Search

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) patients can have low 25-hydroxyvitamin D 25(OH)VitD levels, which may be associated with increased oxidative stress. There is little data on the effect of 25(OH)VitD administration plus dietary intervention on oxidative stress markers in these patients., Aim: To study the effect of 25(OH)VitD administration plus dietary intervention on oxidative stress markers in MetS patients., Methods: This is a pre-specified analysis of a previously published study (NCT01237769 ClinicalTrials.gov). MetS participants (n = 50, 52 ± 10 years) were given dietary instructions and were randomized to 25(OH)VitD 2.000 IU/day p.o. (Suppl group) or no supplementation (No-Suppl group). Serum 25(OH)VitD, oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), paraoxonase activity (PON-1), arylesterase activity (ARYL) and urine 8-isoprostane (8-iso-PGF 2a ) levels were measured at baseline and after 3 months., Results: MetS patients had low baseline 25(OH)VitD levels, which increased by 90% in the Suppl group [from 16.1 (3.3-35.1) to 30.6 (8.4-67.6) ng/mL, p = 0.001] and by 33.3% in the No-Suppl group [from 9.9 (4.0-39.6) to 13.2 (3.5-36.8) ng/mL, p = NS] after intervention. Ox-LDL, PON-1 and ARYL did not change significantly at follow-up in both groups, except for urine 8-iso-PGF 2a levels that decreased by 22.7% in the Suppl group [from 48.8 (26.8-137.1) to 37.7 (12.3-99.0) ng/mmol creatinine, p = 0.015] and by 14.4% in No-Suppl group [from 45.8 (16.6-99.3) to 39.2 (13.3-120.1) ng/mmol creatinine, p = NS]. The reduction in 8-iso-PGF 2a levels did not differ significantly between the 2 groups., Conclusion: The administration of 25(OH)VitD plus dietary intervention in patients with MetS was not associated with meaningful reductions in oxidative stress markers compared with dietary intervention alone., (Copyright © 2018 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the correlation of Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) with low-density (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in untreated individuals attending a lipid clinic., Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in Greece and including 1000 dyslipidemic subjects. We included individuals not taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline visit and divided them in 2 groups: subjects diagnosed with diabetes or fulfilling the criteria of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and hyperlipidemic subjects without diabetes or MetS. The correlations (r(2)) of Apo-B with LDL-C and non-HDL-C were assessed in these 2 groups. Further analyses were performed according to the baseline triglyceride (TG) levels (

Background: Raised triglycerides (TG), decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and a predominance of small dense low density lipoproteins (sdLDL) are characteristics of the metabolic syndrome (MetS)., Objective: To compare the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin monotherapy with moderate dosing combined with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on the lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and MetS., Methods: We previously randomised patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 160 and TG > 200 mg/dl to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or ω-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (Rω group, n = 30). In the present study, only patients with MetS were included (24, 23 and 24 in the R, RF and Rω groups respectively). At baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, the lipoprotein subfraction profile was determined by polyacrylamide 3% gel electrophoresis., Results: The mean LDL size was significantly increased in all groups. This change was more prominent with RF than with other treatments in parallel with its greater hypotriglyceridemic capacity (p < 0.05 compared with R and Rω). A decrease in insulin resistance by RF was also noted. Only RF significantly raised HDL-C levels (by 7.7%, p < 0.05) by increasing the cholesterol of small HDL particles. The cholesterol of larger HDL subclasses was significantly increased by R and Rω., Conclusions: All regimens increased mean LDL size; RF was the most effective. A differential effect of treatments was noted on the HDL subfraction profile., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Objective: Low serum Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) has been proposed as an indicator of the Metabolic Syndrome (MS) and cardiovascular disease in men. On the other hand, the (TAAAA)n repeat polymorphism in the SHBG gene has been shown to affect SHBG levels. The possible role of this polymorphism in the MS was examined in the present study., Design: The study population consisted of 83 men with MS aged 54.9±14.8 years and 166 healthy men of the same age. The diagnosis of MS was based on the criteria proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program - Third Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP III). The waist circumference was recorded and blood samples were obtained after overnight fasting for biochemical and hormonal tests. The SHBG(TAAAA)N polymorphism was genotyped in peripheral blood leucocytes., Results: Genotype analysis for the (TAAAA)n polymorphism of the SHBG gene in the patients and controls identified 6 alleles having 6-11 TAAAA repeats. Patients with MS had more frequently short-allele genotypes (with 6/6, 6/7, 6/8, 7/7, 7/8 or 8/8 tandem repeats) compared to controls (53% vs. 39.8%, p=0.047). In the entire study population, men homozygous for the 6 TAAAA repeat allele had lower SHBG levels (p=0.01) and higher waist circumference (p=0.006) than men heterozygous or non-carriers of this allele., Conclusion: Short SHBG(TAAAA)N allele genotypes may play a role in the development of the MS. The mechanism of this contribution remains unclear., (© J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relative importance of the determinants of the metabolic syndrome in a sample with metabolic syndrome from the Greek population., Methods: A random sample of 824 male (56 ± 11 years) and 1,199 female (58 ± 10 years) subjects with metabolic syndrome [National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III)], but without diabetes mellitus or established cardiovascular disease, was selected from all over Greece. Principal components analysis (PCA) was applied to evaluate the interrelationships between the inherent characteristics of the metabolic syndrome., Results: Among the participants, 87.6% had elevated blood pressure levels, 79.9% had hypertriglyceridaemia, 62.6% had low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, 71.4% had impaired fasting glucose (FG), and 91.5% had abdominal obesity. The most common combination was elevated blood pressure levels, abdominal obesity, impaired fasting glucose (FG), and hypertriglyceridemia (14.2%). PCA revealed three main components that explained 68.4% of the total variation. The first one was heavily loaded by blood pressure (28.6% of the total variation explained), followed by a component characterized by lipid variables (21.7%) and a component characterized by FG and waist circumference measurements (18.1% explained variation)., Conclusions: The most dominant characteristic of metabolic syndrome participants from a Mediterranean country (Greece) was elevated blood pressure levels, which were present in all eight of the most common combinations of metabolic syndrome components, rendering the "hypertensive aspect" of metabolic syndrome the most common one. Because a significant proportion of hypertensive subjects with metabolic syndrome receive no treatment, or are poorly controlled, targeting blood pressure levels in the general population may assist in better preventing metabolic syndrome and its complications.

Background: It is known that weight loss is beneficial for obese and overweight subjects with metabolic syndrome. Very few data exist, however, about whether the presence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance (IR) influence the response of these subjects to weight-reducing interventions. The current study intends to examine whether the presence of metabolic syndrome and its components could influence weight loss in obese and overweight women during a short-term, dietary-based intervention program., Methods: A total of 107 women aged 49.1 +/- 13.5 years old, with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 were studied. The subjects were prescribed a low-fat diet plus weight-reducing drugs when necessary., Results: After 3 months, the subjects with metabolic syndrome lost more weight than those without (6.62% vs. 4.50%; P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the percentage of weight loss and the number of the components of metabolic syndrome present at baseline (Spearman rho = 0.329; P < 0.01). Furthermore, patients in the quartile with the highest homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA-index) lost more weight than the remaining subjects (8.17% +/- 3.34 vs. 5.59% +/- 3.87; P < 0.05). These results were significant, even after adjustment for the medical treatment prescribed., Conclusions: Obese and overweight patients with metabolic syndrome showed a greater reduction of their body weight, compared to the patients without metabolic syndrome. The components of the metabolic syndrome present at baseline correlated positively with the percentage of the weight loss. Finally, the patients with the highest levels of HOMA-index at baseline lost significantly more weight than those with lower levels of this parameter.

We investigated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in 1501 Greeks (613 men and 888 women, aged 40-65 years) referred to outpatients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and without diabetes mellitus or CVD. The 10-year risk of fatal CVD events was calculated using European Society of Cardiology Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (ESC SCORE), Hellenic-SCORE, and Framingham equations. Raised blood pressure (BP) and hypertriglyceridemia were more common in men (89.6% vs 84.2% and 86.8% vs 74.2%, respectively; P < .001). Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and abdominal obesity were more common in women (58.2% vs 66.2% and 85.8% vs 97.1%, respectively; P < .001). The 10-year risk of fatal CVD events using HellenicSCORE was higher in men (6.3% +/- 4.3% vs 2.7% +/- 2.1%; P < .001). European Society of Cardiology Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation and Framingham yielded similar results. The risk equations gave similar assessments in a European Mediterranean population except for HellenicSCORE that calculated more MetS women requiring risk modification. This might justify local risk engine evaluation in event-based studies. (Clinical-Trials.gov ID: NCT00416741).

