1. Mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis: Kobe experience.
- Author
-
Okada Y, Nakai T, Muro T, Ito H, and Shomura Y
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Endocarditis diagnostic imaging, Endocarditis physiopathology, Female, Heart Valve Diseases diagnostic imaging, Heart Valve Diseases physiopathology, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Hemodynamics, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve diagnostic imaging, Mitral Valve physiopathology, Postoperative Complications surgery, Recovery of Function, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Endocarditis surgery, Heart Valve Diseases surgery, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation, Mitral Valve surgery, Mitral Valve Annuloplasty adverse effects, Mitral Valve Annuloplasty instrumentation, Pericardium transplantation
- Abstract
Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed our experience of mitral valve repair for native mitral valve endocarditis in a single institution., Methods: From January 1991 to October 2011, 171 consecutive patients underwent surgery for infective endocarditis. Of these, 147 (86%) had mitral valve repair. At the time of surgery, 98 patients had healed (group A) and 49 had active infective endocarditis (group B). Repair procedures included resection of all infected tissue and thick restricted post-infection tissue, leaflet and annulus reconstruction with treated autologous pericardium, chordal reconstruction with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures, and ring annuloplasty if necessary. Fifty-two (35%) patients required concomitant procedures. The study endpoints were overall survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from valve-related events. The median follow-up was 78 months., Results: There was one hospital death (hospital mortality 0.7%). Survival at 10 years was 88.5% ± 3.5% with no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.052). Early reoperation was required in 4 patients in group B due to persistent infection or procedure failure. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 99% ± 1.0% in group A and 89.6 ± 4.0% in group B ( p = 0.024). Event-free survival at 10 years was 79.3% ± 4.8% (group A: 83.4% ± 5.9%, group B: 72.6% ± 6.9%, p = 0.010)., Conclusions: Mitral valve repair was highly successful using autologous pericardium, chordal reconstruction, and ring annuloplasty if required. Long-term results were acceptable in terms survival, freedom from reoperation, and event-free survival. Mitral valve repair is recommended for mitral infective endocarditis in most patients.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF