Search

Objectives: To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting ≥ 3 metastatic axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in early breast cancer with no palpable axillary adenopathy by clinicopathologic data, contrast-enhanced (CE) lymphatic ultrasound (US), and grayscale findings of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Materials and methods: Women with T1-2N0 invasive breast cancer were consecutively recruited for the CE lymphatic US. Patients from Center 1 were grouped into development and internal validation cohorts at a ratio of 2:1. The external validation cohort was constructed from Center 2. The clinicopathologic data and US findings of SLNs were analyzed. A nomogram was developed to predict women with ≥ 3 metastatic ALNs. Nomogram performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curve analysis. Results: One hundred seventy-nine from Center 1 were considered the development cohorts. The remaining 90 participants from Center 1 were internal cohorts and 197 participants from Center 2 were external validation cohorts. The US findings of no enhancement (odds ratio (OR), 15.3; p = 0.01), diffuse (OR, 19.1; p = 0.01) or focal eccentric (OR, 27.7; p = 0.003) cortical thickening, and absent hilum (OR, 169.7; p < 0.001) were independently associated with ≥ 3 metastatic ALNs. Compared to grayscale US or CE lymphatic US alone, the nomogram showed the highest AUC of 0.88 (0.85, 0.91). The nomogram showed a calibration slope of 1.0 (p = 0.80–0.81; Brier = 0.066–0.067) in validation cohorts in predicting ≥ 3 metastatic ALNs. Conclusion: Patients likely to have ≥ 3 metastatic ALNs were identified by combining the lymphatic and grayscale US findings of SLNs. Our nomogram could aid in multidisciplinary treatment decision-making. Trial registration: This trial is registered on www.chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2000031231. Registered March 25, 2020. Critical relevance statement: A nomogram combining lymphatic CEUS and grayscale US findings of SLNs could identify early breast cancer patients with low or high axillary tumor burden preoperatively, which is more applicable to the Z0011 era. Our nomogram could be useful in aiding multidisciplinary treatment decision-making for patients with early breast cancer. Key points: • CEUS can help identify and diagnose SLN in early breast cancer preoperatively. • Combining lymphatic and grayscale US findings can predict axillary tumor burden. • The nomogram showed a high diagnostic value in validation cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the preoperative diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced lymphatic ultrasound (CEUS) for the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early breast cancer. Materials and methods: We prospectively recruited 102 consecutive patients with clinically node-negative early breast cancer from July 2021 to October 2021. All patients underwent conventional US and percutaneous CEUS examinations. The CEUS of SLNs were classified into four enhancement patterns: homogeneous (I), featured inhomogeneous (II), focal defect (III), and no enhancement (IV). The diagnostic performance of conventional US and CEUS for SLN metastasis was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curves. Results: A total of 78 women were enrolled in this study, including 55, 18, and 5 patients with negative axilla, 1–2, and ≥ 3 metastastic SLNs pathologically, respectively. The identification rate of SLNs by CEUS was 100%. Patterns I and II can select 91.7% (44/48) of patients with disease-free axilla, while patterns III and IV had higher percentages of metastasis (65.2%, p < 0.001 and 57.1%, p < 0.002, respectively). For the SLN metastatic burden, 100% (48/48) of patients with pattern I/II had ≤ 2 metastatic SLNs. Compared with conventional US, the CEUS enhancement patterns showed significant improvement in diagnosing metastatic SLNs (0.813 vs 0.601, p < 0.001). CEUS had greater clinical benefits and correctly reclassified 48% of metastatic SLNs (p < 0.001) without sacrificing the classification accuracy of negative SLNs (p = 0.25), and could improve prediction accuracy by 0.42 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CEUS demonstrated better diagnostic performance and greater clinical benefits than conventional US for the preoperative diagnosis of SLNs, showing its potential to select candidates for precluding axillary surgery in early breast cancer. Key Points: • The homogeneous and featured inhomogeneous enhancement of SLNs are highly suggestive of negative LNs, while focal defect (p < 0.001) and no enhancement (p < 0.002) patterns had higher percentages of metastasis. • The proportion of SLNs with highly suspicious signs on conventional US increases as the type of enhancement pattern increases (no suspicious signs in pattern I/II, 34.8% in pattern III, and 85.7% in pattern IV). • Compared with conventional US, CEUS improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.813 vs. 0.601, p < 0.001) and had greater clinical benefits (IDI = 0.42, p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of axillary metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mutation of p110 alpha-catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PIK3CA) has high predictive and prognostic values for breast cancer. Hence, there has been a marked interest in detecting and monitoring PIK3CA genotype with non-invasive technique, such as circulating free DNA (cfDNA). However, the diagnostic accuracy of PIK3CA genotyping by cfDNA is still a problem of controversy. Here, we conducted the first meta-analysis to evaluate overall diagnostic performance of cfDNA for PIK3CA mutation detection. Literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Seven cohorts from five studies with 247 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for accuracy evaluation. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.86–1.00), respectively; the pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio were 42.8 (95% CI 5.1–356.9) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.02–1.34), respectively; diagnostic odds ratio for evaluating the overall diagnostic performance was 300 (95% CI 8–11867); area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve reached 0.99 (95% CI 0.97–0.99). Subgroup analysis with metastatic breast cancer revealed remarkable improvement in diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 0.86–0.91; specificity: 0.98; diagnostic odds ratio: 300–428). This meta-analysis proved that detecting PIK3CA gene mutation by cfDNA has high diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer, especially for metastatic breast cancer. It may serve as a reliable non-invasive assay for detecting and monitoring PIK3CA mutation status in order to deliver personalized and precise treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive but heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer. This study aimed to identify and validate a prognostic signature for TNBC patients to improve prognostic capability and to guide individualized treatment. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic performance of clinicopathological characteristics and miRNAs in a training set of 58 patients with invasive ductal TNBC diagnosed between 2002 and 2012. A prediction model was developed based on independent clinicopathological and miRNA covariates. The prognostic value of the model was further validated in a separate set of 41 TNBC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2008. Results: Only lymph node status was marginally significantly associated with poor prognosis of TNBC (P = 0.054), whereas other clinicopathological factors, including age, tumor size, histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, P53 status, Ki-67 index, and type of surgery, were not. The expression levels of miR-27b-3p, miR-107, and miR-103a-3p were significantly elevated in the metastatic group compared with the disease-free group (P value: 0.008, 0.005, and 0.050, respectively). The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that lymph node status and miR-27b-3p were independent predictors of poor prognosis (P value: 0.012 and 0.027, respectively). A logistic regression model was developed based on these two independent covariates, and the prognostic value of the model was subsequently confirmed in a separate validation set. The two different risk groups, which were stratified according to the model, showed significant differences in the rates of distant metastasis and breast cancer-related death not only in the training set (P value: 0.001 and 0.040, respectively) but also in the validation set (P value: 0.013 and 0.012, respectively). Conclusion: This model based on miRNA and node status covariates may be used to stratify TNBC patients into different prognostic subgroups for potentially individualized therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To verify whether omitting radiotherapy from breast cancer treatment for patients ≥ 70 years old following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) without axillary lymph node dissection is safe. Previous studies have shown that omitting breast radiotherapy after BCS and axillary lymph node dissection is safe for elderly breast cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety of BCS without axillary surgery or breast radiotherapy (BCSNR) in elderly patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 481 patients with breast cancer, aged ≥ 70 years, between 2010 and 2016. Of these, 302 patients underwent BCSNR and 179 underwent other, larger scope operations. Local recurrence rate, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate, distant metastasis rate, breast-related death, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 60 months, no significant differences in local recurrence, distant metastasis rate, breast-related death, and DFS were noted. The OS was similar (P = 0.56) between the BCSNR group (91.7%) and other operations group (93.0%). The IBTR rate was considered low in both groups, however resulted greater (P = 0.005) in the BCSNR group (5.3%) than in other operations group (1.6%). BCSNR did not affect the survival of elderly patients with breast cancer with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. IBTR was infrequent in both groups; however, there was a significant difference between the two groups. BCSNR is a feasible treatment modality for patients with breast cancer ≥ 70 years old with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]