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of risk factors, each one individually associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. Treatment of all components of MetS is expected to result in reduced risk. Treatment of MetS mainly includes lifestyle changes. In addition, drug therapy may be considered, especially combinations of different drugs, in order to tackle all the features of MetS. We review the therapeutic strategies currently used for obesity and dyslipidemia treatment in patients with MetS, with a focus on drug combinations.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between alcohol consumption and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and overall cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a Mediterranean cohort. It consisted of a cross-sectional analysis of a representative sample of Greek adults (n = 4,153) classified as never, occasional, mild, moderate, or heavy drinkers. Cases with overt CHD, stroke, or PAD were recorded. In our population, 17% were never, 23% occasional, 27% mild, 24% moderate, and 9% heavy drinkers. Moderate alcohol consumption was associated with a lower trend for the prevalence of the MetS (P = .0001), DM (P < .0001), CHD (P = .0002), PAD (P = .005), and overall CVD (P = .001) but not stroke compared with no alcohol use. Heavy drinking was associated with an increase in the prevalence of all of these disease states. Wine consumption was associated with a slightly better effect than beer or spirits consumption on the prevalence of total CVD, and beer consumption was associated with a better effect than spirits consumption. Alcohol intake was positively related with body weight, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and hypertension. Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a lower prevalence of the MetS, DM, PAD, CHD, and overall CVD but not stroke compared with no alcohol use in a Mediterranean population. Heavy drinking was associated with an increase in the prevalence of all of these disease states. Advice on alcohol consumption should probably mainly aim at reducing heavy drinking.

To investigate which of the three recently proposed definitions of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is related to the excessive risk of ischaemic non-embolic stroke in elderly individuals, and thus may be more appropriate to implement in clinical practice. In a population-based case-control study of subjects aged older than 70 years (163 patients vs. 166 controls), we evaluated the association of first-ever acute ischaemic non-embolic stroke with the MetS defined by using recent definitions as proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute/American Heart Association (NHLBI/AHA). By applying the NCEP ATP III, NHLBI/AHA and IDF definitions, the prevalence of MetS in the patient group was 46%, 57.1% and 69.9%, respectively, compared with 15.7%, 18.1% and 30.7% in the control group (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjusting for multiple risk factors, the odds ratio (OR) for ischaemic stroke was 2.59 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-5.42, p = 0.012] for NCEP ATP III-defined MetS and 3.18 (95% CI: 1.58-6.39, p = 0.001) for NHLBI/AHA-defined MetS. However, the association of IDF-defined MetS with ischaemic stroke was not significant (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.50-2.78, p = 0.71). The implementation of the IDF (unlike NCEP ATP III and NHLBI/AHA) MetS definition substantially increases the number of elderly subjects labelled as having MetS without contributing to the identification of those at high risk of stroke.

Background: Visfatin [pre-B cell colony- enhancing factor (PBEF)] is a cytokine highly expressed in visceral fat that exhibits insulin-mimetic properties. However, its role in insulin-resistant states, such as in metabolic syndrome (MetS), remains largely unknown., Objective: To investigate the possible differences of plasma visfatin levels between obese and overweight subjects with and without MetS., Design and Patients: Plasma visfatin concentrations were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 28 overweight and obese [body mass index (BMI)>28 kg/m2] subjects with Mets and 28 age- and sex-matched overweight and obese (BMI>28 kg/m2) individuals without MetS (control group)., Results: Patients with MetS exhibited significantly elevated waist circumference (WCR ) values, higher blood pressure readings, higher fasting glucose and triglyceride concentrations as well as lower levels of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) compared with controls. Total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations did not differ significantly between the two groups. Plasma visfatin concentrations were significantly higher in subjects with MetS compared with controls [27 (16- 65) ng/ml vs 19 (10-47) ng/ml, p<0.05]. The same results were observed even after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. Plasma visfatin levels were positively correlated with age (r=0.32, p<0.05), WCR (r=0.31, p<0.05), triglyceride (r=0.59, p<0.01) and glucose (r=0.33, p<0.05) levels and were negatively correlated with HDL-C levels (r=-0.38, p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed similar results., Conclusion: Plasma visfatin levels are increased in overweight and obese subjects with MetS compared with those individuals who do not fulfil the criteria for the diagnosis of MetS.

