Search

Background: The most common malignancy and second most common cause of death is breast cancer among women. About 2.09 million fatalities from breast cancer happened in 2018. The objective was to evaluate the elevated CA15-3 in breast cancer patients with visceral metastases presenting at the tertiary care hospital of Karachi. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Department of Oncology of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center from 15th December 2018 to 15th November 2019. Female patients aged 26-80 years diagnosed with visceral metastatic (defined as metastasis to lung, liver, brain and adrenal glands) breast cancer were included in the study. The diagnosis of breast cancer was confirmed on histopathology whereas the metastatic sites were evaluated using physical examination and imaging. The serum CA15-3 concentration was assessed using assay kits. The serum CA15-3 level of 0-32 U/ml was taken as normal range for all the patients whereas CA15-3 level greater than 32 U/L was considered as elevated CA15-3. SPSS version 23 was used to enter and analyze data. Results: A total of 139 females were included in the study. The mean age & BMI of the patients were reported as 46.5 years & 26.69 kg/m². In the majority of the patients' metastases were detected in the liver (n=54), 92 in the lungs+ parenchymal disease, 20 in adrenal glands, 12 in pleural effusion and 10 in the brain. Out of 139 patients with visceral metastases, 52(37.4%) had normal CA15-3 level whereas 87 (62.6%) had elevated serum CA15-3 levels (>32 U/L). Conclusion: The serum CA15-3 tumour marker is elevated significantly in visceral metastases and can be used as a prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Palbociclib combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for people with HR+/HER2− breast cancer that has spread to other areas of the body, such as the lungs or liver. Evidence of palbociclib effectiveness in routine clinical practice can provide complementary support for clinical trial findings. This study used electronic health records of people with breast cancer that had spread to their lungs and/or liver to determine how well palbociclib plus an AI worked compared to an AI alone. The study showed that palbociclib plus an AI compared with an AI alone was associated with a 38% or 27% reduction in the risk of death for patients with breast cancer that had spread to the lungs or liver, respectively. These findings support the use of palbociclib plus an AI for people whose breast cancer has spread to their lungs or liver. A cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is the standard of care for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but real-world effectiveness data for patients with lung or liver metastases are limited. This retrospective study included data from the US Flatiron Health database of patients with HR+/HER2− mBC and lung or liver metastases treated with first-line palbociclib (PAL) plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or an AI alone in routine clinical practice. Overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were assessed. A total of 891 patients were included (622 with lung metastasis, 376 with liver metastasis, and 107 with both lung and liver metastasis). After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance patient characteristics, PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.62; p < 0.001) and rwPFS (HR = 0.55; p < 0.001) in patients with lung metastases and numerically longer OS (HR = 0.73; p = 0.056) and significantly longer rwPFS (HR = 0.57, p < 0.001) for those with liver metastases. Overall, PAL + AI versus AI alone was associated with prolonged OS and rwPFS in routine clinical practice, supporting the use of first-line PAL + AI for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC with lung and/or liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were found to be associated with a better clinical outcome in specific subtypes of breast cancer. Aim: To study the association between TILs and the prognosis of Egyptian patients with HER2-negative breast cancer metastatic to the viscera. Methods: This prospective study included 100 patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Intratumoral TILs, stromal TILs, and CD4 and CD8 were examined in the pathological specimens and their relationship with survival and response to treatment was studied. Results: At a median follow-up period of 43 months, the median overall survival was 44.7 months (95%CI: 39.2-50.2) and the 5-year overall survival rate was 28%. A high level of CD8+ve TILs was associated with significantly longer overall survival (p<0.001) and progression-free survival (p=0.043). There was no significant correlation between intratumoral TILs, stromal TILs, or CD4+ve and overall survival. Conclusions: A higher level of CD8+ve TILs is associated with better overall as well as progression-free survival in HER2-negative breast cancer with visceral metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reviews studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. It analyzes the results derived from large randomized studies, highlights the main advantages peculiar to eribulin, and describes the key mechanisms of the antitumor activity displayed by the drug. Among those presented, there are significant retrospective studies evaluating the role of eribulin chemotherapy in late and early advanced breast cancer treatment lines, as well as an analysis of surveys aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the drug in various clinical settings (for visceral metastases, brain lesion, and in elderly patients). This article reflects the main results of Russian population analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin chemotherapy in routine clinical practice.

Abstract Background Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment for patients with hormone receptor ‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). While visceral metastasis is a negative prognostic factor, few studies have distinguished between the prognoses of patients with metastases at different visceral sites. Patients and methods In total, 398 patients receiving fulvestrant 500 mg at a single center over a 6‐year period were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors associated with progression‐free survival (PFS). Kaplan‐Meier analysis was used to compare the PFS of patients with lung and liver metastases. Results Baseline visceral metastases were present in 233 patients, including 138 with lungw/o liver metastases (lung metastases without liver involvement), 51 with liverw/o lung metastases (liver metastases without lung involvement) and 41 with lung and liver metastases. The median PFS was 6.8 months (5.6 and 9.2 months for visceral and nonvisceral metastases, respectively, P = .028). PFS was longer in patients with lungw/o liver metastases than in those with liverw/o lung metastases or lung and liver metastases (9.6, 3.7 and 3.2 months, respectively, P

