that mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells and minimizes apheresis times. Medical data were sampled from Japanese MM patients between April 2017 and September 2019, after the Japanese launch of plerixafor. The study population (190 plerixafor users and 180 non-users) was identified from the Medical Data Vision database, and further stratified into those using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in monotherapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide to trigger apheresis. A descriptive comparison of patient characteristics, healthcare resource use, and medical costs across the mobilization and ASCT phases indicated plerixafor is associated with higher average total medical costs. However, plerixafor-treated patients received fewer concomitant medications and spent less time in apheresis than non-users. A comparison of non-users with a similar analysis conducted pre-plerixafor launch (2013-2017) showed general improvements to treatment independent of plerixafor. The results of this research can inform guidelines for the role of plerixafor in balancing cost-effectiveness and drug efficacy in MM treatment., (© 2022. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

Background: Maintenance ± consolidation or continuous therapy is considered a standard of care for both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, long-term benefits of such therapy have not yet been clarified in the context of clinical practice., Purpose: To clarify the efficacy of maintenance/continuous approach, we retrospectively analyzed the cohort data of newly diagnosed MM patients by propensity-score matching based on age, gender, revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage, and implementation of transplantation to reduce the bias due to confounding variables., Findings: Among 720 patients, 161 were identified for each of the maintenance and no maintenance groups. Maintenance/continuous therapy employed immunomodulatory drugs (n = 83), proteasome inhibitors (n = 48), combination of both (n = 29), or dexamethasone alone (n = 1). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the maintenance group compared with the no maintenance group (median 37.7 and 21.9 months, p = 0.0002, respectively). Prolongation of PFS was observed in both transplanted and non-transplanted patients (p = 0.017 and p = 0.0008, respectively), with standard risk (p < 0.00001), R-ISS stage I (p = 0.037) and stage II (p = 0.00094), and those without obtaining complete response (p = 0.0018). There was no significant benefit in overall survival (OS), but it tended to be better in the maintenance group in non-transplanted patients. Regarding the treatment pattern, the substitution or addition of drugs different from the induction therapy and the combination with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors appeared to be more beneficial for PFS but not OS., Conclusion: These results support the benefit of current maintenance/continuous approach in routine clinical practice in the management of MM., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is still one of the most difficult hematological diseases. It is distinguished by recurrent relapses despite successful treatment. Proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory imide drugs, and monoclonal antibodies have all been developed in the last 10 years as treatment options for MM. However, obtaining a long-term treatment-free period for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains difficult. The most recent and intriguing research is on new BCMA-targeting therapies. CAR-T cell therapy, in particular, has shown promising results in the treatment for triple class refractory MM patients. BCMA CAR-T cell therapy is gaining attention as a potentially game-changing treatment for multiple myeloma. Fortunately, CAR-T cell therapy will be available in Japan in January 2022. However, numerous issues must be addressed. Many RRMM patients receive CAR-T cell therapy, for example, relapse, and progression-free survival are short. This section provides an overview of clinical study results for CAR-T cell therapy targeting BCMA, and the antibody-drug conjugate, bispecific antibodies, selinexor, and venetoclax.

Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with favorable outcomes. Although EuroFlow next-generation flow (NGF) is a global standard for MRD detection, its operating cost is high. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a less expensive method with equivalent sensitivity to that of EuroFlow-NGF. In this study, we compared the analytical ability of our BML 10-color multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) to that of EuroFlow-NGF. Bone marrow samples collected from 51 patients with MM were subjected to MRD detection using BML 10-color-MFC and EuroFlow-NGF. Our antibody panel consisted of CD38 multiepitope, CD138, CD45, CD56, CD19, CD27, CD81, CD117, cytoplasmic immunoglobulin (cIg) κ, and cIgλ in a single tube. The median percentages of total plasma cells, as per 10-color-MFC and EuroFlow-NGF, were 0.2148% and 0.2200%, respectively, with a good correlation between the methods (r = 0.950). The median percentages of myeloma cells determined via 10-color-MFC and EuroFlow-NGF were 0.0012% and 0.0007%, respectively, with a strong correlation (r = 0.954). Our 10-color-MFC demonstrated high sensitivity to detect MRD; the results showed a good correlation with those obtained using EuroFlow-NGF. Therefore, our cost-effective single-tube MFC (approximately 100 USD/sample) is a promising alternative method for the detection of MRD in patients with MM., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological malignancy. Despite the introduction of several novel drugs, most patients relapse. Biomarkers to identify the early signs of relapse will make it possible to adjust the therapeutic strategy before the disease worsens. Although understanding genetic changes is important for the treatment of MM, currently known biomarkers of relapse, including serum free-light chains and monoclonal paraproteins, are not associated with genetic changes., Methods: We therefore performed a multicenter study to examine the usefulness of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) present in the peripheral blood (PB) plasma of patients as a biomarker for MM relapse., Results: We identified several driver mutations by combined analysis of next-generation sequencing and existing databases of candidate oncogenes. Furthermore, relapse was detected more sensitively by monitoring the circulating cfDNA with these driver mutations than by conventional serum free-light chain examination., Conclusion: These results suggest the potential utility of cfDNA in the PB plasma of patients as a relevant early biomarker for MM relapse., (© 2021. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease. The acquisition of resistance to drugs, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), has a negative effect on its prognosis. Cereblon (CRBN) is a key mediator of the bioactivities of IMiDs such as lenalidomide. Moreover, genetic alteration of CRBN is frequently detected in IMiD-resistant patients and is considered to contribute to IMiD resistance. Thus, overcoming resistance to drugs, including IMiDs, is expected to improve clinical outcomes. Here, we examined potential mechanisms of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor and Akt inhibitor in relapsed/refractory MM patients., Methods: We established lenalidomide-resistant cells by knocking down CRBN with RNAi-mediated downregulation or knocking out CRBN using CRISPR-Cas9 in MM cells. Additionally, we derived multi-drug (bortezomib, doxorubicin, or dexamethasone)-resistant cell lines and primary cells from relapsed/refractory MM patients. The effects of HDAC and Akt inhibitors on these drug-resistant MM cells were then observed with a particular focus on whether HDAC inhibitors enhance immunotherapy efficacy. We also investigated the effect of lenalidomide on CRBN-deficient cells., Results: The HDAC inhibitor suppressed the growth of drug-resistant MM cell lines and enhanced the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of therapeutic antibodies by upregulating natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) ligands in MM cells. CRBN-deficient cells showed lenalidomide-induced upregulation of phosphorylated glycogen synthase kinase-3 (p-GSK-3) and c-Myc phosphorylation. Moreover, HDAC and Akt inhibitors downregulated c-Myc by blocking GSK-3 phosphorylation. HDAC and Akt inhibitors also exhibited synergistic cytotoxic and c-Myc-suppressive effects. The dual HDAC and PI3K inhibitor, CUDC-907, exhibited cytotoxic and immunotherapy-enhancing effects in MM cells, including multi-drug-resistant lines and primary cells from lenalidomide-resistant patients., Conclusions: The combination of an HDAC and an Akt inhibitor represents a promising approach for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM.

This study explored the burden associated with stem cell mobilization, with or without cyclophosphamide (CPA), in patients who intended to receive autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). A Japanese health care claims database (MDV) was used to analyze the health care resource utilization patterns and medical cost between 2013 and 2016 (pre-plerixafor launch). The patients were further categorized into groups who received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or G-CSF + CPA group and analyzed in both mobilization and ASCT phases of treatment. Overall, there were more MM patients who were treated with G-CSF + CPA combination therapy than G-CSF alone. Length-of-stay was 1.6 times longer in the combination group during the mobilization phase. A reverse trend was observed during the ASCT phase. Direct cost was approximately 1.2 million yen during the mobilization phase and 2.3 million yen during the ASCT phase, with hospitalization basic fee accounting for the highest proportion in both groups and phases. A substantial amount of healthcare resource and cost was consumed in both phases. This study may serve as a basic reference for further health technology assessment of new medicines such as plerixafor. Further investigation of differences between treatment groups is warranted.

These are the results of phase II study of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone (VMP) induction therapy followed by lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORRs), and safety. Eighty-three eligible patients were enrolled between October 2012 and August 2014. The median PFS was 28.0 months (95% CI 19.6-36.7) and the median OS was 55.3 months (95% CI 51.6-NA). Among the patients who received lenalidomide maintenance therapy, median PFS was significantly improved in patients who had achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better (41.8 vs 20.7 months, p = 0.0070). As the best response, the rates of partial response or better were 85.5% comprising stringent complete response (sCR, 21.7%), complete response (CR, 10.8%), VGPR (18.1%), and partial response (PR, 34.9%). The most frequently observed grade 3 or higher adverse events during the VMP therapy were anemia (28.9%), neutropenia (15.6%), thrombocytopenia (6.0%), and peripheral neuropathy (2.4%). The most frequently observed grade 3 or higher adverse events during the Rd therapy were anemia (3.5%), neutropenia (1.8%), and skin rush (5.3%). The most frequently observed grade 3 or higher adverse events during lenalidomide maintenance therapy were anemia (7.4%) and neutropenia (24.1%). Thus, VMP induction therapy followed by Rd consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance is considered a well-tolerated and effective regimen in transplant-ineligible NDMM. This trial is registered with UMIN-CTR with the identification number UMIN000009042.

