Search

The pathological significance of Tau (encoded by MAPT ) in mechanisms driving cell migration in glioblastoma is unclear. By using an shRNA approach to deplete microtubule-stabilizing Tau in U87 cells, we determined its impact on cytoskeletal coordination during migration. We demonstrated here that the motility of these Tau-knockdown cells (shTau cells) was significantly (36%) lower than that of control cells. The shTau cells displayed a slightly changed motility in the presence of nocodazole, which inhibits microtubule formation. Such reduced motility of shTau cells was characterized by a 28% lower number of microtubule bundles at the non-adhesive edges of the tails. In accordance with Tau-stabilized microtubules being required for cell movement, measurements of the front, body and rear section displacements of cells showed inefficient tail retraction in shTau cells. The tail retraction was restored by treatment with Y27632, an inhibitor of Rho-ROCK signaling. Moreover, we clearly identified that shTau cells displayed relocation of the active phosphorylated form of p190-RhoGAP (also known as ARHGAP35), which inhibits Rho-ROCK signaling, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK, also known as PTK2) in cell bodies. In conclusion, our findings indicate that Tau governs the remodeling of microtubule and actin networks for the retraction of the tail of cells, which is necessary for effective migration., Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests., (© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

Microtubules (MTs) play an important role in many cellular processes and are dynamic structures regulated by an important network of microtubules-associated proteins, MAPs, such as Tau. Tau has been discovered as an essential factor for MTs formation in vitro, and its region implicated in binding to MTs has been identified. By contrast, the affinity, the stoichiometry, and the topology of Tau-MTs interaction remain controversial. Indeed, depending on the experiment conditions a wide range of values have been obtained. In this chapter, we focus on three biophysical methods, turbidimetry, cosedimentation assay, and Förster Resonance Energy Transfer to study Tau-tubulin interaction both in vitro and in cell. We highlight precautions that must be taken in order to avoid pitfalls and we detail the nature of the conclusions that can be drawn from these methods about Tau-tubulin interaction.

Stathmin is a prominent destabilizer of microtubules (MTs). Extensive in vitro studies have strongly suggested that stathmin could act by sequestering tubulin and/or by binding to MT tips. In cells, the molecular mechanisms of stathmin binding to tubulin and/or MTs and its implications for the MT dynamics remain unexplored. By using immunofluorescence resonance energy transfer and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we analyzed the ability of stathmin and its phosphorylated forms (on Ser16, -25, -38, and -63) to interact with tubulin and MTs in A549 cells. Consistent with in vitro studies, we detected stathmin-tubulin interactions at the MT plus ends and in the cytosol. Of interest, we also observed a novel pool of stathmin bound along the MT. Expression of truncated stathmin and use of MT-stabilizing taxol further showed that the C-terminal domain of stathmin is the main contributor to this binding and that the phosphorylation state of stathmin plays a role in its binding along the MT wall. Our findings demonstrate that stathmin binds directly along the MT wall. This pool of stathmin would be readily available to participate in protofilament dissociation when the moving plus end of a depolymerizing MT reaches stathmin molecules.-Nouar, R., Breuzard, G., Bastonero, S., Gorokhova, S., Barbier, P., Devred, F., Kovacic, H., Peyrot, V. Direct evidence for the interaction of stathmin along the length and the plus end of microtubules in cells., (© FASEB.)

Despite extensive studies, the molecular mechanisms of Tau binding to microtubules (MTs) and its consequences on MT stability still remain unclear. It is especially true in cells where the spatiotemporal distribution of Tau-MT interactions is unknown. Using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), we showed that the Tau-MT interaction was distributed along MTs in periodic hotspots of high and low FRET intensities. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed a two-phase exchange of Tau with MTs as a rapid diffusion followed by a slower binding phase. A real-time FRET assay showed that high FRET occurred simultaneously with rescue and pause transitions at MT ends. To further explore the functional interaction of Tau with MTs, the binding of paclitaxel (PTX), tubulin acetylation induced by trichostatin A (TSA), and the expression of non-acetylatable tubulin were used. With PTX and TSA, FRAP curves best fitted a single phase with a long time constant, whereas with non-acetylatable α-tubulin, curves best fitted a two phase recovery. Upon incubation with PTX and TSA, the number of high and low FRET hotspots decreased by up to 50% and no hotspot was observed during rescue and pause transitions. In the presence of non-acetylatable α-tubulin, a 34% increase in low FRET hotspots occurred, and our real-time FRET assay revealed that low FRET hotspots appeared with MTs recovering growth. In conclusion, we have identified, by FRET and FRAP, a discrete Tau-MT interaction, in which Tau could induce conformational changes of MTs, favoring recovery of MT self-assembly.

Microtubules (MTs) are involved in many crucial processes such as cell morphogenesis, mitosis and motility. These dynamic structures resulting from the complex assembly of tubulin are tightly regulated by stabilising MT-associated proteins (MAPs) such as tau and destabilising proteins, notably stathmin. Because of their key role, these MAPs and their interactions have been extensively studied using biochemical and biophysical approaches, particularly in vitro. Nevertheless, numerous questions remain unanswered and the mechanisms of interaction between MT and these proteins are still unclear in cells. Techniques coupling cell imaging and fluorescence methods, such as Förster resonance energy transfer and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, are excellent tools to study these interactions in situ. After describing these methods, we will present emblematic data from the literature and unpublished experimental results from our laboratory concerning the interactions between MTs, tau and stathmin in cells., (Copyright © 2013 Soçiété Française des Microscopies and Soçiété de Biologie Cellulaire de France.)