Search

Background: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide valuable information for preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions. However, no data exist on MDCT parameters predicting residual mitral regurgitation (MR) post-MitraClip (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA)., Methods: We analyzed preprocedural MDCTs of 78 consecutive patients with secondary MR undergoing MitraClip implantation at our institution. Moderate-or-severe mitral leaflet calcification (MLC) was defined as calcification, with-or-without mitral annular calcification, extending beyond the mitral leaflet base. Residual MR was assessed by postprocedural transesophageal echocardiography, and clinical outcomes were assessed at 1-year., Results: Fifteen patients (19 %) had residual MR ≥2+. Compared to patients with none-or-mild residual MR, MDCT-derived mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) to mitral annulus area (MAA) ratio was significantly lower (0.32 ± 0.06 vs. 0.39 ± 0.09; p = 0.003), and the prevalence of MLC was higher (40 % vs. 18 %; p = 0.057) in those with residual MR ≥2+. Furthermore, the MVOA/MAA ratio and MLC were independent predictors of residual MR ≥2+ post-MitraClip [adjusted odds ratio (OR adj ): 0.88 (0.80-0.97) and 5.50 (1.16-26.23), respectively]. On receiver-operating-characteristic-curve analysis, MVOA/MAA ratio <0.31 had a sensitivity of 87 % and a specificity of 60 % for residual MR ≥2+. When patients were classified according to the presence of MLC and an MVOA/MAA ratio <0.31, those with both parameters had significantly higher rates of postprocedural residual MR ≥2+ and mitral reintervention at 1-year than those with only one, and those without both parameters., Conclusions: In patients with secondary MR undergoing the MitraClip procedure, preprocedural MDCT parameters, specifically MVOA/MAA ratio and MLC, are useful to predict postprocedural residual MR., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair has revolutionized the treatment of primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. The landmark EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study) and COAPT (Clinical Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for High Surgical Risk Patients) trials included only clinically stable patients with favorable mitral valve anatomy for edge-to-edge repair. However, since its initial commercial approval in the United States, growing operator experience, device iterations, and improvements in intraprocedural imaging have led to an expansion in the use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair to more complex mitral valve pathologies and clinical scenarios, many of which were previously considered contraindications for the procedure. Because patients with prohibitive surgical risk are often older and present with complex mitral valve disease, knowledge of the potential effectiveness, versatility, and technical approach to a broad range of anatomy is clinically relevant. In this review the authors examine the current experience with mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in various pathologies and scenarios that go well beyond the EVEREST II trial inclusion criteria., (Copyright © 2021 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide valuable information for preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions. However, no data exists on pre-MDCT parameters predicting high transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) post-MitraClip procedure. We analyzed the preprocedural MDCTs of 156 consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip implantation at our institution. The mean TMPG was assessed by periprocedural transesophageal and pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography. MDCT-derived mitral annulus area (MAA), anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annulus diameters, and mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) were smaller in patients with mean TMPG ≥5 mmHg than those with mean TMPG <5 mmHg after 1-or 2-clip implantation. Small MAA, AP and ML diameters, and MVOA were moderately correlated with high TMPG post-MitraClip, in which MAA and MVOA had the highest degree of correlation after 1-clip (r = -0.46 both), whereas MAA and ML had the strongest degree of correlation after 2-clip (r = -0.39 both) and at discharge (r = -0.38 both). From the receiver-operating-characteristic curve analyses, no significant differences in the area under the curve were observed among these MDCT parameters for low TMPG after MitraClip implantation, except for those between MAA and AP diameter at discharge (p=0.026). For optimal cutoff values, MAA ≥1100 and ≥1300 mm 2 had positive predictive values of 89% and 91%, while both MAA ≥750 and ≥900 mm 2 had negative predictive values of 100%, for mean TMPG <5 mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation, respectively. In conclusion, in patients undergoing the MitraClip procedure, preprocedural MDCT parameters are useful to predict postprocedural mitral stenosis., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate candidacy for surgical mitral valve (MV) repair of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) after failed MitraClip., Background: Percutaneous mitral repair with MitraClip is safe and effective in patients with degenerative and functional MR with high surgical risk. However, some patients require subsequent mitral surgery for recurrence of significant MR., Methods: This single-center, observational study includes consecutive patients who underwent mitral surgery after failed MitraClip., Results: Twenty-five patients (age, 69 ± 15 years; 52% women) with severe symptomatic MR after failed MitraClip implantation underwent mitral surgery after a median interval of 5.1 months (interquartile range, 2.5-14 months). Ten patients underwent MV repair (8 with robotic minithoracotomy) and 15 underwent MV replacement (most with sternotomy). Two patients in whom MV repair was intended underwent MV replacement because MitraClip-related leaflet damage prohibited repair. Examples of relative contraindication for MV repair that led to pursuing MV replacement were advanced patient age in 4 patients (mean age, 85 ± 7.6 years), endocarditis in 1 patient, and severely calcified or rheumatic leaflets in 5 patients. Perioperative complications were rare and intermediate-term mortality was similar between groups (3 patients in the MV repair group [30%] vs 4 patients in the MV replacement group [27%]; P=.90)., Conclusion: When performed by an experienced mitral surgeon and within 1 year of failed MitraClip implantation, surgical MV repair is feasible in most patients who were surgical repair candidates before the clip. Having the option for surgical MV repair after failed MitraClip is important to preserve optimal long-term outcomes for patients who undergo transcatheter mitral repair with MitraClip, especially as ongoing trials are shifting to study lower-risk patients who are also candidates for surgical repair.