Search

Purpose: In cholesteatoma recidivism, achieving satisfactory hearing outcome after revision surgery remains challenging. The presence of concomitant recidivism pathology or related anatomical abnormalities can impact revision reconstruction of the sound transmission system. The current study aimed to identify prognostic factors affecting hearing outcomes after surgery for cholesteatoma recidivism. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients whose ears required initial surgery for recidivism between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients followed up for < 6 months and those not indicated for ossiculoplasty were excluded. The impact of preoperative otoscopic findings, computed tomography (CT) features, and hearing levels on the prediction of satisfactory hearing (postoperative air–bone gap [ABG] ≤ 20 dB) was evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Overall, 102 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 24.8 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent predictive factors for satisfactory hearing: presence of aeration in the tympanic cavity (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 13.287 [1.113–158.604], p = 0.0409), absence of soft-tissue density occupying the oval window (OR [95% CI]: 13.445 [3.178–56.887], p = 0.0040), and ≤ 22.5 dB preoperative ABG in four-frequency average (OR [95% CI]: 9.339 [2.026–43.050], p = 0.0042). Conclusions: For cholesteatoma recidivism, reliable preoperative prediction based on CT and ABG would facilitate decision-making regarding the probability of efficient revision ossiculoplasty or appropriate preoperative counseling, including early hearing rehabilitation using hearing aids or implementation of simultaneous implantable hearing equipment during surgery for recidivism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Appropriate reconstruction of the canal wall or maintenance of the middle ear pressure in cholesteatoma may help in preventing recurrence. Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction (RMR) can overcome the challenge of a wider canal wall defect or temporal bone immaturity, which possibly increases the recurrence risk. This study compared the outcomes of RMR and intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy (ICW) for cholesteatomas with minimal mastoid extension and quantitatively evaluate the relationship between anatomical features and recurrence. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone primary ICW or RMR for pars flaccida cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension from 2009 to 2019. The main outcome measures were anatomical measurements of the shortest distance between the cranial fossa and the upper canal wall (SCU), attic volume, and bony defect area of the canal wall (BDC) on computed tomography; recidivism; and postoperative air–bone gap (ABG). Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative anatomical factors, recidivism incidence, and postoperative ABG between the RMR (n = 20) and ICW (n = 60) groups. However, the median BDC was significantly greater in the RMR group (58.3 vs. 37.0 mm2). There was no significant difference in the SCU and attic volume between patients with and without recurrence. Conclusion: Selection of RMR or ICW may not affect recidivism and hearing outcomes in cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension. Bony defect size and attic narrowness were not associated with recurrence. Considering wider visualization and one-staged operation, RMR can be more adaptable than ICW for cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aeration status of the middle ear is presumed to be one of the factors affecting the outcome in acquired cholesteatoma. The present study investigated the impact of postoperative middle ear aeration on hearing and recurrence after intact canal wall tympanoplasty.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 127 pars flaccida cholesteatoma patients who underwent primary intact canal wall tympanoplasty at a tertiary academic medical center. We collected data on clinical characteristics, including extent of cholesteatoma, surgical procedure, pre- and postoperative middle ear aeration, hearing level, and recurrence. The aeration was measured before and at one year after operation on two axial computed tomography (CT) planes: at the lateral semicircular canal (mastoid cavity) and at the oval window (tympanic cavity). Based on the postoperative air-bone gap (ABG), patients were categorized into two groups: the successful hearing (ABG ≤15 dB) group and the unsuccessful hearing (ABG >15 dB) group. We used aeration ratio to assess the relationship between postoperative aeration improvement and hearing outcome or recurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with hearing outcome.Results: At one year after operation, aeration ratio in both mastoid and tympanic cavities was significantly improved than the preoperative status (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The positive correlation was found between postoperative aeration ratios of mastoid cavity and tympanic cavity (r = 0.348, p < 0.001, Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient). In mastoid and tympanic cavities, the postoperative aeration ratio in successful hearing group (n = 57) was significantly higher than that in the unsuccessful hearing group (n = 45) at one year after operation (p < 0.001, p = 0.028, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that postoperative aeration ratio in mastoid cavity and preoperative ABG were significant independent prognostic factors for successful hearing (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.630 [0.985 - 7.024], p = 0.045; 0.891[0.840 - 0.944], p < 0.001, respectively). However, postoperative aeration ratios did not significantly differ between with (n = 14) and without recurrence (n = 113) groups in both cavities.Conclusion: Our results suggest that better postoperative aeration in mastoid cavity is independently associated with satisfactory hearing outcome after intact canal wall tympanoplasty in pars flaccida cholesteatoma. However, no significant differences were observed between middle ear aeration at one year after operation and recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear.Methods: Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative).Results: A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67.Conclusions: The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to clarify the usefulness of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and establish HRCT criteria for presurgical assessment of the mastoid extension in pars flaccida cholesteatomas of the middle ear.Methods: Retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent primary surgery for pars flaccida cholesteatoma and those who underwent temporal bone HRCT for pretreatment evaluation were reviewed. The distance in the anterior-most portion of the mastoid sinus on HRCT was measured, and the presence of surgically verified mastoid extension of cholesteatoma was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative).Results: A total of 107 patients with pars flaccida cholesteatoma were included. The distance in the M+ cases was significantly longer than that in the M- cases, and the cutoff value was 3.6 mm. The difference between the ipsilateral/diseased-side distance and the contralateral/evaluable side (difference value) in M+ cases was larger than that in M- cases, with a cutoff value of 0.6 mm. The inter-rater reliability of this distance measurement was excellent, regardless of imaging experience.Conclusions: The cutoff values of the distance and the difference value can be used for pretreatment HRCT evaluation of mastoid extension in middle ear cholesteatoma with relatively high accuracy, regardless of the experience and skill levels of the evaluator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]