Search

Background: Whether transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) devices perform similarly with respect to the underlying mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology remains unknown. The aim of the present analysis was to assess outcomes of TMVR according to the MR underlying etiology among the CHoice of OptImal transCatheter trEatment for Mitral Insufficiency (CHOICE-MI) registry., Methods: Of 746 patients, 229 patients (30.7%) underwent TMVR. The study population was subdivided according to primary, secondary, or mixed MR. Patients with mitral annular calcification were excluded. The primary study endpoint was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year. Secondary study endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year, New York Heart Association functional class, and residual MR, both at discharge and 1 year., Results: The predominant MR etiology was secondary MR (58.4%), followed by primary MR (28.7%) and mixed MR (12.9%). Technical success and procedural mortality were similar according to MR etiology. Discharge echocardiography revealed residual MR 2+ in 11.3%, 3.7%, and 5.3% of patients with primary, secondary, and mixed MR, respectively (P = .1). MR elimination was similar in all groups up to the 1-year follow-up. There was no difference in terms of primary combined outcome occurrence according to MR etiology. One-year all-cause mortality was reported in 28.8%, 24.2%, and 32.1% of patients with primary, secondary, and mixed MR, respectively (P = .07)., Conclusions: In our study we did not find differences in short-term and 1-year outcomes after TMVR according to MR etiology., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is feasible for selected patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who are poor candidates for valve surgery. Intermediate-term to long-term TMVR outcomes have not been reported., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness through 2-year follow-up of TMVR in high-surgical-risk patients with severe MR., Methods: The first 100 patients enrolled in the Expanded Clinical Study of the Tendyne Mitral Valve System, an open-label, nonrandomized, prospective study of transapical TMVR, were followed for 2 years., Results: The patients (aged 74.7 ± 8.0 years, 69.0% male) had symptomatic (66.0% New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III or IV) grade 3+ or 4+ MR that was secondary or mixed in 89 (89.0%). Prostheses were successfully implanted in 97 (97.0%) patients. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 39.0%; 17 (43.6%) of 39 deaths occurred during the first 90 days. Heart failure hospitalization (HFH) fell from 1.30 events per year preprocedure to 0.51 per year in the 2 years post-TMVR (P < 0.0001). At 2 years, 93.2% of surviving patients had no MR. No patient had >1+ MR. The improvement in symptoms at 1 year (88.5% NYHA functional class I or II) was sustained to 2 years (81.6% NYHA functional class I or II). Among survivors, the left ventricular ejection fraction was 45.6 ± 9.4% at baseline and 39.8 ± 9.5% at 2 years (P = 0.0012). Estimated right ventricular systolic pressure decreased from 47.6 ± 8.6 mm Hg to 32.5 ± 10.4 mm Hg (P < 0.005)., Conclusions: In this study, the impact of TMVR on severity of MR, reduction in HFH rate, and improvement in symptoms was sustained through 2 years. All-cause mortality and the need for HFH was highest in the first 3 months postprocedure. (Expanded Clinical Study of the Tendyne Mitral Valve System; NCT02321514)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The present paper is an analysis of the first 100 patients treated in the Expanded Clinical Study of the Tendyne Mitral Valve System (Global Feasibility Study; NCT02321514) supported by Abbott. Dr Muller has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research grant support from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Sorajja has served as a consultant for Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Duncan has served as a proctor and consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Neochord. Dr Bethea has served as a consultant for Abbott. Dr Grayburn has served as a consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Valtech Cardio, and Neochord; and has received research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Valtech Cardio, and Neochord. Drs Babaliaros and Denti have served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. Dr Guerrero has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott; and has received research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Thourani has served as a consultant for and received research grant support from Abbott. Dr Dumonteil has served as a proctor and consultant for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Modine has served as a proctor and consultant for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Blanke has received institutional grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, MVRX, and Neovasc. Dr Leipsic has received institutional grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, MVRX, and Neovasc. Dr Badhwar has served as an uncompensated consultant for Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with high morbidity and mortality that can be ameliorated by surgical valve repair or replacement. Despite this, many patients with MR do not undergo surgery. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) may be an option for selected patients with severe MR., Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of TMVR in a cohort of patients with native valve MR who were at high risk for cardiac surgery., Methods: Patients underwent transcatheter, transapical delivery of a self-expanding mitral valve prosthesis and were examined in a prospective registry for short-term and 30-day outcomes., Results: Thirty patients (age 75.6 ± 9.2 years; 25 men) with grade 3 or 4 MR underwent TMVR. The MR etiology was secondary (n = 23), primary (n = 3), or mixed pathology (n = 4). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 7.3 ± 5.7%. Successful device implantation was achieved in 28 patients (93.3%). There were no acute deaths, strokes, or myocardial infarctions. One patient died 13 days after TMVR from hospital-acquired pneumonia. Prosthetic leaflet thrombosis was detected in 1 patient at follow-up and resolved after increased oral anticoagulation with warfarin. At 30 days, transthoracic echocardiography showed mild (1+) central MR in 1 patient, and no residual MR in the remaining 26 patients with valves in situ. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume index decreased (90.1 ± 28.2 ml/m 2 at baseline vs. 72.1 ± 19.3 ml/m 2 at follow-up; p = 0.0012), as did the left ventricular end-systolic volume index (48.4 ± 19.7 ml/m 2 vs. 43.1 ± 16.2 ml/m 2 ; p = 0.18). Seventy-five percent of the patients reported mild or no symptoms at follow-up (New York Heart Association functional class I or II). Successful device implantation free of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and device malfunction at 30 days was 86.6%., Conclusions: TMVR is an effective and safe therapy for selected patients with symptomatic native MR. Further evaluation of TMVR using prostheses specifically designed for the mitral valve is warranted. This intervention may help address an unmet need in patients at high risk for surgery. (Early Feasibility Study of the Tendyne Mitral Valve System [Global Feasibility Study]; NCT02321514)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective of this study is to describe and compare the use of the MitraClip therapy in mitral regurgitation (MR) patients with degenerative MR (DMR) and functional MR (FMR)., Introduction: Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of severe MR using the MitraClip device is approved for use in the USA for high risk DMR while European guidelines include its use in FMR patients as well., Methods: The MitraClip in the Asia-Pacific Registry (MARS) is a multicenter retrospective registry, involving eight sites in five Asia-Pacific countries. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, procedural outcomes and 1-month outcomes [death and major adverse events (MAE)] were compared between FMR and DMR patients treated with the MitraClip., Results: A total of 163 patients were included from 2011 to 2014. The acute procedural success rates for FMR (95.5%, n = 84) and DMR (92%, n = 69) were similar (P = 0.515). 45% of FMR had ≥2 clips inserted compared to 60% of those with DMR (P = 0.064).The 30-day mortality rate for FMR and DMR was similar at 4.5% and 6.7% respectively (P = 0.555). The 30-day MAE rate was 9.2% for FMR and 14.7% for DMR (P = 0.281). Both FMR and DMR patients had significant improvements in the severity of MR and NYHA class after 30 days. There was a significantly greater reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = 0.002) and end systolic diameter (P = 0.017) in DMR than in FMR., Conclusions: The MitraClip therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment option for both FMR and DMR. Although, there is a significantly greater reduction in LV volumes in DMR, patients in both groups report clinical benefit with improvement in functional class. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: Percutaneous MitraClip therapy has been shown to be safe and efficacious in mitral regurgitation (MR). Our aim was to describe early outcomes in patients from the Asia- Pacific region., Methods and Results: The MitraClip Asia-Pacific Registry (MARS) includes data from eight different centres in five countries in the Asia-Pacific region. The primary efficacy outcome was reduction in MR to ≤2+ at 30 days. The safety outcome was 30-day freedom from major adverse events (MAE), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, non-elective cardiac surgery, renal failure, transfusion of ≥2 units of blood, ventilation for >48 hours, septicaemia, and new onset atrial fibrillation. A total of 142 patients underwent the MitraClip procedure from February 2011 to October 2013. Fifty-three point five percent (76) of patients had functional MR, 45.8% (65) had degenerative MR and 0.7% (1) had mixed MR. The acute procedural success rate was 93.7% (133). Thirty-one point seven percent of the patients were in NYHA Class I-II at baseline, compared to 82.1% at 30 days (p<0.001). Zero percent (0) of the patients had ≤2+ MR at baseline compared to 76.8% (109) at 30 days (p<0.001)., Conclusions: Results from the Asia-Pacific region show that the MitraClip procedure is effective in reducing mitral regurgitation and has favourable short-term safety outcomes.

M itral regurgitation (MR) is a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (LV) and options for repairing the valve have yielded conflicting results. We compared one-year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with grade 3-4MR and severe LV dilatation (end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD] above 65mm) undergoing either left ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion alone or mitral valve repair (surgical minimally invasive repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair). This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with grade 3-4MR and severe LV dilatation who underwent either LVAD or MVR between 2008-2018. Baseline and post-operative transthoracic echocardiograms were analysed for LV-ejection fraction (EF), LV EDD and MR. Functional class, re-hospitalisation, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was obtained. Fifty-two patients (27 LVAD; 25 MVR; 44 men) with grade 3-4MR and pre-existing LV systolic dysfunction (47 [90%] NYHA class III-IV) underwent either LVAD or MVR. There was no significant between group difference in NYHA class, however LVAD patients were younger (49±14 vs 60±17years; P=0.01) with lower LVEF baseline (21±7% vs 29±12%, P=0.01). MVR patients had more severe pre-operative MR (P=0.01). Less than 2+ (mild-moderate) MR was achieved in 84% of LVAD patients with a reduction in LVEDD (Pre-76±7mm/68±8mm; Post- 69mm±11mm/62±12mm; P=0.01). Less than 2+ MR was achieved in 77% of MVR patients with a corresponding reduction in LVEDD (Pre- 71±7mm/53±12mm; Post- 68mm±8mm/51±11mm;P=0.01). 82% of LVAD patients (P=0.01) and 100% of MVR patients (P=0.01) reported mild or no symptoms at 12-month follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups in re-hospitalisation rates, and all cause cardiovascular morbidity and mortality at one year (P=0.29). Patients undergoing isolated LVAD insertion have an improvement in MR severity comparable to patients with end-stage MR undergoing MVR. Unloading of the LV by LVAD with consequent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions is associated with a significant improvement in MR. This may explain the lack of additional benefit of MVR in LVAD patients shown in large registries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]