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, characteristics, hemodynamic conditions, and clinical significance of right-to-left (R-L) shunt through an iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) after the MitraClip procedure., Background: R-L shunt through an iASD after the MitraClip procedure has not been well investigated., Methods: From 2014 to 2017, 385 consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation underwent the MitraClip procedure. iASD was assessed using intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. Right and left heart catheterization was used to assess the hemodynamic status of patients. All patients provided written informed consent for the procedure. All data for this study were collected from an established interventional cardiology laboratory database approved by the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Institutional Review Board., Results: R-L shunt was observed in 20 patients (5%). In 7 of these patients (35%), R-L shunt was accompanied by acute deoxygenation. Prevalence of severe tricuspid regurgitation (55% vs. 20%; p = 0.001), serum B-type natriuretic peptide (664 pg/ml [434 to 1,169 pg/ml] vs. 400 pg/ml [195 to 699 pg/ml]; p = 0.006), mean pulmonary artery pressure (38 mm Hg [34 to 45 mm Hg] vs. 29 mm Hg [22 to 37 mm Hg]; p < 0.001), and right atrial pressure (19 mm Hg [13 to 20 mm Hg] vs. 10 mm Hg [7 to 14 mm Hg]; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with R-L shunt than in those with left-to-right shunt. Patients with R-L shunt also showed a more prominent reduction in the left atrial V-wave and mean pressure from baseline to post-procedure compared with those with left-to-right shunt (-22.8 ± 2.6 mm Hg vs. -11.8 ± 0.9 mm Hg [p = 0.002] and -7.9 ± 0.8 mm Hg vs. -4.0 ± 0.4 mm Hg [p = 0.003], respectively)., Conclusions: R-L shunt through an iASD was observed in 5% of patients who underwent the MitraClip procedure and in one-third of patients with R-L shunt presented acute deoxygenation. Elevated right atrial pressure concomitant with pulmonary hypertension and significant reduction in left atrial pressure after MitraClip deployment were associated with R-L shunt., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Most patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) are likely to require surgery, but years can pass until there is a clear indication for it. The timing of mitral valve surgery for asymptomatic patients with severe DMR is controversial, and current guidelines are limited because they are based on nonrandomized studies and expert opinion., Observations: In this narrative review, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction and an increase in left ventricular end-systolic diameter are adverse signs in the context of mitral regurgitation. Consequently, serial echocardiography is essential. However, measurements may be imprecise, and the evidence regarding the association with outcome in asymptomatic patients is inconsistent. Mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical approach; however, repair rate, durability, and outcomes vary between centers, rendering decision-making in an asymptomatic patient with DMR even more challenging. The use of natriuretic peptides, stress testing, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial strain imaging can aid in risk stratification and optimization of the timing of mitral valve surgery in an asymptomatic patient., Conclusions and Relevance: Management of asymptomatic patients with DMR requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond the guidelines. Close follow-up and the use of multiple modalities are recommended. Knowledge of surgical options, experience, and outcomes is important when an intervention is considered.

Background: Diastolic mitral regurgitation (DMR) results from atrioventricular conduction disturbances, acute aortic regurgitation, and/or marked elevation of left ventricular filling pressure. Generally benign, in some clinical circumstances DMR has presumed to result in hemodynamic decompensation. The aforementioned causes of DMR are frequently encountered in patients treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) but its clinical significance in this setting has not been studied. We sought to investigate the incidence of DMR and its prognostic implications following TAVR., Methods: Baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables from a prospective TAVR registry were analyzed to determine the correlates of post-procedural DMR and its impact on late outcomes (all-cause mortality and the composite of mortality and readmission due to heart failure)., Results: Of 267 patients undergoing TAVR, post-procedural DMR was present in 25 (9.3%). Independent predictors of DMR included pacemaker implantation [OR=2.7 (95%CI 1.03-6.50)], post-procedural systolic MR and aortic regurgitation [OR=3.7 (1.20-10.80) and OR=4.1 (1.50-10.60), respectively], and use of self-expanding bioprostheses [OR=4.9 (1.60-21.0)]. The incidence of the combined endpoint of death and/or readmission for heart failure was higher in patients with versus those without DMR (25% vs. 41%, respectively, p=0.08), although this association did not attain statistical significance on multivariable analyses. Interaction term analysis indicated a trend toward a heightened risk for the composite endpoint among patients with post-procedural aortic regurgitation (≥moderate) in whom DMR occurred (χ 2 2.94, p=0.09)., Conclusions: Although DMR following TAVR is common (occurring in approximately 1 of 10 patients), it is not independently associated with an increased risk of death and/or readmission for heart failure. Therefore, DMR post TAVR is more likely a marker of cardiac dysfunction than a causative factor., (Copyright © 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)