Search

Background: High-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) has gained attention in the field of headache research and clinical practice. In this narrative review, we analyzed the available literature to assess the evidence that could help decide whether HFEM may represent a distinct clinical and/or biological entity within the migraine spectrum., Methods: The output of the literature search included 61 papers that were allocated to one of the following topics: (i) socio-demographic features and burden; (ii) clinical and therapeutic aspects; (iii) pathophysiology; and (iv) classification., Results: Multiple features differentiate subjects with HFEM from low-frequency episodic migraine and from chronic migraine: education, employment rates, quality of life, disability and psychiatric comorbidities load. Some evidence also suggests that HFEM bears a specific profile of activation of cortical and spinal pain-related pathways, possibly related to maladaptive plasticity., Conclusions: Subjects with HFEM bear a distinctive clinical and socio-demographic profile within the episodic migraine group, with a higher disease burden and an increased risk of transitioning to chronic migraine . Recognizing HFEM as a distinct entity is an opportunity for the better understanding of migraine and the spectrum of frequency with which it can manifest, as well as for stimulating further research and more adequate public health approaches., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article (past 4 years). FC: None. RDI received personal fees for participating in speaking at scientific events from Eli-Lilly, TEVA and Lundbeck. He has participated in an advisory board for Pfizer and AbbVie. MC: None. FB: None. GV received personal fees for participating in speaking at scientific events from Lundbeck. DM reports support from Abbvie for participating in advisory boards; consulting fees from LifeSciences Consultants, fees from Medscape for organizing educational programs; and personal fees from Lundbeck for lecturing at symposia. PP-R reports support for the present study from AbbVie and personal fees for consulting from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medscape, Novartis, Pfizer and Teva. She has received personal fees for speaking from AbbVie, Dr Reddy's, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medscape, Novartis and Teva, and has had grants paid to her research group from AbbVie, AGAUR, EraNet Neuron, FEDER RIS3CAT, Instituto Investigacion Carlos III, International Headache Society, Novartis and Teva. She is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Lilly Foundation Spain.PJG reports, over the last 36 months, grants from Celgene and Kallyope; personal fees from Aeon Biopharma, Abbvie, Amgen, eNeura, CoolTech LLC, Dr Reddys’, Eli-Lilly and Company, Epalex, Linpharma, Lundbeck, Man&Science, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Satsuma, Shiratronics and Teva Pharmaceuticals; personal fees for advice through Gerson Lehrman Group, Guidepoint, SAI Med Partners and Vector Metric; fees for educational materials from CME Outfitters; as well as publishing royalties or fees from Massachusetts Medical Society, Oxford University Press, UptoDate and Wolters Kluwer. CT reports support from Abbvie and Novartis for investigator-initiated trials; consulting fees from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Dompé, Ipsen, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Teva and Medscape for participating in advisory boards; support from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Dompé, Ipsen, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Teva for attending meetings; and personal fees from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Teva for lecturing at symposia. She is principal investigator of clinical trials sponsored by Abbvie, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Teva. She has received research grants from the European Commission, the Italian Ministry of Health and the Migraine Research Foundation.

Background: miR-155 is involved in the generation and maintenance of inflammation and pain, endothelial function and immune system homeostasis, all functions that are relevant for migraine. The present study aims to assess the levels of miR-155 in migraine subtypes (episodic and chronic) in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls., Methods: This is a cross-sectional, controlled, study involving three study groups: I) episodic migraine (n = 52, EM), II) chronic migraine with medication overuse (n = 44, CM-MO), and III) healthy controls (n = 32, HCs). We assessed the interictal gene expression levels of miR-155, IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-10 in peripheral blood monocytes using rtPCR. The monocytic differentiation toward the M1 (pro-inflammatory) or M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes was assessed in circulating monocytes with flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting., Results: miR-155 gene expression was higher in CM-MO group (2.68 ± 2.47 Relative Quantification - RQ) when compared to EM group (1.46 ± 0.85 RQ, p = 0.006) and HCs (0.44 ± 0.18 RQ, p = 0.001). In addition, miR-155 gene expression was higher in EM group when compared to HCs (p = 0.001). A multivariate analysis confirmed the difference between EM and CM-MO groups after correction for age, sex, smoking habit, preventive treatment, aura, presence of psychiatric or other pain conditions. We found higher gene expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, and lower gene expression of IL-10 in migraine participants when compared to HCs (p = 0.001 for all comparisons). TNF-α and IL-10 genes alterations were more prominent in CM-MO when compared to EM participants (p = 0.001). miR-155 positively correlated with IL-1β (p = 0.001) and TNF-α (p = 0.001) expression levels. Finally, in people with CM-MO, we described an up-regulated percentage of events in both M1 and M2 monocytic profiles., Conclusions: Our study shows for the first time a specific profile of activation of miR-155 gene expression levels in monocytes of selected migraine subpopulations, more pronounced in subjects with CM-MO. Interestingly, mir-155 expression correlated with markers of activation of the inflammatory and immune systems. The CM-MO subpopulation showed a peculiar increase of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory monocytes which worths further investigation., Trial Registration: www., Clinicaltrials: gov . (NCT05891808)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The burden and disability associated with headaches are conceptualized and measured differently at patients' and populations' levels. At the patients' level, through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); at population level, through disability weights (DW) and years lived with a disability (YLDs) developed by the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). DW are 0-1 coefficients that address health loss and have been defined through lay descriptions. With