Search

Introduction: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a global multicenter database to propose evidence-based revisions for the ninth edition of the TNM classification of pleural mesothelioma (PM). This study analyzes the M category to validate eighth edition M category recommendations., Methods: Cases were submitted electronically or by transfer of existing institutional databases for patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed PM. The presence and number of metastases (single versus multiple) in each of eight organ systems were reported for patients with M1 disease at diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in OS were assessed by log-rank test., Results: Of 7338 submitted cases, 3598 were eligible and 3221 had sufficient data for clinical staging; 228 cases (7%) were M1. Median overall estimated survival was inferior for M1 compared with M0 patients: 10.5 months versus 21.5 months, respectively (p < 0.0001); estimated 1-year survival was 46% versus 71%, respectively. OS differences between M categories were preserved within histologic subgroups. Among 158 patients with organ-specific documentation of M1 disease, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between those with intrathoracic versus more distant metastatic disease (14.4 mo versus 10.9 mo, p = 0.64). No significant survival difference was detected between patients with metastatic disease in a single-organ system versus multiple-organ systems (12.6 mo versus 8.8 mo, p = 0.45)., Conclusions: This evidence-based analysis of the M category for PM conforms with the eighth edition M descriptors. No changes are proposed in the ninth edition of the mesothelioma M category., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Kindler’s work is supported in part by the University of Chicago Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA014599. Dr. Rusch’s work is supported in part by MSK Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. Dr. Nowak acknowledges support from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, APP2008104 and APP1197652. No tobacco industry support has been received for the conduct of this research. None of the investigators involved have received tobacco industry support. Dr. Kindler has relationships with Amgen (consultant), Opna Bio LLC (consultant), and Enlivex Therapeutics (consultant). Dr. Pass has relationships with Roche (steering committee and speakers bureau) and AstraZeneca (advisory board). Dr. Ripley receives institutional clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca and Merck (speakers bureau). Dr. Rusch receives institutional clinical trial funding from Genentech; receives meeting preparation and travel reimbursement from NIH/NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee; and serves as unpaid member, DSMC Committee, MARS II trial (Cancer Research UK). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed an international database to inform potential revisions in the ninth edition of the TNM classification of diffuse pleural mesothelioma (PM). This study analyzed the clinical and pathologic N categories to determine whether revisions were indicated relative to the eighth edition staging system., Methods: Of 7338 PM cases diagnosed from 2013 to 2022 and 3598 met all inclusion criteria for planned analyses. Data on 2836 patients without metastases were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of diagnosis. Patients were included regardless of whether they received neoadjuvant treatment. For the pathologic N analysis, patients who underwent resection (extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication) were included. N subgroups were analyzed and OS assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: The existing eighth edition N categories were performed adequately in the ninth edition data set. A median OS advantage was noted for clinical and pathologic N0 versus N1 patients: 23.2 versus 18.5 and 33.8 versus 25.0 months, respectively. Patients with resected pN0 had a 3-year OS of 48%. No difference in OS was noted for single- versus multiple-station nodal metastases. The number of nodal stations sampled at the time of resection was not associated with a difference in OS., Conclusions: Data regarding clinical and pathologic N categories corroborate those used in the eighth edition. No changes in the N categories are recommended in the ninth edition of PM staging system., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Pass reports serving on the steering committee and speakers bureau of Roche and serving on the advisory board of AstraZeneca. Dr. Ripley reports receiving institutional clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca and serving on the speakers’ bureau of Merck. Dr. Rusch reports receiving institutional clinical trial funding from Genentech; having meeting preparation and receiving travel reimbursement from NIH/NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee; and serving as an unpaid member, DSMC Committee, MARS II trial (Cancer Research UK). Dr. Opitz reports receiving an institutional grant and serving on the speakers’ bureau of Roche; serving on the advisory board and speakers’ bureau of AstraZeneca; serving on the advisory boards of Merck Sharp & Dohme and Bristol-Myers Squibb; receiving an institutional grant from Medtronic; and having proctorship from Intuitive. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The eighth edition of the TNM classification of pleural mesothelioma (PM) saw substantial changes in T and N components and stage groupings. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer collected data into a multinational database to further refine this classification. This ninth edition proposal incorporates changes proposed in the clinical (c)T component but not the pathologic T component, to include size criteria, and further refines TNM stage groupings for PM., Methods: Data were submitted through electronic data capture or batch transfer from institutional databases. Survival was measured from diagnosis date. Candidate stage groups were developed using a recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithm applied to all cM0 cases for clinical stage and subsequently for pathologic stage. Cox models were developed to estimate survival for each stage group., Results: Of 3598 submitted cases, 2192 were analyzable for overall clinical stage and 445 for overall pathologic stage. Recursive partitioning and amalgamation generated survival tree on overall survival outcomes restricted to cM0, with newly proposed (ninth edition) cT and cN component-derived optimal stage groupings of stage I (T1N0), II (T1N1; T2N0), IIIA (T1N2; T2N1/2; any T3), IIIB (any T4), and IV (any M1). Although cT and pathologic T descriptors are different in the ninth edition, aligning pathologic stage groupings with clinical stage produced better discrimination than did retaining eighth edition pathologic stage groupings., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this revision of the clinical TNM classification for PM is the first to incorporate the measurement-based proposed changes in cT category. The pathologic TNM aligns with clinical TNM., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Ripley receives institutional clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca and Merck Speakers’ Bureau. Dr. Rusch receives institutional clinical trial funding from Genentech; meeting preparation and travel reimbursement from National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee; and is an unpaid member, Data Safety Monitoring Committee, Mesothelioma And Radical Surgery II trial (Cancer Research UK). Dr. Pass has relationships with Roche (Steering Committee and Speakers’ Bureau) and AstraZeneca (Advisory Board). