Search

Up until now, the discussion in the literature as to the choice of fluids is almost completely restricted to the composition, with little to no attention paid to the importance of hemodynamic end points to achieve a desired optimal volume. The determination of fluid volume is left to the discretion of the attending physician with only surrogate markers as guidance the initiation and cessation of fluid therapy. In this article, we aim to discuss the available literature on existing clinical and experimental criteria for the initiation and cessation of fluid therapy. Furthermore, we present recent data that have become available after the introduction of direct in vivo microscopy of the microcirculation at the bedside, and discuss its potential influence on the existing paradigms and controversies in fluid therapy., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of sublingual microcirculatory flow alterations, according to a predefined arbitrary cutoff value, in patients with 'clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion'. Secondary endpoints were the changes in microvascular flow index (MFI), 'clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion', and stroke volume (SV) after fluid administration, and the differences between groups. Methods: Prospective, single-center, observational study in a 22-bed mixed intensive care unit (ICU). Patients ≥18 years with invasive hemodynamic monitoring and 'clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion' as the principal reason for fluid administration were included. Before and after fluid challenge, systemic hemodynamics and direct in vivo observation of the sublingual microcirculation with sidestream dark-field imaging were obtained. Microvascular flow index (MFI) <2.6 was predefined as abnormal. Results: N = 50. At baseline, MFI <2.6 was present in 66 % of the patients. In these patients, MFI increased from 2.3 (2-2.5) at baseline to 2.5 (2.1-2.8) after fluid challenge ( p = 0.003). This was accompanied by a reduction in the number of 'clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion' from 2 (1-2) to 1 (0-2) ( p < 0.001). However, in patients with MFI >2.6 at baseline, MFI and clinical signs changed insignificantly [2.8 (2.8-2.9) versus 2.8 (2.7-3), p = 0.45, respectively, 1 (1-2) versus 1 (1-2), p < 0.32]. These changes were not restricted to patients with a rise in SV ≥10 %. Conclusions: These data add to the understanding that noninvasive assessment of microvascular blood flow may help to identify patients eligible for fluid therapy, and to evaluate its effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The clinical use of vasoactive drugs is not only intended to improve systemic hemodynamic variables, but ultimately to attenuate derangements in organ perfusion and oxygenation during shock. This review aims (1) to discuss basic physiology with respect to manipulating vascular tone and its effect on the microcirculation, and (2) to provide an overview of available clinical data on the relation between vasoactive drugs and organ perfusion, with specific attention paid to recent developments that have enabled direct in vivo observation of the microcirculation and concepts that have originated from it. Methods: A MedLine search was conducted for clinical articles in the English language over the last 15 years pertainig to shock, sepsis, organ failure, or critically ill patients in combination with vasoactive drugs and specific variables of organ perfusion/oxygenation (e.g., tonometry, indocyanine clearance, laser Doppler, and sidestream dark field imaging). Results: Eighty original papers evaluating the specific relationship between organ perfusion/oxygenation and the use of vasoactive drugs were identified and are discussed in light of physiological theory of vasomotor tone. Conclusions: Solid clinical data in support of the idea that increasing blood pressure in shock improves microcirculatory perfusion/oxygenation seem to be lacking, and such a concept might not be in line with physiological theory of microcirculation as a low-pressure vascular compartment. In septic shock no beneficial effect on microcirculatory perfusion above a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg has been reported, but a wide range in inter-individual effect seems to exist. Whether improvement of microcirculatory perfusion is associated with better patient outcome remains to be elucidated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mortality in the setting of septic shock varies between 20% and 100%. Refractory septic shock leads to early circulatory failure and carries the worst prognosis. The pathophysiology is poorly understood despite studies of the microcirculatory defects and the immuno-paralysis. The acute circulatory distress is treated with volume expansion, administration of vasopressors (usually noradrenaline: NA), and inotropes. Ventilation and anti-infectious strategy shall not be discussed here. When circulation is considered, the literature is segregated between interventions directed to the systemic circulation vs. interventions directed to the micro-circulation. Our thesis is that, after stabilization of the acute cardioventilatory distress, the prolonged sympathetic hyperactivity is detrimental in the setting of septic shock. Our hypothesis is that the sympathetic hyperactivity observed in septic shock being normalized towards baseline activity will improve the microcirculation by recoupling the capillaries and the systemic circulation. Therefore, counterintuitively, antihypertensive agents such as beta-blockers or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (clonidine, dexmedetomidine) are useful. They would reduce the noradrenaline requirements. Adjuncts (vitamins, steroids, NO donors/inhibitors, etc.) proposed to normalize the sepsis-evoked vasodilation are not reviewed. This itemized approach (systemic vs. microcirculation) requires physiological and epidemiological studies to look for reduced mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We reported a case of early detection of peripheral hypoperfusion trough the evaluation of a new index in intensive care: Renal Doppler Resistive Index (RRI). Case presentation: We admitted a 76-year-old man who underwent ileostomy and hernioplasty because of an intestinal occlusion due to obstructive strangulated right inguinal hernia. The post-operative period was characterised by hemodynamic instability and he needed an invasive hemodynamic monitoring, administration of vasopressors and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Then, hemodynamic stability was obtained and vasopressors interrupted. RRI was lower than 0.7. In the eleventh post-operative day, despite stable macrocirculatory parameters, we found increased values of RRI. An abdomen ultrasound first and then a CT scan revealed the presence of bleeding from the previous ileostomy. Hence, the patient immediately underwent another surgical operation. Conclusions: RRI modification appears to be more precocious than any other hemodynamic, microcirculatory and metabolic parameter routinely used. RRI has been widely used to assess renal function in critically ill patients; now, we presume that RRI could represent a common and useful tool to manage target therapy in critical condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]