Search

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer has undergone a profound revolution in recent years. In addition to the introduction of novel molecules in the clinics, the field has witnessed a tremendous development of functional imaging modalities adding new biological insights which can ultimately inform tailored treatment strategies, including local therapies. The evolution and rise of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) have been particularly notable in patients with oligometastatic disease, where it has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment strategy yielding favorable results in terms of disease control and improved oncological outcomes. The possibility of debulking all sites of disease, matched with the ambition of potentially extending this treatment paradigm to polymetastatic patients in the not-too-distant future, makes Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) an attractive paradigm which can be used in conjunction with systemic therapy in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is usually categorized as high- or low-volume disease. This is relevant because low- and high-volume metastatic disease are associated with different outcomes, and thus management of the two forms should differ. Although some definitions have been reported, the concept of oligometastatic disease is not so clearly defined, giving rise to further variability in the choice of treatment, mainly between systemic agents and radiotherapy, especially in the era of metastasis-directed therapy. With the aim of providing clinicians with guidance on best practice, a group of medical and radiation oncologists, experts in prostate cancer, used the round robin method to generate a series of consensus statements on management of low-volume mHSPC. Consensus was obtained on three major areas of controversy: (1) with regard to clinical definitions of mHSPC, it was held that oligometastatic and low-volume disease refer to different concepts and should not be used interchangeably; (2) regarding therapy of de novo low-volume metastatic disease, androgen deprivation therapy alone can be considered undertreatment, and all patients should be evaluated for systemic treatment combinations; local therapy should not be denied in patients with mHSPC, regardless of the intensity of systemic therapy, and metastasis-directed therapy can be proposed in selected cases; (3) with regard to treatment of metachronous metastatic disease, patients should be evaluated for systemic treatment combinations. Metastasis-directed therapy can be proposed to delay systemic treatment in selected cases, especially if prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography staging has been performed and when indolent disease occurs. It is hoped that clinicians treating patients with mHSPC in daily practice will find this expert opinion of value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New metabolic tracers have improved sensitivity and specificity for the real extent of tumor burden in prostate cancer. This study aims to compare the impact of these tracers for metastasis-directed therapy. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-guided metastasis-directed therapy in castration-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients resulted in higher rates of androgen deprivation therapy-free survival, when compared with 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography-guided treatments (P = .00). Background: The present analysis aims to compare the impact of 18F-fluorocholine (18F-choline) and gallium-68 prostatespecific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT)eguided metastases-directed therapies (MDTs) in patients with castration-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC). Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria were: (1) histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma; (2) evidence of biochemical relapse after primary tumor treatment; (3) ≤ 3 hypermetabolic oligorecurrent lesions detected by 18F-choline or 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT; (4) PET-CT imaging performed in a single nuclear medicine department; (5) patients treated with upfront stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) without hormone therapy; and (6) SBRT delivered with a dose per fraction ≥ 5 Gy. In the case of oligoprogression (≤ 3 lesions outside the previous RT field) after MTD, a further course of SBRT was proposed; otherwise, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered. Results: A total of 118 lesions in 88 patients were analyzed. Forty-four (50%) patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET-guided SBRT, and the remaining underwent choline PET-based SBRT. The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 5-87 months) for the entire cohort. Overall survival and local control were both 100%. Distant progression occurred in 48 (54.5%) patients, for a median distant progression-free survival of 22.8 months (range, 14.4-28.8 months). The median pre-SBRT prostate-specific antigen was 2.04 ng/mL in the choline PET cohort and 0.58 ng/mL in the PSMA-PET arm. Disease-free survival rates were 63.6% and 34%, respectively, in the 68Ga-PSMA and choline PET group (P = .06). The ADT administration rate was higher after choline-PETeguided SBRT (P = .00) owing to the higher incidence of polymetastatic disease after first-course SBRT compared with 68Ga-PSMA-based SBRT. Conclusion: In the setting of