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The primary tumor (T) component in the eighth edition of pleural mesothelioma (PM) staging system is based on pleural involvement and extent of invasion. Quantitative assessment of pleural tumor has been found to be prognostic. We explored quantitative and qualitative metrics to develop recommendations for T descriptors in the upcoming ninth edition of the PM staging system., Methods: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer prospectively collected data on patients with PM. Sum of maximum pleural thickness (Psum) was recorded. Optimal combinations of Psum and eighth edition cT descriptors were assessed using recursive binary splitting algorithm, with bootstrap resampling to correct for the adaptive nature of the splitting algorithm, and validated in the eighth edition data. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in OS assessed by the log-rank test., Results: Of 7338 patients submitted, 3598 were eligible for cT analysis and 1790 had Psum measurements. Recursive partitioning identified optimal cutpoints of Psum at 12 and 30 mm, which, in combination with extent of invasion, yielded four prognostic groups for OS. Fmax greater than 5 mm indicated poor prognosis. cT4 category (based on invasion) revealed similar performance to eighth edition. Three eighth edition descriptors were eliminated based on low predictive accuracy. Eighth edition pT descriptors remained valid in ninth edition analyses., Conclusion: Given reproducible prognostication by Psum, size criteria will be incorporated into cT1 to T3 categories in the ninth edition. Current cT4 category and all pT descriptors will be maintained, with reclassification of fissural invasion as pT2., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Rusch receives institutional clinical trial funding from Genentech; meeting prep and travel reimbursement from National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee; unpaid member, DSMC Committee, MARS II trial (Cancer Research UK). Dr. Opitz has relationships with Roche (institutional grant and speakers bureau), AstraZeneca (advisory board and speakers bureau), Merck Sharp and Dohme (advisory board), Bristol Myers Squibb (advisory board), Medtronic (institutional grant), and Intuitive (proctorship). Dr. Pass has relationships with Roche (steering committee and speakers bureau) and AstraZeneca (advisory board). None of the investigators involved have received tobacco industry support. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from diffusion weighted (DW) MRI preoperatively to predict the predominant histologic component among biphasic pleural mesothelioma (PM) tumors., Methods: ADC maps were generated from DW MRI scans. Histology and predominant component of biphasic PM were confirmed following surgical resection. Statistical analyses were done with R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Average ADC values corresponding to epithelioid- and sarcomatoid-predominant tumors were compared. ADC thresholding was accomplished by recursive partitioning and confirmed with ROC analysis., Results: Eighty-four patients with biphasic PM's, 69 (82 %) epithelioid-predominant (BE) and 15(18 %) sarcomatoid-predominant (BS) tumors were evaluated. Thirty-eight (45 %) patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), 39 (46 %) had extended pleural decortication (ePDC) and 7 (8 %) had pleural decortication (PDC). ADC values ranged between 0.696 x 10 -3 to 1.921 x 10 -3 mm 2 /s. BE tumors demonstrated significantly higher ADC values than BS tumors (p = 0.026). ADC values above 0.94 x 10 -3 mm 2 /s were associated with a significant increase of relative risk of being in group BE over group BS (relative risk: 1.47, 95 %CI: 1.05-2.06, p = 0.027) CONCLUSION: Average ADC values of BE tumors were higher than BS tumors and the two groups can be separated by a cut off value of 0.94 X 10 -3 mm 2 /s., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive primary malignancy of the pleura that presents unique radiologic challenges with regard to accurate and reproducible assessment of disease extent at staging and follow-up imaging. By optimizing and harmonizing technical approaches to imaging MPM, the best quality imaging can be achieved for individual patient care, clinical trials, and imaging research. This consensus statement represents agreement on harmonized, standard practices for routine multimodality imaging of MPM, including radiography, computed tomography, 18 F-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, by an international panel of experts in the field of pleural imaging assembled by the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. In addition, modality-specific technical considerations and future directions are discussed. A bulleted summary of all technical recommendations is provided., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: We report a series of 355 consecutive patients treated over 9 years in a single institution with intended PDC., Background: Surgery for MPM has shifted from extra-pleural pneumonectomy to PDC with the goal of MCR., Methods: Clinical and outcome data were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier estimators and log rank test were used to compare the overall survival, and logistic regression models were used., Results: MCR was achieved in 304. There were 223 males, median age was 69 and histology was epithelioid in 184. The 30 and 90-day mortality were 3.0% and 4.6%.Most complications were low grade. Prolonged air leak in 141, deep venous thrombosis in 64, Atrial fibrillation in 42, chylothorax in 24, Empyema in 23, pneumonia in 21, Hemothorax in 12 and pulmonary embolus in 8. Median/5-year survival were 20.7 months/17.9% in the intent-to-treat cohort and 23.2months/21.2% in the MCR group. The survivals were best for patients with Tlstage and epithelioid histology (69.8months/54.1%). In a multivariable analysis, factors that were found to be associated with longer patient overall survival included epithelioid histology, T stage, quantitative clinical stage/tumor volume staging, adjuvant chemotherapy, intraoperative heated chemo, female sex, and length of stay shorter than 14 days., Conclusions: PDC is feasible with low mortality and is associated with manageable complication rates. 