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as new Type 2 diabetes. MetS consists of visceral obesity, elevated blood pressure, impaired glucose metabolism, atherogenic dyslipidaemia (elevated triglycerides and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), as well as other metabolic abnormalities. The underlying pathophysiology seems to be largely, but not uniquely, attributable to insulin resistance. Existing antihypertensive drugs were designed to lower blood pressure rather than to modify the metabolic abnormalities associated with hypertension. This review considers the role of renin-angiotensin system inhibition and especially the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the treatment of hypertension in MetS. There are differences among ARBs. Among them is the uricosuric effect of losartan. Furthermore, telmisartan may function as a partial agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma).

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with increased risk for both vascular and chronic kidney disease. Whether statins ameliorate these risks is not established., Methods: This post hoc analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary heart disease (CHD). Evaluation (GREACE) examines the effect of statins on estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) and serum uric acid (SUA) levels and their relation to vascular events in CHD patients with MetS. MetS patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 365) received lifestyle advice, target-driven treatment with statins (mainly atorvastatin) and treatment for hypertension and elevated glucose. Group B (n = 347) received the same except for statins. Patients without MetS were divided into those who received treatment similar to Group A and Group B [Groups C (n = 504) and D (n = 384), respectively]. All patients were followed for 3 years., Results: A total of 12.1% of patients in Group A experienced a vascular event vs 28% in Group B; risk ratio (RR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.64, P < 0.0001, while in those without MetS (Group C vs Group D), the respective RR was 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.79, P < 0.0001. In Group A, e-GFR increased by 13.7% and SUA levels fell by 8.9%, while in Group B e-GFR was reduced by 5.8% and SUA increased by 4.3% (P < 0.005). Stepwise regression analysis showed that these changes were independently related to vascular events., Conclusion: Among CHD patients, those with MetS benefited more from statin treatment than those without MetS. This benefit could be partially attributed to favourable changes in e-GFR and SUA levels probably induced by statin treatment.

It has been proposed that the most common lipid abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome are elevated triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein concentrations as well as the existence of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. However, so far there are only limited clinical data concerning the distribution of LDL particles in patients with this syndrome. The aim of our study was to directly determine the concentration and relative distribution of LDL subfractions in patients with metabolic syndrome. One hundred seventy-five individuals were included. Patients with metabolic syndrome (n = 105) exhibited higher concentrations of dense LDL particles and lower mean LDL particle size than the control population (n = 70). Both of these parameters were significantly correlated with the number of components of metabolic syndrome. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum triglyceride concentration was the most important determinant of the presence of small, dense LDL particles. In conclusion, patients with metabolic syndrome exhibit higher concentrations of small, dense LDL subfractions than individuals who do not fulfill the criteria for the diagnosis of this syndrome. This increase is directly related to the number of components of metabolic syndrome and is mainly determined by the serum concentrations of triglycerides.

The hypertriglyceridemic waist (HTGW) phenotype (hypertriglyceridemia and increased waist circumference) has been proposed as an inexpensive tool to monitor individuals with the atherogenic metabolic triad, hyperinsulinemia, hyperapobetalipoproteinemia, and increased levels of small, dense LDL (sdLDL) particles. We assessed the association of the HTGW phenotype with the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) and the atherogenic metabolic triad in inhabitants (n = 260) of northwestern Greece attending the Outpatient Lipid Clinic of the University Hospital of Ioannina. The LDL subfractions were assessed using the Lipoprint LDL System. HTGW (+) individuals had a more adverse lipid and lipoprotein profile compared with HTGW (-) individuals. Moreover, HTGW (+) subjects had elevated levels of sdLDL-C, as well as decreased mean and peak LDL particle size compared with HTGW (-) subjects. To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the sdLDL-C abnormality in HTGW (+) subjects. Among men (n = 105), 52.3% of the MetSyn (+) individuals and 66.7% of the HTGW (+) individuals had the metabolic triad. Among women (n = 155), the corresponding percentages were 42.3% and 50.0%. Only 22.2% and 10.6% of the MetSyn (-) subjects (men and women, respectively) and 19.6% and 15.2% of the HTGW (-) subjects (men and women, respectively) had the atherogenic metabolic triad. In conclusion, the HTGW (+) phenotype is associated with a hostile lipid profile that includes higher levels of sdLDL-C and decreased LDL particle size. The HTGW phenotype, compared with the MetSyn criteria, can provide an easy and inexpensive tool to monitor patients characterized by an adverse lipid and lipoprotein profile.

Background: The Friedewald formula (LDL-F) for the estimation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations is the most often used formula in clinical trials and clinical practice. However, much concern has been raised as to whether this formula is applicable in all patient populations such as the presence of chylomicronaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate various LDL cholesterol calculation formulas as well as LDL cholesterol levels provided by the Lipoprint LDL System (LDL-L) in patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn)., Results: LDL-F showed significant differences from other formulas in the total cohort, as well as in MetSyn individuals. This was not the case in nonMetSyn subjects, where LDL-F did not differ with other formulas, with the exception of one formula (LDL by Planella, LDL-P). The bias between LDL-F and other LDL estimation formulas were significantly higher in MetSyn subjects compared to nonMetSyn individuals, except for LDL-L which produced similar bias with LDL-F in both study groups., Conclusion: LDL-F seems to exhibit some limitations as far as the calculation of LDL-C levels in patients with the MetSyn is concerned. LDL-L might be more accurate in MetSyn subjects, but so far its use is limited for the estimation of small, dense LDL (sdLDL) cholesterol levels and mean LDL particle size for research purposes only.

Background: Obesity is becoming increasingly common worldwide and is strongly associated with the metabolic syndrome (MetS). MetS is considered to be a cluster of risk factors that increase the risk of vascular events., Objective: In an open-label randomised study (the FenOrli study) we assessed the effect of orlistat and fenofibrate treatment, alone or in combination on reversing the diagnosis of the MetS (primary end-point) as well as on anthropometric and metabolic parameters (secondary end-points) in overweight and obese patients with MetS but no diabetes., Methods: Overweight and obese patients (N = 89, body mass index (BMI) > 28 kg/m2) with MetS [as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria] participated in the study. Patients were prescribed a low-calorie low-fat diet and were randomly allocated to receive orlistat 120 mg three times a day (tid) (O group), micronised fenofibrate 200 mg/day (F group), or orlistat 120 mg tid plus micronised fenofibrate 200 mg/day (OF group). Body weight, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, serum total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, triglyceride, creatinine (SCr) and uric acid (SUA) levels, as well as homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index and liver enzyme activities were measured at baseline and after 3 months of treatment., Results: Of the 89 patients enrolled, three (one in each group) dropped out during the study due to side effects. After the 3-month treatment period, 43.5% of patients in the O group, 47.6% in the F group and 50% in the OF group no longer met the MetS diagnostic criteria (primary end-point, p < 0.0001 vs. baseline in all treatment groups). No significant difference in the primary end-point was observed between the three treatment groups. Significant reductions in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, TC, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglyceride and SUA levels, as well as gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity and HOMA index were observed in all treatment groups. In the OF group a greater decrease in TC (-26%) and LDL-C (-30%) was observed compared with that in the O and F groups (p < 0.01) and a more pronounced reduction of triglycerides (-37%) compared with that in the O group (p < 0.05). SUA levels and alkaline phosphatase activity decreased more in the F and OF groups compared with the O group (p < 0.05). Moreover, SCr significantly increased and estimated creatinine clearance decreased in the F and OF groups but they were not significantly altered in the O group (p < 0.01 for the comparison between O and either F or OF groups). Glucose (in groups O and OF), as well as insulin levels and HOMA index (in all groups), were significantly reduced after treatment (p < 0.05 vs. baseline)., Conclusion: The combination of orlistat and micronised fenofibrate appears to be safe and may further improve metabolic parameters in overweight and obese patients with MetS compared with each monotherapy.