oligorecurrent castration-sensitive PC, PSMA-PET-guided SBRT produced a higher rate of ADT-free patients when compared with the 18F-choline-PET cohort. Randomized trials are advocated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in two groups of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients: oligorecurrent PC and oligoprogressive castration-resistant PC (oligo-CRPC).Methods: Inclusion criteria of the present multicentre retrospective analysis were: (1) oligorecurrent PC, defined as the presence of 1-3 lesions (bone or nodes) detected with choline positron emission tomography or CT plus bone scan following biochemical recurrence; (2) oligo-CRPC, defined as metastases (bone or nodes) detected after a prostatic-specific antigen rise during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Primary end points were: distant progression-free survival (DPFS) and ADT-free survival in oligorecurrent PC patients; DPFS and second-line systemic treatment-free survival in oligo-CRPC patients.Results: About 100 patients with oligorecurrent PC (139 lesions) and 41 with oligo-CRPC (70 lesions), treated between March 2010 and April 2016, were analysed. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, in the oligorecurrent group 1- and 2-year DPFS were 64.4 and 43%. The rate of LC was 92.8% at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 23.4 months, in the oligo-CRPC group 1- and 2-year DPFS were 43.2 and 21.6%. Limitations include the retrospective design.Conclusions: Stereotactic body radiotherapy seems to be a useful treatment both for oligorecurrent and oligo-CRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose or objective: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is widely used for treatment of uncomplicated spine metastases to palliate symptoms and prolong disease control. However, criteria for patient selection are not available. The aim of this study is to identify determinants of local failure and progression-free interval in patients treated with SBRT to spinal metastases. Materials and methods: Data from consecutive patients treated with Cyberknife-based spine SBRT between January 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively collected. Dose was expressed as Biological Effective Dose for α/β=10 (BED10). Kaplan-Meyer method was used to calculate Local Control (LC) and Disease Free Survival (DFS) from date of SBRT to event. Univariate (UVA) and Multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed using log-rank and Cox model, respectively. Results: Sixty-two patients accounting for 70 spinal metastases were included. Median age was 66 (range 32- 87) years. Disease was metastatic at diagnosis in 21 patients (34%) : an active primary tumor was present in 17 patients (27%). Among treated sites, most represented primary malignancies were prostate (n=28, 40%) and breast (n=21, 30%). Dose regimens consisted of 25-30 Gy in 5 fractions and 21-30 Gy in 3 fractions in respectively 61 (87%) and 9 (13%) cases, resulting in a median BED of 43.2 (range 37.5-60) Gy10. Concurrent chemotherapy (including cytotoxic or targeted agents) was administered in 43% of cases (n=30). After a median follow up of 10 months (range 1-24 months), 9 local relapses and 40 distant progressions were observed. One year LC was 87% (Fig.1): nonprostate primary tumor (p=0.003, Fig.2) and concurrent chemotherapy (p=0.006, Fig.3) were associated to poorer LC at UVA, and an independent correlation was confirmed at MVA (respectively p=0.017 and p=0.024). One-year DFS was 43% (Fig.4). UVA showed a correlation between impaired DFS and active primary tumor (p=0.003), metastatic dissemination at diagnosis (p=0.02) and nonprostate primary tumor (p=0.009), although only an active primary tumor site was independently associated to DFS at MVA (p=0.007, Fig.5). Only G2 acute pain or nausea were observed. No late toxicity, in particular vertebral fracture, was reported. Conclusion: Spine SBRT results in high LC rates and durable progression-free survival with low incidence of mild toxicity. Clinical nomograms based on patient-related characteristics may help to select candidates for this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors were used in combination with SBRT in 93% of cases. • Radiotherapy schedules of single fraction doses were 10–20 Gy. • Radiotherapy schedules of hypofractionated doses were 35–60 Gy in 3–5 fractions. • Local control of irradiated lesions was achieved in 76–100% of the patients. • The 2-year overall survival was 71% after combined approach. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of SBRTdrug combination in patients affected by mRCC and associated oncologic outcomes and toxicity profiles. We performed a critical review of the Pubmed, Medline, and Embase databases from January 1, 2000 through April 30, 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-Analyses statement. To assess the overall quality of the literature reviewed, we used a modified Delphi tool. A total of 6 studies were included, corresponding to a cohort of 216 patients. Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors were the most widely used drugs in combination with SBRT, being administered in 93% patients. No study reported an increase of radiation-induced toxicity. SBRT resulted to be safe, without increase in terms of drugs-related adverse events in this setting. Moreover, this approach showed promising clinical outcomes in terms of LC and OS [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]