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate the overall survival (OS) in real-world clinical practice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and visceral metastases (liver or lung) treated in the third-line setting with eribulin, gemcitabine or capecitabine overall and in the major clinical categories of MBC (TNBC, HR+/HER2−, and HER2+). Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted with de-identified patient electronic health records from the Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA). Patients with a diagnosis of metastatic breast with lung or liver metastases, and treated with eribulin, gemcitabine, or capecitabine as third-line therapy were included in the analysis. Landmark survival was calculated as percentage of patients alive at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Overall survival was compared between treatment arms within TNBC and HR+/HER2− using log-rank analysis. Cox regression analyses was performed to estimate hazard ratios for comparison of treatments within TNBC and HR+/HER2− subtype. Results: 443 patients with liver or lung metastases received third-line therapy with eribulin (n = 229), gemcitabine (n = 134), or capecitabine (n = 80). Eribulin patients had a higher percentage of patients alive at all landmark timepoints vs. gemcitabine, and a higher percentage of patients alive until 36 months vs. capecitabine. Median survival times showed that overall, and within the TNBC and HR+/HER2− subtype, patients receiving eribulin had a numerically higher median overall survival. Conclusions: This real-world evidence study is consistent with randomized clinical trial data and demonstrates consistency of eribulin effectiveness in MBC patients with lung or liver metastases overall and in TNBC and HR+/HER2− disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment for patients with hormone receptor ‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). While visceral metastasis is a negative prognostic factor, few studies have distinguished between the prognoses of patients with metastases at different visceral sites. Patients and methods: In total, 398 patients receiving fulvestrant 500 mg at a single center over a 6‐year period were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors associated with progression‐free survival (PFS). Kaplan‐Meier analysis was used to compare the PFS of patients with lung and liver metastases. Results: Baseline visceral metastases were present in 233 patients, including 138 with lungw/o liver metastases (lung metastases without liver involvement), 51 with liverw/o lung metastases (liver metastases without lung involvement) and 41 with lung and liver metastases. The median PFS was 6.8 months (5.6 and 9.2 months for visceral and nonvisceral metastases, respectively, P = .028). PFS was longer in patients with lungw/o liver metastases than in those with liverw/o lung metastases or lung and liver metastases (9.6, 3.7 and 3.2 months, respectively, P < .001; liverw/o lung vs. lungw/o liver hazard ratio (HR) 1.70; lung and liver vs. lungw/o liver HR 2.85). Patients with liver metastases experienced significantly worse PFS than those without liver involvement (3.7 vs. 9.2 months, P < .001). PFS benefits were observed in patients with longer disease‐free intervals, no liver metastases, and no previous chemotherapy. Conclusion: Fulvestrant treatment benefited patients with lungw/o liver or nonvisceral metastases. When treating hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative MBC patients with endocrine therapy, it is important to differentiate patients with lung metastases from those with liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: In this paper, we present a prospective observational study, which determines the incidence of bone metastases and its correlation with hormonal receptors (estrogen receptor [ER]/progesterone receptor [PR]) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer.Materials and Methods: From October of 2015 to July 2017, 262 patients were eligible for the study, of which 98 patients presented/developed bone metastases. ER/PR and HER2 receptor status were determined, and bone scintigraphy with a technetium-99 m was carried out on each patient during the study.Results: The incidence rate of bone metastases as found in this study was 25.25%, and the mean and median age at diagnosis were 47.23 and 46, respectively (age range = 28-80). Bone metastases were more prevalent in ER-positive tumors (P = 0.043), tumors with lymph node positivity (P = 0.002), and lower grade tumors (P = 0.002), whereas visceral metastases were more common with ER-tumors (P = 0.005), tumors with higher grade (P = 0.012), and tumors with lymph node positivity (P = 0.034). In this study cohort, the spine and pelvis were the most commonly involved subsites of bone metastases (P < 0.001).Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the metastatic patterns in breast cancer strongly correlate with various breast cancer subtypes, mainly designated by ER, PR, and HER2. Hormone receptor-positive tumors show a predilection for bones as the first site of relapse compared to hormone-receptor-negative tumors which have a proclivity to develop as visceral metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This report assesses the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) with or without visceral metastases. Patients and methods: Pre- and postmenopausal women with disease progression following prior ET (PALOMA-3; N=521) and postmenopausal women untreated for ABC (PALOMA-2; N=666) were randomized 2 : 1 to ET (fulvestrant or letrozole, respectively) plus palbociclib or placebo. Progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) were evaluated by prior treatment and visceral involvement. Results: Visceral metastases incidence was higher in patients with prior resistance to ET (58.3%, PALOMA-3) than in patients naive to ET in the ABC setting (48.6%, PALOMA-2). In patients with prior resistance to ET and visceral metastases,median PFS (mPFS) was 9.2months with palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus 3.4months with placebo plus fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-0.61], and objective response rate (ORR) was 28.0% versus 6.7%, respectively. In patients with nonvisceral metastases, mPFS was 16.6 versus 7.3months, HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36-0.77. In patients with visceral disease and naive to ET in the advanced disease setting, mPFS was 19.3months with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 12.9months with placebo plus letrozole (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.85); ORR was 55.1% versus 40.0%; in patients with nonvisceral disease, mPFS was not reached with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 16.8months with placebo plus letrozole (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36-0.70). In patients with prior resistance to ET with visceral metastases, palbociclib plus fulvestrant significantly delayed deterioration of QoL versus placebo plus fulvestrant, whereas patient-reported QoL was maintained with palbociclib plus letrozole in patients naive to endocrine-based therapy for ABC. Conclusions: Palbociclib plus ET prolonged mPFS in patients with visceral metastases, increased ORRs, and in patients previously treated for ABC, delayed QoL deterioration, presenting a standard treatment option among patients with visceral metastases amenable to endocrine-based therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]