Search

Objective: The current study aims to evaluate if vaginal misoprostol (400 mcg) administered prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion increases the ease and success of insertion among women who had delivered only by elective cesarean delivery (CD)., Study Design: The current study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Assiut Women's Health Hospital, Egypt, between the 1st of April 2015 and the 31st of March 2016 and included women who delivered only by elective CD. One hundred forty women were randomized into two groups; misoprostol group received two misoprostol 400-mcg tablets vaginally, and placebo group received two placebo tablets 3 h before a copper T380A IUD insertion. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the ease of insertion score using a 10-cm visual analog scale between both groups with 0=very easy insertion, and 10=terribly difficult insertion., Results: The ease of insertion score was lower in the misoprostol group (2.2±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.5, p=.0001) with higher number of successful IUD insertions than the placebo group (69 [98.6%] vs. 61 [87.1%], p=.009). The mean pain score reported by the women was lower in misoprostol group (2.7±0.6 vs. 4.3±0.8) with higher level of satisfaction from the whole procedure (8.9±0.4 vs. 7.9±0.2) with p=.001 for both., Conclusions: Misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally prior to IUD insertion eases and increase the success of insertion with reduction of pain among women who had delivered only by elective CD., Implications: The use of vaginal misoprostol before IUD insertion in women who had never delivered vaginally before may increase the ease and success of insertion. Moreover, it may reduce the pain felt by women during the procedure., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To test the effectiveness and safety of early amniotomy after vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labor., Study Design: A randomized clinical trial that included 320 women with medical or obstetric indication for labor induction. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups, amniotomy group and control group. Each participant received vaginal misoprostol 50 μg every 6 h for induction of labor. In amniotomy group, amniotomy was done in the early active phase of labor while in the control group, the membranes were left to rupture spontaneously or as judged by the senior resident in the duty., Results: More subjects in the amniotomy group achieved vaginal delivery within 24 h than in the control group [117 (73.13 %) vs. 105 (65.63 %)]. Subjects in the amniotomy group reported shorter induction to delivery interval (09.72 ± 4.61 h vs. 13.61 ± 5.61, P = .002), and better neonatal outcome compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between both group with regard to number of doses of misoprostol, need for oxytocin, Cesarean Section indication and maternal side effects., Conclusion: Early amniotomy after vaginal misoprostol for labor induction is associated with higher successful vaginal delivery rate, shorter labor duration and better neonatal outcome.

Background: Labor induction in the presence of unfavorable cervix is a common indication for the use of prostaglandins. However, in the last years, there has been a considerable interest in the use of nitrous oxide donors for cervical ripening and labor induction., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravaginal administration of NOD isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and induction of labor., Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Woman's Health Center, Assiut University., Methods: Two hundred and ninety women scheduled for labor induction were recruited and assigned randomly to IMN or placebo followed by misoprostol 50 μg. The efficacy of the medication was evaluated by predetermined outcome variables for cervical ripening and induction of labor and delivery., Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, parity, gestational age, indication for induction, and Bishop's score. Women receiving IMN plus misoprostol showed significant changes in the Bishop score 6 h after administration as compared to misoprostol plus placebo (8.57 ± 1.46 vs. 7.6 ± 1.39 h, P = 0.001), significantly shorter intervals from the beginning of the induction to the beginning of the active phase of labor (10.97 ± 2.87 vs. 13.91 ± 2.16 h, P = 0.0004) and from the beginning of induction to the time of delivery (19.56 ± 3.96 vs. 23 ± 2.62 P ≤ 0.001). No significant differences in the incidence of uterine hypersystole, tachysystole and hyperstimulation. Regarding headache, much more women suffer headache in the IMN group (51) with significant difference to placebo group (11)., Conclusions: Using a combination of IMN and misoprostol is more efficient than misoprostol alone in terms of fast cervical ripening and shortening of induction-labour interval.

Aims: To assess the effectiveness and safety of sublingual misoprostol (50 microg), compared with the same dose administered vaginally every 6 h for cervical ripening and labor induction in women with a viable fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy., Methods: This double-blind randomized prospective placebo-controlled trial included 480 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction and undilated, uneffaced cervices. The patients were assigned randomly to receive 50 microg of sublingual or 50 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 6 h for 24 h. Maternal and neonatal outcome were analyzed., Results: A total of 169 (70.4%) patients delivered vaginally in the sublingual group compared to 160 (66.7%) in the vaginal group. The main indications for cesarean section in both groups were fetal distress (33/71 [46.4%] vs 38/80 [47.5%]), followed by failure of labor progress. Thirty three (13.8%) patients in the sublingual group had meconium staining of the amniotic fluid compared to 39 (16.3%) in the vaginal group. There was no difference between the groups regarding the induction-to-delivery interval, duration of labor, neonatal outcome or maternal side-effects., Conclusion: Sublingual misoprostol is as effective as vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term. Moreover, the sublingual route is associated with a significantly higher patient satisfaction rate than vaginal misoprostol.