1. Open to robotic right donor hepatectomy: A tectonic shift in surgical technique.
- Author
-
Amma, Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony, Mathew, Johns Shaji, Varghese, Christi Titus, Nair, Krishnanunni, Mallick, Shweta, Chandran, Biju, Menon, Ramachandran Narayana, Gopalakrishnan, Unnikrishnan, Balakrishnan, Dinesh, George, Preethi Sara, Vayoth, Sudheer Othiyil, and Sudhindran, Surendran
- Subjects
OPERATIVE surgery ,HEPATECTOMY ,PROPENSITY score matching ,MINIMALLY invasive procedures ,ROBOTICS ,LIVER surgery - Abstract
Robotic right live donor hepatectomy (r‐LDRH) has been reported with reduced morbidity compared to open donor right hepatectomy (o‐LDRH) in few recent series. Nevertheless, its routine use is debated. We present a large series comparing pure r‐LDRH with o‐LDRH. Consecutive r‐LDRH performed from June 2018 to June 2020 (n = 102) were compared with consecutive donors undergoing o‐LDRH (n = 152) from February 2016 to February 2018, a period when r‐LDRH was not available at this center. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis of 89 case‐control pairs was additionally performed. Primary endpoints were length of high dependency unit (HDU) and hospital stay and Clavien‐Dindo graded complications among donors. Although r‐LDRH took longer to perform (540 vs. 462 min, P <.001), the postoperative peak transaminases levels (P <.001), the length of HDU (3 vs. 4 days, P <.001), and hospital stay (8 vs. 9 days, P <.001) were lower in in donors undergoing r‐LDRH. Clavien‐Dindo graded complications were similar (16.67% in r‐LDRH and 13.16% in o‐LDRH). The rates of early allograft dysfunction (1.6% vs. 3.3%), bile leak (14.7% vs. 10.7%), and 1‐year mortality (13.7% vs. 11.8%) were comparable between r‐LDRH and o‐LDRH recipients. PSM analysis yielded similar results between the groups. These data support the safety and feasibility of r‐LDRH in select donors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF