Search

OBJECTIVES Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and lack of adherence to the therapeutic regimen is a main risk factor for acute graft rejection; hence, the prolonged-release formulation was created. A high intrapatient variability for tacrolimus trough levels has been associated with worse graft outcomes; therefore, we investigated the correlation between the tacrolimus variation coefficient and the development of biopsy-proven acute graft rejection in kidney transplant patients with typical maintenance immunosuppression versus the prolonged-release formulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a single-center observational retrospective study that included all adult kidney transplants from deceased donors between January 2011 and December 2014 for which the transplant recipients were given maintenance therapy with tacrolimus prolonged-release formulation (Advagraf). The overall tacrolimus variation coefficient was calculated for the follow-up period from transplant until December 2019. Biopsy-proven acute graft rejection results were collected throughout follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software. RESULTS The study was composed of 147 patients with a mean follow-up time of 60.4 ± 15 months. The mean age of the patients was 47.5 ± 11.9 years and 67.3% were men. Of these 147 patients, 29 had at least 1 episode of acute graft rejection during follow-up. There was a significant correlation between patients with a higher tacrolimus variation coefficient and the presence of biopsy-proven acute graft rejection. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine an intrapatient variability cutoff point of 28.3% for tacrolimus. Younger patients were also more likely than older patients to develop acute graft rejection in our sample. CONCLUSIONS High intrapatient variability of tacrolimus trough levels is a risk factor for acute graft rejection in kidney transplant patients.

Background Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in older adults. Although BPH may be asymptomatic in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with low diuresis, the condition may become troublesome when diuresis resumes after transplantation. This study evaluated the effect that developing acute urinary retention (AUR) in first 4 months after kidney transplantation (KT) can have on graft function at 6 months. The study identified predictive factors and analyzed treatment of AUR in these patients. Methods This study retrospectively included 303 men who received KT. Independent samples Student t test was used to compare glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) at 6 months. Logistic regression was applied to identify predictors of AUR. Results The study found that 14 patients developed AUR within the first 4 months after KT. This group had lower GFR at 6 months post-KT. Nine patients required transurethral resection of the prostate, and 2 of these patients developed acute graft pyelonephritis following resection. Residual diuresis and recipient age were predictive factors. Recipient age >55 years was a risk factor. Medical therapy of BPH before transplantation was a protective factor. Conclusions Developing AUR in the first 4 months after KT was associated with lower graft GFR at 6 months, and transurethral resection of the prostate was required in 64% of these patients, with good results. Medical therapy for BPH before the transplant was associated with a lower risk of AUR. Older patients and patients with pretransplant low urine output had a higher risk of AUR. These patients should be closely monitored in the posttransplant period for the presence of obstructive uropathy.

Background Borderline changes suspicious for acute T-cell–mediated rejection (BC) are frequently seen on biopsy specimens, but their clinical significance and clinical management are still controversial. Our goal was to compare clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven BC vs acute T-cell–mediated rejection (aTCMR) and the influence of treating BC on graft outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in all kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven BC and aTCMR between January 2012 and December 2018, according to Banff 2017 criteria; patients with concomitant antibody-mediated rejection were excluded. Results We included 85 patients, 30 with BC (35.3%) and 55 with aTCMR (64.7%). There was no difference between groups regarding demographics, HLA matching and sensitization, immunosuppression, or time of transplant. Treatment with steroids was started in 15 patients with BC (50%) and in all patients with aTCMR, with 4 of the latter additionally receiving thymoglobulin (7.2%). At 1 year post biopsy, overall graft survival was 71%, and despite presenting better estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at biopsy (33.3 ± 23.4 vs 19.9 ± 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = .008), patients in the BC group presented the same graft survival as the aTCMR group according to Kaplan-Meyer survival curves. When analyzing the BC group (n = 30) and comparing the patients who were treated (n = 15) vs a conservative approach (n = 15), graft survival at 1 year was 87% for treated patients and 73% for nontreated patients (P = .651), with no difference in eGFR for patients with functioning graft. However, at longer follow-up, survival curves showed a trend for better graft survival in treated patients (70.2 ± 9.2 vs 38.4 ± 8.4 months, P = .087). Conclusion Our study showed that patients with BC did not present better graft survival or graft function at 1 year after biopsy or at follow-up compared with the aTCMR group, despite better eGFR at diagnosis. We found a trend for better graft survival in patients with BC treated with steroids compared with a conservative approach. These results reinforce the importance of borderline changes in graft outcomes and that the decision to treat can influence long-term outcomes.

