Search

To compare the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprostene bunod (LBN) ophthalmic solution 0.024% every evening (qpm) with timolol maleate 0.5% twice daily (BID) in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group clinical study.Subjects aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of OAG or OHT in 1 or both eyes.Subjects were randomized (2:1) to a 3-month regimen of LBN 0.024% qpm or timolol 0.5% 1 drop BID. Intraocular pressure was measured at 8 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm of each postrandomization visit (week 2, week 6, and month 3). Adverse events were recorded throughout the study.The primary efficacy end point was IOP in the study eye measured at each of the 9 assessment time points. Secondary efficacy end points included the proportion of subjects with IOP ≤18 mmHg consistently at all 9 time points and the proportion of subjects with IOP reduction ≥25% consistently at all 9 time points.Of 420 subjects randomized, 387 completed the study (LBN 0.024%, n = 264; timolol 0.5%, n = 123). At all 9 time points, the mean IOP in the study eye was significantly lower in the LBN 0.024% group than in the timolol 0.5% group (P ≤ 0.002). At all 9 time points, the percentage of subjects with mean IOP ≤18 mmHg and the percentage with IOP reduction ≥25% were significantly higher in the LBN 0.024% group versus the timolol 0.5% group (mean IOP ≤18 mmHg: 22.9% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.005; IOP reduction ≥25%: 34.9% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.001). Adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.In this phase 3 study, LBN 0.024% qpm demonstrated significantly greater IOP lowering than timolol 0.5% BID throughout the day over 3 months of treatment. Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% was effective and safe in these adults with OAG or OHT.

To investigate anatomical configuration of ciliary body and iris using ultrasound biomicroscopy as a predictor of malignant glaucoma development.Retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital.Cohort of 31 consecutive patients diagnosed with post-surgical malignant glaucoma.Anterior chamber angle, iris and ciliary body configuration of involved eyes that had ultrasound biomicroscopy evaluation prior to the malignant glaucoma onset were evaluated. In cases with no presurgical ultrasound biomicroscopy exam of the involved eye, images from the fellow eye (imaged within 6 months) were analysed.Qualitative parameters.Thirty-one eyes (31 patients) had confirmed malignant glaucoma between 1996 and 2008. Most patients were women (65%) and had an anatomical narrow angle or angle-closure glaucoma (77%). Mean intraocular pressure at diagnosis was 30.4 ± 13.5 mmHg. The most common operation was trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (55%, 17/31 eyes), combined (3/17) or not (14/17) with cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Among these 31 cases, we were able to evaluate the ultrasound biomicroscopy images of 13 patients (13 eyes) including involved eyes imaged prior to the malignant glaucoma onset or eligible fellow eyes. A narrow angle with or without iridotrabecular contact was found in all eyes. A large and/or anteriorly positioned ciliary body associated with an iris root angulating forward and centrally, revealing a plateau iris configuration, was noticed in 85% (11/13) of these eyes.Identification of plateau iris configuration by ultrasound biomicroscopy should be considered as a possible predictor of post-operative malignant glaucoma development.

PURPOSE Static fixation is the standard method for stabilizing the eye during automated perimetry. Kinetic fixation is an alternative for fixation control in which the eye follows a moving target. This study was conducted to evaluate the fixation accuracy of static and kinetic fixation perimetry and to determine their ability to detect the absolute scotoma of the physiologic blind spot. METHODS The 71 patients with early glaucomatous field loss (mean age 65 years) and 45 control subjects (mean age 57 years) recruited from five clinical sites underwent threshold testing on the Dicon perimeter (kinetic fixation; Vismed, San Diego, CA) and Humphrey Field Analyzer (static fixation). The frequency of Heijl-Krakau fixation catch-trial errors was used as an indicator of fixation accuracy, and the measured sensitivity at the physiologic blind spot was used as an indicator of perimetric accuracy. RESULTS In patients with glaucoma, the frequency of fixation errors was significantly greater for kinetic fixation (17.2%) than for static fixation (10.2%). In the control group, the frequency of fixation errors also was significantly greater for kinetic fixation (27.5%) than for static fixation (12.6%). The threshold at the presumed location of the blind spot (15 degrees temporal, 3 degrees inferior from fixation) was 14.8 dB using kinetic fixation versus 4.0 dB with static fixation in patients with glaucoma, and 18.5 dB using kinetic fixation versus 2.5 dB using static fixation in the control group. CONCLUSION Relative to static fixation, kinetic fixation was associated with fixation inaccuracy and underestimation of the absolute scotoma at the physiologic blind spot.