Introduction: There are no data concerning the degree of awareness, treatment and control of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components or associated vascular risk in the general population., Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was made of a representative sample of Greek adults (n=9669, 49% men and 51% women), living in urban, semi-urban and rural areas (55%, 23% and 22%, respectively). The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP-ATP III) and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions for the MetS were used., Results: The age-standardised prevalence of the MetS in the general population was 24.5% [95% CI 23.4-25.7%] (n=2369). This was similar in men and women and increased with age. Among subjects with the NCEP MetS the prevalence of hypertension was 71%, elevated blood glucose 55%, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 58%, high triglycerides 63% and abdominal obesity 82%. Only one third of subjects were aware of the MetS component conditions, less than one quarter were on treatment, and very few (< or =10%) were controlled for MetS components. Awareness of MetS individual component conditions (e.g. arterial hypertension), and consequently effective control, was lower than that reported in other cohorts, including subjects without MetS. Only 5% of subjects were aware of MetS as an entity, 2% were treated for all component conditions and only 1% were controlled. Using the IDF definition, the prevalence of MetS was higher (43.4%) and awareness, treatment and control of MetS and its components were significantly lower., Conclusions: The prevalence of MetS is high in Greece but is not recognised among the general population. Therefore, treatment and control of MetS and component conditions are extremely low. If the situation does not improve soon, MetS will cause a further increase in the vascular disease epidemic in the years to come. This calls for urgent education of the public and the medical community.

The metabolic syndrome is a constellation of interrelated abnormalities that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and progression to type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of this syndrome is increasing because of the 'obesity epidemic'. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III defined practical criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome and established the basic principles for its management. Also, the International Diabetes Federation recently proposed another definition. The metabolic syndrome is a secondary target for cardiovascular risk reduction. Clinicians should identify individuals with this condition, assess their cardiovascular risk and treat them by an aggressive and multifaceted approach. The most effective therapeutic intervention in patients with the metabolic syndrome should focus on modest weight reduction and regular physical activity. Adoption of a healthier diet and smoking cessation are necessary. Drug therapy may be needed to achieve recommended goals if therapeutic lifestyle changes are not sufficient. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is the primary target of therapy (new aggressive goals should be achieved). Statins are probably the drugs of choice. Fibrates and nicotinic acid are also useful options. Hypertension should be managed aggressively probably starting with an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system or a calcium channel blocker and adding a low dose of a thiazide diuretic if necessary. Aspirin should be administered if the cardiovascular risk is high. In the future acarbose, metformin, meglitinides and thiazolidinediones may be used in patients with the metabolic syndrome to delay the onset of type 2 diabetes and reduce cardiovascular risk. Such an intense and multifactorial approach is likely to reverse the bad prognosis associated with the metabolic syndrome.

Objective: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions, was compared in 9669 subjects, representing the Greek population., Results: The age-adjusted prevalence of NCEP ATP III-defined MetS was 24.5% whereas that of IDF-defined MetS was 43.4% (+77%,p < 0.0001). The majority (up to 69%) of older age groups had IDF-defined MetS. The calculated vascular event risk was low (6.1% and 7.2% using the Framingham and PROCAM calculation, respectively) in those with IDF-defined MetS when compared with those with NCEP ATP III MetS (11.3% and 13.7%, respectively) (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons)., Conclusion: MetS could be considered as a 'normal' variant if it was present in the majority of the population. Moreover, the vascular risk associated with IDF-defined MetS could be low, raising cost-effectiveness issues. Alternatively, the new IDF definition may realistically reflect the current MetS epidemic. More studies are required to support or refute those interpretations.

There are no prospective data on the effect of a multitargeted treatment approach on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Furthermore, the optimal hypolipidemic drug treatment in these patients remains controversial. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, intention-to-treat, and parallel study, 300 nondiabetic patients with MetS, free of CVD at baseline, were studied for a period of 12 months. Age- and sex-matched subjects without MetS (n = 100) acted as controls. All patients received lifestyle advice and a stepwise-implemented drug treatment of hypertension, impaired fasting glucose, and obesity. For hypolipidemic treatment, the patients were randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups: atorvastatin (n = 100, 20 mg/d), micronized fenofibrate (n = 100, 200 mg/d), and both drugs (n = 100). Clinical and laboratory parameters, including the lipid profile and C-reactive protein (CRP), were assessed at the baseline and at the end of the study. The primary end point was the proportion of patients not having MetS or its component features at the end of the 12-month treatment period. The secondary end points were the difference in 10-year CVD risk (Prospective Cardiovascular Munster risk calculator) and the degree of CRP reduction. By the end of the study, 76% of the patients no longer had MetS, and 46% had only one diagnostic MetS factor. The estimated 10-year (Prospective Cardiovascular Munster) risk of all patients with MetS at baseline was 14.6%. This was reduced in the atorvastatin group to 6.4%, in the fenofibrate group to 9.2%, and in the combination group to 5.5% (P < .0001 for all vs baseline). The 10-year risks of the atorvastatin and combination groups were not different from that of the control group (5.0%). C-reactive protein was significantly reduced in all treatment groups, with the atorvastatin and combination groups having the greatest reduction (65% and 68%, respectively, P < .01 vs the fenofibrate group, 44%). Lipid values were significantly improved in all 3 treatment groups, with those on the combined treatment attaining lipid targets to a greater extent than those in the other 2 groups. A target-driven and intensified intervention aimed at multiple risk factors in nondiabetic patients with MetS substantially offsets its component factors and significantly reduces the estimated CVD risk. The atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination had the most beneficial effect on all lipid parameters and significantly improved their CVD risk status. Atorvastatin and combination treatment were more effective than fenofibrate alone in reducing CRP levels.

Background: Despite important recent advances in the understanding of the consequences of metabolic syndrome, its pathophysiological characteristics remain unclear. It has been proposed that disturbances in phosphate metabolism may contribute to the development of this constellation of cardiovascular risk factors. However, there have been insufficient clinical data supporting this hypothesis to date. The aim of our study is to confirm the presence of hypophosphatemia in patients with metabolic syndrome, as well as investigate mechanisms that may underlie the disturbances in phosphate metabolism in this patient group., Methods: Two hundred fifty-five individuals were enrolled. The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was based on Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Subjects with fewer than 3 criteria served as controls., Results: Patients with metabolic syndrome showed significantly lower phosphate and magnesium levels compared with controls. Because fractional excretion of phosphate was similar in both groups, we assume that hypophosphatemia in patients with metabolic syndrome can be attributed to decreased dietary intake, as well as internal redistribution of this element. Lower magnesium values in the patient group may result from the same mechanisms as lower phosphate levels. In addition, hyperinsulinemia-induced renal magnesium wasting also may be a contributory factor., Conclusion: Patients with metabolic syndrome show significantly lower phosphate and magnesium levels compared with healthy individuals. The clinical significance of these disturbances, as well as their importance as targets for preventive or therapeutic interventions, remains to be established.

Plasma- and lipoprotein-associated activity of the platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-acetylhydrolase, PAF-AH) plays an important role in inflammation and in atherosclerotic process, which are present in the metabolic syndrome (MS). Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) is an esterase associated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) which contributes to the anti-atherogenic effects of this lipoprotein. We investigated the activities of both enzymes in 60 patients with MS and 110 age- and sex-matched subjects without it (non-MS group). Plasma PAF-AH activity was higher in the MS compared to the non-MS group, while HDL-PAF-AH and serum PON1 activities were lower in the MS compared to the non-MS group. Univariate regression analysis in the MS group showed that plasma PAF-AH activity was positively associated with systolic blood pressure, whereas HDL-PAF-AH activity was inversely associated with the homeostasis model assessments (HOMA) index. Both associations remained significant in the multivariate regression analysis, suggesting that insulin resistance and systolic hypertension are major determinants for the alterations in plasma and HDL-associated PAF-AH activity among those observed in MS patients.

