Search

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel CT post-processing software that generates subtraction maps of baseline and follow-up CT examinations in the course of myeloma bone lesions., Materials and Methods: This study included 61 consecutive myeloma patients who underwent repeated whole-body reduced-dose MDCT at our institution between November 2013 and June 2015. CT subtraction maps classified a progressive disease (PD) vs. stable disease (SD)/remission. Bone subtraction maps (BSMs) only and in combination with 1-mm (BSM+) source images were compared with 5-mm axial/MPR scans., Results: Haematological response categories at follow-up were: complete remission (n = 9), very good partial remission (n = 2), partial remission (n = 17) and SDh (n = 19) vs. PDh (n = 14). Five-millimetre CT scan yielded PD (n = 14) and SD/remission (n = 47) whereas bone subtraction + 1-mm axial scans (BSM+) reading resulted in PD (n = 18) and SD/remission (n = 43). Sensitivity/ specificity/accuracy for 5-mm/1-mm/BSM(alone)/BSM + in "lesion-by-lesion" reading was 89.4 %/98.9 %/98.3 %/ 99.5 %; 69.1 %/96.9 %/72 %/92.1 % and 83.8 %/98.4 %/92.1 %/98.3 %, respectively. The use of BSM+ resulted in a change of response classification in 9.8 % patients (n = 6) from SD to PD., Conclusion: BSM reading is more accurate for monitoring myeloma compared to axial scans whereas BSM+ yields similar results with 1-mm reading (gold standard) but by significantly reduced reading time., Key Points: • CT evaluation of myeloma bone disease using a longitudinal bone subtraction post-processing algorithm. • Bone subtraction post-processing algorithm is more accurate for assessment of therapy. • Bone subtraction allowed improved and more efficient detection of myeloma bone lesions. • Post-processing tool demonstrating a change in response classification in 9.8 % patients (all showing PD). • Reading time could be substantially shortened as compared to regular CT assessment.

Introduction: The aim if this study is to find out if contrast between gray (GM) and white matter (WM) on non-enhanced brain CT (NECT) can be enhanced by using a frequency selective non-linear blending., Methods: Thirty consecutive patients (40 % female; mean age 67.73 ± 12.71 years), who underwent NECT of the brain, were retrospectively included in this study. Brain scan readings were performed by two radiologists independently, for NECT and subsequently the images were read using a new frequency selective non-linear blending algorithm (best contrast, BC). Optimal settings of BC for enhanced delineation of anatomical structures were set at an averaged center of 30 HU, averaged delta of 5 HU, and a slope of 5. For contrast-to-noise ratio calculation (CNR), gray and white matter attenuation values were measured for both NECT and BC in different anatomical structures., Results: CNR increase in the gray matter was 5.91 ± 2.45 for the cortical gray matter and 4.41 ± 1.82 for the basal ganglia. The contrast ratio between cortical gray and white matter was 1.87 and 1.7 (basal ganglia/WM) for BC quantification vs. 1.43 (cortex/WM) and 1.33 (basal ganglia/WM) for standard NECT (both p < 0.0001). Improved CNR did not depend on the anatomical structures measured., Conclusion: Frequency selective non-linear blending allows better discrimination between WM and GM and therefore may enhance diagnostic accuracy of NECT.

Rationale of this study was to evaluate whether unfolded rib images enhance time efficiency in detection of rib fractures and time efficiency in patients with acute thoracic trauma. 51 subsequent patients with thoracic trauma underwent 64-slice computed tomography. 1mm thick axial slices were reformatted using a commercially available post-processing software application generating rotatable unfolded rib images. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by 3 readers and compared to multiplanar reformations of the original CT images. Reformation and evaluation times were recorded. 116 rib fractures were detected. The multiplanar reformation analysis yielded a sensitivity of 87.9%/93.9%/79.7% with a specificity of 97%/97%/82.2%, whilst the unfolded rib image analysis yielded a sensitivity of 94.8%/94.8%/92.2% and a specificity of 85.2/87.8%/82.4 (p=0.06/0.8/0.04) with high inter-observer agreement (k=0.79-0.85). The mean reading time for the multiplanar reformations was significantly longer (reader 1: 103.7 ± 27.1s/reader 2: 81.8 ± 40.6s/reader 3: 154.3 ± 39.2s) than the evaluation of the unfolded rib images (19.4 ± 4.9s/26.9 ± 15.0s/49.9 ± 18.7s; p<0.01). Concluding, the unfolded rib display reduces reading time for detection of rib fractures in acute thoracic trauma patients significantly and does not compromise the diagnostic accuracy significantly in experienced radiologists. However, unexperienced readers may profit from use of this display. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]