Search

The consequences of the consumption of cannabinoids with other drugs of abuse are of particular medical relevance. Several studies investigated the ability of cannabinoids to induce a locomotor cross-sensitization to other addictive drugs, but results remain inconsistent. Therefore, we investigated in mice the consequences of a repeated treatment with the cannabinoid agonist HU 210 on motor effects of morphine or alcohol. In mice receiving a daily injection of HU 210 (12.5 to 200 microg/kg) during 7 days, no hetero-sensitization to the stimulation induced by either morphine (7.5 mg/kg) or alcohol (1 or 1.5 g/kg) emerged, from 1 day up to 35 days after the end of the sub-chronic treatment with HU 210. Even a chronic treatment with a high dose of HU 210 (14 days, 200 microg/kg) induced no subsequent enhancement of the stimulant effects of morphine or alcohol. In fact, the motor stimulant effect of morphine or alcohol in chronically HU 210 pre-treated mice was even abolished until the 3rd day of abstinence. This reduction was presumably due to residual HU 210 since this effect was prevented by the cannabinoid antagonist rimonabant. Afterwards, chronically cannabinoid pre-treated mice remained less active than vehicle pre-treated mice from the 7th day up to the 35th day after the end of the 14-day treatment with HU 210. In conclusion, we failed to detect any hetero-sensitization whatever the pre-treatment regimen. However, only after the 14-day regimen, HU 210 pre-treated mice displayed a long-lasting decrease in activity, suggesting that some neuronal adaptive changes may have occurred.

Previous studies evidenced in rats the suppression by cannabinoids of motor stimulant effects of various drugs of abuse. Here we investigated, in mice, the effects of an acute or a chronic administration with the cannabinoid agonist HU 210 on the motor stimulant effects of either morphine or alcohol. HU 210 (12.5-200 microg/kg), when acutely administered, antagonized the stimulant effects of morphine (7.5 mg/kg) or alcohol (1 or 1.5 g/kg). A tolerance to this antagonistic interaction with morphine and alcohol occurred after a 7-day or a 14-day HU 210 treatment, leading to the reappearance of morphine- and alcohol-induced stimulation. The CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (10 mg/kg) enhanced the stimulant effect induced by low doses of morphine (5 or 7.5 mg/kg). Rimonabant (3 or 10 mg/kg) altered the locomotor effect of alcohol in a biphasic manner. It enhanced the stimulant effect of low doses of alcohol (1 or 1.5 g/kg) while decreasing the locomotor activity of mice treated with a high dose (3 g/kg) of alcohol. Furthermore, rimonabant (3 and 10 mg/kg) enhanced the duration of alcohol-induced loss of righting reflex (4 g/kg), suggesting a dual implication of cannabinoidergic pathways in acute effects of alcohol.

Two lines of mice, previously selected for their sensitivity (BS) or their resistance (BR) to an anxiogenic benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor inverse agonist, methyl beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (beta-CCM), have recently been shown to present several differences in anxiety. In the present study, attempt was made to extend their behavioral profile in two situations classically used for testing antidepressant drugs. Reassessment of locomotor performance of these new populations confirmed that the motor activity of BR mice was lower than that of BS mice. In both the forced-swimming and the tail suspension tests, the immobility time of BS mice was significantly higher than that of BR mice. In the tail suspension test, two administrations of imipramine (30 mg/kg i.p., 5 h and 30 min before testing) significantly reduced the immobility time of BS mice but not of BR mice. From these data, it appears that BS mice are more "depressed" than BR mice. Thus, these selectively bred lines may represent potentially useful animal models to investigate behavioral, neurochemical and neuroendocrine correlates of antidepressant action.

NocII is a heptadecapeptide whose sequence lies immediately downstream of nociceptin, the newly discovered natural agonist of the ORL1 receptor, in pronociceptin, nociceptin's precursor polypeptide. Since the sequence of NocII is framed by putative convertase excision sites and it totally conserved across murine and human species, we have sought to determine whether this orphan neuropeptide might by physiologically significant, i.e. endowed with central biological activity in vivo. Intracerebroventricular administration of 10 and 100 ng of NocII increased locomotion in mice. However, unlike nociceptin, which stimulates both the horizontal and vertical (rearing) components of locomotion, NocII affected only the horizontal component. The motor stimulant action of NocII appears to depend largely on dopamine transmission since it is totally reversed by the D1 or the D2 dopamine receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and haloperidol. NocII does not modify the number of explored holes in the hole board test, indicating that, unlike nociceptin, the orphan peptide does not affect exploratory behavior in mice.

