Search

Aggregate statistics can provide intra-conflict and inter-conflict mortality comparisons and trends within and between U.S. combat operations. However, capturing individual-level data to evaluate medical and non-medical factors that influence combat casualty mortality has historically proven difficult. The Department of Defense (DoD) Trauma Registry, developed as an integral component of the Joint Trauma System during recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, has amassed individual-level data that have afforded greater opportunity for a variety of analyses and comparisons. Although aggregate statistics are easily calculated and commonly used across the DoD, other issues that require consideration include the impact of individual medical interventions, non-medical factors, non-battle-injured casualties, and incomplete or missing medical data, especially for prehospital care and forward surgical team care. Needed are novel methods to address these issues in order to provide a clearer interpretation of aggregate statistics and to highlight solutions that will ultimately increase survival and eliminate preventable death on the battlefield. Although many U.S. military combat fatalities sustain injuries deemed non-survivable, survival among these casualties might be improved using primary and secondary prevention strategies that prevent injury or reduce injury severity. The current commentary proposes adjustments to traditional aggregate combat casualty care statistics by integrating statistics from the DoD Military Trauma Mortality Review process as conducted by the Joint Trauma System and Armed Forces Medical Examiner System., (2024.)

Under direction from the Defense Health Agency, subject matter experts (SMEs) from the Joint Trauma System, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, and civilian sector established the Military Trauma Mortality Review process. To establish the most empirically robust process, these SMEs used both qualitative and quantitative methods published in a series of peer-reviewed articles over the last 3 years. Most recently, the Military Mortality Review process was implemented for the first time on all battle-injured service members attached to the United States Special Operations Command from 2001 to 2018. The current Military Mortality Review process builds on the strengths and limitations of important previous work from both the military and civilian sector. To prospectively improve the trauma care system and drive preventable death to the lowest level possible, we present the main misconceptions and lessons learned from our 3-year effort to establish a reliable and sustainable Military Trauma Mortality Review process. These lessons include the following: (1) requirement to use standardized and appropriate lexicon, definitions, and criteria; (2) requirement to use a combination of objective injury scoring systems, forensic information, and thorough SME case review to make injury survivability and death preventability determinations; (3) requirement to use nonmedical information to make reliable death preventability determinations and a comprehensive list of opportunities for improvement to reduce preventable deaths within the trauma care system; and (4) acknowledgment that the military health system still has gaps in current infrastructure that must be addressed to globally and continuously implement the process outlined in the Military Trauma Mortality Review process in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Introduction: The United States and United Kingdom (UK) had differing approaches to the surgical skill mix within deployed medical treatment facilities (MTFs) in support of the military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan., Methods: The US and UK combat trauma registries were scrutinized for patients with penetrating neck injury (PNI) at deployed coalition MTF between March 2003 and October 2011. A multivariate mixed effects logistic regression model (threshold, p < 0.05) was used stratified by MTF location and year of injury. The dependent variable was fatality on leaving Role 3, and the independent variables were ISS on arrival, nationality, MTF nationality, and presence of head and neck surgeon., Results: A total of 3,357 (4.9%) of 67,586 patients who arrived alive at deployed military MTF were recorded to have sustained neck injuries; of which 2,186 (83%) were PNIs and the remainder were blunt injuries. When service members killed in action were included, the incidence of neck injury rose from 4.9% to 10%. Seven hundred nine (32%) of 2,186 patients with PNI underwent neck exploration; 555 patients were recorded to have sustained cervical vascular injury, 230 (41%) of 555 underwent vascular ligation or repair. Where it was recorded, PNI directly contributed to death in 64 (28%) of 228 of patients. Fatality status was positively associated with ISS on arrival (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.06; p < 0.001) and the casualty being a local national (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.38; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Significant differences in the treatment and survival of casualties with PNI were identified between nations in this study; this may reflect differing cervical protection, management protocols, and surgical capability and is worthy of further study. In an era of increasing specialization within surgery, neck exploration remains a skill that must be retained by military surgeons deploying to Role 2 and Role 3 MTF., Level of Evidence: Retrospective cohort study, level III.

The Afghan National Army Special Operations Command (ANASOC) uses several documents for casualty reporting. By analyzing these documents from a period of March to December 2018, the authors demonstrate the predominance of gunshot fatalities within ANASOC at approximately 63% of combat deaths and a high rate of prehospital death at approximately 97% of combat deaths. The data also demonstrate relatively few cases of long-term disability from ANASOC soldiers wounded in action. The authors used these conclusions to create a Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-Afghanistan (CJSOTF-A) working group that recommended changes to the medical curriculum at the ANASOC School of Excellence. These recommendations centered on an increased emphasis on bleeding control to prevent death from hemorrhagic shock., (2019.)

Objectives: To perform the first direct comparison of the facial injuries sustained and treatment performed at USA and UK deployed medical treatment facilities (MTFs) in support of the military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan., Setting: The US and UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registries were scrutinised for all patients with facial injuries presenting alive to a UK or US deployed MTF between 1 March 2003 and 31 October 2011., Participants: US and UK military personnel, local police, local military and civilians., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: An adjusted multiple logistic regression model was performed using tracheostomy as the primary dependent outcome variable and treatment in a US MTF, US or UK military, mandible fracture and treatment of mandible fracture as independent secondary variables., Results: Facial injuries were identified in 16 944 casualties, with the most common being those to skin/muscle (64%), bone fractures (36%), inner/middle ear (28%) and intraoral damage (11%). Facial injuries were equally likely to undergo surgery in US MTF as UK MTF (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.4603 to 1.142, p=0.6656); however, variations were seen in injury type treated. In US MTF, 692/1452 (48%) of mandible fractures were treated by either open or closed reduction compared with 0/167 (0%) in UK MTF (χ 2 : 113.6; p≤0.0001). US military casualties who had treatment of their mandible fracture (open reduction and internal fixation or mandibulo-maxillary fixation) were less likely to have had a tracheostomy than those who did not undergo stabilisation of the fractured mandible (OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.86; p=0.0066)., Conclusions: The capability to surgically treat mandible fractures by open or closed reduction should be considered as an integral component of deployed coalition surgical care in the future., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Technology has become a necessity in modern society, providing capabilities that have never been experienced before. The integration of such capabilities arms today's Special Operations medic with abilities that can make a vast difference to the survivability rate of an ill or injured patient. Taking advantage of new technological capabilities such as advanced monitoring and diagnostics and portable ultrasound also plays a key role; together with the evolution in modern communication., (2019.)

Background: During the past 17 years of conflict the deployed US military health care system has found new and innovative ways to reduce combat mortality down to the lowest case fatality rate in US history. There is currently a data dearth of emergency department (ED) care delivered in this setting. We seek to describe ED interventions in this setting., Methods: We used a series of ED procedure codes to identify subjects within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from January 2007 to August 2016., Results: During this time, 28,222 met inclusion criteria. The median age of causalities in this dataset was 25 years and most (96.9%) were male, US military (41.3%), and part of Operation Enduring Freedom (66.9%). The majority survived to hospital discharge (95.5%). Most subjects sustained injuries by explosives (55.3%) and gunshot wound (GSW). The majority of subjects had an injury severity score that was considered minor (74.1%), while the preponderance of critically injured casualties sustained injuries by explosive (0.7%). Based on AIS, the most frequently seriously injured body region was the extremities (23.9%). The bulk of administered blood products were packed red blood cells (PRBC, 26.4%). Endotracheal intubation was the most commonly performed critical procedure (11.9%). X-ray (79.9%) was the most frequently performed imaging study., Conclusions: US military personnel comprised the largest proportion of combat casualties and most were injured by explosive. Within this dataset, ED providers most frequently performed endotracheal intubation, administered blood products, and obtained diagnostic imaging studies., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Level of Evidence: Observational/retrospective/historic controls, level IV.

