1. Comparative study of 27-gauge vs 25-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
- Author
-
Hiroki Sasaki, Yasushi Kitaoka, K Mitsui, Hitoshi Takagi, Akira Shiono, Yasunari Munemasa, Jiro Kogo, and H. Takeda
- Subjects
Pars plana ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Intraocular pressure ,Microsurgery ,Visual acuity ,Time Factors ,genetic structures ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Visual Acuity ,Glaucoma ,Vitrectomy ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Postoperative Complications ,Ophthalmology ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Intraoperative Complications ,Intraocular Pressure ,Aged ,business.industry ,Epiretinal Membrane ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Sclera ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Clinical Study ,Feasibility Studies ,Sclerostomy ,Female ,Epiretinal membrane ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Tomography, Optical Coherence - Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare 27-gauge (27G) with 25-gauge (25G) microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). Participants Seventy-four eyes of 66 patients undergoing 3-port pars plana vitrectomy using 27G or 25G instrumentation. Methods Seventy-four eyes of 66 patients with ERM, who underwent 27G or 25G microincision vitrectomy were prospectively evaluated. Results The mean operation time for vitrectomy was significantly longer in the 27G group than in the 25G group (9.9±3.5 vs 6.2±2.7 min, respectively, P
- Published
- 2016