Search

Objectives: Mitral regurgitation due to anterior mitral leaflet lesions is associated with an increased risk of mitral regurgitation recurrence after mitral valve repair compared with posterior leaflet-related lesions. Both edge-to-edge (E-to-E) and neochordal repair, associated with ring annuloplasty, have been used in our institution to address isolated anterior mitral leaflet lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and echocardiographic long-term results of those two approaches for isolated anterior mitral leaflet lesions by means of a propensity match analysis., Methods: An institutional database retrospective review within the time-frame 2000 to 2021 was carried out. The Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence function were employed. Cox regression was used to identify the risk factor for mortality during the follow-up., Results: The estimated freedom from reoperative mitral valve surgery at 20 years was 78% in the E-to-E group and 64% in the neochordae group (P = 0.032). The longitudinal analysis performed to analyse the mitral regurgitation recurrence rate showed a higher rate of mitral regurgitation ≥3+ recurrence in the neochordae group at 5 (5.1% vs 8.7%), -10 (8.2% vs 13.2%), and 15 years (8.8% vs 16.5%) (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Isolated anterior leaflet pathology can be effectively treated with E-to-E or neochordal repair and ring annuloplasty. In our series, clinical and echocardiographic results were better in E-to-E group. The excellent durability of this technique up to 20 years of follow-up, together with its simplicity and reproducibility, confirms the role the E-to-E techniques as an excellent treatment option for severe mitral regurgitation due anterior mitral leaflets lesions., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: Uncorrected severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to posterior prolapse leads to left ventricular dilatation. At this stage, mitral valve repair becomes mandatory to avoid permanent myocardial injury. However, which technique among neochoardae implantation and leaflet resection provides the best results in this scenario remains unknown., Methods: We selected 332 patients with left ventricular dilatation and severe degenerative MR due to posterior leaflet (PL) prolapse who underwent neochoardae implantation (85 patients) or PL resection (247 patients) at our institution between 2008 and 2020. A propensity score matching analysis was carried on to decrease the differences at baseline., Results: Matching yielded 85 neochordae implantations and 85 PL resections. At 10 years, freedom from cardiac death and freedom from mitral valve reoperation were 92.6 ± 6.1% vs 97.8 ± 2.1% and 97.7 ± 2.2% vs 95 ± 3% in the neochordae group and in the PL resection group, respectively. The MR ≥2+ recurrence rate was 23.9 ± 10% in the neochordae group and 20.8 ± 5.8% in the PL resection group (P = 0.834) at 10 years. At the last follow-up, the neochordae group showed a higher reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (44 vs 48 mm; P = 0.001) and a better ejection fraction (60% vs 55%; P < 0.001) compared to PL resection group., Conclusions: In this subgroup of patients, both neochordae implantation and leaflet resection provide excellent durability of the repair in the long term. Neochordae implantation might have a better effect on dilated left ventricle., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although >150,000 mitral TEER procedures have been performed worldwide, the impact of MR etiology on MV surgery after TEER remains unknown., Objectives: The authors sought to compare outcomes of mitral valve (MV) surgery after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) stratified by mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology., Methods: Data from the CUTTING-EDGE registry were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeries were stratified by MR etiology: primary (PMR) and secondary (SMR). MVARC (Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium) outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were evaluated. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (IQR: 1.1-25.8 months) after surgery., Results: From July 2009 to July 2020, 330 patients underwent MV surgery after TEER, of which 47% had PMR and 53.0% had SMR. Mean age was 73.8 ± 10.1 years, median STS risk at initial TEER was 4.0% (IQR: 2.2%-7.3%). Compared with PMR, SMR had a higher EuroSCORE, more comorbidities, lower LVEF pre-TEER and presurgery (all P < 0.05). SMR patients had more aborted TEER (25.7% vs 16.3%; P = 0.043), more surgery for mitral stenosis after TEER (19.4% vs 9.0%; P = 0.008), and fewer MV repairs (4.0% vs 11.0%; P = 0.019). Thirty-day mortality was numerically higher in SMR (20.4% vs 12.7%; P = 0.072), with an observed-to-expected ratio of 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9-5.3) overall, 2.6 (95% CI: 1.2-4.0) in PMR, and 4.6 (95% CI: 2.6-6.6) in SMR. SMR had significantly higher 1-year mortality (38.3% vs 23.2%; P = 0.019). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the actuarial estimates of cumulative survival were significantly lower in SMR at 1 and 3 years., Conclusions: The risk of MV surgery after TEER is nontrivial, with higher mortality after surgery, especially in SMR patients. These findings provide valuable data for further research to improve these outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Bhadra has received travel compensation from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Tagliari has received research support from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Dr Leurent has been a consultant and physician proctor for and has received speaker honoraria from Abbott. Dr Asgar has been a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and W. L. Gore & Associates; and has received research grants from Abbott. Dr Leroux has been a physician proctor for Medtronic and Abbott; and a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Dumonteil has received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursement by Edwards Lifesciences; and has been a physician proctor and consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Geirsson has been a member of the Medtronic Strategic Surgical Advisory Board. Dr Wyler von Ballmoos has served as a consultant for LivaNova, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Dr Reardon has been a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and W. L. Gore & Associates. Dr Bapat has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, 4C Medical, and Boston Scientific. Dr Nazif has equity in Venus Medtech; and has received consulting fees or honoraria from Keystone Heart, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Dr Kaneko has been a speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and Baylis Medical; and has been a consultant for 4C Medical. Dr Modine has been a physician proctor and consultant for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott. Dr Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; and has been a consultant for InnovHeart. Dr Tang has been a physician proctor for Medtronic; a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott, and NeoChord; and a physician advisory board member for Abbott, Boston Scientific and JenaValve; and has received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthineers and East End Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complete rings or posterior bands are both commonly used during mitral valve repair, but which one ensures the best long-term outcome in patients with Barlow disease is a topic of debate. This study evaluated whether the type of annuloplasty device affects the long-term durability of the repair., Methods: We selected 296 consecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to Barlow disease who underwent edge-to-edge mitral repair at our institution between 2004 and 2013. For the edge-to-edge repair, a complete semirigid ring was used in 151 patients, whereas a posterior flexible band was used in 145 patients. The clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of both groups were compared at long-term follow-up., Results: At 14 years, the overall survival was 87.3% ± 2.79% in the ring group and 94.1% ± 2.30% in the band group (P = .056). The incidence of mitral valve reintervention was 4.9% ± 1.95% in the ring group and 5.5% ± 2.53% in the band group (P = .371) at 14 years. The incidence of recurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥3+ and ≥2+ was 8.3% ± 2.64% in the ring group and 8.7% ± 3.07% in the band group (P = .991) and 26.5% ± 4.23% in the ring group and 17.4% ± 3.26% in the band group (P = .697), respectively. Mitral regurgitation ≥1+ at discharge was the only independent predictor of reoperation and recurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥3+ in the long-term., Conclusions: In patients with Barlow disease undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, the type of annuloplasty device does not influence the long-term results. Achieving an optimal immediate result remains the key to maintain the stability of the repair at long-term., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: For cases of initial suboptimal mitral valve repair, the edge-to-edge (EE) technique has been used as a bailout procedure. However the long-term durability of those rescued mitral valves is currently unknown. With this study we aim to evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the EE technique used to rescue patients with initial suboptimal conventional mitral valve repair., Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to query for patients who had undergone mitral valve repair with the EE technique used as a bailout procedure. The cumulative incidence function using death as a competing event was used to estimate cardiac death and redo for mitral valve replacement. To describe the time course of mitral regurgitation, we performed a longitudinal analysis using generalized estimating equations with random intercept for correlated data., Results: Eighty-one patients were selected. The median follow-up was 9.1 years (interquartile range, 6.7-12.1; maximum, 22.6 years). At 15 years the estimated Kaplan-Meier overall survival was 63.2% ± 8.69% (95% confidence interval, 43.76-77.46) and the predicted rate of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation recurrence was 16.67%. At 15 years the cumulative incidence function for redo for mitral valve replacement with death as a competing event was 2.