Living donor kidney transplant represents the best treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney disease; however, it has been associated with possible risks to the donor. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of kidney donation in the donor's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and proteinuria and related risk factors.A single-center, retrospective study, including all living donors who underwent nephrectomy between January 2000 and December 2019, was performed. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Risk factors for a decrease in eGFR30 mL/min/1.73 mEighty-six donors were included with a mean age of 46.7 ± 9.07 years. The mean follow-up was 105.6 ± 65.4 months, and 35 patients (41%) had more than 10 years of follow-up. No significant difference was found in proteinuria or body mass index (P.1) before and after the donation. The prevalence of hypertension was higher after kidney donation (9.3% vs 22.1%; P.001). A mean reduction in the eGFR in the first year of 37 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 mLiving donor nephrectomy appears to be an acceptably safe intervention. Predonation eGFR influences the adaptative response after nephrectomy; however, other variables did not have an impact on long-term outcome in our population.

Kidney retransplant outcomes in the elderly are not well established. Our aim was to compare major clinical outcomes between patients older and younger than 60 years old at retransplant and between first and second kidney transplant (KT) for recipients older than 60 years old.We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study that included all patients who underwent KT between January 2008 and December 2019. We defined 3 groups according to recipient age and retransplant status: group 1, patients ≥60 years old and retransplant; group 2, patients60 years old and retransplant; group 3, patients ≥60 years old and first kidney transplant. We compared clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival between groups.We included 109 patients with a second KT, including 13 older than 60 years old (group 1) and 96 younger than 60 years old (group 2). There were no differences in death-censored graft survival or patient survival. There were no biopsy-proven acute rejections for older patients compared with 21 events in the younger group. Regarding differences between retransplant (group 1, n = 13) and first kidney transplant (group 3, n = 390) in patients older than 60 years old, there were no differences in death-censored graft survival at 1 and 5 years or in patient survival.In our study, major clinical outcomes of retransplant in the elderly were similar to those of their younger counterparts with a second graft and with those of older patients with a first graft.

Introduction Post-transplant diabetes mellitus is a complication of kidney transplantation with deleterious effects on graft and patient survival and is associated with higher mortality. The goal of this paper is to identify risk factors that contribute to its development so that it can be avoided. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 659 kidney transplants performed in adult patients between January 2013 and December 2017. We excluded patients with a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and identified 61 patients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus (10.6%), then compared them to a control group of 61 patients who did not suffer from the disease, namely the kidney transplant pair or the patient submitted for transplant immediately after. Discussion A comparative analysis of the 2 groups revealed significant differences regarding the use of β-blockers, fasting glucose on the fifth day post-transplant, kidney recipient age, and body mass index. Using multivariate logistic regression methods, 2 variables with an impact on post-transplant diabetes development were found: fasting glucose on the fifth day post-transplant (odds ratio 1.044, 95% confidence interval 1.010–1.079, P = .010) and body mass index (odds ratio 1.130, 95% confidence interval 1.009–1.264, P = .034). We did not find any differences for other potential risk factors. Conclusion A high plasma glucose level on the fifth day after the transplant and a high body mass index in the setting of the transplant can potentially impact the transplant's outcomes, so it is important to identify these levels as soon as possible to take measures to prevent this disease.

Fibrogenesis markers, such as alpha-actin (AA), CD163 (macrophages), and E-cadherin, have been studied as chronic kidney allograft injury (CAI) predictors, a major cause of allograft failure. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the value of these markers in predicting CAI and initiation of dialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 26 kidney allograft biopsies (from 22 patients with CAI) during 2 years, evaluating intensity and percentage of marked cells on glomeruli and tubulointerstitial compartment. At the time of the biopsy, patients were 45.5 ± 15.8 years and 4.2 years after transplant, and they had a mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 25.8 ± 9.9 mL/min. From an average of 8.5 glomeruli per biopsy, there was ≤25% sclerosis in 17 cases, 26% to 50% in 5, and >50% in 4. Interstitial fibrosis or tubular atrophy affected ≤25% of cortical area in 14 cases, 26% to 50% in 8, and >50% in 2. Twelve patients started dialysis 5.8 ± 4.7 years after transplant, with an average GFR 20.9 mL/min at the time of the biopsy. RESULTS: There was a higher intensity and percentage of CD163-marked cells in the tubulointerstitial compartment in advanced interstitial fibrosis. We found an association between intensity of AA in the tubulointerstitial compartment and initiation of dialysis (P = .003) and a negative correlation between intensity of E-cadherin loss and GFR (r = -0.56, P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, intensity of tubulointerstitial AA was shown to be a predictor of initiation of dialysis, and E-cadherin loss intensity was associated to CAI progression. However, prospective and larger studies are needed to evaluate the predictive value of these markers. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Introduction/Objective Transplantation is the treatment of choice in end-stage renal disease. However, there are complications that require transplantectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for transplantectomy in the first 3 months after renal transplantation. Material and Methods This retrospective study included 770 kidney transplants performed between June 2011 and June 2017. Logistic regression was applied to study the relationship between independent variables and the occurrence of transplantectomy. Results Analyzing variables of the recipients, it was verified that age over 65 years; body mass index; dialysis time; history of previous transplant and comorbidities such as obesity, overweight, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, peripheral arterial disease; or history of a thrombotic episode were not predictive factors. It was found that the use of expanded criteria donors, their age, or cause of death were not predictive factors. The use of a right renal graft or grafts with multiple arteries; the duration of surgery; the performance of surgery at dawn; the need for transfusion; the cold ischemia time; and hemodynamic parameters at reperfusion (central venous pressure, systolic or diastolic blood pressure) were not predictive factors. The recipient age at transplantation (p = .014; B=–0.059; Exp(B)=0.943 [0.899-0.988]) and reoperation in the first 10 days after transplantation (p Conclusion Reoperation in the first 10 days after transplantation decreased the risk of transplantectomy in the first 3 months. The lower the age of the recipient, the greater the risk of transplantectomy.

Pretransplant kidney biopsy from marginal donors is used to guide the decision of whether to accept or discard organs for transplantation; however, there is controversy about this procedure, and the need for a pretransplant biopsy is still a debate. We sought to determine if histologic evaluation before implantation of marginal kidneys would influence the outcome.A retrospective observational cohort study of marginal donor transplants at Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra was done. From 2009 to 2016, 650 marginal kidney transplants were analyzed. We evaluated long-term graft survival in a cohort of patients who received marginal kidneys. The recipients were divided into 2 groups based on whether a pretransplant donor biopsy was performed. Continuous variables were summarized by mean and standard deviation or median and range, as applicable. Categorical variables were summarized by relative and absolute frequencies. The survival analysis was obtained and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.The median age of recipients and donors were statistically different between both groups (P .001), with the donors and the recipients being younger in the group without a pretransplant biopsy. The median cold ischemia time was higher in the biopsy group (P = .01). The survival analysis showed that graft survival didn't differ between the groups (P = .2).Selection of kidneys based on histological findings may not influence the graft survival and implies a higher cold ischemia time. More data are necessary to provide insight into which clinical, histologic, and biochemical parameters are necessary for decision making on kidney acceptance.

