Search

Introduction: Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) has evolving recommendations for the optimal supraglottic airway (SGA) device for inclusion to the medics' aid bag., Methods: We convened an expert consensus panel consisting of a mix of 8 prehospital specialists, emergency medicine experts, and experienced combat medics, with the intent to offer recommendations for optimal SGA selection. Prior to meeting, we independently reviewed previously published studies conducted by our study team, conducted a virtual meeting, and summarized the findings to the panel. The studies included an analysis of end-user after action reviews, a market analysis, engineering testing, and prospective feedback from combat medics. The panel members then made recommendations regarding their top 3 choices of devices including the options of military custom design. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze panel recommendations., Results: The preponderance (7/8, 88%) of panel members recommended the gel-cuffed SGA, followed by the self-inflating-cuff SGA (5/8, 62%) and laryngeal tube SGA (5/8, 62%). Panel members expressed concerns primarily related to the (1) devices' tolerance for the military environment, and (2) ability to effectively secure the gel-cuffed SGA and the self-inflating-cuff SGA during transport., Conclusions: A preponderance of panel members selected the gel-cuff SGA with substantial feedback highlighting the need for military-specific customizations to support the combat environment needs.

Background: Prehospital surgical cricothyrotomies and complications from placement are an important and under-evaluated topic for both the military and civilian prehospital populations. This study uses the Department of Defense Trauma Registry to identify complications and the incidence of complications in prehospital combat surgical cricothyrotomies., Methods: A secondary analysis of previously described prehospital-based dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) was performed. Casualties who had a prehospital cricothyrotomy performed were isolated and assessed for documented airway injuries and surgical procedures after hospital admission., Results: There were 25,8976 casualties in the original dataset, of which 251 met inclusion for this analysis. The median age was 25 and most (98%) were male. Explosives were most frequent (55%) followed by firearm (33%) mechanisms. Most were host nation partner forces (35%) and humanitarian (32%) casualties. The median injury severity score was 24. The most frequent seriously injured body region was the head/neck (61%). Most (61%) were discharged alive. Within the 251, 14% had a complication noted, most commonly requiring tracheostomy revision (5%)., Conclusions: Cricothyrotomies are rarely performed, but when they are performed and the casualty survives long enough to reach a military treatment facility with surgical capabilities, the incidence of near-term and long-term complications is high. A better understanding of outcomes associated with this procedure will enable more targeted training and technology development.

Background: Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially preventable death on the battlefield. Prior to 2017, the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) recommended the surgical cricothyrotomy as the definitive airway of choice. More recently, the CoTCCC has recommended the iGel™ as the supraglottic airway (SGA) of choice. Data comparing these methods in medics are limited. We compared first-pass placement success among combat medics using a synthetic cadaver model. Methods: We conducted a randomized cross-over study of United States Army combat medics using a synthetic cadaver model. Participants performed a surgical cricothyrotomy using a method of their choosing versus placement of the SGA iGel in random order. The primary outcome was first-pass success. Secondary outcomes included time-to-placement, complications, placement failures, and self-reported participant preferences. Results: Of the 68 medics recruited, 63 had sufficient data for inclusion. Most were noncommissioned officers in rank (54%, E6-E7), with 51% reporting previous deployment experience. There was no significant difference in first-pass success (P = .847) or successful cannulation with regard to the two devices. Time-to-placement was faster with the iGel (21.8 seconds vs. 63.8 seconds). Of the 59 medics who finished the survey, we found that 35 (59%) preferred the iGel and 24 (41%) preferred the cricothyrotomy. Conclusions: In our study of active duty Army combat medics, we found no significant difference with regard to first-pass success or overall successful placement between the iGel and cricothyrotomy. Time-to-placement was significantly lower with the iGel. Participants reported preferring the iGel versus the cricothyrotomy on survey. Further research is needed, as limitations in our study highlighted many shortcomings in airway research involving combat medics.