Search

Objectives: Patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk for infections. This study investigated the outcome and characteristics of CTD patients under intensive care unit (ICU) treatment for sepsis. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted and reviewed all patients with a CTD diagnosis admitted to the ICU of a university hospital for sepsis between 2006 and 2019. Mortality was computed and multivariate logistic regression was used to detect independent risk factors for sepsis mortality. Furthermore, the positive predictive value of ICU scores such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was evaluated. Results: This study included 44 patients with CTD (mean age 59.8 ± 16.1 years, 68.2% females), most of them with a diagnosed SLE (61.4%) followed by systemic sclerosis (15.9%). 56.8% (n = 25) were treated with immunosuppressives and 81.8% (n = 36) received glucocorticoids. Rituximab was used in 3 patients (6.8%). The hospital mortality of septic CTD patients was high with 40.9%. It was highest among systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients (85.7%). SOFA score and diagnosis of SSc were independently associated with mortality in multivariate logistic regression (P = 0.004 and 0.03, respectively). The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), SOFA and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were good predictors of sepsis mortality in the investigated cohort (SAPS II AUC 0.772, P = 0.002; SOFA AUC 0.756, P = 0.004; APACHE II AUC 0.741, P = 0.007). Conclusions: In-hospital sepsis mortality is high in CTD patients. SSc diagnoses and SOFA were independently associated with mortality. Additionally, common ICU scores were good predictors for mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a high risk of infections that may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission in case of resulting sepsis. Data regarding the mortality of these patients are very limited. This study investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with RA admitted to the ICU for sepsis and compared the results to a control cohort without RA. Methods: All patients with RA as well as sex-, age-, and admission year-matched controls admitted to the ICU of a university hospital for sepsis between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Mortality was calculated for both the groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for sepsis mortality. The positive predictive value of common ICU scores was also investigated. Results: The study included 49 patients with RA (mean age 67.2 ± 9.0 years, 63.3% females) and 51 matched controls (mean age 67.4 ± 9.5 years, 64.7% females). Among the patients with RA, 42.9% (n = 21) were treated with conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and 30.6% (n = 15) received glucocorticoids only. Seven (14.3%) patients received biologic (b) DMARDs. The hospital mortality was higher among patients with RA (42.9% vs 15.7%, P = .0016). Rheumatoid arthritis was independently associated with mortality in multivariate logistic regression (P = .001). In patients with RA, renal replacement therapy (P = .024), renal failure (P = .027), and diabetes mellitus (P = .028) were independently associated with mortality. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were good predictors of sepsis mortality in patients with RA (APACHE II area under the curve [AUC]: 0.78, P = .001; SAPS II AUC: 0.78, P < .001; SOFA AUC 0.78, P < .001), but their predictive power was higher among controls. Conclusions: Hospital sepsis mortality was higher in patients with RA than in controls. Rheumatoid arthritis itself is independently associated with an increased sepsis mortality. Renal replacement therapy, renal failure, and diabetes were associated with an increased mortality. Common ICU scores were less well predictors of sepsis mortality in patients with RA compared to non-RA controls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of thrombolytic treatment in patients with intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism (IHR-PE) remains controversial.Objectives: In this study, we assessed whether systemic thrombolysis decreases hemodynamic decompensation and mortality in a cohort of unselected patients with IHR compared with patients with conventional anticoagulation.Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2018, 137 patients with IHR-PE were identified among 539 consecutive patients treated for symptomatic PE. In 35 patients (25.5%), systemic thrombolysis was used. Propensity score matching was performed based on 17 pretreatment variables. The primary outcome was hemodynamic decompensation, defined by systolic hypotension, need for catecholamines or signs of end-organ hypoperfusion, and all-cause mortality during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes, such as 1-year survival, and safety outcomes, such as bleeding events, were analyzed.Results: The effects of systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation were compared in 55 matched patients with IHR-PE (systemic thrombolysis n = 21; anticoagulation n = 34). Thrombolysis was associated with a reduction (0% vs. 31%; p = 0.004) of the primary outcome during hospitalization and a 1-year survival benefit (100% vs. 83.2%; p = 0.036). Severe bleeding events occurred in 4.8% vs. 0% (p = 0.382) and moderate bleeding was observed in 14.3% vs. 7.1% (p = 0.359) in patients with thrombolysis compared with anticoagulation, respectively.Conclusions: Thrombolysis was associated with a significant reduction of the combined endpoint of hemodynamic decompensation and death during hospitalization and lower all-cause mortality after 1 year in an unselected group of patients with IHR-PE. Further studies are required to improve the therapy of IHR-PE and to identify the subgroup of patients that might benefit from thrombolytic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be a faster indicator of treatment success in adults with severe sepsis and septic shock compared to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP).Methods: Data from adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock managed at the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Leipzig between September 2009 and January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Values for CRP, PCT and IL-6 on admission as well as after 24 and 48-72 h were collected. Antibiotic therapy was defined as clinically successful if the patient survived ICU stay.Results: A total of 328 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with adequate data quality were included. After 48-72 h, the median IL-6 was significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (114.2 pg/ml vs. 746.6 pg/ml; p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference for PCT (5.6 vs. 4.9 ng/ml; p = 0.586) and CRP (158.5 mg/l vs. 172.4 mg/l; p = 0.988).Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that IL-6 is better than PCT and CRP in predicting the treatment success in predominantly non-surgical sepsis in the first 48-72 h. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Abnormal admission blood glucose was reported as a useful predictor of outcome in critically ill patients.Objectives: To identify patients at higher risk, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between admission blood glucose levels and patient mortality during the management of nontraumatic critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED).Methods: In this prospective, single-center observational study in a German university ED, all adult patients admitted to the resuscitation room of the ED were included between September 1, 2014 and August 31, 2015. Directly after resuscitation room admission, blood samples for admission blood glucose were taken, and adult patients were divided into groups according to predefined cut-offs between the admission blood glucose. Study endpoint was in-hospital mortality.Results: During the study period, 532 patients were admitted to the resuscitation room. The data of 523 patients (98.3%) were available for analysis. The overall in-hospital mortality was 34.2%. In comparison with an in-hospital mortality of 25.2% at an admission blood glucose of 101-136 mg/dL (n = 107), admission blood glucose of ≤ 100 mg/dL (n = 25, odds ratio [OR] 6.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.44-16.23, p < 0.001), 272-361 mg/dL (n = 63, OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.31-4.90, p = 0.007), and ≥ 362 mg/dL (n = 44, OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.42-6.18, p = 0.004) were associated with a higher mortality.Conclusions: Abnormal admission blood glucose is associated with a high in-hospital mortality. Admission blood glucose is an inexpensive and rapidly available laboratory parameter that may predict mortality and help to identify critically ill patients at risk in a general nontraumatic critically ill ED patient cohort. The breakpoint for in-hospital mortality may be an admission blood glucose ≤ 100 and ≥ 272 mg/dL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of critically ill non-trauma patients in the resuscitation room of an emergency department (ED) is very challenging, and it is difficult to identify patients with a higher risk of death. Previous studies have shown that lactate indices can predict survival for selected diseases and syndromes.Objective: As reported for other patient populations, we set out to determine whether admission lactate or lactate dynamics (LD) within 24 h can predict 30-day mortality in unselected critically ill non-traumatic patients.Methods: In this retrospective study over a 1-year period, admission lactate, time weighted average lactate (LacTW) and LD of all critically ill adult patients admitted from ED to intensive care unit were analyzed. A linear regression model was implemented to estimate lactate data 1 h after admission.Results: The admission lactate, LacTW, and LD within 24 h were analyzed from 392 critically ill patients. The overall 30-day mortality rate was around 29%. Admission lactate (4.1 ± 4.0 mmol/L vs. 6.6 ± 6.1 mmol/L; p < 0.01) and LacTW (1.8 ± 1.7 mmol/L vs. 4.1 ± 4.8 mmol/L; p < 0.01) were different between survivors and non-survivors. LD between survivors and non-survivors did not differ at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, or 24 h. After excluding patients with out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest during resuscitation room management, admission lactate and LD between survivors and non-survivors did not differ at 1 h, 12 h, and 24 h. LD at 6 h (44% ± 42% vs. 33% ± 58%; p = 0.042) and LacTW (1.7 ± 1.6 mmol/L vs. 2.6 ± 3.0 mmol/L; p < 0.01) did differ.Conclusions: In critically ill ED patients initially requiring treatment in a resuscitation room setting, LD at 6 h and LacTW may predict their survival beyond 30 days. These findings need to be confirmed in a prospective study design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]