Aims: To estimate the prevalence of vascular disease (coronary heart disease/stroke/peripheral arterial disease) in individuals with the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) with or without diabetes mellitus (DM) when compared with subjects without the MetSyn., Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of a representative sample of Greek adults (n = 4153), men and women (49% and 51%, respectively), living in urban, semi-urban and rural areas (54%, 25% and 21%, respectively). The National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III definition of the MetSyn was used., Results: The age-adjusted prevalence of the MetSyn was 23.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 22.4%-25.1%]; this was similar in men and women. The fully adjusted prevalence of vascular disease in those with the MetSyn (n = 984) was 29.4%, significantly higher than in those without (n = 3169, 9.6%, p < 0.0001), while subjects without both the MetSyn and DM had the lowest vascular disease prevalence (n = 3035, 8.9%). Subjects with the MetSyn but no DM (n = 674) had a vascular disease prevalence of 24.1% (p < 0.0001 vs. those without the MetSyn), which was similar to that in subjects with DM without the MetSyn (n = 134, 25.4%), but lower than in those with both the MetSyn and DM (n = 310, 40.7%, p < 0.0001 vs. all). In comparison to those without the MetSyn [odds ratio (OR) = 1], the ORs of prevalent vascular disease, after multivariate analysis for age, sex and components of the MetSyn, and antiatherosclerotic drugs were: all MetSyn = 1.94 (95% CI = 1.35-2.47), with both MetSyn and DM = 3.04 (95% CI = 1.98-4.11) and with MetSyn but no DM = 1.48 (95% CI = 1.12-1.92)., Conclusions: The prevalence of vascular disease was markedly increased in the presence of the MetSyn. Those with both the MetSyn and DM had the highest prevalence of vascular disease, followed by those with the MetSyn without DM. Probably MetSyn without DM should be considered as a coronary heart disease-risk equivalent in future guidelines. This initiative would reset treatment targets and potentially provide additional benefit in patients with the MetSyn.

The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is increasing owing to lifestyle changes leading to obesity. This syndrome is a complex association of several interrelated abnormalities that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and progression to diabetes mellitus (DM). Insulin resistance is the key factor for the clustering of risk factors characterizing the metabolic syndrome. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III defined the criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome and established the basic principles for its management. According to these guidelines, treatment involves the improvement of the underlying insulin resistance through lifestyle modification (eg, weight reduction and increased physical activity) and possibly by drugs. The coexistent risk factors (mainly dyslipidemia and hypertension) should also be addressed. Since the main goal of lipid-lowering treatment is to achieve the NCEP low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target, statins are a good option. However, fibrates (as monotherapy or in combination with statins) are useful for the treatment of the metabolic syndrome that is commonly associated with hypertriglyceridemia and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. The blood pressure target is < 140/90 mm Hg. The effect on carbohydrate homeostasis should possibly be taken into account in selecting an antihypertensive drug. Patients with the metabolic syndrome commonly have other less well-defined metabolic abnormalities (eg, hyperuricemia and raised C-reactive protein levels) that may also be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. It seems appropriate to manage these abnormalities. Drugs that beneficially affect carbohydrate metabolism and delay or even prevent the onset of DM (eg, thiazolidinediones or acarbose) could be useful in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, among the more speculative benefits of treatment are improved liver function in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and a reduction in the risk of acute gout.

In a population-based case–control study we assessed the association between obesity and acute ischaemic/non-embolic stroke. A total of 163 patients aged older than 70 years (88 men and 75 women) admitted due to a first-ever-in-a-lifetime acute ischaemic/non-embolic stroke and 166 volunteers (87 men and 79 women) without a history of cardiovascular disease were included. The association of stroke with body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC) was determined by multivariate logistic regression modelling after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Overweight and obesity were more prevalent amongst stroke patients compared to controls. Subjects with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 had 2.5-times higher odds to suffer an acute ischaemic/non-embolic stroke compared to subjects within the lowest BMI category of 18.5–20.9 kg/m2. Analysis of interaction showed that in the presence of overweight and/or obesity (classified as a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and/or a WC >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women) the inverse relationship between HDL cholesterol and ischaemic/non-embolic stroke was negated. Excess weight is associated with an increased risk of acute ischaemic/non-embolic stroke in elderly individuals independently of concurrent metabolic derangements. Moreover, in the presence of obesity, HDL cholesterol loses its protective effect against ischaemic stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]