Search

Rationale: Some classes of drugs can selectively affect learning (i.e., acquisition of behavior) at doses that do not affect performance (i.e., previously learned behavior). Some drugs (e.g., benzodiazepines) show selective effects on acquisition across a wide variety of tasks. Other drugs [e.g., N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists and opiate agonists], however, show selective effects under some tasks, but not others., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the NMDA-antagonist dizocilpine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), the opiate-agonist morphine (1.0-17.0 mg/kg), and the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide (3.0-30.0 mg/kg) in rats under a novel repeated-acquisition and performance task., Methods: Nose pokes to a correct location within a 2x3 stimulus array on a computer touch screen were reinforced with food. In the acquisition component, the correct location changed across sessions but remained constant within sessions; in the performance component, the correct location was constant both across and within sessions., Results: Both chlordiazepoxide and dizocilpine selectively impaired accuracy in the acquisition component at doses that did not affect accuracy in the performance component or overall response speed. Morphine, however, did not affect acquisition without affecting performance or response speed., Conclusions: These results with rats resembled those previously obtained for response-sequence learning in primates, rather than those previously reported for spatial learning in rats. Therefore, previous discrepancies in results for NMDA antagonists and opiate agonists across tasks probably were not a function of the species studied, but, rather, they more likely were a function of unique variables controlling acquisition within each task.

Effects of a benzodiazepine (chlordiazepoxide), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (dizocilpine), and an opiate agonist (morphine) were studied with a procedure designed to assess effects of drugs and other manipulations on nonspatial learning in rats. In each session, rats were exposed to 2 different 2-choice odor-discrimination problems with food reinforcement for correct responses. One problem (performance discrimination) remained the same throughout the study. That is, 1 odor was always correct (S+) and the other was never correct (S-). For the other problem (reversal discrimination), stimuli changed every session. Six different odors were used to program the reversal discrimination; on any given session, S+ was a stimulus that had served as S- the last time it had appeared, S- was a stimulus that had been S+ on its last appearance. Thus, in each session, learning a discrimination reversal could be studied along with the performance of a comparable, but previously learned, discrimination. Chlordiazepoxide interfered with reversal learning at doses that had no effect on the performance discrimination. Morphine and dizocilpine also impaired reversal learning but only at doses that also affected performance of the well-learned performance discrimination.

Effects of morphine and 2 N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, phencyclidine and LY235959, were studied using a within-subject, repeated-acquisition/performance procedure adapted to the Morris Swim Task. In the performance component, subjects swam to a hidden platform that was always in the same location in the pool. In the acquisition component, the platform was moved to a different place for each session. Baseline training produced rapid and direct swims to the platform in the performance component and steep within-session learning curves in the acquisition component. All 3 compounds increased swim distances, escape latencies, and slowed swim speed in a dose-dependent manner, but only morphine consistently produced selective impairments on acquisition. NMDA antagonists generally affected acquisition only at doses that also disrupted performance, although phencyclidine produced selective effects in some animals. These outcomes were different than those from studies of response chains in primates, suggesting that task and species variables may be important determinants of drug effects on acquisition.

Rats were trained on concurrent schedules in which pressing one lever postponed shock and pressing the other lever produced periods of signaled timeout from avoidance on variable-ratio schedules. These procedures generated high rates of timeout-reinforced responding and provided a baseline for studying the effects of drugs on behavior maintained by different types of negative reinforcement (shock postponement vs. timeout). Morphine (2.5 to 10.0 mg/kg) reduced behavior maintained by timeout at doses that increased or had no effect on avoidance responding. In contrast, d-amphetamine (0.125 to 2.0 mg/kg) produced large increases in timeout responding at doses that had minimal effect on avoidance in rats trained on variable-interval and variable-ratio schedules. Thus, the event-dependent effects of morphine, observed in previous studies in which timeout responding was maintained at low rates by interval schedules, were replicated with high timeout rates maintained by variable-ratio schedules. The effects of d-amphetamine could also be described as "event dependent" because timeout responding was stimulated more than avoidance regardless of the maintenance schedule or baseline rate.

Rats were trained on concurrent schedules in which pressing one lever postponed shock and pressing the other occasionally (variable-interval schedule) produced a 2-min timeout during which the shock-postponement schedule was suspended and its correlated stimuli were removed. These procedures provided a baseline for studying the effects of drugs on behavior maintained by different sources of negative reinforcement (shock avoidance and timeout from avoidance). Experiment 1 studied a benzodiazepine agonist, chlordiazepoxide, and antagonist, CGS 8216. Chlordiazepoxide (2.5-30 mg/kg) had little effect on avoidance responding except at higher doses, when it reduced responding. By comparison, responding on the timeout lever was increased in 5 of 6 rats. These effects were reversed by CGS 8216 (2.5-5 mg/kg) in the 2 rats tested, but CGS 8216 had no effect by itself. Experiment 2 studied an opiate agonist, morphine, and antagonist, naltrexone, with 3 rats. Morphine's (2.5-20 mg/kg) effects were opposite those of chlordiazepoxide: At doses that either increased or had no effect on avoidance responding, morphine depressed timeout responding. Naltrexone (5 mg/kg) reversed these actions but had no effect by itself.