Search

Purpose: Oral ulcerative mucositis (UM) and gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) have been associated with increased likelihood of systemic infection (bacteremia and sepsis) in patients being treated for hematological malignancies. To better define and contrast differences between UM and GIM, we utilized the United States 2017 National Inpatient Sample and analyzed patients hospitalized for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) or leukemia., Methods: We utilized generalized linear models to assess the association between adverse events-UM and GIM-among hospitalized MM or leukemia patients and the outcome of febrile neutropenia (FN), septicemia, burden of illness, and mortality., Results: Of 71,780 hospitalized leukemia patients, 1255 had UM and 100 GIM. Of 113,915 MM patients, 1065 manifested UM and 230 had GIM. In an adjusted analysis, UM was significantly associated with increased risk of FN in both the leukemia (aOR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.09-3.92) and MM cohorts (aOR = 4.96, 95% CI = 3.22-7.66). Contrastingly, UM had no effect on the risk of septicemia in either group. Likewise, GIM significantly increased the odds of FN in both leukemia (aOR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.35-5.88) and MM (aOR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.51-9.31) patients. Similar findings were noted when we restricted our analysis to recipients of high-dose condition regimens in preparation for hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. UM and GIM were consistently associated with higher burden of illness in all the cohorts., Conclusion: This first use of big data provided an effective platform to assess the risks, outcomes, and cost of care of cancer treatment-related toxicities in patients hospitalized for the management of hematologic malignancies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Patients with haematological malignancies frequently endure neutropenia and gastrointestinal (GI)-mucositis after high-dose chemotherapy. In these patients, ciprofloxacin is used for Gram-negative infection prophylaxis., Objectives: We investigate ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics after oral administration in patients with haematological malignancies and explore the impact of GI-mucositis on oral bioavailability and clearance in order to assure adequate systemic exposure., Methods: Adult haematological patients from two Dutch University Medical Centres received 500 mg twice daily oral ciprofloxacin for Gram-negative prophylaxis. The ciprofloxacin plasma concentrations were collected at various timepoints after oral ciprofloxacin administration and at various days after completion of chemotherapy. Data obtained after oral and intravenous ciprofloxacin administration in 28 healthy volunteers without mucositis served as a control group (391 samples). For haematological patients the degree of GI-mucositis was assessed using the Daily Gut Score (DGS), plasma citrulline and albumin. Data were analysed by non-linear mixed-effects modelling., Results: In total, 250 blood samples were collected in 47 patients with a wide variety of haematological malignancies between 0-30 days after start of chemotherapy. Mucositis was generally mild [DGS median (IQR) 1 (1-1) and citrulline 16 μmol/L (12-23)]. The time to Cmax was slower in haematological patients compared with healthy volunteers although no association with the degree of mucositis (defined as DGS or citrulline) could be identified. Ciprofloxacin bioavailability and clearance were 60% and 33.2 L/h, respectively., Conclusions: This study supports oral dosing of ciprofloxacin as Gram-negative infection prophylaxis in haematological patients with mild-to-moderate mucositis capable of oral intake., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Earlier studies have suggested that severe intestinal mucositis (IM; citrulline < 10 µmol/L) is an independent risk factor for bloodstream infections (BSI) after cytotoxic therapy. Our aim was to grade IM in patients receiving commonly used chemotherapy and conditioning regimens, and characterize its relationship with BSI incidence. In a retrospective analysis of remission induction (RI) chemotherapy, or conditioning for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; myeloablative conditioning [MAC] and non-myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning [NMA/RIC]), data were collected on central venous catheter (CVC) characteristics and BSI. The relationship between BSI occurrence and the degree of IM (determined by citrulline levels) and neutropenia was analyzed. In 626 CVC episodes, 268 (42.8%) laboratory-confirmed BSIs (LCBIs) occurred, classified as mucosal barrier injury (MBI)-LCBIs in 179 (28.6%) episodes, central line-associated BSIs in 113 (18.1%) episodes, and catheter-related BSIs in 55 (8.8%) episodes. In NMA/RIC, the mean duration of hypocitrullinemia was 0.77 days, with LCBI and MBI-LCBI occurring in 11.1% and 4.8% of episodes. In autologous HSCT, RI, and MAC allogeneic HSCT, LCBI and MBI-LCBI occurred frequently (40.0-63.8% and 22.8-53.2% of episodes, respectively) and the mean duration of hypocitrullinemia was significantly higher (9.2-13.8 days). There was a strong correlation between LCBI and the duration of hypocitrullinemia (Pearson's correlation coefficient R = 0.96), as opposed to the relationship between LCBI and the duration of neutropenia (R = 0.42). We conclude that citrulline can be used to grade BSI risk for commonly used intensive treatment regimens., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose: Despite advances in personalizing the efficacy of cancer therapy, our ability to identify patients at risk of severe treatment side effects and provide individualized supportive care is limited. This is particularly the case for mucositis (oral and gastrointestinal), with no comprehensive risk evaluation strategies to identify high-risk patients. We, the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Mucositis Study Group, therefore aimed to systematically review current evidence on that factors that influence mucositis risk to provide a foundation upon which future risk prediction studies can be based., Methods: We identified 11,018 papers from PubMed and Web of Science, with 197 records extracted for full review and 113 meeting final eligibility criteria. Data were then synthesized into tables to highlight the level of evidence for each risk predictor., Results: The strongest level of evidence supported dosimetric parameters as key predictors of mucositis risk. Genetic variants in drug-metabolizing pathways, immune signaling, and cell injury/repair mechanisms were also identified to impact mucositis risk. Factors relating to the individual were variably linked to mucositis outcomes, although female sex and smoking status showed some association with mucositis risk., Conclusion: Mucositis risk reflects the complex interplay between the host, tumor microenvironment, and treatment specifications, yet the large majority of studies rely on hypothesis-driven, single-candidate approaches. For significant advances in the provision of personalized supportive care, coordinated research efforts with robust multiplexed approaches are strongly advised.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of agents for the prevention and/or treatment of gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM)., Methods: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: Recommendation, Suggestion, and No Guideline Possible., Results: A total of 78 papers across 13 interventions were examined of which 25 were included in the final review. No new guidelines were possible for any agent due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence. Existing guidelines for probiotics and hyperbaric oxygen were unchanged., Conclusions: Of the agents studied for the prevention and treatment of GIM, the evidence continues to support use of probiotics containing Lactobacillus spp. for prevention of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with pelvic malignancy, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat radiation-induced proctitis. Additional well-designed research is encouraged to enable a decision regarding palifermin, glutamine, sodium butyrate, and dietary interventions, for the prevention or treatment of GIM.

Gastrointestinal mucositis is a complex inflammatory reaction of the mucous membranes, a side effect of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Currently, assessment scales are used to diagnose mucositis. However, a biomarker which would determine whether there is mucositis and thereby establish the severity objectively would be very useful. This will give the opportunity to evaluate studies, to determine risk factors and incidence, and it will make it possible to compare studies. Moreover, this biomarker might improve clinical management for patients. In this paper, we reviewed studies concerning potential biomarkers in blood samples and fecal samples, and potential tests in breath samples and urine samples. We include biomarkers and tests studied in animal models and/or in clinical trials, and discuss the validity, diagnostic accuracy, and applicability.

Background: In the 1960s, it was reported that infectious complications were the main cause of fever during neutropenia that followed hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). More recently, mucositis has become recognized as an important determinant of the inflammatory response and infectious complications., Methods: The objective of this prospective study was to determine the impact of intestinal mucositis, as measured by plasma citrulline, and neutropenia on the systemic inflammatory response (C-reactive protein) and the occurrence of bacteremia among 2 cohorts of HSCT recipients: 1 composed of 18 patients who had been treated with a myeloablative (MA) regimen (high-dose melphalan) and the other involving 19 patients who had received the non-myeloablative (NMA) regimen (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide). Blood cultures were obtained for surveillance from admission onwards as well as at the onset of fever., Results: The MA regimen induced severe intestinal mucositis manifest by citrullinemia <10 μmol/L, which was accompanied by an inflammatory response, and bacteremia affected 8 (44%) of 18 patients and coincided with the nadir of citrullinemia. By contrast, those who had been treated with the NMA regimen did not develop severe intestinal mucositis, had a moderate inflammatory response, and only 2 (11%) of the 19 patients developed bacteremia. However, both groups experienced profound neutropenia and its duration was significantly longer for those receiving the NMA regimen., Conclusion: This study suggests that severe intestinal mucositis, i.e., citrullinemia <10 μmol/L, defines the period of risk of bacteremia better than does neutropenia, and that measuring plasma citrulline may prove useful in deciding who needs empirical antimicrobial therapy and when., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The matched-control study failed to show a clinical relevant impact of palifermin on intestinal mucositis, although there was a reduced inflammatory response and less febrile neutropenia among patients who had no bacteraemia.

Background: Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the biological basis for cancer therapy-induced mucosal barrier injury (mucositis). The last formal review of the subject by MASCC/ISOO was published in 2007; consequently, an update is timely., Methods: Panel members reviewed the biomedical literature on mucositis pathobiology published between January 2005 and December 2011., Results: Recent research has provided data on the contribution of tissue structure changes, inflammation and microbiome changes to the development of mucositis. Additional research has focused on targeted therapy-induced toxicity, toxicity clustering and the investigation of genetic polymorphisms in toxicity prediction. This review paper summarizes the recent evidence on these aspects of mucositis pathobiology., Conclusion: The ultimate goal of mucositis researchers is to identify the most appropriate targets for therapeutic interventions and to be able to predict toxicity risk and personalize interventions to genetically suitable patients. Continuing research efforts are needed to further our understanding of mucositis pathobiology and the pharmacogenomics of toxicity.

Gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis is a common side effect of intense chemotherapy to prepare patients for hematopoietic SCT. Measuring intestinal damage objectively remains difficult, and clinicians often rely on albumin levels as an indicator of GI mucositis, but citrulline might be a more specific marker, which has in the past been shown to correlate with clinical signs of GI mucositis. We evaluated the courses of albumin and citrulline following different conditioning regimens for SCT and studied their relatedness to the subsequent inflammatory response using C-reactive protein. Patterns of albumin and citrulline differed significantly between myeloablative and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens. After myeloablative regimens, decreasing citrulline levels preceded the occurrence of inflammation unlike albumin levels, which decreased thereafter. Albumin levels were greatly influenced by inflammation, confirming it to be a 'negative acute-phase protein', whereas citrulline levels were not. Citrulline appeared to be a better biomarker of GI mucositis than albumin. Measuring citrulline might prove useful in clinical decision making, in identifying GI mucositis, and it would also be of interest to see how it compares with other biomarkers in the setting of acute GI GVHD.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to review the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of agents for the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal mucositis., Methods: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, and no guideline possible., Results: A total of 251 clinical studies across 29 interventions were examined. Panel members were able to make one new evidence-based negative recommendation; two new evidence-based suggestions, and one evidence-based change from previous guidelines. Firstly, the panel recommends against the use of misoprostol suppositories for the prevention of acute radiation-induced proctitis. Secondly, the panel suggests probiotic treatment containing Lactobacillus spp., may be beneficial for prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with malignancies of the pelvic region. Thirdly, the panel suggests the use of hyperbaric oxygen as an effective means in treating radiation-induced proctitis. Finally, new evidence has emerged which is in conflict with our previous guideline surrounding the use of systemic glutamine, meaning that the panel is unable to form a guideline. No guideline was possible for any other agent, due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence., Conclusions: This updated review of the literature has allowed new recommendations and suggestions for clinical practice to be reached. This highlights the importance of regular updates.

Introduction: Oral mucositis is recognised as one of the most debilitating complications of high-dose cytostatic chemotherapy used to prepare for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but very little is known about oesophageal mucositis, as endoscopy is not routinely performed., Materials and Methods: We incorporate the computed tomography (CT) scan in the diagnostic workup of fever during neutropenia to detect evidence of pulmonary complications. This allowed us to evaluate whether mucosal barrier injury to the oesophagus can be determined. We selected 46 patients without oesophageal cancer or immune suppression (controls), who had a normal oesophagus, and measured the mucosal thickness at the upper part (UP), middle part (MP) and lower part (LP) of the oesophagus. Next, we selected 30 patients having a CT scan done for diagnostic purposes within 14 days after HSCT and measured mucosal thickness at the same levels. We also scored oral mucositis and gut toxicity., Results: The mucosal thickness of the UP, MP and LP, respectively, for the controls (mean +/- SD) was 4.1 mm (+/-1.1), 4.2 mm (+/-1.2) and 4.8 mm (+/-1.3), and the corresponding values for the subjects were 5.9 mm (+/-2.2), 5.9 mm (+/-2.0) and 7.7 mm (+/-3.0). Analysis of variance showed statistically significant differences between subjects and controls at all oesophageal levels. All patients suffered from severe oral mucositis at the time., Conclusion: Hence, mucosal barrier injury to the oesophagus can be objectively measured using CT scan.

Oral and intestinal mucositis are among the most significant dose-limiting toxic effects of intensive cancer treatment and are associated with adverse clinical and economic outcomes. Palifermin (Kepivancetrade mark), an N-truncated recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor-1, is the first agent to be approved for prevention of oral mucositis. Keratinocyte growth factor, a potent epithelial mitogen, appears to play a major role in the healing process. Palifermin has multiple biological activities that appear to protect the mucosal epithelium and promote its early regeneration after irradiation- and chemotherapy-induced injury. These include inhibition of epithelial cell apoptosis and DNA damage, up-regulation of detoxifying enzymes and down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as enhanced migration, proliferation and differentiation of epithelial cells. Palifermin reduces the incidence, severity and duration of oral mucositis in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing myelotoxic conditioning therapy and haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clinical sequelae, including febrile neutropenia and resource use (opioid analgesia and parenteral feeding), are concomitantly reduced. Other potential applications being explored include use in the solid tumour setting, reduction of intestinal mucositis and reduction of GVHD in allogenic transplantation. Thus, the development of palifermin and other potential new agents for preventing chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced mucositis represents an important breakthrough in oncological supportive care.

Oral mucositis (OM) has substantial negative clinical, quality-of-life, and economic consequences for patients with haematologic malignancies who require myeloablative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Uniform training in OM assessment is infrequent in clinical practice, so the true incidence and duration of OM are unknown. Nurses and physicians from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation recently undertook an audit of 214 patients (197 evaluable patients) treated at 25 centres, the Prospective Oral Mucositis Audit (POMA), to determine the incidence, severity, and duration of OM. To standardise the assessment of OM severity, the World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Toxicity Scale was used across centres. This article focuses on the quality control analyses that were conducted to ensure that OM was accurately assessed across all 25 centres. Twenty-two trainers, who received comprehensive training about POMA study design, pathobiology of OM, and endpoint assessment, educated staff at the 25 transplantation centres about OM assessment. The trained staff collected data by completing daily worksheets for each patient. Three quality control analyses, of 82, 1949, and 4111 worksheets respectively, showed a nurse assessment accuracy rate of 74%, 90%, and 90%. The most common errors were in assigning WHO grade 0 or 1. This analysis shows that training of nursing staff had a positive effect on assessment of OM severity, which should ultimately lead to improvement in the quality of supportive care.

Background: Patients with haematological malignancies frequently endure neutropenia and gastrointestinal (GI)-mucositis after high-dose chemotherapy. In these patients, ciprofloxacin is used for Gram-negative infection prophylaxis.Objectives: We investigate ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics after oral administration in patients with haematological malignancies and explore the impact of GI-mucositis on oral bioavailability and clearance in order to assure adequate systemic exposure.Methods: Adult haematological patients from two Dutch University Medical Centres received 500 mg twice daily oral ciprofloxacin for Gram-negative prophylaxis. The ciprofloxacin plasma concentrations were collected at various timepoints after oral ciprofloxacin administration and at various days after completion of chemotherapy. Data obtained after oral and intravenous ciprofloxacin administration in 28 healthy volunteers without mucositis served as a control group (391 samples). For haematological patients the degree of GI-mucositis was assessed using the Daily Gut Score (DGS), plasma citrulline and albumin. Data were analysed by non-linear mixed-effects modelling.Results: In total, 250 blood samples were collected in 47 patients with a wide variety of haematological malignancies between 0-30 days after start of chemotherapy. Mucositis was generally mild [DGS median (IQR) 1 (1-1) and citrulline 16 μmol/L (12-23)]. The time to Cmax was slower in haematological patients compared with healthy volunteers although no association with the degree of mucositis (defined as DGS or citrulline) could be identified. Ciprofloxacin bioavailability and clearance were 60% and 33.2 L/h, respectively.Conclusions: This study supports oral dosing of ciprofloxacin as Gram-negative infection prophylaxis in haematological patients with mild-to-moderate mucositis capable of oral intake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human lactoferrin is a natural defense protein belonging to the innate immune system present in several body fluids and secretions, as well as in the secondary granules of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Lactoferrin and its derivatives have pleiotropic functions including broad-spectrum anti-microbial activity, anti-tumor activity, regulation of cell growth and differentiation, and modulation of inflammatory as well as humoral and cellular immune responses. This is the reason why much research has addressed the potential therapeutic activity of these molecules in different clinical settings, especially regarding infectious diseases and uncontrolled inflammatory conditions. In patients with hematological malignancies treated with a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), morbidity and mortality due to infections and uncontrolled inflammation remains high, despite many advances in supportive care. These life-threatening complications are a result of the damage caused by the conditioning regimens to the mucosal barrier, and the innate and adaptive, humoral, and cellular immune defenses. These complications necessitate the continued exploration of new treatment modalities. Systemic and probably local levels of lactoferrin are decreased following HSCT. Therefore, the use of lactoferrin, or short peptide derivatives that retain the cationic N-terminal moiety that is essential for the anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory activity, may prove to be a promising versatile class of agents for managing the complications that arise from HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about lymphocyte subsets by R. Schmidmaier and colleagues in the June 24, 2011 issue.

Background: Currently, objective tests are lacking that enable the extent and duration of intestinal mucosal damage induced by myeloablative chemotherapy to be determined. To address this problem, we explored a citrulline-based assessment score as this amino acid is a simple quantitative marker of intestinal failure. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]