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.48-7.84). No case of more than mild mitral stenosis was detected., Conclusions: The EE technique can be effectively used as a bailout procedure in patients with suboptimal conventional mitral valve repair with satisfactory long-term results., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Moderate secondary mitral regurgitation is common in patients with severe aortic regurgitation, but whether it has to be addressed at the time of aortic valve surgery remains unclear. With this study, we evaluated the long-term fate of moderate secondary mitral regurgitation in this specific scenario., Methods: Between January 2004 and January 2018, in 154 patients admitted to our institution for treatment of severe aortic regurgitation, a moderate secondary mitral regurgitation was diagnosed. Ninety-four patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (group 1) and 60 patients underwent also concomitant mitral valve annuloplasty (group 2)., Results: One death (1.1%) occurred in group 1, whereas two deaths (3.3%) occurred in group 2 (p = .561). At 11 years, the cumulative incidence function of cardiac death, with noncardiac death as a competing risk was 11.5 ± 5.11% in group 1 and 8.3 ± 5.15% in group 2 (p = .731). The cumulative incidence function of mitral valve reintervention, with death as a competing risk, was 3.7 ± 2.61% in group 1 and 4.5 ± 4.35% in group 2 (p = .620) at 11 years. Secondary mitral regurgitation improved to ≤mild in 66% and 76% of the survivors of group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = .67)., Conclusions: In our experience, in patients with moderate secondary mitral regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation, concomitant mitral valve annuloplasty did not improve the long-term survival, the incidence of cardiac death and mitral valve reoperation or the evolution of the mitral valve disease., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Mitral regurgitation (MR) due to commissural prolapse or flail represents a pattern of valve dysfunction that can be treated, among other techniques, by suturing the margins of the anterior and posterior leaflets in the commissural area (commissural closure). The very long-term results of this technique have not been reported so far and represent the objective of this study., Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was carried on querying for patients who underwent commissural closure and ring annuloplasty within the time frame 1997-2007 to provide a robust long-term assessment. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) using death as a competitive outcome was used to estimate cardiac death and reoperation for mitral valve replacement. To describe the time course of MR, we performed a longitudinal analysis using generalized estimating equations with a random intercept for correlated data., Results: A total of 125 patients were included. At 15 years, the CIF for cardiac death, with non-cardiac death as a competitive event, was 8.0 ± 2.57% (95% confidence interval [3.88-13.93]). At 15 years, the CIF for reintervention for a mitral valve replacement with death as a competitive event was 5.0 ± 1.98%, 95% confidence interval [2.04-9.89]. No significant predictors of reintervention for mitral valve replacement were identified. At 5 years, the predicted rate of MR ≥3+ recurrence was 2.53% while it was 8.22% at 15 years. In no case a more than mild mitral stenosis was detected., Conclusions: Severe MR due to commissural prolapse/flail can be effectively treated with commissural closure and ring annuloplasty. In our series, the rate of reoperation in the very long term was extremely low. Similarly, longitudinal analysis demonstrated a very low rate of MR ≥3+ recurrence., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The appropriateness of moderate aortic regurgitation treatment during mitral valve (MV) surgery remains unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes of patients with moderate aortic regurgitation at the time of MV surgery., Methods: We included 183 patients admitted to our institution for elective treatment of MV disease between 2004 and 2018, in whom moderate aortic regurgitation was diagnosed during preoperative evaluation. One hundred and twenty-two patients underwent isolated MV surgery (study group) whereas 61 patients underwent concomitant MV surgery and aortic valve replacement (control group)., Results: One death (0.8%) occurred in the study group, and 3 deaths (4.8%) occurred in the control group (P = 0.52). The rate of the most common postoperative complication was similar between the 2 groups. At 12 years, the