Search

While transcatheter mitral valve (TMV) replacement technology has great clinical potential for surgically inoperable patients suffering from mitral regurgitation, no TMV has yet achieved regulatory approval. The diversity of devices currently under development reflects a lack of consensus regarding optimal design approaches. In Part I of this two-part study, a test system was developed for the quantification of paravalvular leakage (PVL) following deployment of a TMV or TMV-like device in pressurized, explanted porcine hearts (N = 7). Using this system, PVL rate was investigated as a function of steady trans-mitral pressure (ΔP), TMV shape, and TMV-annular oversizing, using a series of "mock TMV plug" devices. Across all devices, PVL was found to approximately trend with the square of ΔP. PVL rates were approximately 0-15 mL/s under hypotensive pressure, 10-40 mL/s under normotension, and 30-85 mL/s under severe hypertension. D-shaped devices significantly reduced PVL vs. circular devices; however, this effect was diminished upon oversizing to the annulus by 6 mm inter-trigonal distance. In conclusion, this steady pressure, in vitro test system was effective to compare PVL performance across TMV-like designs. PVL exhibited complex dynamics in terms of its response to transvalvular pressure and TMV profile.

Transcatheter mitral valve (TMV) replacement technology has great clinical potential for surgically inoperable patients suffering from mitral regurgitation. An important goal for robust TMV design is maximizing the likelihood of achieving a geometry post-implant that facilitates optimal performance. To support this goal, improved understanding of the annular forces that oppose TMV radial expansion is necessary. In Part II of this study, novel circular and D-shaped Radial Expansion Force Transducers (C-REFT and D-REFT) were developed and employed in porcine hearts (N = 12), to detect the forces required to radially expand the mitral annulus to discrete oversizing levels. Forces on both the septal-lateral and inter-commissural axes (F SL and F IC ) scaled with device size. The D-REFT experienced lower F SL than the C-REFT (19.8 ± 7.4 vs. 17.4 ± 10.8 N, p = 0.002) and greater F IC (31.5 ± 14.0 vs. 36.9 ± 16.2 N; p = 0.002), and was more sensitive to degree of oversizing. Across all tests, F IC /F SL was 2.21 ± 1.33, likely reflecting low resistance to radial expansion at the aorto-mitral curtain. In conclusion, the annular forces opposing TMV radial expansion are non-uniform, and depend on final TMV shape and size. Based on this two-part study, we propose that radial force applied at the commissural aspect of the annulus has the most potent effect on paravalvular sealing.