Search

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe, evaluate, and compare the outcome between end-to-end and side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomoses for all stages of lymphedema., Methods: A total of 123 patients were divided into the end-to-end ( n = 63) or the side-to-end ( n = 60) group. The demographics and intraoperative and postoperative findings were evaluated. In addition, subcategory evaluation was performed for early- and advanced-phase lymphedema., Results: The demographic findings were insignificant. The intraoperative findings showed a significantly higher number of lymphaticovenous anastomoses performed for the end-to-end group (4.1 ± 1.7) over the side-to-end group (3.2 ± 1.2) ( p < 0.001), whereas the number of different lymphatic vessels used per patient was not significant (3.4 ± 1.4 versus 3.2 ± 1.2; p = 0.386). The diameter of the lymphatic vessels was not significant (0.43 ± 0.06 mm versus 0.45 ± 0.09 mm; p = 0.136). Although both groups showed significant postoperative volume reduction, the side-to-end group had a significantly better reduction in all time intervals ( p < 0.03) and longitudinal outcome ( p = 0.004). However, the subcategory evaluation for early-phase patients showed no difference between the two groups, but a significantly better volume reduction ratio was noted for the side-to-end group at all time intervals ( p < 0.025) in addition to overall longitudinal outcome ( p = 0.004) in advanced lymphedema patients., Conclusions: This is the first study to report the efficacy of end-to-end versus side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomosis in different phases of lymphedema. Although both end-to-end and side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomoses are significantly effective in volume reduction, there was a significantly better reduction for the side-to-end group in advanced-phase lymphedema patients with stage II late and stage III disease, whereas no difference was noted for early-phase lymphedema patients., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Supermicrosurgery is defined as microsurgery working on vessels less than 0.8 mm, allowing applications in smaller-dimension microsurgery, such as lymphedema, minimal invasive reconstruction, small parts replantation, and application of perforator as recipient. To accommodate this technique, developments and use of finer instruments, smaller sutures, new diagnostic tools, and higher-magnification microscopes have been made. Although supermicrosurgery has evolved naturally from microsurgery, it has developed into a unique field based on different thinking and tools to solve problems that once were difficult to solve., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest All the authors of this article do not have any conflict of interest to declare in relation to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Learning Objectives: After reviewing this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the trends in reconstruction using flaps. 2. Understand the surgical anatomy and elevation of the three best flaps: superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator, profunda artery perforator, and thin anterolateral thigh perforator. 3. Understand the core principle and the modern evolution of microsurgery. 4. Be acquainted with new microsurgical tips to maximize outcomes., Summary: Plastic surgery has a long history of innovation expanding the conditions we can treat, and microsurgical reconstruction has played a pivotal role. Freestyle free flaps now create another paradigm shift in reconstructive surgery, relying on a better understanding of anatomy and physiology, opening the door to patient-specific customized reconstruction. This article aims to provide information regarding useful and practical new advances in the field of microsurgery.

Background  Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) preserves functional gait while avoiding the need for prosthesis. However, when primary closure is not possible after amputation, higher level amputation is recommended. We hypothesize that reconstruction of the amputation stump using free tissue transfer when closure is not possible can achieve similar benefits as primarily closed TMAs. Methods  Twenty-eight TMAs with free flap reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed in 27 diabetic patients with a median age of 61.5 years from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was limb salvage rate, with additional evaluation of flap survival, ambulatory status, time until ambulation, and further amputation rate. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed based on the microanastomosis type. Results  Flap survival was 93% (26 of 28 flaps) and limb salvage rate of 93% (25 of 27 limbs) was achieved. One patient underwent a second free flap reconstruction. In the two failed cases, higher level amputation was required. Thirteen flaps had partial loss or other complications which were salvaged with secondary intension or skin grafts. Median time until ambulation was 14 days following reconstruction (range: 9–20 days). Patients were followed-up for a median of 344 days (range: 142–594 days). Also, 88% of patients reported good ambulatory function, with a median ambulation score of 4 out of 5 at follow-up. There was no significant difference between the subgroups based on the microanastomosis type. Conclusion  TMA with free flap reconstruction is an effective method for diabetic limb salvage, yielding good functional outcomes and healing results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background  With the technological advances, microsurgery has evolved to the era of supermicrosurgery since its inception. With the popularization of these flaps, proficiency in using tools such as color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) has become crucial. Despite the increased interest, studies regarding the role of ultrasound in microsurgical reconstruction are scarce. Therefore, in this study, we discussed currently available imaging modalities for reconstructive surgeons, types of ultrasound, and the role of ultrasound in microsurgical reconstruction, and made recommendations for ultrasound use in reconstructive surgery. Methods  We performed a computerized search of ultrasound in reconstructive surgery using the MEDLINE database. Data regarding ultrasound indications, usage, and outcomes were collected. Results  Of the 115 articles identified, the majority was written on nonreconstructive ultrasound uses (51.4%). For the reconstructive uses, mapping of perforators was the most common usage (39.1%), followed by flap monitoring and volume measurement. In addition, we found that there are a limited number of literature on the role of CDU in reconstructive surgery, especially on its intraoperative and postoperative use. Conclusion  CDU is a valuable and powerful tool for any reconstructive surgeons who are interested in performing microsurgery or supermicrosurgery. As the demand of customized flaps using superthin flaps, perforator-to-perforator anastomosis, and supermicrosurgery increases, understanding and becoming versatile in CDU will be critical. We hope our experience with using ultrasound and refinements that we made are helpful for those who would like to include it as a part of their armamentarium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background  Overall success rate after diabetic foot reconstruction using free flap has been acceptable, but certain parts of the foot like the heel remains more challenging. Patients and Methods  This retrospective study reviewed 37 patients reconstructed with free flaps for diabetic foot ulcer on the heel region from 2008 to 2017. Flap outcome in addition to various risk factors were analyzed; arterial status on heel, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, chronic renal failure patient, hemoglobin A1c level, C-reactive protein, and osteomyelitis. Results  Overall flap survival was 73% and resulted in limb salvage and functional ambulation. Total flap loss was 27% and the majority ended up with high-level amputation. Among the risk factors evaluated, the arterial status of the heel and ASA status significantly increased the odds for failure. When both arterial branches to the heel were impaired, the odds of failure were 80 times higher to fail (p < 0.05). Conclusion  The vascularity of the surrounding tissue of the defect plays a critical role in overall success of diabetic heel reconstruction. Aggressive debridement using the angiosome concept is necessary to assure surrounding tissue has a good circulation. Despite the high chance of failure, success will lead to limb salvage and to reasonable functional ambulation whereas failure to salvage the heel will lead to higher level amputation. This warrants microsurgeons to make an effort to perform reconstruction to the heel defect after obtaining maximal vascularity after angioplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]