Search

Aims: Midazolam is the drug of choice for palliative sedation and is titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation. A previous pharmacokinetic (PK) study showed that variability between patients could be partly explained by renal function and inflammatory status. The goal of this study was to combine this PK information with pharmacodynamic (PD) data, to evaluate the variability in response to midazolam and to find clinically relevant covariates that may predict PD response., Method: A population PD analysis using nonlinear mixed effect models was performed with data from 43 terminally ill patients. PK profiles were predicted by a previously described PK model and depth of sedation was measured using the Ramsay sedation score. Patient and disease characteristics were evaluated as possible covariates. The final model was evaluated using a visual predictive check., Results: The effect of midazolam on the sedation level was best described by a differential odds model including a baseline probability, Emax model and interindividual variability on the overall effect. The EC50 value was 68.7 μg l -1 for a Ramsay score of 3-5 and 117.1 μg l -1 for a Ramsay score of 6. Comedication with haloperidol was the only significant covariate. The visual predictive check of the final model showed good model predictability., Conclusion: We were able to describe the clinical response to midazolam accurately. As expected, there was large variability in response to midazolam. The use of haloperidol was associated with a lower probability of sedation. This may be a result of confounding by indication, as haloperidol was used to treat delirium, and deliria has been linked to a more difficult sedation procedure., (© 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Aims: Midazolam is the drug of choice for palliative sedation and is titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation. Because of large inter-individual variability (IIV), however, the time it takes to achieve adequate sedation varies widely. It would therefore greatly improve clinical care if an individualized dose could be determined beforehand. To find clinically relevant parameters for dose individualization, we performed a pharmacokinetic study on midazolam, 1OH-midazolam (1-OH-M) and 1OH-midazolam-glucuronide (1-OH-MG) in terminally ill patients., Methods: Using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM 7.2), a population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted with 192 samples from 45 terminally ill patients who received midazolam either orally or subcutaneously. The covariates analysed were patient characteristics, co-medication and blood chemistry levels., Results: The data were accurately described by a one compartment model for midazolam, 1-OH-M and 1-OH-MG. The population mean estimates for midazolam, 1-OH-M and 1-OH-MG clearance were 8.4 l h -1 (RSE 9%, IIV 49%), 45.4 l h -1 (RSE 12%, IIV 60.5%) and 5.1 l h -1 (RSE 11%, IIV 49.9%), respectively. 1-OH-MG clearance was correlated with the estimated glomular filtration rate (eGFR) explaining 28.4% of the IIV in 1-OH-MG clearance. In addition, low albumin levels were associated with decreased midazolam clearance, explaining 18.2% of the IIV., Conclusion: Our study indicates albumin levels and eGFR as relevant clinical parameters to optimize midazolam dosing in terminally ill patients. The correlation between low albumin levels and decreased midazolam clearance is probably a result of inflammatory response as high CRP levels were correlated in a similar way., (© 2017 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background and Objective: Midazolam is used to sedate children during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pharmacokinetic changes are expected because of extracorporeal circulation and maturation. We present a population pharmacokinetic model for midazolam and its major metabolites in neonates during venoarterial ECMO., Methods: We studied 20 neonates on venoarterial ECMO, with a median postnatal age of 0.79 (range 0.17-5.8) days and a bodyweight of 3.0 (range 2.7-3.9) kg at the onset of ECMO. The median ECMO duration was 124 (range 70-275) hours. Serum concentrations were measured at the initiation and discontinuation of the midazolam infusion (100-300 microg/kg/h). Analysis of concentrations of midazolam, 1-hydroxymidazolam and its glucuronide were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. A two-compartment model for midazolam and a one-compartment model for the metabolites 1-hydroxymidazolam and hydroxymidazolam glucuronide adequately described the data, with allometric scaling of all parameters., Results: Following the start of ECMO, the volume of distribution of midazolam increased from 4.29 to 14.6 L/3 kg, with an elimination half-life of 1.85 hours. The median midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam clearance values increased 3-fold within the first 5 days (up to 1.38 and 5.31 L/h/3 kg, respectively), whereas hydroxymidazolam glucuronide clearance remained constant at 0.18 L/h/3 kg. Interpatient variability estimates of midazolam, 1-hydroxymidazolam and hydroxymidazolam glucuronide clearance and midazolam and hydroxymidazolam glucuronide volumes of distribution varied between 87% and 129%. Concomitant inotropic infusion increased hydroxymidazolam glucuronide clearance by 23%., Conclusion: After allometric scaling, clearance of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam increases as a result of maturation or recovery from critical illness. In ECMO patients weighing 2.7-3.9 kg, continuously infused midazolam doses of 300 microg/kg/h for 6 hours and 150 microg/kg/h thereafter provide adequate serum concentrations for sedation. The dose must be increased substantially after 5-7 days. Hydroxymidazolam glucuronide accumulates during ECMO, providing an increased proportion of the overall effect, up to 34% after 7 days. Large unexplained interpatient variability warrants careful titration of sedation and adverse effects.