5-year survival of patients undergoing PDC with MCR in multi-modality setting is approaching 25% depending on quantitative and clinical stage, sex and histological subtype and is better than PDC without- MCR., Competing Interests: The research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or nonprofit sectors. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Imaging of mesothelioma plays a role in all aspects of patient management, including disease detection, staging, evaluation of treatment options, response assessment, pre-surgical evaluation, and surveillance. Imaging in this disease impacts a wide range of disciplines throughout the healthcare enterprise. Researchers and clinician-scientists are developing state-of-the-art techniques to extract more of the information contained within these medical images and to utilize it for more sophisticated tasks; moreover, image-acquisition technology is advancing the inherent capabilities of these images. This paper summarizes the imaging-based topics presented orally at the 2021 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig), which was held virtually from May 7-9, 2021. These topics include an update on the mesothelioma staging system, novel molecular targets to guide therapy in mesothelioma, special considerations and potential pitfalls in imaging mesothelioma in the immunotherapy setting, tumor measurement strategies and their correlation with patient survival, tumor volume measurement in MRI and CT, CT-based texture analysis for differentiation of histologic subtype, diffusion-weighted MRI for the assessment of biphasic mesothelioma, and the prognostic significance of skeletal muscle loss with chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Prognostic models for malignant pleural mesothelioma have been limited to demographics, symptoms, and laboratory values. We hypothesize higher accuracy using both tumor and patient characteristics. The mesothelioma prognostic test (MPT) and molecular subtype based on claudin-15-to-vimentin expression ratio are molecular signatures associated with survival. Tumor volume (TV) has improved performance compared with clinical staging, whereas neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is prognostic for malignant pleural mesothelioma., Methods: Tumor specimens and clinical data were collected prospectively from patients who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy and decortication (PD) during 2007 to 2014. MPT and claudin-15-to-vimentin ratio were determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, whereas TV was assessed from preoperative scans. Risk groups were derived from combinations of adverse factors on the basis of the Cox model. Predictive accuracy was assessed using Harrell's c-index., Results: MPT, molecular subtype, TV, and NLR were independently prognostic in patients with EPP (N = 191), suggesting equal weighting in a final three-group model (c = 0.644). In the PD cohort (N = 193), MPT poor risk combined with TV greater than 200 cm 3 was associated with triple the risk compared with other subgroups (hazard ratio = 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.70-5.09, p < 0.001) persisting when adjusted for molecular subtype, NLR, performance status, and serum albumin to yield a final three-group model (c = 0.641). The EPP and PD models achieved higher accuracy than published models (c ≤ 0.584, c ≤ 0.575) and pathologic staging (c = 0.554, c = 0.571)., Conclusions: The novel models use pretreatment parameters obtained from minimally invasive biopsy, imaging, and blood tests to evaluate the expected outcome of each type of surgery in newly diagnosed patients and improve stratification on clinical trials., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Molecular and immunologic breakthroughs are transforming the management of thoracic cancer, although advances have not been as marked for malignant pleural mesothelioma where pathologic diagnosis has been essentially limited to three histologic subtypes., Methods: A multidisciplinary group (pathologists, molecular biologists, surgeons, radiologists, and oncologists), sponsored by European Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, met in 2018 to critically review the current classification., Results: Recommendations include: (1) classification should be updated to include architectural patterns and stromal and cytologic features that refine prognostication; (2) subject to data accrual, malignant mesothelioma in situ could be an additional category; (3) grading of epithelioid malignant pleural mesotheliomas should be routinely undertaken; (4) favorable/unfavorable histologic characteristics should be routinely reported; (5) clinically relevant molecular data (programmed death ligand 1, BRCA 1 associated protein 1 [BAP1], and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) should be incorporated into reports, if undertaken; (6) other molecular data should be accrued as part of future trials; (7) resection specimens (i.e., extended pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy) should be pathologically staged with smaller specimens being clinically staged; (8) ideally, at least three separate areas should be sampled from the pleural cavity, including areas of interest identified on pre-surgical imaging; (9) image-acquisition protocols/imaging terminology should be standardized to aid research/refine clinical staging; (10) multidisciplinary tumor boards should include pathologists to ensure appropriate treatment options are considered; (11) all histologic subtypes should be considered potential candidates for chemotherapy; (12) patients with sarcomatoid or biphasic mesothelioma should not be excluded from first-line clinical trials unless there is a compelling reason; (13) tumor subtyping should be further assessed in relation to duration of response to immunotherapy; and (14) systematic screening of all patients for germline mutations is not recommended, in the absence of a family history suspicious for BAP1 syndrome., Conclusions: These multidisciplinary recommendations for pathology classification and application will allow more informative pathologic reporting and potential risk stratification, to support clinical practice, research investigation and clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.)

