Search

The function of long non-coding RNA LHFPL3 antisense RNA 1 (LHFPL3-AS1) in cancer progression has been studied, while its role in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. This study aims to unravel the effects of LHFPL3-AS1 on NPC progression via microRNA (miR)-143-5p/homeobox A6 (HOXA6) axis. NPC tissues were collected and NPC cells were cultured. NPC cells were subjected to radiation therapy to construct the radiation therapy resistance NPC cell line. The levels of LHFPL3-AS1, miR-143-5p and HOXA6 in NPC cells and tissues were examined. LHFPL3-AS1, miR-143-5p or HOXA6 expression was changed and then transfected into radiation-resistant NPC cells to detect cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion and cell apoptosis in vitro . The tumorigenesis in nude mice in vivo was conducted to detect tumor growth. The targeting relations among LHFPL3-AS1, miR-143-5p and HOXA6 were validated. It was discovered that LHFPL3-AS1 and HOXA6 expression was elevated while the miR-143-5p level was depleted in radiation-resistant NPC cells and NPC tissues. The silenced LHFPL3-AS1 or augmented miR-143-5p repressed the proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion of radiation-resistant NPC cells, while accelerated cell apoptosis in vitro . Silenced LHFPL3-AS1 hindered tumor growth in vivo . MiR-143-5p deletion reversed the effects of reduced LHFPL3-AS1; while HOXA6 upregulation reversed the effects of enriched miR-143-5p. LHFPL3-AS1 sponged miR-143-5p that targeted HOXA6. It is concluded that the down-regulated LHFPL3-AS1 retards the development of radiation-resistant NPC cells via sponging miR-143-5p to modulate HOXA6. This study reveals novel therapeutic targets for NPC treatment.

The prognostic significance of miR-24 in tumors has not been determined. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically assess the correlation between miR-24 and its prognostic value in cancers PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were used to search relevant articles (up to 1 October 2020). Studies that evaluated the prognostic value of miR-24 in tumors were included. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate survival outcomes and clinical characteristics. All data analyses were implemented using STATA 12.0 software. A total of 17 studies from 15 articles involving 1705 patients were collected for the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed that elevated miR-24 expression was obviously associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.20-2.31). Furthermore, we also found that elevated miR-24 expression was positively correlated with tumor size (large or small) and tumor stage (III-IV vs I-II). Elevated miR-24 expression indicates poor prognosis and may be a promising prognostic marker in different cancers. Our findings needed to be verified through further investigations. [Figure: see text].

Several studies on the prognostic value of microRNA 142 (miR-142) in solid tumors have reported conflicting results. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between the miR-142 and prognosis in solid tumors. A comprehensive search for relevant studies was conducted until 10 November 2020. Studies that investigated the prognostic significance of the miR-142 in solid tumors were included. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model. All data analyses were performed using the STATA 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, U.S.A.). Twenty articles involving 2451 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that high miR-142 expression was a better predictor of overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.93) and disease-free/progression-free/recurrence-free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS) (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.91) compared with low miR-142 expression. MiR-142 can be used as an effective prognostic marker for patients with solid tumors. Future large prospective studies are warranted to further confirm the present findings., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

It has been reported that microRNA-206(miR-206) plays an important role in cancers and could be used as a prognostic biomarker. However, the results are controversial. Therefore, we summarize all available evidence and present a meta-analysis to estimate the prognostic value of miR-206 in various cancers. The relevant studies were collected by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases until August 21, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to explore the association between miR-206 and survival results and clinicopathologic features. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. Twenty articles involving 2095 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled HR showed that low miR-206 expression was significantly associated with unfavourable overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.03, 95 CI%: 1.53-2.70, P < 0.01). In addition, we found that low miR-206 expression predicted significantly negative association with tumor stage (III-IV VS. I-II) (OR = 4.20, 95% CI: 2.17-8.13, P < 0.01), lymph node status (yes VS. no) (OR = 3.58, 95%: 1.51-8.44, P = 0.004), distant metastasis (yes VS. no) (OR = 3.19, 95%: 1.07-9.50, P = 0.038), and invasion depth (T3 + T4 vs. T2 + T1) (OR = 2.43, 95%: 1.70-3.49, P < 0.01). miR-206 can be used as an effective prognostic indicator in various cancers. Further investigations are warranted to validate the present results., Competing Interests: There is no conflict of interest in the manuscript., (Copyright © 2020 Rongqiang Liu et al.)

Background: Several studies have investigated miR-4293 rs12220909 polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility and yielded different results. Because of this controversy, we designed a meta-analysis to assess comprehensively the association of the rs12220909 polymorphism with cancer risk., Methods: Relevant articles were collected by searching the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang. Data on rs12220909 in cancer patients and controls were extracted. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were performed., Results: Five studies with 3820 cases and 4574 controls were included in our meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that the rs12220909 polymorphism was not associated with cancer risk in any genetic model. (C vs G: odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74-1.07; GC vs GG: OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.67-1.03; CC vs GG: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.82-1.36; CC+GC vs GG: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.69-1.03; CC vs GC+GG: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.85-1.40)., Conclusions: Our results indicate that rs12220909 is not associated with cancer risk. Larger, well-designed multicenter studies are needed to further explore the association of miR-4293 rs12220909 polymorphism with cancer risk.