Search

Objective: To evaluate stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for presurgical functional mapping of human motor cortex., Methods: Transcranial magnetic stimulation using a frameless stereotactic system was performed in two patients with tumors near the central sulcus. TMS motor function maps were plotted on the patients' three-dimensional volumetric magnetic resonance imaging data and compared with direct electrical cortical stimulation at surgery with the patient under local anesthesia., Results: Stereotactic TMS was well tolerated by both patients and was consistent with known somatotopic representation of human motor cortex. The results demonstrated a good correlation between the TMS and electrical cortical stimulation maps, with all TMS responses eliciting more than 75% of the maximum motor evoked potential falling within 1 cm of the electrical cortical stimulation site., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that stereotactic TMS is feasible and can provide accurate noninvasive localization of cortical motor function. It may prove to be a useful method for presurgical planning.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) represent different approaches to mapping the motor cortex. fMRI identifies areas of hemodynamic changes during task performance while TMS provides electrophysiologic data concerning the localization and density of cortical motoneurons. Here we define the spatial correlation between fMRI and TMS maps and compared them with direct electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). We performed fMRI at 1.5 T on 3 normal subjects and 2 patients with mass lesions near the central sulcus using a multislice, asymmetric, spin-echo, echo-planar pulse sequence during the performance of a motor task. We also performed focal TMS with surface EMG recordings from the muscles primarily involved in the fMRI task. We coregistered the stimulation sites in real time with the fMRI maps using a frameless stereotactic system. In both patients we also performed ECS of the cortex during surgery under local anesthesia. fMRI maps were validated by the electrophysiologic data both pre- and intraoperatively. Our results suggest that regions of fMRI activation correspond spatially to areas of highest motoneuron density as demonstrated by electrophysiologic techniques.

We used transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans to investigate the effect of focal unilateral stimulation of the motor cortex on the function of the contralateral motor cortex. Surface-recorded, rectified, averaged electromyography (EMG) showed relative silent periods in small hand muscles at 35-64 and 123-158 ms following ipsilateral cortical stimulation over the hand area. The first inhibitory phase started 11 ms after the minimum corticospinal conduction time from the contralateral cortex, appropriate for transcallosal conduction. Foot muscles (with focal stimulation over the ipsilateral hand area) also showed silent periods at 61-104 ms, indicating a marked spread of the inhibitory effect throughout the opposite motor cortex. H-reflex studies in the upper limb showed that this inhibitory effect was not mediated at the level of the alpha motoneuron. Single motor unit peristimulus time histogram studies in upper limb muscles showed inhibition similar to that seen in the surface recordings and no evidence of excitation following ipsilateral motor cortex stimulation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation performed with large circular coils centered at the vertex activates both excitatory and inhibitory processes bilaterally so that focal unilateral stimulation is preferable in detailed studies of motor system physiology.

History, methodology and description of recording motor action potentials elicited by magnetic stimulation of the cortex through the skull. Summary of clinical results published in the literature and those carried out by the author.

We studied the effect of stimulus intensity, coil size, mental alertness and prestimulus muscle contraction on the variability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by magnetic cortical stimulation (MCS). In 5 healthy subjects we delivered MCS either with a circular coil centered at the vertex or a figure-8 coil centered over the motor cortex hand area, recording from first dorsal interosseous. With the subject at rest or exerting 5% maximum voluntary contraction, 30 consecutive stimuli were given at 4 stimulus intensities (SIs) in 10% increments above resting motor threshold. Concurrent mental arithmetic constituted mental alertness. Spectral analysis was performed on data from 300 consecutive stimuli. The variability of MEP response size was inversely related to stimulus intensity, prestimulus voluntary muscle contraction, the recruitment of motoneurons and the size of the field generated by the magnetic coil. The MEP variability was larger than and not correlated with the variability of the H-reflex. Fast Fourier transformation and cross-correlation analysis did not identify a consistent dominant frequency, suggesting that the variability in MEP size is essentially random. We suggest that the variability in MEP response is caused by constant, rapid, spontaneous fluctuations in corticospinal and segmental motoneuron excitability levels. Any maneuver that raises this level or increases the probability of motoneuron firing will decrease MEP variability.

