1. Prone during pandemic: development and implementation of a quality-based protocol for proning severe COVID-19 hypoxic lung failure patients in situationally or historically low resource hospitals
- Author
-
Alfredo J. Astua, Andrew J. Michaels, and Eli K. Michaels
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,ARDS ,Supine position ,Proning ,medicine.medical_treatment ,SARS CoV-2 ,Prone positioning ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Severity of Illness Index ,Low resource setting ,Patient Positioning ,High reliability organization (HRO) ,03 medical and health sciences ,symbols.namesake ,0302 clinical medicine ,Clinical Protocols ,Severity of illness ,Prone Position ,Humans ,Medicine ,Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Hypoxia ,Prospective cohort study ,Crew resource management (CRM) ,Dialysis ,Aged ,Austere environment ,lcsh:RC705-779 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,lcsh:Diseases of the respiratory system ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Prone position ,Bonferroni correction ,Technical Advance ,Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) ,Emergency medicine ,symbols ,Female ,Respiratory Insufficiency ,business ,Body mass index - Abstract
Background Intermittent Prone Positioning (IPP) for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) decreases mortality. We present a program for IPP using expedient materials for settings of significant limitations in both overwhelmed established ICUs and particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) treating ARDS due to COVID-19 caused by SARS CoV-2. Methods The proning program evolved based on the principles of High Reliability Organizations (HROs) and Crew Resource Management (CRM). Patients with severe ARDS [PaO2:FiO2 ratio (PFr) ≤ 150 on FiO2 ≥ 0.6 and PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O] received IPP. Patients were placed prone 16 h each day. When PFr was ≥ 200 for > 8 h supine IPP ceased. IPP used available materials without requiring additional work from the bedside team. Changes in PFr, PaCO2, and the SaO2:FiO2 ratio (SaFr) positionally were evaluated using t-statistics and ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (p Results Between 14APR2020 and 09MAY2020, at the peak of deaths in New York, there were 202 IPPs in 29 patients. Patients were 58.5 ± 1.7 years of age (37, 73), 76% male and had a body mass index (BMI) of 27.8 ± 0.8 (21, 38). Pressor agents were used in 76% and 17% received dialysis. The PFr prior to IPP was 107.5 ± 5.6 and 1 h after IPP was 155.7 ± 11.2 (p p = 0.02). Pre-prone PaCO2 was 60.0 ± 2.5 and the 1-h post-prone PaCO2 was 67.2 ± 3.1 (p = 0.02). Supine PaCO2 after IPP was 60.4 ± 3.4 (p = 0.90). The SaFr prior to IPP was 121.3 ± 4.2 and the SaFr 1 h after positioning was 131.5 ± 5.1 (p = 0.03). The post-IPP supine SaFr was 139.7 ± 5.9 (p p p 2 over the four time points measured. Using regression coefficients, the SaFrs predicted by PFrs of 150 and 200 at baseline are 133.2 and 147.3, respectively. Conclusions An IPP program for patients with COVID-19 ARDS can be instituted rapidly, safely, and effectively during an overwhelming mass casualty scenario. This approach may be equally applicable in both traditionally austere environments in LMICs and in otherwise capable centers facing situational resource limitations.
- Published
- 2021