Objectives: Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is a standard induction regimen for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, some patients discontinue VRd because of severe adverse events, despite its high efficacy. We aimed to study the efficacy of modified dose of VRd (VRd lite) in transplant-eligible patients with NDMM., Methods: Forty-eight transplant-eligible patients with NDMM were included. VRd lite was administered every 4 weeks. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, and dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally on the day of and the day after bortezomib administration. Lenalidomide was omitted on days 1, 8 and 15, which are the days of bortezomib administration., Results: The overall response rate (ORR) after four cycles of VRd lite was 83%, including a complete response of 25%. Thirty-eight among the 45 patients who completed at least four cycles of VRd lite received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ORR and very good partial response or better were upgraded to 100% and 74%, respectively, following ASCT., Conclusion: Our strategy consisting of VRd lite followed by ASCT is, thus, a highly effective and well-tolerated regimen resulting in durable responses in patients with NDMM., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Although multiple myeloma has been defined as incurable, and the treatment outcome has recently improved rapidly. Antibodies against multiple myeloma, elotuzumab, and daratumumab can safely enhance their effects even when added to the combination therapy of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulators that have been used till date. Initially, triplet therapy combining antibody therapy with doublet therapy was approved in Japan for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In 2019, daratumumab combination therapies were approved for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, and these therapies are the new standard of care. Recently, the results of clinical trials that added daratumumab to the triplet therapies of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and dexamethasone have been reported. These trials report greater therapeutic effects, with a significant improvement in the MRD negative rate. We hope that quadruplet therapy including these antibodies will be available in clinical practice, leading to further improvements in the treatment outcomes.

We report the final results from a multicenter, open-label phase I study of carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Twenty-six RRMM patients were enrolled and received a median of 4.0 prior regimens; 12/26 patients (46.2%) completed the planned 18 administration cycles (mean number of cycles: 14.5 ± 4.9). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous carfilzomib studies. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), but no new safety concerns were observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs (incidence: ≥ 10%) were lymphocyte count decreased (46.2%), platelet count decreased (42.3%), and neutrophil count decreased (34.6%). The overall response rate was 88.5% (23/26; 90% confidence interval: 72.8-96.8). Complete response (CR) or better was achieved by 30.8% of patients compared with 3.8% in the interim analysis. The median time to CR or better response was 9.4 months. Median progression-free survival and duration of response were 19.5 months and 20.3 months, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached. Long-term administration of carfilzomib produced deep response and long-term disease control. The combination of carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone was well tolerated and showed promising clinical efficacy for heavily pretreated RRMM patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered in the database clinicaltrials.jp (clinical trial registration number: Japic CTI 142677).

The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) is used as induction treatment in multiple myeloma; however, the optimum schedule for this regimen remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of twice-weekly VRD (twVRD) and modified VRD-lite in transplant-eligible myeloma patients. Fifty-five patients (median age 61 years) were included; 22 received twVRD (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11] and lenalidomide [25 mg/body on days 1-14] over 21-day cycles) and 33 received modified VRD-lite (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and lenalidomide [15 mg/body on days 2-7, 9-14, 16-21] over 28-day cycles). Overall response, very good partial response, and complete response rates after VRD were 96.4%, 45.5%, and 20.0%, respectively (median follow-up period, 17.7 months). The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 95.8% and 98.2%, respectively. The response rate and PFS were similar between the groups, regardless of cytogenetic risk and age. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 and thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 was higher in the twVRD group (27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003 and 27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003). In conclusion, modified VRD-lite had similar efficacy with, but better tolerability than, twVRD in transplant-eligible patients.

This multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 study evaluated single-agent carfilzomib in 50 heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (median of five prior treatments). In phase 1, patients were dosed at three levels: 15, 20, or 20/27 mg/m 2 . Maximum tolerated dosage was not reached at the tolerability evaluation. Patients in phase 2 were treated with 20/27 mg/m 2 carfilzomib. Median duration of exposure to carfilzomib in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group at this final analysis was 4.7 months (range: 0.3-39.4). Overall response rate in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group, primary endpoint of the study, was 22.5% (n = 9) (95% confidence interval, 12.3-37.5) with 2.5% (n = 1) stringent complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group were 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-13.6) and 22.9 months (95% CI, 14.1-not estimable), respectively. Frequently occurring grade ≥3 adverse events in the 20/27 mg/m 2 group included lymphopenia (72.5%), neutropenia (40.0%), and leukopenia (32.5%). Giving long-term carfilzomib monotherapy led to long-term overall survival for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients with a favorable safety profile. Carfilzomib monotherapy can be a good option for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

The prognosis of multiple myeloma was quite poor in the last century, but it has significantly improved with the incorporation of novel agents, immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors. Thalidomide was first developed as a sedative in 1950s, but it was withdrawn from the market because of teratogenicity. In 1990s, however, thalidomide received attention due to the discovery of its anticancer potential derived from antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory activities, and its therapeutic effect on myeloma. In 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of thalidomide under strict control for the treatment of multiple myeloma. After that, two new IMiDs, lenalidomide and pomalidomide, were developed for the sake of more antitumor activity and less adverse events than thalidomide. The molecular mechanism of action of IMiDs remained unclear for a long time until 2010 when the protein cereblon (CRBN) was identified as a primary direct target. IMiDs binds to CRBN and alters the substrate specificity of the CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, resulting in breakdown of intrinsic downstream proteins such as IKZF1 (Ikaros) and IKZF3 (Aiolos). There are many clinical trials of multiple myeloma using IMiDs under various conditions, and most of them show the efficacy of IMiDs. Nowadays lenalidomide plays a central role in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory settings, mainly in combination with other novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. This review presents an overview of recent advances in immunomodulatory drugs in the treatment of multiple myeloma., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Lenalidomide is an effective therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma (MM). However, its efficacy in the context of chromosomal abnormalities (CA) is poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM, who received lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Ld), in the context of CA. The median age and number of prior therapies were 69 and 2, respectively. Three, 11, 45, and 19 patients achieved complete response, very good partial response, partial response, and stable disease, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.1 and 38.8 months, respectively. Seventy-two patients were evaluated for frequently observed translocations; median PFS was 24.4 months in 20 patients with t(11;14), 13.0 months in 16 patients with t(4;14), and 3.7 months in seven patients with t(14;16). G-banded karyotype analysis detected 11 hypodiploid patients, who had shorter PFS and OS (2.5 and 6.2 months, respectively) compared to others (13.0 and 43.7 months, respectively). Hypodiploid patients showed poor clinical outcome, whereas patients with t(11;14) showed favorable outcome. In summary, the present study presents the clinical impact of chromosomal abnormalities on the outcome of Ld therapy, and contributes to understanding the appropriate choice of lenalidomide-based therapy to achieve effective treatment of RR MM.

Epigenetic alterations play an important role in the pathogenesis in multiple myeloma, but their biological and clinical relevance is not fully understood. Here, we show that DOT1L, which catalyzes methylation of histone H3 lysine 79, is required for myeloma cell survival. DOT1L expression levels were higher in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma than in normal plasma cells. Treatment with a DOT1L inhibitor induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in myeloma cells, and strongly suppressed cell proliferation in vitro The anti-myeloma effect of DOT1L inhibition was confirmed in a mouse xenograft model. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing and microarray analysis revealed that DOT1L inhibition downregulated histone H3 lysine 79 dimethylation and expression of IRF4-MYC signaling genes in myeloma cells. In addition, DOT1L inhibition upregulated genes associated with immune responses and interferon signaling. Myeloma cells with histone modifier mutations or lower IRF4/MYC expression were less sensitive to DOT1L inhibition, but with prolonged treatment, anti-proliferative effects were achieved in these cells. Our data suggest that DOT1L plays an essential role in the development of multiple myeloma and that DOT1L inhibition may provide new therapies for myeloma treatment., (Copyright© 2019 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Because multiple myeloma is rare in young people, there are fewer reports on the same. Thus, its clinical aspects and prognosis remain unelucidated. We retrospectively evaluated 30 patients with multiple myeloma aged ≤ 45 years at diagnosis. We divided them into three groups based on their cytogenetic risks: standard risk (SR), high risk (HR), and unknown risk. The frequency of HR patients was 36.6%, the highest of the three groups, unlike the previous report. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 35 months (SR vs. HR, 46 vs. 29 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) (SR vs. HR, NR vs. 82 months). The OS was significantly worse, and the PFS also appeared inferior in HR patients. The International Staging System score was not associated with OS. Thus, young patients with myeloma appeared to have a higher frequency of HR features, suggesting that instead of age, the cytogenetic risk was a significant prognostic factor.