Detailed guidelines pertaining to radiological assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma are currently lacking due to the rarity of the disease, complex morphology, propensity to invade multiple planes simultaneously, and lack of specific recommendations within the radiology community about assessment, reporting, and follow-up. In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was co-sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. One of the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus imaging and management guidelines. Here, we present the recommendations for radiologic assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the setting of clinical trial enrollment. We discuss optimization of imaging parameters across modalities, standardized reporting, and response assessment within clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Detailed guidelines regarding the use of radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are currently lacking because of the rarity of the disease, the wide spectrum of clinical presentations, and the paucity of high-level data on individual treatment approaches., Methods: In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was cosponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Research, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Among the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus guidelines., Results: Here we present consensus recommendations on the use of radiation therapy for MPM in three discrete scenarios: (1) hemithoracic radiation therapy to be used before or after extrapleural pneumonectomy; (2) hemithoracic radiation to be used as an adjuvant to lung-sparing procedures (i.e., without pneumonectomy); and (3) palliative radiation therapy for focal symptoms caused by the disease. We discuss appropriate simulation techniques, treatment volumes, dose fractionation regimens, and normal tissue constraints. We also assess the role of particle beam therapy, specifically, proton beam therapy, for MPM., Conclusion: The recommendations provided in this consensus statement should serve as important guidelines for developing future clinical trials of treatment approaches for MPM., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

On March 28- 29, 2017, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Thoracic Malignacy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation convened the NCI-International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer- Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Mesothelioma Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in Bethesda, Maryland. The goal of the meeting was to bring together lead academicians, clinicians, scientists, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to focus on the development of clinical trials for patients in whom malignant pleural mesothelioma has been diagnosed. In light of the discovery of new cancer targets affecting the clinical development of novel agents and immunotherapies in malignant mesothelioma, the objective of this meeting was to assemble a consensus on at least two or three practice-changing multimodality clinical trials to be conducted through NCI's National Clinical Trials Network., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The primary objective of this single-institution phase I clinical trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine added to cisplatin and delivered as heated intraoperative chemotherapy after resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma., Methods: The extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) treatment arms were based on investigators' assessment of patient fitness and potential for macroscopic complete resection. Previously established intracavitary dosing of cisplatin (range 175-225 mg/m 2 ) with systemic cytoprotection was used in combination with escalating doses of gemcitabine, following a 3-plus-3 design from 100 mg/m 2 in 100-mg increments., Results: From 2007 to 2011, 141 patients were enrolled and 104 completed treatment. The median age of those completing treatment was 65 years (range 43-85 years), and 22 (21%) were female. In the EPP arm (n = 59), 31 patients (53%) had the epithelioid histologic type and the median radiographic tumor volume was 236 cm 3 (range 16-4285 cm 3 ). In the P/D arm (n = 41), 29 patients (71%) had the epithelioid histologic type and the median tumor volume was 79 cm 3 (range 6-1107 cm 3 ). The operative mortality rate was 2%, and 35 and 22 serious adverse events were encountered among 27 patients (46%) and 16 patients (39%) in the EPP and P/D arms, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 leukopenia) was observed in two patients who were receiving 1100 mg/m 2 of gemcitabine, thus establishing the maximum tolerated dose at 1000 mg/m 2 , in combination with 175 mg/m 2 of cisplatin. The median overall and recurrence-free survival times in treated patients were 20.3 and 10.7 months, respectively., Conclusions: Combination cisplatin and gemcitabine heated intraoperative chemotherapy can be administered safely and feasibly in the context of complete surgical resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma by EPP or P/D., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) database revealed that clinical (cTNM) staging minimally stratified survival and was discrepant with pathological (pTNM) staging. To improve prognostic classification of MPM, alternative staging models based on quantitative parameters were explored., Methods: An institutional review board-approved MPM registry was queried to identify patients with available pathological and preoperative imaging data. Qualifying patients were randomly assigned to training and test sets in a 1:2 ratio. Computed cTNM and pTNM staging (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed.) were compared. Quantitative image analysis included tumor volume assessed from three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans (VolCT) and maximal fissural thickness (Fmax). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship with VolCT was examined by Cox regression analysis to identify optimized cut-points. Performance of cTNM and quantitative models derived was compared in the test set using Harrell's C index., Results: A total of 472 patients met inclusion criteria. TNM staging was concordant with pathological TNM staging in 171 of 472 (36.2%), understaged in 209 (44.2%), and overstaged in 92 (19.4%) patients. The most concordant feature was involvement of interlobar fissures. A quantitative clinical staging model comprising VolCT and Fmax (c-index = 0.638, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.603 to 0.673) performed statistically significantly better as a prognostic classifier when compared in the test set with cTNM (c-index = 0.562, 95% CI = 0.525 to 0.599, P = .001)., Conclusions: Improved prognostic performance may be achievable by quantitative clinical staging combining VolCT and Fmax, providing a cost-effective and clinically relevant surrogate for clinical TNM stage.