We investigated the electromyographic silent period in abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. In APB, we measured cortical stimulation silent period (CSSP) duration as a function of stimulus intensity, motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and muscle twitch force. We used peri-stimulus-time histograms to study the effect of cortical stimulation on single-motor unit firing patterns. We compared F-waves, H-reflexes and magnetic MEPs elicited during the CSSP to control responses elicited at rest and during voluntary contraction. CSSP duration depended on the intensity of cortical stimulation. However, we found no relationship between CSSP duration and MEP amplitude or muscle twitch force, thus the CSSP is not dependent solely on Renshaw cell inhibition or on changes in Ia and Ib afferent activity following the cortically induced muscle twitch. At low intensities of stimulation, the interval to resumption of motor unit firing following the peak in the peri-stimulus-time histogram corresponding to MEP latency sometimes exceeded that which could be accounted for by the motor unit's firing rate prior to the stimulus, suggesting that synchronization of motor unit firing by cortical stimulation cannot account for the CSSP. We found brief inhibition of F-waves during the CSSP in some subjects, reflecting activation of inhibitory corticospinal projections or segmental effects. In contrast, we observed longer inhibition of H-reflexes during the CSSP in all subjects, perhaps resulting from presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents. Magnetic MEPs also were inhibited during the CSSP, suggesting inhibition of cortical elements by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

A brief monophasic pulse through an electromagnetic coil preferentially activates motor pathways of each hemisphere, depending on the direction of coil current flow. Using the preferred direction for each hemisphere, the minimum stimulus intensity (threshold) that evoked compound muscle action potentials in the contralateral abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle was significantly less for the left hemisphere than the right. Threshold for biceps on each side was significantly higher than ADM, but there was no side-to-side difference. Assessing handedness using a standard handedness index, those who had less tendency to use the right hand for everyday tasks had greater differences between hemispheres for ADM thresholds. The lower threshold of the left-hemisphere projection to hand muscles is probably related to the asymmetry of corticomotoneuronal monosynaptic connections; a greater number project to the motor neuron pool of the right- than left-hand muscles.

Voluntary contraction of a muscle greatly increases the amplitude and decreases the latency of the motor potentials evoked by electromagnetic coil brain stimulation (facilitation). Facilitation has also been observed with contraction of a nearby ipsilateral and a contralateral homologous muscle. We studied these facilitatory relationships in 5 normal subjects in small hand, forearm and upper arm muscles using surface-recorded compound motor action potentials, single motor unit recordings, and post-stimulus time histograms. There was no evidence for spread of facilitation between any pair of muscles if the muscle from which motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded was completely at rest during brain stimulation, although this sometimes required training to accomplish or could not be achieved. Thus, although spread of facilitation has been observed by others under these conditions, we did not find this effect. There may be significant interindividual variations in the degree of facilitatory spread.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex can evoke motor responses in small hand muscles. This response can be facilitated by a background muscle contraction of the target muscle, resulting in an enhanced compound muscle action potential (CMAP) with a shorter onset latency. A number of intracortical mechanisms may account for this facilitatory effect, including, in part, direct input from visual to motor cortex. We studied the facilitation produced by a visual-motor task and compared those results with the facilitation produced by the same task without the visual cues. No differences in facilitation of amplitude or latency were observed. This suggests that there is no direct influence exerted by the visual cortex upon those elements of the motor cortex activated by a tangential magnetic stimulus, i.e., corticocortical and corticospinal neurons and their processes. Also, the large majority of facilitation (90%) was produced by a very small background voluntary contraction (less than 5% of maximum), indicating that any mild-to-moderate contraction of the target muscles will produce a consistent response for clinical measurements.