Although elotuzumab (ELO) is associated with improved outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), no data are available for the usage of ELO following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Here, we report two cases of relapsed MM treated with ELO in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone (ELd) following allo-SCT. Case 1 had been treated with 11 lines of therapy followed by cord blood transplantation resulting in partial response. ELd was introduced 140 days post-transplantation and continued for eight cycles until disease progression. No worsening in graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was observed under ELd treatment. Case 2 had received unrelated bone marrow transplantation due to primary refractory disease after undergoing six regimens. Carfilzomib-based maintenance therapy had to be discontinued owing to severe myelosuppression. Subsequently, ELd treatment was initiated 544 days following the allo-SCT, which led to an improvement in serum paraprotein level and amelioration in GvHD. In both cases, immunosuppressants were tapered off. Several studies have shown exacerbation of GvHD under LEN monotherapy following allo-SCT. However, an ELd regimen may be one of the safer options for treating post-allo-SCT relapse.

The international staging system (ISS) is the most commonly used risk-stratification system for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is determined by serum albumin and β2-microglobulin levels. In the two determinants, β2-microglobulin levels are frequently observed to be elevated in patients with myeloma, particularly in those with renal impairment. In comparison with patients with intact immunoglobulin myeloma, patients with LC myeloma do not necessarily show decreased levels of serum albumin. The clinical impact of ISS in patients with LCMM, in particular the distinction between ISS I and II, may be complicated due to non-decreased levels of serum albumin in both stages. Accordingly, we have attempted to assess clinical relevance of the ISS in patients with LC myeloma. The clinical data of 1899 patients with MM diagnosed between January 2001 and December 2012 were collected from 38 affiliated hospitals of the Japanese Society of Myeloma. Significant difference was not found between stage I (n = 72) and stage II (n = 92) in LC myeloma patients (n = 307). The mean serum albumin concentration of patients with LC myeloma was within the reference range but higher than that of patients with IgG + IgA myeloma (n = 1501), which complicates the distinction between ISS stage I and II myeloma. Patients with LC myeloma had low frequencies of t(4; 14) and high frequency of elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and despite a relevant amount of missing data in our registry (R-ISS stage I; n = 11, stage II; n = 32, and stage III: n = 18), the information included in the R-ISS scoring system seems to be more accurate than ISS to obtain a reliable risk stratification approach in non-ISS stage III LC myeloma patients., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

In recent years, many antibody therapies for multiple myeloma have been developed. Antibodies against SLAMF7, CD38, B-cell maturation antigen and PD-1 have been developed and clinical trials are currently under way. As of July 2017, antibodies clinically available in Japan for the treatment of multiple myeloma are elotuzumab against SLAMF7 and daratumumab against CD38. Elotuzumab is a humanized IgG1-kappa monoclonal antibody targeting human SLAMF7. SLAMF7 is a cell surface glycoprotein receptor highly expressed on multiple myeloma cells, and it is also expressed on natural killer cells and is critical for natural killer function. Binding of elotuzumab to natural killer cells leads to activation of natural killer cells, resulting in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of elotuzumab-bound multiple myeloma cells, but not complement-dependent cytotoxicity. The result of a randomized phase III trial of elotuzumab+lenalidomide+dexamethasone (ELOQUENT-2) reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 30% vs lenalidomide+dexamethasone in relapse/refractory multiple myeloma. Daratumumab is a human anti-CD38 IgG1-kappa antibody. CD38 is expressed ubiquitously virtually in all tissues that are highly expressed on plasma cells and it represents an attractive target for immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies. In the phase III CASTOR trial, patients treated with daratumumab+bortezomib+dexamethasone had a better CR rate and progression-free survival rate compared with bortezomib+dexamethasone-treated patients (29% vs 10%, median progression-free survival: 16.7 vs 7.1 months, respectively). Moreover, in the phase III POLLUX trial, patients treated with daratumumab+lenalidomide+dexamethasone had a better response and progression-free survival (CRR or better: 55% vs 23%, 30-month progression-free survival: 58% vs 35%), compared with lenalidomide+dexamethasone-treated patients.

Therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma have dramatically changed in the last two decades, especially after the introduction of proteasome inhibitors. The first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2003. Since then, it has been a backbone therapy for not only relapsed or refractory myeloma patients but also newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Second-generation proteasome inhibitors, such as carfilzomib and ixazomib, have been approved, and three proteasome inhibitors were incorporated into several regimens with other cytotoxic agents, such as alkylating agents, immunomodulatory drugs and monoclonal antibodies. Because each proteasome inhibitor shows different properties with respect to adverse events, understanding and managing each adverse event of proteasome inhibitors are necessary for the continuation of therapy with minimal interruption of treatment. This review summarizes the recent advances in proteasome inhibitors used in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered a potentially curative therapy for patients with multiple myeloma, the role of allo-HSCT remains unclear in the novel agent era. We conducted a retrospective study of 65 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent allo-HSCT at 19 institutions from 2009 to 2016. Patients received a median of 3 (range, 1 to 7) lines of prior therapy, including at least 1 novel agent, except for autologous HSCT. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6% to 30.3%) and 47.2% (95% CI, 33.9% to 59.4%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, an age ≥50 years and less than a very good partial response (VGPR) before allo-HSCT were independent significant adverse factors for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30, P = .0063; HR, 2.86; P = .0059) and OS (HR, 2.37, P = .013; and HR, 2.74; P = .040). In contrast, the 3-year PFS and OS rates in patients <50 years of age who achieved a VGPR or better before allo-HSCT were 64.3% (95% CI, 29.8% to 85.1%) and 80.2% (95% CI, 40.3% to 94.8%), respectively. The overall response rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 75.0% to 94.0%). The proportion of VGPR or better increased from 29% before allo-HSCT to 71% after allo-HSCT. The nonrelapse mortality at 3 years was 23.4% (95% CI, 13.8% to 34.4%). Only an age ≥50 years was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (HR, 4.71; P = .015). We showed that allo-HSCT is feasible for heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, even in the novel agent era. Allo-HSCT in particular is a promising therapy for young and chemosensitive patients., (Copyright © 2018 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bortezomib (Btz) is an active agent used to treat multiple myeloma (MM). Not all patients who receive Btz-containing therapy show a favorable response. Interaction of cellular adhesion molecules with MM and bone marrow stromal cells is crucial for the survival of MM cells. However, little is known about the role of these molecules in the sensitivity of MM to Btz-containing therapy. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between the level of cellular adhesion molecules in MM cells and the efficacy of Btz plus dexamethasone (Bd) therapy. The expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule gene (NCAM, also known as CD56), ITGA4, CXCR4, and other genes were analyzed in 74 samples of primary MM cells collected from patients before they received Bd therapy. Of the eight genes tested, expression of NCAM was lower among patients who responded poorly to Bd therapy. In vitro expression of NCAM induced by transfection of MM cells enhanced their sensitivity to Btz treatment by causing accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins. Our results indicate that expression of NCAM is associated with better response to Btz treatment and is a promising candidate biomarker for predicting response to therapies involving Btz.

Objective The complication of systemic immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis in patients with monoclonal immunoglobulin affects the prognosis, but amyloid deposition in tissues is sometimes difficult to detect due to bleeding tendencies and preferential distributions. However, fibrinolysis is known to be exacerbated in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis specifically. We therefore explored new biomarkers for predicting a diagnosis of systemic AL amyloidosis focusing on coagulation and fibrinolysis markers. Methods We reviewed the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with serum monoclonal protein, including primary systemic AL amyloidosis and multiple myeloma (MM), treated at our hospital between January 2008 and December 2014. Results Among several biomarkers, only the serum level of plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC) in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (n=26) at the diagnosis was significantly higher than in patients with MM without AL amyloidosis (n=26) (mean±standard deviation, 3.69±2.82 μg/mL vs. 1.23±0.97 μg/mL, p<0.01). The cut-off for predicting a diagnosis of systemic AL amyloidosis in patients with serum monoclonal protein was 1.72 μg/mL with 84.6% sensitivity and 80.8% specificity. Hepatic involvement resulted in a significantly higher PIC level than no involvement in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. The serum PIC level was also associated with the hematological response of systemic AL amyloidosis. Conclusion PIC is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis and management of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis.