Search

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is one of the most reliable methods for typing of Escherichia coli, including extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC). We investigated the performance of a new typing method, SpectraCell RA (River Diagnostics, Madison, WI), in comparison on MLST on a well-defined collection of ESBL-EC isolates obtained from chicken meat and humans. Ninety-two ESBL-EC isolates obtained from meat and 59 ESBL-EC isolates obtained from human rectal swabs and clinical blood cultures were typed using MLST and SpectraCell RA. The sensitivity and specificity of SpectraCell RA were calculated, using MLST as a reference method. Subsequently, the results of SpectraCell RA were used to determine the relatedness of ESBL-EC isolates from chicken and humans. Using MLST as the gold standard, the performance of SpectraCell RA was evaluated for 3 different cutoff values: 0.99975, 0.99955, and 0.99935. Depending on the cutoff value, the sensitivity was mediocre to unacceptably low, with values of 9.4%, 43.9%, and 66.7%, respectively. When sensitivity increased, the specificity decreased rapidly, from 95.6% to 69.8% and 34.4%, respectively. Also, the number of clusters containing both human and meat samples varied from 0 (0.0%) to 14 (38.9%). Our study shows that SpectraCell RA is not a suitable typing method for ESBL-EC when evaluating relationships of ESBL-EC at the population level.

The worldwide prevalence of highly resistant Gram-negative rods (HR-GNR) is increasing rapidly. Reliable typing methods are needed to detect and control outbreaks and to monitor the effectiveness of infection control programs in endemic situations. In this study, we investigated the performance of the DiversiLab typing method in comparison with the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing method. Six hundred fifty-three HR-GNR isolates, which were obtained during a 6-month prospective survey in 18 Dutch hospitals, were typed by AFLP and DiversiLab. Subsequently, the sensitivity and specificity of DiversiLab were calculated, using AFLP as the reference method. In addition, results were compared by means of epidemiological linkage, and Cohen's kappa for agreement was calculated. DiversiLab considered significantly more isolates (275) to belong to a cluster than AFLP (198) (P < 0.001). In direct comparison, the sensitivity was 83.8%, and the specificity was 78.6%. When epidemiological linkage was included in the analysis, DiversiLab considered eight isolates as secondary cases, which were considered unique in AFLP. Only two secondary cases, according to AFLP, were missed by DiversiLab. This results in a kappa for agreement of 0.985. In daily practice, a typing method has to be used in combination with epidemiological information. When this was done, DiversiLab was shown to be a reliable method for the typing of HR-GNR. This, in combination with the ease of use and the speed, makes DiversiLab an appropriate method for screening in routine clinical practice. When a cluster is suspected and the consequences of these findings are substantial, a confirmatory analysis should be performed.