Introduction: Haemorrage is the leading cause of death after combat related injuries and bleeding management is the cornerstone of management of these casualties. French armed forces are deployed in Barkhane operation in the Sahel-Saharan Strip who represents an immense area. Since this constraint implies evacuation times beyond doctrinal timelines, an institutional decision has been made to deploy blood products on the battlefield and transfuse casualties before role 2 admission if indicated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the transfusion practices on battlefield during the first year following the implementation of this policy., Materials and Methods: Prospective collection of data about combat related casualties categorized alpha evacuated to a role 2. Battlefield transfusion was defined as any transfusion of blood product (red blood cells, plasma, whole blood) performed by role 1 or Medevac team before admission at a role 2. Patients' characteristics, battlefield transfusions' characteristics and complications were analysed., Results: During the one year study, a total of 29 alpha casualties were included during the period study. Twenty-eight could be analysed, 7/28 (25%) being transfused on battlefield, representing a total of 22 transfusion episodes. The most frequently blood product transfused was French lyophilized plasma (FLYP). Most of transfusion episodes occurred during medevac. Compared to non-battlefield transfused casualties, battlefield transfused casualties suffered more wounded anatomical regions (median number of 3 versus 2, p = 0.04), had a higher injury severity score (median ISS of 45 versus 25, p = 0,01) and were more often transfused at role 2, received more plasma units and whole blood units. There was no difference in evacuation time to role 2 between patients transfused on battlefield and non-transfused patients. There was no complication related to battlefield transfusions. Blood products transfusion onset on battlefield ranged from 75 min to 192 min after injury., Conclusion: Battlefield transfusion for combat-related casualties is a logistical challenge. Our study showed that such a program is feasible even in an extended area as Sahel-Saharan Strip operation theatre and reduces time to first blood product transfusion for alpha casualties. FLYP is the first line blood product on the battlefield., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

I suggest that Special Operations Forces (SOF) medicine should explicitly acknowledge the Special Operations combat medic's role in attending death. This acknowledgment will allow researchers to evaluate and delimit the medic's needs in relationship to an expanded set of roles that move beyond life-saving care. This article comprises four sections. First, I provide background to my argument by exploring some assumptions of modern medicine and objections to exploring battlefield death care. Second, I describe how I see the medic's role expanding with the introduction of prolonged field care. Third, I address the implications of the medic's expanded role in relationship to role and function stress and strain. Fourth, I address the moral complexity related to withdrawing or withholding care. I conclude by briefly highlighting some of the implications for future research. In explicitly engaging death as a medical reality for which the medic ought to be prepared, SOF medicine could set the foundational development for seeing death as a valuable gift to be explored, not a failure to be avoided or burden to be overcome., (2018.)

Background: Pain control in trauma is an integral part of treatment in combat casualty care (CCC). More soldiers injured on the battlefield will need analgesics for pain than those who will need lifesaving interventions (LSI). It has been shown that early treatment of pain improves outcomes after traumatic injury, whereas inadequate treatment leads to higher rates of PTSD. The purpose of this article is to report the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) experience with point of injury (POI) use of analgesia., Methods: All cases documented in the IDF Trauma Registry (ITR) between January 1997 and December 2014 were examined. All cases of POI pain medications were extracted. Data collection included mechanism of injury, wound distribution, pain medication administered, mortality, and provider type., Results: Of 8,576 patients, 1,056 (12.3%) patients who had at least one documented pain management treatment were included in this study. Demographics of the study population included 94.2% men and 5.8% women with a median age of 21 years. Injury mechanisms included 40.3% blast injuries (n = 426) and 29% gunshot injuries (306). Of 1,513 injured body regions reported, 52% (787) were extremity wounds (upper and lower), 23% (353) were truncal wounds, and 17.7% (268) were head and neck injuries. A total of 1,469 episodes of analgesic treatment were reported. The most common types of analgesics were morphine (74.7%, 1,097 episodes), ketamine (9.6%, 141 episodes), and fentanyl (13.6%, 200 episodes). Of the patients, 39% (413) received more than one type of analgesic. In 90.5% of cases, analgesia was administered by a physician or a paramedic. Over the span of the study period (1997-2014), types of analgesics given by providers at POI had changed, as fentanyl was introduced to providers. A total of 801 LSIs were performed on 379 (35.9%) patients receiving analgesia, and no adverse events were found in any of the casualties., Conclusion: Most casualties at POI did not receive any analgesics while on the battlefield. The most common analgesics administered at POI were opioids and the most common route of administration was intravenously. This study provides evidence that over time analgesic administration has gained acceptance and has been more common place on the battlefield. Increasingly, more casualties are receiving pain management treatment early in CCC along with LSIs. We hope that this shift will impact CCC by reducing PTSD and overall morbidity resulting from inadequate management of acute pain.