With the emergence of checkpoint blockade and other immunotherapeutic drugs, and the growing adoption of smaller, more flexible adaptive clinical trial designs, there is an unmet need to develop diagnostics that can rapidly immunophenotype patient tumors. The ability to longitudinally profile the tumor immune infiltrate in response to immunotherapy also presents a window of opportunity to illuminate mechanisms of resistance. We have developed a fine needle aspirate biopsy (FNA) platform to perform immune profiling on thoracic malignancies. Matching peripheral blood, bulk resected tumor, and FNA were analyzed from 13 mesothelioma patients. FNA samples yielded greater numbers of viable cells when compared to core needle biopsies. Cell numbers were adequate to perform flow cytometric analyses on T cell lineage, T cell activation and inhibitory receptor expression, and myeloid immunosuppressive checkpoint markers. FNA samples were representative of the tumor as a whole as assessed by head-to-head comparison to single cell suspensions of dissociated whole tumor. Parallel analysis of matched patient blood enabled us to establish quality assurance criteria to determine the accuracy of FNA procedures to sample tumor tissue. FNA biopsies provide a diagnostic to rapidly phenotype the tumor immune microenvironment that may be of great relevance to clinical trials.

Background: Clinical tumor (T), node, and metastasis staging is based on a qualitative assessment of features defining T descriptors and has been found to be suboptimal for predicting the prognosis of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Previous work suggests that volumetric computed tomography (VolCT) is prognostic and, if found practical and reproducible, could improve clinical MPM classification., Methods: Six North American institutions electronically submitted clinical, pathologic, and imaging data on patients with stages I to IV MPM to an established multicenter database and biostatistical center. Two reference radiologists blinded to clinical data independently reviewed the scans; calculated clinical T, node, and metastasis stage by standard criteria; performed semiautomated tumor volume calculations using commercially available software; and submitted the findings to the biostatistical center. Study end points included the feasibility of a multi-institutional VolCT network, concordance of independent VolCT assessments, and association of VolCT with pathological T classification., Results: Of 164 submitted cases, 129 were evaluated by both reference radiologists. Discordant clinical staging of most cases confirmed the inadequacy of current criteria. The overall correlation between VolCT estimates was good (Spearman correlation 0.822), but some were significantly discordant. Root cause analysis of the most discordant estimates identified four common sources of variability. Despite these limitations, median tumor volume estimates were similar within subgroups of cases representing each pathological T descriptor and increased monotonically for each reference radiologist with increasing pathological T status., Conclusions: The good correlation between VolCT estimates obtained for most cases reviewed by two independent radiologists and qualitative association of VolCT with pathological T status combine to encourage further study. The identified sources of user error will inform design of a follow-up prospective trial to more formally assess interobserver variability of VolCT and its potential contribution to clinical MPM staging., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma is essential to patient management, prognostication, and response assessment. From animal models to clinical trials, the gamut of research activities and clinical standards relies on imaging to provide information on lesion morphology and the growing number of physiologic characteristics amenable to capture through imaging techniques. The complex morphology, growth pattern, and biological mechanisms of mesothelioma, however, present challenges for image acquisition and interpretation. Nevertheless, novel approaches to image acquisition and subsequent image analysis have expanded the opportunities for (as well as the need for) imaging in this disease. This paper summarizes the imaging-based research presented orally at the 2014 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig) in Cape Town, South Africa, October 2014. Presented topics include the imaging of hypoxia in a murine model through positron emission tomography (PET), the use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the histologic composition of biphasic mesothelioma and to assess early response to chemotherapy, the correlation of CT-based tumor volume with the volume of the post-surgical tumor specimen, the development of volumetric tumor response criteria, and pre-treatment tumor volume growth considerations for tumor response assessment., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We have previously described patterns of failure after extrapleural pneumonectomy and multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma and sought to update our results with a larger cohort of recent patients., Methods: A total of 169 patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy without preoperative chemotherapy between 2001 and 2010. Data for treatment, recurrence, and survival were determined from medical records. A thoracic radiologist reviewed postoperative computed tomography or positron emission tomography computed tomography scans to determine sites of recurrence. Time to recurrence was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Rates were compared using the Fisher exact test., Results: The median age of patients was 62 years. Histology on final pathology was epithelial for 104 patients (62%) and nonepithelial for 65 patients (38%). A total of 132 patients (78%) received heated intraoperative chemotherapy; 77 patients (45%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 71 patients (42%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. Most chemotherapy regimens included platinum or pemetrexed. Median radiation therapy dose was 54 Gy. Among 158 evaluable patients, a recurrence developed in 118 (75%). Median follow-up was 83 months, median time to recurrence was 13.1 months, and median survival was 15 months. Sites of first recurrence