It is known that the incidence of malignancy in transplant recipients is higher than in the general population, with a more aggressive behavior and a worse outcome. In fact, malignancy is the third most common cause of death among kidney transplant (KT) recipients, after cardiovascular events and infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of malignancies after KT in a single center. A total of 2353 patients who underwent KT between 1987 and 2012 were retrospectively studied. The results were compared with a group without cancer. During the follow-up period leading to August 2014, which included a median duration of 126.3 ± 81.8 months, 223 malignancies (9.4%) were diagnosed, which were the cause of death in 59 patients. Patients with cancer were older, had a longer duration of graft function, and had more episodes of acute rejection (AR), and a higher number of patients were treated with azathioprine and cyclosporine as initial immunosuppressive regime (P = .001). The most frequent malignancy was skin cancer (28.7%), followed by malignant lymphoma (12.1%) and kidney cancer (10.8%). The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 58.0 ± 11.1 years. The average time for development of a cancer was 7.5 ± 5.8 years, with 43.2% detected between 1 and 5 years. Patient survival was significantly lower among subjects with cancer, and censored graft survival was significantly higher in this group (P = .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that recipients' age and acute rejection episode are risk factors for development of post–kidney transplantation malignancy.

NTRODUCTION: Collapsing glomerulopathy (CG) is a rare form of glomerular injury. Although commonly associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, it can occur in association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 50-year-old man, with chronic kidney disease secondary to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, who received a cadaveric kidney transplant in 2007. There were no relevant intercurrences until May 2015, when he presented with nephrotic range proteinuria (± 4 g/d). A graft biopsy was performed and it did not show any significant pathological changes. In September, he developed a full nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria 19 g/d) and a graft biopsy was repeated. CG features were evident with a rich immunofluorescence. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies were positive; the remaining immunologic study was normal. Viral markers for HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were negative. The patient was treated with corticosteroid pulses and plasmapheresis (seven treatments). A rapid deterioration of kidney function was seen and he became dialysis dependent. He was discharged with a low-dose immunosuppressive treatment. In October, he was hospitalized with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). The auto-immune study was repeated, revealing complement consumption and positive titers of ANA and Anti-dsDNA antibodies. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) and antiglomerular basement membrane antibody (anti-GBM) were negative. Treatment with intravenous corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and human immunoglobulin was ineffective and the outcome was fatal. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the possible association of CG and SLE. To our knowledge, it is the first case of SLE presenting with CG and DAH, with the singularity of occurring in a kidney transplant recipient receiving immunosuppression. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of early surgical complications of kidney transplantation in our institution and its association with donor and recipient factors, as well as patient and transplant outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all kidney transplants performed during 2015 was made. We evaluated the incidence of surgical complications and the outcome of patients and grafts at a 3-month follow-up interval. RESULTS: During the study period, 141 kidney transplants occurred. Seventeen patients had surgical complications (6 urologic, 6 vascular, and 5 other complications). Five patients lost the graft during the follow-up. Older age was associated with other surgical complications (P = .023), and graft loss was associated with the existence of surgical complications, namely, vascular complications (P

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) is an important cause of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). Recipient determinants (male sex, white race, and older age), deceased donation, high-dose immunosuppression, diabetes, delayed graft function (DGF), cytomegalovirus infection, and acute rejection (AR) are risk factors. Reducing immunosuppression is the best strategy in BKVN. The objective of our study was to evaluate CAD progression after therapeutic strategies in BKVN and risk factors for graft loss (GL). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 23 biopsies, from patients with CAD and histological evidence of BKVN, conducted over a period of 10 years. Glomerular filtration rate was 60 years), and 22 had a deceased donor. Diabetes affected 4 patients, DGF occurred in 3, cytomegalovirus infection in 2, and AR in 15. All patients were medicated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (95.7% tacrolimus) and corticoids, and 16 also received an antimetabolite. One year after antimetabolite reduction/discontinuation and/or CNI reduction/switching and/or antiviral agents, graft function was decreased in 11 patients, increased/stabilized in 10, and unknown in 2. GL occurred in 9 patients. Older age (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-3.28) and DGF (hazard ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-12.64) were the main risk factors for GL. The lower GFR at the time of the BKVN diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of initiation of dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: GL occurred in 39.1% of patients with BKVN and DGF; older age and lower GFR at the time of diagnosis were important risk factors. Early diagnosis of BKVN is essential to prevent GL. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