The First World War was a huge tragedy for mankind, but, paradoxically, it represented a source of significant progress in a broad series of human activities, including medicine, since it forced physicians to improve their knowledge in the treatment of a large number of wounded soldiers. The use of heavy artillery and machine guns, as well as chemical warfare, caused very serious and life-threatening lesions and wounds. The most frequent causes of death were not mainly related to gunshot wounds, but rather to fractures, tetanus and septic complications of infectious diseases. In the first part of this article, we describe the surgical procedures and medical therapies carried out by Italian physicians during the First World War, with the aim of treating wounded soldiers in this pre-antibiotic era. Antibacterial solutions, such as those of Dakin-Carrel and sodium hypochlorite and boric acid, the tincture of iodine as well as the surgical and dressing approaches and techniques used to remove pus from wounds, such as ignipuncture and thermocautery or lamellar drainage are reported in detail. In the second part of the paper, the organization of the Italian military hospitals network, the systems and tools useful to transport wounded soldiers both in the front lines and in the rear is amply discussed. In addition, the number of soldiers enrolling, and those dying, wounded or missing during the Great War on the Italian front is estimated.

Background: Pelvic vascular injuries (PVIs) rarely occur in isolation and are often associated with significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, trends, and early outcomes of PVIs sustained in combat., Methods: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry was queried to identify all patients treated with PVIs during the first 10 years of Operation Enduring Freedom. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, type of vascular injury, in-theater complications, and early clinical outcomes were examined., Results: From 2003 to 2012, 143 patients (99% male) sustained a PVI in Afghanistan. During this period, there was a persistent increase in the percentage of patient visits (0.4% in 2003 to 2.0% in 2012). The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 24. Sixty-six percent of patient injuries were secondary to explosions. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) encountered by dismounted personnel accounted for 47% of all injuries and were associated with a significantly higher ISS (28) compared with all other mechanisms of injury (P < .01). There were 85 (43%) arterial and 112 (57%) venous PVIs. The most frequent arterial injury was the common iliac artery. Injury to the femoral vein was associated with a higher median transfusion requirement. One patient died in combat theater. Injuries from IEDs had higher rates of coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia compared with other mechanisms of injury (P = .03). Forty-two patients (29%) sustained early infectious complications. Injuries from explosions were also associated with a significantly higher rate of infectious complications compared with other mechanisms of injury (P < .01)., Conclusions: PVIs have occurred with increasing frequency during Operation Enduring Freedom. Despite a persistently low mortality, complication and infection rates remain high, particularly when injuries are secondary to explosions. IEDs are associated with higher ISS and complication rates. Future studies must continue to focus on the prevention and treatment of PVIs sustained in combat, particularly those caused by explosions., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The article presents a comparative characteristics of domestic and foreign approaches to the static analysis of losses of surgical profile in military conflicts. The ways of improvements of statistical materials on military losses for improvement of surgical aid delivery are mapped out. The authors proved the need to establish the register of combat trauma.

The article analyses the experience of medical support of the Red Army troops during the Great Patriotic War. The data characterizing particular forms and methods of work of the medical service of different fronts in the dynamics of the operations in different periods of the war is given. Taken in the Red Army's principles of medical support and the organizational and staff structure of the health service as a whole showed its viability in various conditions of defensive and offensive operations. At the same time, the activities of the medical service needed to make adjustments on the basis of the provisions of the unified military field medical doctrine. A system of medical and evacuation support was created, successfully operated and was improved during the war. The lessons and experiences of medical support in the Great Patriotic War, its comparison with modem problems of the military medicine make it possible to identify the direction of improvement of activities of the medical service in the performance of modern problems by the Armed Forces.