were in the ipsilateral hemithorax or mediastinum for 54% of patients, in the abdomen for 39% of patients, in the contralateral hemithorax for 28% of patients, and in other distant sites for 5% of patients. Some patients had simultaneous recurrences in multiple sites., Conclusions: The most common site of recurrence after extrapleural pneumonectomy and planned multimodality therapy remains the ipsilateral hemithorax (including mediastinum), and true distant failure (other than the abdomen or contralateral hemithorax) remains unusual. The distribution of recurrences is strikingly similar to our prior report., (Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is essential to the diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of this disease. The complex morphology and growth pattern of MPM, however, create unique challenges for image acquisition and interpretation. These challenges have captured the attention of investigators around the world, some of whom presented their work at the 2012 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig 2012) in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, September 2012. The measurement of tumor thickness on computed tomography (CT) scans is the current standard of care in the assessment of MPM tumor response to therapy; in this context, variability among observers in the measurement task and in the tumor response classification categories derived from such measurements was reported. Alternate CT-based tumor response criteria, specifically direct measurement of tumor volume change and change in lung volume as a surrogate for tumor response, were presented. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT has a role in other settings, but investigation into its potential use for imaging mesothelioma tumor perfusion only recently has been initiated. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET) are important imaging modalities in MPM and complement the information provided by CT. The pointillism sign in diffusion-weighted MRI was reported as a potential parameter for the classification of pleural lesions as benign or malignant, and PET parameters that measure tumor activity and functional tumor volume were presented as indicators of patient prognosis. Also reported was the use of PET/CT in the management of patients who undergo high-dose radiation therapy. Imaging for MPM impacts everything from initial patient diagnosis to the outcomes of clinical trials; iMig 2012 captured this broad range of imaging applications as investigators exploit technology and implement multidisciplinary approaches toward the benefit of MPM patients., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Local recurrence limits long-term survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. We investigated whether hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy lavage affects the interval to recurrence and overall survival among patients with favorable prognostic factors., Methods: Using a preoperative risk assessment algorithm we had previously developed and validated, we retrospectively identified a cohort of patients treated with cytoreductive surgery from 2001 to 2009. The patients had epithelial histologic findings on biopsy and were characterized as having a low risk of early recurrence and death (ie, tumor volume ≤ 500 cm(3) and were either men with a hemoglobin level of ≥ 13 g/dL or were women). Those patients who had received hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy were compared with a comparison group of those who had not. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the balance of prognostic factors. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to estimate and compare the interval to recurrence and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for multivariate analysis., Results: The cohort criteria identified 103 patients: 72 who received hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy and 31 who did not. The groups were balanced for prognostic factors, except for the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (more common in the comparison group). The hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy group exhibited a significantly longer interval to recurrence (27.1 vs 12.8 months) and overall survival (35.3 vs 22.8 months) than the comparison group. The improved interval to recurrence and overall survival for the hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy group were particularly evident among the subgroups of patients who had not received hemithoracic radiotherapy and who had pathologic stage N1 or N2 lymph node metastases., Conclusions: A favorable outcome and minimal incremental morbidity support the incorporation of hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy into multimodality treatment strategies for patients with low-risk epithelial malignant pleural mesothelioma., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of CT-derived tumor volume, with control for other prognostic factors, for stratifying survival after surgery-based multimodality treatment of a large cohort of patients with epithelial malignant pleural mesothelioma., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 338 patients with mesothelioma who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy between 2001 and 2007. The study cohort comprised 88 patients with epithelial subtype tumors, DICOM-format CT scans, and data regarding neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Tumor volume was calculated, and Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare the estimated survival functions of patient subgroups based on volume and other covariates related to outcome (sex, age, preoperative platelet count, hemoglobin concentration, WBC count, clinical and pathologic TNM category, and administration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy). A multivariate regression model was derived on the basis of the most significant univariate predictors., Results: The median estimated tumor volume was 319 cm(3) (range, 4-3256 cm(3)). In univariate analysis, tumor volume, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, pathologic TNM category, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy met the criteria for inclusion in the reverse stepwise regression analysis. In the final model, tumor volume, hemoglobin concentration, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were identified as independently associated with overall survival., Conclusion: With control of prognostic covariates, CT-derived tumor volume can be used to stratify survival of patients with epithelial mesothelioma after extrapleural pneumonectomy and should be included in prognostic evaluation of patients for whom resection is being considered.