Search

Large-scale studies are essential to answer questions about complex microbial communities that can be extremely dynamic across hosts, environments, and time points. However, managing acquisition, processing, and analysis of large numbers of samples poses many challenges, with cross-contamination being the biggest obstacle. Contamination complicates analysis and results in sample loss, leading to higher costs and constraints on mixed sample type study designs. While many researchers opt for 96-well plates for their workflows, these plates present a significant issue: the shared seal and weak separation between wells leads to well-to-well contamination. To address this concern, we propose an innovative high-throughput approach, termed as the Matrix method, which employs barcoded Matrix Tubes for sample acquisition. This method is complemented by a paired nucleic acid and metabolite extraction, utilizing 95% (vol/vol) ethanol to stabilize microbial communities and as a solvent for extracting metabolites. Comparative analysis between conventional 96-well plate extractions and the Matrix method, measuring 16S rRNA gene levels via quantitative polymerase chain reaction, demonstrates a notable decrease in well-to-well contamination with the Matrix method. Metagenomics, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (16S), and untargeted metabolomics analysis via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) confirmed that the Matrix method recovers reproducible microbial and metabolite compositions that can distinguish between subjects. This advancement is critical for large-scale study design as it minimizes well-to-well contamination and technical variation, shortens processing times, and integrates with automated infrastructure for enhancing sample randomization and metadata generation., Importance: Understanding dynamic microbial communities typically requires large-scale studies. However, handling large numbers of samples introduces many challenges, with cross-contamination being a major issue. It not only complicates analysis but also leads to sample loss and increased costs and restricts diverse study designs. The prevalent use of 96-well plates for nucleic acid and metabolite extractions exacerbates this problem due to their wells having little separation and being connected by a single plate seal. To address this, we propose a new strategy using barcoded Matrix Tubes, showing a significant reduction in cross-contamination compared to conventional plate-based approaches. Additionally, this method facilitates the extraction of both nucleic acids and metabolites from a single tubed sample, eliminating the need to collect separate aliquots for each extraction. This innovation improves large-scale study design by shortening processing times, simplifying analysis, facilitating metadata curation, and producing more reliable results., Competing Interests: R.K. is a scientific advisory board member and consultant for BiomeSense, Inc., has equity, and receives income. He is a scientific advisory board member and has equity in GenCirq. He is a consultant and scientific advisory board member for DayTwo and receives income. He has equity in and acts as a consultant for Cybele. He is a co-founder of Biota, Inc., and has equity. He is a cofounder of Micronoma, has equity, and is a scientific advisory board member. D.M. is a consultant for, and has stock in, BiomeSense, Inc. P.C.D. is an advisor and holds equity in Cybele, Sirenas, and BileOmix and is a scientific co-founder and advisor for and holds equity in Ometa, Enveda, and Arome with prior approval by University of California San Diego. P.C.D. also consulted for DSM animal health in 2023. The terms of these arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the University of California San Diego, in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

Despite advances in sequencing, lack of standardization makes comparisons across studies challenging and hampers insights into the structure and function of microbial communities across multiple habitats on a planetary scale. Here we present a multi-omics analysis of a diverse set of 880 microbial community samples collected for the Earth Microbiome Project. We include amplicon (16S, 18S, ITS) and shotgun metagenomic sequence data, and untargeted metabolomics data (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography mass spectrometry). We used standardized protocols and analytical methods to characterize microbial communities, focusing on relationships and co-occurrences of microbially related metabolites and microbial taxa across environments, thus allowing us to explore diversity at extraordinary scale. In addition to a reference database for metagenomic and metabolomic data, we provide a framework for incorporating additional studies, enabling the expansion of existing knowledge in the form of an evolving community resource. We demonstrate the utility of this database by testing the hypothesis that every microbe and metabolite is everywhere but the environment selects. Our results show that metabolite diversity exhibits turnover and nestedness related to both microbial communities and the environment, whereas the relative abundances of microbially related metabolites vary and co-occur with specific microbial consortia in a habitat-specific manner. We additionally show the power of certain chemistry, in particular terpenoids, in distinguishing Earth's environments (for example, terrestrial plant surfaces and soils, freshwater and marine animal stool), as well as that of certain microbes including Conexibacter woesei (terrestrial soils), Haloquadratum walsbyi (marine deposits) and Pantoea dispersa (terrestrial plant detritus). This Resource provides insight into the taxa and metabolites within microbial communities from diverse habitats across Earth, informing both microbial and chemical ecology, and provides a foundation and methods for multi-omics microbiome studies of hosts and the environment., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Microbial communities contain a broad phylogenetic diversity of organisms; however, the majority of methods center on describing bacteria and archaea. Fungi are important symbionts in many ecosystems and are potentially important members of the human microbiome, beyond those that can cause disease. To expand our analysis of microbial communities to include data from the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, five candidate DNA extraction kits were compared against our standardized protocol for describing bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene amplicon- and shotgun metagenomics sequencing. The results are presented considering a diverse panel of host-associated and environmental sample types and comparing the cost, processing time, well-to-well contamination, DNA yield, limit of detection and microbial community composition among protocols. Across all criteria, the MagMAX Microbiome kit was found to perform best. The PowerSoil Pro kit performed comparably but with increased cost per sample and overall processing time. The Zymo MagBead, NucleoMag Food and Norgen Stool kits were included.

One goal of microbial ecology researchers is to capture the maximum amount of information from all organisms in a sample. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted a gap in traditional DNA-based protocols, including the high-throughput methods the authors previously established as field standards. To enable simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 and microbial community profiling, the authors compared the relative performance of two total nucleic acid extraction protocols with the authors' previously benchmarked protocol. The authors included a diverse panel of environmental and host-associated sample types, including body sites commonly swabbed for COVID-19 testing. Here the authors present results comparing the cost, processing time, DNA and RNA yield, microbial community composition, limit of detection and well-to-well contamination between these protocols.