Introduction: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) in an austere environment is an evolving surgical modality., Methods: A retrospective evaluation of all patients surviving 24 hours who underwent a laparotomy from 2002 to 2011 in Iraq and Afghanistan was performed. DCL was defined as a patient undergoing laparotomy at two distinct North American Treaty Organization (NATO) Role 2 or 3 medical treatment facilities (MTFs); a NATO Roles 2 and 3 MTFs, and/or having the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code 54.12, for reopening of recent laparotomy site. Definitive laparotomy (DL) was defined as patients undergoing one operative procedure at one NATO Role 2 or 3 MTF. Demographic data including injury severity scores, hematological transfusion, mortality, intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal operative interventions, and complications were compared., Results: DCL composed of 26.5% (n = 331) of all 1,248 laparotomies performed between March 2002 and September 2011. Total intra-abdominal, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and thromboembolic complications for DCL versus DL were 8.5% and 5.6% (p = 0.07), 2.1% and 0.8% (p = 0.06), and 1.5% and 0.7% (p = 0.17), respectively. Theater discharge mortality from DCL and DL were 1.5% (n = 5), and 1.4% (n = 13) (p = 0.90), respectively., Conclusions: In conclusion, excluding deaths with the first 24 hours, DCL and DL had comparable mortality and complication rates at NATO Roles 2 and 3 MTFs., (Reprint & Copyright © 2016 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.)

Introduction: On January 11th 2013, France launched Operation Serval in Mali following Resolution 2085 of the Security Council of the United Nations. Between January and March 2013, more than 4000 French soldiers were deployed to support the Malian National Army and the African Armed Forces., Methods: All of the patients who had surgery during Operation Serval were entered into a computerised database. Patients' demographic data (age, sex, status) and types of performed surgical procedures (specialties, injury mechanisms) were recorded., Results: 268 patients were operated on in Gao's Role 2 with a total of 296 surgeries. Among those operated on, 40% were Malian civilians, 24% were French soldiers, and 36% were soldiers of the International Coalition Forces. The majority of the surgeries were orthopaedic, and visceral surgeries were common as well, representing 43% of the total surgeries. Specialised surgical procedures including neurosurgery, thoracic, and vascular surgery were also performed. Forty percent of the surgeries were scheduled. War-related traumatic surgeries represented 22% of the surgical procedures, with non-war related surgeries and non-trauma emergency surgeries making up the rest., Conclusion: this analysis confirms the specific characteristic of asymmetric warfare that it results in a relatively reduced number of war-related casualties. Forward surgical teams have to deal with a wide range of injuries requiring several surgical specialties. Surgeries dedicated to medical aid provided to the population also represented an important part of the surgical activity. Because of the diversity and the technicality of the surgical procedures in Role 2, surgeons had to be trained in war surgery covering all of the surgical specialties, while they maintained their specific skills. In France in 2007, the French Military Health Service Academy (École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France) offered an advanced course in surgery for deployment in combat zones, with a special focus on damage control surgeries and the management of mass casualties incidents., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In recent military conflicts, military surgeons encounter more high-energy injuries associated with explosives. Advances in the field care and shorter evacuation time increased survival. However, casualties still incur severe injuries especially to the extremities. We present wound patterns, anatomical distribution and severity of injuries in a Role 2 hospital., Materials and Methods: Two years data have been retrospectively reviewed. Only explosives and firearms injuries were included in the study. Patient profile, admission details, mechanism of injury, AIS anatomical locations, ISS, surgical and medical treatments have been analyzed., Results: Data revealed 170 male casualties. IEDs and GSW accounted for 133 (78%) and 37 (22%) casualties, respectively. An average of 1.8 IED and 1.2 GSW anatomical locations were exposed to injuries. Regardless of the mechanism, injuries were most commonly located in the extremities. IEDs caused significantly higher soft tissue injuries., Discussion: Explosives do not necessarily cause more severe injuries than firearms. However, fragments create multiple, complicated soft tissue injuries which constitute more than half of the injuries. Timely wound debridement and excision of contaminated tissue are crucial to manage extremity soft tissue injuries., Conclusion: Casualty care should be assessed within the context of the capabilities present at a hospital and the cause, type and severity of the wounds. The NATO description of Role 2 care only requires an integrated surgical team for damage control surgery with limited diagnostic and infrastructural capabilities.