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an asbestos-related neoplasm that originates in pleural mesothelial cells and progresses locally along the pleura until it encases the lungs and mediastinum, ultimately causing death. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and optimal management. Computed tomography (CT) continues to be the primary and initial imaging modality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) complements CT scan and is superior in determining chest wall and diaphragmatic invasion. FDG18-PET/CT provides anatamo-metabolic information and is superior to both CT and MRI in overall staging and monitoring response to therapy. This chapter will detail the imaging finding of MPM and role of imaging in guiding management.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess, in the evaluation of patients with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from diffusion-weighted images obtained with a free-breathing single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence and to correlate the ADC values with the three histologic subtypes of MPM., Subjects and Methods: Sixty-two patients with a known pleural abnormality and clinical findings suggestive of MPM underwent diffusion-weighted 3-T MRI and ADC calculation. The pathologic diagnosis was confirmed by surgical procedure. ADC values were correlated with the histologic subtypes of MPM. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and the Student's t test., Results: Fifty-seven patients had MPM. Forty of the tumors were epithelioid, 11 were biphasic, and six were sarcomatoid. The other five patients had pleural thickening (two patients), metastatic adenocarcinoma (one patient), chronic inflammation (one patient), and malignant lymphoma (one patient). Because of image distortion, the diffusion-weighted images and ADC maps were not satisfactory for assessment in seven cases. The ADC values of MPM were 1.31 +/- 0.15 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s for the epithelioid, 1.01 +/- 0.11 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s for the biphasic, and 0.99 +/- 0.07 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s for the sarcomatoid subtypes of MPM. The ADC of the epithelioid subtype was statistically significantly higher than that of the sarcomatoid subtype (p < 0.05). The ADC in the two cases of benign plaque was 0.85 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s., Conclusion: The ADC values of epithelioid mesothelioma are higher than those of sarcomatoid mesothelioma. There is no significant difference between the ACD values of biphasic and those of sarcomatoid MPM.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive pleural tumor with a complex growth pattern. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and management. Computed tomography (CT) has been the mainstay in the clinical evaluation of MPM; however it underestimates early chest wall invasion, peritoneal involvement, and has well-known limitations in nodal metastatic evaluation. Perfusion CT can evaluate the microvasculature of tumors; however its disadvantages, such as high radiation exposure and side effects from iodinated contrast, have limited its use to research settings. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT, both in the differentiation of malignant from benign pleural disease and in the assessment of chest wall and diaphragmatic involvement. Perfusion and diffusion MRI are promising new techniques for the assessment of tumor cellularity and microvasculature and can be used for quantitative and qualitative assessment of treatment response. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is useful for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, for staging, and for monitoring response to therapy. PET-CT is superior to other imaging modalities in detecting more extensive disease involvement and identifying unsuspected occult distant metastases. This review focuses on the practical aspects of the radiological assessment of MPM, highlighting the role of the radiologist in preoperative and postoperative evaluation with a multimodality approach.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor that arises from the pleura and frequently extends to adjacent structures. MPM cells produce and respond to many angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF expression in MPM is correlated with microvascular density, which is associated with poor survival. CT has been widely used as the primary imaging modality for the clinical evaluation of MPM. Major findings include nodular pleural thickening, unilateral pleural effusion, and tumor invasion of adjacent structures. CT tends to underestimate early chest wall invasion and peritoneal involvement and has well-known limitations in the evaluation of lymph node metastases. Perfusion CT can evaluate the microvasculature of tumors, while its disadvantages, such as high radiation exposure or side effects from iodinated contrast, limit its use in both research and clinical settings. MRI can provide additional information to CT. Because of its excellent contrast resolution, MRI is superior to CT, both in the differentiation of malignant from benign pleural disease, and in the assessment of chest wall and diaphragmatic involvement. Perfusion MRI is the most promising technique for the assessment of the tumor microvasculature. In MPM, therapeutic effects of chemotherapy can be monitored with perfusion MRI. It has been shown that FDG-PET is useful for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, for staging and monitoring metabolic response to therapy against MPM, and that it has prognostic value. An initial report on PET/CT imaging of MPM has shown increased accuracy of overall staging, improving the assessment of tumor resectability. PET/CT seems to be superior to other imaging modalities in detecting more extensive disease involvement, and identifying unsuspected occult distant metastases.