cumulative incidence function of cardiac death, with non-cardiac death as a competing risk, was 4.7 ± 2.8% in the study group; no cardiac deaths were observed in the control group (P = 0.078). At 6 and 12 years, in the study group, the cumulative incidence function of aortic valve reintervention, with death as a competing risk, was 2.5 ± 1.85% and 19 ± 7.1%, respectively., Conclusions: The appropriate management of moderate aortic regurgitation at the time of MV surgery deserves a careful evaluation by balancing the reintervention rate with the age, the operative risk and the life expectancy of the patient. Our findings suggest that a patient-tailored approach is the key to achieving the best clinical outcome for each individual patient., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Degenerative mitral valve disease represents the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in industrialized countries. When left untreated, patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation show a poor clinical outcome. Conversely, a timely and appropriate correction provides a restored life expectancy and a good quality of life. Therefore, in this scenario, surgical mitral valve repair represents the gold standard of treatment. This review aims to analyze the indications, timing, and contemporary surgical techniques of mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Moreover, the value of heart team approach and centers of excellence for mitral valve repair are also deeply discussed., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Unlike secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of left ventricular disease, results of surgical treatment of severe atrial functional MR has remained largely unspoken. The aim of this study is to analyze short to midterm results of isolated ring annuloplasty in patients with severe atrial functional MR, in comparison with a matched cohort of patients with secondary MR., Methods: A retrospective review of our Institutional database was carried out to find all patients fulfilling strict echocardiographic criteria to define atrial functional MR. A control group of patients with MR secondary to ventricular disease was selected. All patients underwent mitral repair by means of isolated ring annuloplasty. Mortality, reoperation for severe MR, and recurrence of MR were assessed by clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of recurrence of MR using death and reoperation as the competitive risk was used., Results: Twenty patients were selected for the study group and 25 for the control group. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of mortality and reoperation rate. At 2 years, the CIF of recurrence of MR ≥ 3+ and ≥ 2+ was significantly higher in patients with secondary MR compared to patients with atrial functional MR (20.8 ± 8.29% vs 5.9 ± 5.71% and 45.8 ± 10.17% vs 5.9 ± 5.71%) CONCLUSION: In patients with severe atrial functional MR, mitral valve repair by means of isolated ring annuloplasty seems a more effective and durable treatment as compared to patients with MR secondary to ventricular disease. Larger cohorts with longer follow up are needed to confirm these results., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: After mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), no or mild (≤1+/4+) residual MR should remain. Occasionally patients are left with more than mild residual MR (>1+/4+) for a number of reasons. The aim of this study was to assess the late implications of such a suboptimal repair in a matched cohort study., Methods: From 2006 to 2013, a total of 2158 patients underwent mitral repair for degenerative MR in our institution. Fifty patients (2.3%) with residual MR >1+ at hospital discharge (study group) were matched up to 1:2 with 91 patients operated on during the same period who were discharged with MR ≤1+ (control group). The median follow-up was 8 years (interquartile range 6.3-10.1, longest 12.7 years). A comparative analysis of the outcomes in the 2 groups was performed., Results: Overall survival at 8 years was 87 ± 8% in the study group and 92 ± 3% in the control group (P = 0.23). There were 3 late deaths (6.0%) in the study group and 6 deaths (6.6%) in the control group. Freedom from reoperation was similar (P = 1.0). At 8 years the prevalence of MR ≥3+ was significantly higher in the study group (15.6% vs 2.1%, P < 0.001) as was the use of diuretics, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers. Interestingly, even in the control group, a gradual progression of MR was observed because 13.3% of the patients had MR ≥2+ at 8 years with a significant increase over time (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Residual MR more than mild at hospital discharge is associated with lower durability of mitral repair and the need for more medical therapy in the long term. However, even an initial optimal result does not completely arrest the progression of the degenerative process., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Uncorrected severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to