The recently characterized heptadecapeptide nociceptin, the endogenous agonist of the orphan opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1 receptor), has been tested for its effects on locomotion and exploratory behaviour in mice. I.c.v. administration of as little as 10 ng of nociceptin/animal stimulated locomotor activity. This effect was dose-dependent, increasing in intensity up to 100 ng and in duration for doses in the range of 1000-10000 ng. The stimulation of horizontal locomotion elicited by 100 ng nociceptin was accompanied by a stimulation of the vertical component of locomotion. These effects were not reversed by high doses (1.5 and 4.5 mg/kg s.c.) of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone. Increasing doses of the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (0.1-0.5 mg/kg i.p.) as well as of the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1 H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride] (0.0075-0.03 mg/kg s.c.) reversed this effect, suggesting that nociceptin exerts its motor-stimulant actions by increasing central dopaminergic transmission. Nociceptin was also found to increase the number of head dips in the hole-board test, indicating that the peptide stimulates exploratory behaviour.

Both dexamphetamine and the pure dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR 12783 elicit a stimulation of locomotion and increase swimming activity in the behavioral despair test in mice. The dopamine D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 dose dependently (7.5-30 micrograms/kg s.c.) antagonized the stimulant locomotor effect on both drugs but did not prevent their antiimmobility effect on the behavioral despair test. The D2 dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol dose dependently (12.5-50 micrograms/kg i.p.) antagonized the effects of dexamphetamine on both locomotor activity and behavioral despair test. By contrast, haloperidol inhibited the effects of GBR 12783 in the forced swimming test but not on locomotion. It is concluded that indirect dopamine agonists are effective on the behavioral despair test independently of a stimulation of locomotor activity. Their effects on the despair test depend on the stimulation of D2 but not D1 dopamine receptors.

Rats received one daily i.p. injection of the dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR12783 (1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]4-(3-phenyl-2-(propenyl)-piperazine) (10mg/kg) or vehicle for 9 days. Fourteen days after discontinuing treatment, their locomotor activity was assessed after injection of GBR12783 (5 mg/kg) or vehicle, then 6 days later, after i.c.v. injection of [D-Trp(11)]neurotensin (750 ng) or saline. A sensitization to the stimulant locomotor effects of both GBR12783 and [D-Trp(11)]neurotensin occurred in rats exposed to the actimeter following the 1st, 5th and 9th injections of GBR12783. Rats without prior experience of the activity cages before the challenge tests showed no sensitization to either GBR12783 or [D-Trp(11)] neurotensin. Our data suggest that a similar mechanism may underlie the locomotor sensitization to GBR12783 and the heterosensitization to [D-Trp(11)]neurotensin.

Locomotor effects of modafinil were analysed and compared in various strains of mice and rats. A stimulation of locomotor activity was evidenced in all tested strains of mice: Swiss CD1, BALB/c, DBA2, C3H, B6CBAF1/JICO, Nude CD1 and in all tested strains of rats: Long Evans, Sprague Dawley, Wistar. In mice, from 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal, a precocious stimulant effect was observed. The drug seems to operate in its native form on the mouse brain since its intracerebroventricular administration (from 15 micrograms/mouse) elicited a stimulation of locomotion. In rats, the effective doses were higher (from 40 mg/kg ip); the effects of modafinil mainly oppose to the decrease in locomotion (habituation) which normally occurs in control animals. In addition, it was observed that administration of modafinil in rats habituated to their environment induced a recovery of locomotor activity.

Previously established dose-response curves indicated that modafinil 20-40 mg/kg i.p. elicited in mice an obvious stimulation of locomotor activity roughly similar to that induced by (+)amphetamine 2-4 mg/kg. The effects of various agents modifying dopamine transmission were compared on the locomotor response to both drugs. The preferential D2 dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol 37.5-150 micrograms/kg i.p. suppressed the stimulant effect of (+)amphetamine in a dose dependent manner, but not that of modafinil. The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (7.5-30 micrograms/kg s.c.) reversed the (+)amphetamine but not the modafinil induced hyperactivity. The tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (200 mg/kg) suppressed the hyperactivity induced by 4 mg/kg dexamphetamine but not that induced by 20 mg/kg modafinil. Associating L-DOPA 150 mg/kg and benserazide 37.5 mg/kg with (+)amphetamine 2 mg/kg resulted in stereotyped climbing behavior, that was not observed with modafinil 10-80 mg/kg. The profound akinesia induced by reserpine (4 mg/kg s.c.; 5 h before testing) was reversed by (+)amphetamine 2 mg/kg but not by modafinil 40 mg/kg. Finally, on synaptosomes prepared from mouse striata preloaded with [3H]dopamine, modafinil 10(-5) M did not increase the spontaneous [3H]dopamine release whereas (+)amphetamine, at the same concentration, doubled it. From all these differences between the two drugs, it is concluded that the mechanism underlying the modafinil induced stimulant locomotor effect differs completely from that of (+)amphetamine.