Background: Tumor recurrence remains the main barrier to survival after surgery for pleural mesothelioma (PM). Soluble mesothelin‐related protein (SMRP) and cancer antigen 125 (CA‐125) are established blood‐based biomarkers for monitoring PM. We prospectively studied the utility of these biomarkers after pleurectomy decortication (PD). Methods: Patients who underwent PD and achieved complete macroscopic resection with available preoperative SMRP levels were included. Tumor marker levels were determined within 60 days of three timepoints: (1) preoperation, (2) post‐operation, and (3) recurrence. Results: Of 356 evaluable patients, 276 (78%) had recurrence by the end of follow‐up interval. Elevated preoperative SMRP levels were associated with epithelioid histology (p < 0.013), advanced TNM (p < 0.001) stage, and clinical stage (p < 0.001). Preoperative CA‐125 levels were not significantly associated with clinical covariates. Neither biomarker was associated with survival or disease‐free survival. With respect to nonpleural and nonlymphatic recurrences, mean SMRP levels were elevated in patients with pleural (p = 0.021) and lymph node (p = 0.042) recurrences. CA‐125 levels were significantly higher in patients with abdominal (p < 0.001) and lymph node (p = 0.004) recurrences. Among patients with all three timepoints available, we observed an average decrease in SMRP levels by 1.93 nmol/L (p < 0.001) postoperatively and again an average increase at recurrence by 0.79 nmol/L (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in levels of CA‐125 across the study timepoints (p = 0.47). Conclusions: Longitudinal changes in SMRP levels corresponded with a radiographic presence of disease in a subset of patients. SMRP surveillance could aid in detection of local recurrences, whereas CA‐125 could be helpful in recognizing abdominal recurrences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the challenges of predicting resectability in pleural mesothelioma, a type of cancer that affects the lining of the lungs. Resectability refers to the ability to surgically remove the tumor. The article highlights the complexity of determining resectability, which is influenced by factors such as surgical expertise and alternative treatment options. Various imaging techniques, such as CT, MR, and PETCT, are used to predict tumor involvement and assess resectability. The article also proposes a model that combines clinical and radiological parameters to predict unresectable tumors. The identification of unresectable tumors before surgery is crucial to avoid unnecessary procedures and expedite non-surgical treatments. The article suggests that further research is needed to validate the proposed model and explore other predictive and prognostic parameters. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) database revealed that clinical (cTNM) staging minimally stratified survival and was discrepant with pathological (pTNM) staging. To improve prognostic classification of MPM, alternative staging models based on quantitative parameters were explored.Methods: An institutional review board-approved MPM registry was queried to identify patients with available pathological and preoperative imaging data. Qualifying patients were randomly assigned to training and test sets in a 1:2 ratio. Computed cTNM and pTNM staging (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed.) were compared. Quantitative image analysis included tumor volume assessed from three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans (VolCT) and maximal fissural thickness (Fmax). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship with VolCT was examined by Cox regression analysis to identify optimized cut-points. Performance of cTNM and quantitative models derived was compared in the test set using Harrell's C index.Results: A total of 472 patients met inclusion criteria. TNM staging was concordant with pathological TNM staging in 171 of 472 (36.2%), understaged in 209 (44.2%), and overstaged in 92 (19.4%) patients. The most concordant feature was involvement of interlobar fissures. A quantitative clinical staging model comprising VolCT and Fmax (c-index = 0.638, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.603 to 0.673) performed statistically significantly better as a prognostic classifier when compared in the test set with cTNM (c-index = 0.562, 95% CI = 0.525 to 0.599, P = .001).Conclusions: Improved prognostic performance may be achievable by quantitative clinical staging combining VolCT and Fmax, providing a cost-effective and clinically relevant surrogate for clinical TNM stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imaging of malignant pleural mesothelioma is essential to patient management, prognostication, and response assessment. From animal models to clinical trials, the gamut of research activities and clinical standards relies on imaging to provide information on lesion morphology and the growing number of physiologic characteristics amenable to capture through imaging techniques. The complex morphology, growth pattern, and biological mechanisms of mesothelioma, however, present challenges for image acquisition and interpretation. Nevertheless, novel approaches to image acquisition and subsequent image analysis have expanded the opportunities for (as well as the need for) imaging in this disease. This paper summarizes the imaging-based research presented orally at the 2014 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig) in Cape Town, South Africa, October 2014. Presented topics include the imaging of hypoxia in a murine model through positron emission tomography (PET), the use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the histologic composition of biphasic mesothelioma and to assess early response to chemotherapy, the correlation of CT-based tumor volume with the volume of the post-surgical tumor specimen, the development of volumetric tumor response criteria, and pre-treatment tumor volume growth considerations for tumor response assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]