INTRODUCTION: There is a high incidence of nephrotic proteinuria in renal transplant recipients, which is an accurate predictor of graft loss. Despite this, its histologic correlates and prognostic implications are still not well characterized. We assessed the clinical and histological correlates of kidney transplantation patients with nephrotic range proteinuria. METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed clinical and histological data from 50 kidney transplantation biopsy specimens from 44 renal transplant recipients with nephrotic range proteinuria between 2006 and 2015. The median follow-up time was 93 months (range, 14 months to 190 months). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 45.2 ± 13.7 years and our cohort included 86% recipients of deceased-donor grafts. The maintenance immunosuppressive regimen included calcineurin inhibitors in 68% and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in 32% of patients. The average proteinuria was 6.9 ± 3.8 g/d and 52% of patients presented with nephrotic syndrome. The main histological findings were transplant glomerulopathy (22%), de novo glomerular disease (22%), and recurrence of primary disease (22%). Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis was present in 78% of the biopsy specimens. Thirty-one patients (62%) lost the graft at follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the histologic diagnosis nor the proteinuria levels and the outcome of the graft. CONCLUSIONS: The main causes of nephrotic range proteinuria in patients undergoing biopsy were transplant glomerulopathy, recurrence of the underlying disease, and de novo glomerulonephritis. Nephrotic range proteinuria was related to a high rate of graft loss. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

INTRODUCTION: Rehospitalization early post-kidney transplant is common and has a negative impact in morbidity, graft survival, and health costs. Infection is one the most common causes, and identifying the risk factors for early readmission due to infectious complications may guide a preventive program and improve outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, characterize the population, and identify the risk factors associated with early readmission for infectious complications post-kidney transplantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all the kidney transplants performed during 2015. The primary outcome was readmission in the first 3 months post-transplant due to infectious causes defined by clinical and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We evaluated 141 kidney transplants; 71% of subjects were men, with an overall mean age of 50.8 ± 15.4 years. Prior to transplant, 98% of the patients were dialysis dependent and 2% underwent pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant. The global readmission rate was 49%, of which 65% were for infectious complications. The most frequent infection was urinary tract infection (n = 28, 62%) and the most common agent detected by blood and urine cultures was Klebsiella pneumonia (n = 18, 40%). The risk factors significantly associated with readmission were higher body mass index (P = .03), diabetes mellitus (P = .02), older donor (P = .007), and longer cold ischemia time (P = .04). There were 3 graft losses, but none due to infectious complications. CONCLUSION: There was a high incidence of early rehospitalization due to infectious complications, especially urinary tract infections to nosocomial agents. The risk factors identified were similar to other series. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Introduction Invasive fungal infections (IFI) affecting transplant recipients are associated with increased mortality and graft dysfunction. Objective Describe the frequency, clinical features, and outcomes of IFI (except pneumocystis infection) in kidney transplant recipients. Method Single-center descriptive study including every kidney transplant recipient with a culture-proven or probable IFI between 2003 and 2013, according to the EORTC-MSG criteria. Results We identified 45 IFI. There were 13 cases of invasive candidiasis (C. albicans: 6 and non–C. albicans candidial spp.: 7), 11 cases of pulmonary aspergillosis (A. fumigatus: 9 and A. flavus: 2); 11 cases of subcutaneous mycosis (Alternaria spp.: 9, Paecilomyces spp.: 1, and Pseudallescheria spp.: 1); 7 cases of cryptococcosis; 2 cases of pneumonia by non-Aspergillus molds (Mucor spp.: 1 and Cunninghamella spp.: 1); and 1 case of Geotrichum capitatum pneumonia. All patients were recipients from deceased donors. Six cases occurred in the first 3 months post-transplant, 15 cases between the third and twelfth months, and 21 cases after the twelfth month. Treatment options were fluconazole for Candida infections, voriconazole or caspofungin for aspergillosis, liposomal amphotericin for cryptococcosis, and itraconazole plus excision or cryotherapy for subcutaneous mycosis. Fifteen patients died (33%). Mortality rates were 15% for invasive candidiasis, 45% for aspergillosis, 71% for cryptococcosis, 100% for non-Aspergillus molds and G. capitatum pneumonia, and 0% for subcutaneous mycosis. Six patients who survived (14%) started regular hemodialysis. Conclusion IFI still have a high mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant recipients, as verified in this report. We reinforce the need for a high index of suspicion and prompt treatment.

Background Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstones of immunosuppressive management in renal allograft recipients even though their nephrotoxicity may contribute to a reduced long-term graft survival. This has created a great interest in improving immunosuppressive strategies in the early post-transplantation period. Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), such as everolimus, are promising alternatives, although their side effects may have a drawback in de novo renal transplant recipients, for instance, delaying renal function in the presence of renal ischemia/acute tubular necrosis and predisposing to lymphocele development. Study and Methods A retrospective study was developed to compare the combined therapy of low-dose tacrolimus and everolimus (study group) with mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid and standard-dose tacrolimus (control group) in the first 3 months post-transplantation. The study's end-points concerned renal graft function, proteinuria, incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, surgical complication rates, and incidence of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation. Results There was no more delayed graft function in the study group and graft function distribution was similar between groups. Median serum creatinine and eGFR were comparable as well as proteinuria levels. Generally, adverse events were rare in both groups and there were no significant statistical differences between them in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection, surgical complication, and new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation rates. Conclusion Despite the slightly lower tendency for serum creatinine in the study group, renal allograft function wasn't statistically different between groups. Moreover, there weren't more metabolic or surgical complications in the study group. Everolimus may be a choice in tacrolimus-sparing strategies, but a larger study and a longer follow-up are still required.

Introduction Several factors have an impact on allograft survival but many are still controversial. In this study we investigated the effect of multiple factors on early renal graft function as an effort to find new tools to improve. Material and Methods This was a transversal study of 64 patients who underwent kidney transplantation during the first semester of 2013. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. We used SPSS 20.0. Univariate analysis through nonparametric tests and multivariate analysis through linear regression were made. Results Regarding the donor, age (β = 1.581; P = .003) and stroke as cause of death (P = .044) were associated with a higher creatinine level. Concerning the recipient, age (β = 0.963; P = .001) as well as the difference between the candidate and the donor (β = 1.203; P = .000), black race (P = .032/.000), male gender (P = .027/.046), vasculopathic end-stage renal disease (ESRD; P = .050), hemodialysis (HD) modality (P = .001/.033), HD session before surgery (P = .005), body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 (P = .043), hypoalbuminemia (β = −0.280/−0.076; P = .029/.046), and anemia (β = −0.361; P = .032) were also associated with a higher creatinine level. Living donor transplant (P = .000/.043), instant diuresis (P = .000/.021), and post-transplantation higher blood pressure (BP; systolic BP [SBP] β = −0.452; P = .021 and diastolic BP [DBP] β = −0.318; P = .033) were associate with lower creatinine values. Overall, 87.6% of the renal function markers after the first semester were explained by the multiple factors above mentioned. Conclusions Our findings are of practical clinical interest because nutritional status, hemoglobin, albumin, and BP are some of the objective measurable and modifiable parameters of which management may improve renal graft function.