this literature review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of disability in headache disorders, and to present a coefficient referring to patients' disability which might inform future GBD definitions of DW for headache disorders., Methods: We searched SCOPUS and PubMed for papers published between 2015 and 2023 addressing disability in headache disorders. The selected manuscript included a reference to headache frequency and at least one PROM. A meta-analytic approach was carried out to address relevant differences for the most commonly used PROMs (by headache type, tertiles of medication intake, tertiles of females' percentage in the sample, and age). We developed a 0-1 coefficient based on the MIDAS, on the HIT-6, and on MIDAS + HIT-6 which was intended to promote future DW iterations by the GBD consortium., Results: A total of 366 studies, 596 sub-samples, and more than 133,000 single patients were available, mostly referred to cases with migraine. Almost all PROMs showed the ability to differentiate disability severity across conditions and tertiles of medication intake. The indexes we developed can be used to inform future iterations of DW, in particular considering their ability to differentiate across age and tertiles of medication intake., Conclusions: Our review provides reference values for the most commonly used PROMS and a data-driven coefficient whose main added value is its ability to differentiate across tertiles of age and medication intake which underlie on one side the increased burden due to aging (it is likely connected to the increased impact of common comorbidities), and by the other side the increased burden due to medication consumption, which can be considered as a proxy for headache severity. Both elements should be considered when describing disability of headache disorders at population levels., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Vestibular symptoms accompanying headache are quite common in migraine patients. Based on the association of vertigo with migraine, vestibular migraine was included in the appendix of the 3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders as a possible migraine subtype worthy of further investigation. In this post hoc, exploratory analysis, we investigated the occurrence of oculo-vestibular signs (OVSs) during experimentally induced migraine attacks in 24 episodic migraine patients and 19 healthy controls exposed to sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG - 0.9 mg). A comprehensive clinical examination was performed at baseline, at the onset of the migraine-like attack, and immediately before hospital discharge (180 minutes after NTG administration). Three of the 13 migraine patients who developed a spontaneous-like migraine attack during the hospital observation period (23.1%) also developed OVSs during the induction test. Noteworthy, none of the patients with a negative induction test developed OVSs and no OVSs were reported in healthy subjects at any time point. The exploratory nature of our study does not allow to draw definite conclusions on the possible implications of a vestibular dysfunction in migraine pathophysiology. Our results however suggest that NTG administration may lend itself to investigate vestibular dysfunction in migraine, at least in a subset of patients. The present findings represent a starting point for designing future ad hoc and well-powered studies., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: In Italy, monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are subsidized for the preventive treatment of high frequency and chronic migraine (CM) in patients with a MIgraine Disability ASsessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11. Eligibility to treatment continuation requires a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at three months (T3). In this study, we evaluate whether a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at T3 is a reliable predictor of response to one-year erenumab treatment., Methods: In this prospective, open-label, real-world study, 77 CM patients were treated with erenumab 70-140 mg s.c. every 28 days for one year (T13). We collected the following variables: monthly migraine days (MMDs), monthly headache days (MHDs), days of acute medication intake, MIDAS, HIT-6, anxiety, depression, quality of life and allodynia. Response to erenumab was evaluated as: i) average reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment period; and ii) percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs during the last 4 weeks after the 13 th injection (Responders T13 )., Results: Erenumab induced a sustained reduction in MMDs, MHDs and intake of acute medications across the 12-month treatment period, with 64.9% of patients qualifying as Responders T13 . At T3, 55.8% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score (MIDAS Res ) and 55.4% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs (MMD Res ). MIDAS Res and MMD Res patients showed a more pronounced reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment as compared to NON-MIDAS Res (MIDAS Res : T0: 23.5 ± 4.9 vs. T13: 7.7 ± 6.2; NON- MIDAS Res : T0: 21.6 ± 5.4 vs. T13: 11.3 ± 8.8, p = 0.045) and NON-MMD Res (MMD Res : T0: 23.0 ± 4.5 vs. T13: 6.6 ± 4.8; NON-MMD Res : T0: 22.3 ± 6.0 vs. T13: 12.7 ± 9.2, p < 0.001) groups. The percentage of Responders T13 did not differ between MIDAS Res (74.4%) and NON-MIDAS Res (52.9%) patients (p = 0.058), while the percentage of Responders T13 was higher in the MMD Res group (83.3%) when compared to NON-MMD Res (42.9%) (p = 0.001). MMD Res predicted the long-term outcome according to a multivariate analysis (Exp(B) = 7.128; p = 0.001), while MIDAS Res did not. Treatment discontinuation based on MIDAS Res would have early excluded 36.0% of Responders T13 . Discontinuation based on "either MIDAS Res or MMD Res " would have excluded a lower percentage (16%) of Responders T13 ., Conclusion: MIDAS Res only partly reflects the 12-month outcome of erenumab treatment in CM, as it excludes more than one third of responders. A criterion based on the alternative consideration of ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score or MMDs in the first three months of treatment represents a more precise and inclusive option., Trial Registration: The trial was retrospectively registered at www., Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT05442008). CGRP: Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide., Midas: MIgraine Disability Assessment. MMDs: monthly migraine days. MIDAS Res : Patients with a MIDAS score reduction of at least 50% at T3. MMD Res : Patients with a MMDs reduction of at least 50% at T3. Responder T13 : Patients with a MMDs reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the last 4 weeks of observation period (after 13 erenumab administrations). T0: First erenumab administration. T3, T6, T9, T12: Follow-up visits at three, six, nine, and twelve months after first erenumab administration. T13: Last visit of the protocol., (© 2022. The Author(s).)