A continuous 8-day s.c. administration of morphine (450 microgram/kg/h) sensitized rats to the morphine-induced stimulation of locomotion (morphine test dose = 3 mg/kg, s.c.) but not to the acetorphan (5 mg/kg, i.v.)-induced stimulation of locomotion. On the other hand, a continuous 10-day intracerebroventricular infusion of the enkephalinase inhibitor, thiorphan (25 micrograms/rat/h), known to desensitize the acetorphan-induced stimulation of locomotion, also desensitized the morphine (3 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced stimulation of locomotion. The continuous 10-day, s.c. administration of morphine desensitized to the morphine (3 mg/kg, s.c.)-but not acetorphan (5 mg/kg, i.v.)-induced analgesia, as measured by the latency to jump from a hot plate (55 degrees C). On the other hand, the continuous 10-day intracerebroventricular infusion of thiorphan did not desensitize to morphine (3 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced analgesia. Thus, the chronic actions of morphine and thiorphan, according to the tested function, did not result in cross-sensitization (locomotion) or cross-tolerance (nociception). These differences could depend on the involvement of different opioid receptors (mu vs. delta) and/or on different functional organizations.

Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of [D-Trp11]neurotensin to rats decreased locomotor activity at a low dose (30 ng) and increased it at a high dose (750 ng). Only this high dose increased the dopamine turnover in the nucleus accumbens. The locomotor stimulant effect elicited by this high dose was potentiated by the dopamine uptake inhibitor, GBR 12783 (1-[2-(diphenyl-methoxy)ethyl]4-(3-phenyl-2-propenyl) piperazine) (5 mg/kg, i.p.), and reduced by the dopamine releaser, dexamphetamine (1.5 mg/kg). It was suppressed by the bilateral injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (8 micrograms/2 microliters) into the nucleus accumbens when rats were tested 4 days after the lesion. Fifteen days after the lesion, the i.c.v. administration of 750 ng of [D-Trp11]neurotensin induced hypolocomotion during the first hour of the test, and hyperlocomotion during the second hour. This latter locomotor stimulant effect was suppressed by the dopamine antagonist, haloperidol (50 micrograms/kg, i.p.). Thus, the hypokinetic effect of 30 ng [D-Trp11]neurotensin is independent of dopamine transmission, whereas the hyperkinesia elicited by 750 ng proceeds via an increase in dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens.

A chronic treatment (10 mg/kg, twice daily during 9 days) with the dopamine uptake inhibitor GBR 12783 was performed in rats at a dose increasing their locomotor activity. Forty-eight hours after the last administration, animals were sacrificed and 3H mazindol binding was performed on brain slices. Autoradiographic analysis revealed no change in this binding relatively to control animals in regions with high dopamine contents: striatum, nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle, substantia nigra and ventral tegmentum area. The treatment did not either modify the levels of dopamine (DA) and metabolites (HVA, DOPAC) both in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens. Thus, early after the end of the treatment, the chronic blockade of the dopamine uptake complex regulates neither the dopamine uptake complex nor the dopamine metabolism.

We compared the ability of various dopamine (DA) uptake inhibitors to displace the in vivo striatal [3H]GBR 12783 (1-[2(diphenylmethoxy) ethyl)-4-(3-phenyl-1[3H]-2-propenyl)-piperazine) binding with their stimulant effect on locomotor activity on mice. GBR 12783 (8 mg/kg), GBR 13069 (10 mg/kg), cocaine (20 mg/kg), mazindol (3 mg/kg) or pyrovalerone (2 mg/kg) stimulated locomotion as long as they occupied the DA uptake complex. In contrast, nomifensine (3 mg/kg) did not stimulate locomotion although it competed with [3H]GBR 12783 for the occupancy of the DA uptake complex at a significant level (> 50%). Administered at their ED50 doses, GBR 12783, BTCP (N-[1-(2-benzo(b)thiophenyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine, GBR 13069, amineptine and dexamphetamine significantly increased locomotor activity whereas the other inhibitors tested did not. The locomotor response elicited by GBR 12783 (10 mg/kg) was not decreased by desipramine (20 mg/kg) nor by oxaprotiline (10 mg/kg). The increase in locomotion elicited by GBR 12783 was positively correlated with the basal locomotor activity of the mice. The stimulant effect of GBR 12783 was potentiated by SKF 525A and by budipine. Additional pharmacological properties might conceal the relationship between the effects of some DA uptake inhibitors on locomotion, and on in vivo occupancy of DA uptake sites.

The enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan was infused intracerebroventricularly in rats during 14 days (25 micrograms/5 microliters/hr), inducing an average inhibition of cerebral enkephalinase of about 65%. Animals were tested during the infusion for their response to acetorphan, a parenterally active derivative of thiorphan. When administered intravenously on day 8 of the infusion, acetorphan (5 mg/kg) significantly increased locomotion in chronic saline-infused rats but not in animals receiving thiorphan. Furthermore, when injected at the same dose on day 10, acetorphan did not modify the latency to jump, in the hot plate test, in thiorphan-treated rats, whereas it elicited a significant analgesia in chronic saline-treated controls. These data show that the effects induced by the administration of an enkephalinase inhibitor were diminished after a period of chronic inhibition of the enzyme, suggesting the development of tolerance.

Neurotensin injected intracerebroventricularly at the dose of 30 ng per rat was without intrinsic effect on locomotion. When associated with the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan (50 micrograms, intracerebroventricular) it decreased locomotor activity. On the contrary, the 3 micrograms dose of NT, which had a tendency to decrease locomotion, stimulated locomotor activity when associated with thiorphan (50 micrograms, intracerebroventricular). This effect was independent of endogenous enkephalins since it was not suppressed by a high dose of naloxone (2 mg/kg). Similarly, increasing doses of the enkephalinase-resistant peptide [D-Trp11]neurotensin had a biphasic effect on locomotion since doses lower than 60 ng were hypokinetic whereas higher doses were hyperkinetic. This latter effect was not modified by thiorphan. It was antagonized by the dopamine antagonist haloperidol (50 micrograms/kg, IP).

In mice, low doses (1-2-4 mg/kg s.c.) of dexamphetamine stimulated locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner. Over the same range of doses the drug dose dependently inhibited the in vivo striatal binding of the dopamine uptake inhibitor, [3H]GBR 12783. At 3 mg/kg dexamphetamine, the stimulant effect and the inhibition of the striatal binding of [3H]GBR 12783 displayed a similar time course. Pretreatments that either increased (L-DOPA 200 mg/kg, benserazide 50 mg/kg i.p.) or decreased (reserpine 5 mg/kg s.c., alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine 200 mg/kg) striatal dopamine levels did not modify the inhibition by dexamphetamine of [3H]GBR 12783 binding in vivo. This suggests that the inhibition is due to a direct effect of dexamphetamine, not mediated by endogenous dopamine, and further that a unique site is responsible for the neuronal uptake of dexamphetamine and for the binding of pure dopamine uptake inhibitors.

The present study investigated the role of mu and delta opioid receptors in the control of the horizontal and vertical components of locomotion. Mice received intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) enkephalin analogs specific for either the mu or delta opioid receptors. The administration of the specific mu agonist [D-Ala2-NMePhe4-Gly5(ol)] enkephalin (DAGO) induced a dose-dependent increase in horizontal activity and a decrease in vertical activity. The specific delta agonist [D-Pen2,D-Pen5] enkephalin (DPDPE) increased both components of motor activity. The opiate antagonist naltrexone reversed the effects of DAGO, but did not influence the effects of DPDPE on motor activity. The pretreatment with the delta opiate antagonist ICI 154, 129 completely reversed the effects of DPDPE on locomotion but antagonized only partially the effects of DAGO on locomotion. These results indicate that the two components of locomotor activity--horizontal and vertical activity--are modulated differently by the stimulation of mu or delta opioid receptors.

Acetorphan, a parenterally active enkephalinase inhibitor, induced dose-dependently a naloxone-reversible analgesia on the hot-plate jump test in DBA/2J (DBA2) mice but was devoid of effects in C57BL/6J (C57) mice. By contrast, acetorphan increased locomotion in both strains; however, the DBA2 strain was much more sensitive than C57 mice to the locomotor stimulant effect. The increased locomotion was antagonized by naloxone in both strains. These data suggest that endogenous enkephalins modulate nociception and locomotion in the two inbred strains differently.

To investigate whether endogenous enkephalins modulate locomotion we studied the effect of the systemic administration of acetorphan, a parenterally active "enkephalinase" inhibitor. Locomotor activity in mice and rats was considered as an index to the activity of mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons. Acetorphan injected i.v. induced an increase in locomotion, mice and rats presenting a similar behavioral response. Naloxone, at low doses, blocked the enhanced motor response. The increased locomotion was antagonized by a pretreatment with haloperidol or potentiated by GBR 12783, a potent and specific inhibitor of dopamine (DA) uptake. The neurotoxic lesion of the mesolimbic DA system with 6-hydroxydopamine abolished the effect of acetorphan. These data suggest that the locomotor hyperactivity induced by the enkephalinase inhibitor results from the protection of local endogenous enkephalins and may be mesolimbic DA-dependent.