Noninvasive in vivo imaging of microcirculatory blood flow or perfusion (average speed times concentration of moving red blood cells) is of interest in several clinical applications, including monitoring of burn wounds1,2 and investigation of peripheral arterial disease,3 as well as several others.4 One technique that has gained a lot of focus in the last decades is laser speckle contrast imaging [LSCI; sometimes laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA)] in which tissue is illuminated with a laser and the resulting speckle pattern is detected with a camera. Light that scatters when interacting with moving particles in the tissue will obtain a Doppler frequency shift depending on the velocity of the particles. The interference of light with different frequencies will give rise to fluctuations in the speckle pattern formed on the imaging sensor. The movement of the speckles on the sensor will cause an image blur that increases with exposure time. The local spatial statistics of this blur can be related to the movement of particles in the tissue, as is done in LSCI.5 LSCI has been increasingly used over laser Doppler imaging mainly due to its simple setup and fast acquisition and data processing. However, conventional LSCI has drawbacks such as a nonlinear response to perfusion, dependency to static scattering contrast, and a high variability in the presence of noise.5,6 Recent work has gone into calibrating and correcting for these issues to make LSCI a more accurate technique.7 Despite this, while it is generally accepted that LSCI is related to microcirculatory perfusion, the relationship is complex and a direct mapping is still not known.4,8 For the older laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique, the relation to microcircular perfusion is better understood, where it is, for example, possible to theoretically show that the perfusion estimate is linearly related to the flow speed.9,10 To address the nonlinearity of LSCI to perfusion, Parthasarathy et al.11 proposed a new setup using multiple exposure times. The technique, called multi-exposure laser speckle contrast imaging (MELSCI, sometimes MESI), obtains information about the speckle motion blur at various exposures, enabling more advanced models to be used when estimating perfusion from the contrast.5,12 Several approaches to capture multi-exposure images have been proposed. The initial approach by Parthasarathy et al.11 was to use a time-modulated laser to achieve multi-exposure images. By capturing all images with a fixed exposure time but only illuminating the tissue during parts of that time, multi-exposures can be generated. However, a problem with this approach is that images with different exposure times are separated in time since they are captured sequentially. Dragojevic et al.13 suggested another approach that addressed this drawback. This was based on a high-speed camera, only capturing images at the shortest exposure time required, and in postprocessing adding successive images together to create longer exposure times. These synthetic exposure times are valid if the interframe delay in the camera is negligible. This method is faster and more accurate than previous methods due to all exposure times essentially being captured simultaneously, but it produces immense amounts of data that must be transferred and processed. At the time, this was, therefore, limited to an offline technique. Hence, MELSCI has so far been held back by technical limitations in both the imaging setup and the computation time of the models. To address this problem of a data and processing bottleneck, we have previously presented a system for synthetic MELSCI,14 based on a high-speed 1000-frames per second (fps) 1-megapixel camera directly interfaced to a field programmable gate array (FPGA) performing the multi-exposure contrast algorithm outlined by Dragojevic13 in real-time. Processed contrast images were sent to a computer, massively reducing the data throughput requirements. This system could produce multi-exposure contrast images at 15.6 fps, using all available frames from the 1000-fps camera, without any loss of data. However, due to insufficient processing power, the system was not able to transfer the processed images to the computer fast enough, and thus could not provide a real-time video-rate output. Furthermore, while the calculation of multi-exposure contrast images was fast enough, at the time there was no multi-exposure perfusion algorithm fast enough to keep up with the continuous stream of contrast images. The model proposed by Parthasarathy et al.11 and later refined by Kazmi et al.15 requires nonlinear fitting to extract perfusion-related parameters from the multi-exposure contrast. This process must be performed individually in each pixel for full field perfusion images, which is not feasible in real-time with satisfactory frame rates.6 We have previously presented a method using machine learning and simulated data from thousands of Monte Carlo tissue models from which we train an artificial neural network (ANN) to translate multi-exposure contrast to laser Doppler perfusion. We showed that this technique not only achieves a model-inference time of