posterior prolapse leads to left ventricular dilatation. At this stage, mitral valve repair becomes mandatory to avoid permanent myocardial injury. However, which technique among neochoardae implantation and leaflet resection provides the best results in this scenario remains unknown. METHODS We selected 332 patients with left ventricular dilatation and severe degenerative MR due to posterior leaflet (PL) prolapse who underwent neochoardae implantation (85 patients) or PL resection (247 patients) at our institution between 2008 and 2020. A propensity score matching analysis was carried on to decrease the differences at baseline. RESULTS Matching yielded 85 neochordae implantations and 85 PL resections. At 10 years, freedom from cardiac death and freedom from mitral valve reoperation were 92.6 ± 6.1% vs 97.8 ± 2.1% and 97.7 ± 2.2% vs 95 ± 3% in the neochordae group and in the PL resection group, respectively. The MR ≥2+ recurrence rate was 23.9 ± 10% in the neochordae group and 20.8 ± 5.8% in the PL resection group (P  = 0.834) at 10 years. At the last follow-up, the neochordae group showed a higher reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (44 vs 48 mm; P  = 0.001) and a better ejection fraction (60% vs 55%; P  < 0.001) compared to PL resection group. CONCLUSIONS In this subgroup of patients, both neochordae implantation and leaflet resection provide excellent durability of the repair in the long term. Neochordae implantation might have a better effect on dilated left ventricle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The EuroSCORE II is widely used to predict 30-day mortality in patients undergoing open and transcatheter cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the EuroSCORE II in predicting 30-day mortality in a large cohort of patients undergoing surgical mitral valve repair in a high-volume centre. METHODS A retrospective review of our institutional database was carried on to find all patients who underwent mitral valve repair in our department from January 2012 to December 2019. Discrimination of the EuroSCORE II was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. The maximum Youden's Index was employed to define the optimal cut-point. Calibration was assessed by generating calibration plot that visually compares the predicted mortality with the observed mortality. Calibration was also tested with the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Finally, the accuracy of the models was tested calculating the Brier score. RESULTS A total of 2645 patients were identified, and the median EuroSCORE II was 1.3% (0.6–2.0%). In patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), the EuroSCORE II showed low discrimination (area under the curve 0.68), low accuracy (Brier score 0.27) and low calibration with overestimation of the 30-day mortality. In patients with secondary MR, the EuroSCORE II showed a good overall performance estimating the 30-day mortality with good discrimination (area under the curve 0.88), good accuracy (Brier score 0.003) and good calibration. CONCLUSIONS In patients with degenerative MR operated on in a high-volume centre with a high level of expertise in mitral valve repair, the EuroSCORE II significantly overestimates the 30-day mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES After mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), no or mild (≤1+/4+) residual MR should remain. Occasionally patients are left with more than mild residual MR (>1+/4+) for a number of reasons. The aim of this study was to assess the late implications of such a suboptimal repair in a matched cohort study. METHODS From 2006 to 2013, a total of 2158 patients underwent mitral repair for degenerative MR in our institution. Fifty patients (2.3%) with residual MR >1+ at hospital discharge (study group) were matched up to 1:2 with 91 patients operated on during the same period who were discharged with MR ≤1+ (control group). The median follow-up was 8 years (interquartile range 6.3–10.1, longest 12.7 years). A comparative analysis of the outcomes in the 2 groups was performed. RESULTS Overall survival at 8 years was 87 ± 8% in the study group and 92 ± 3% in the control group (P  = 0.23). There were 3 late deaths (6.0%) in the study group and 6 deaths (6.6%) in the control group. Freedom from reoperation was similar (P  = 1.0). At 8 years the prevalence of MR ≥3+ was significantly higher in the study group (15.6% vs 2.1%, P  < 0.001) as was the use of diuretics, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers. Interestingly, even in the control group, a gradual progression of MR was observed because 13.3% of the patients had MR ≥2+ at 8 years with a significant increase over time (P  < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Residual MR more than mild at hospital discharge is associated with lower durability of mitral repair and the need for more medical therapy in the long term. However, even an initial optimal result does not completely arrest the progression of the degenerative process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]