Search

The altered pharmacokinetics of renally cleared drugs such as meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) might impact target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is applied to individualize meropenem dosing. However, most population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models developed to date have not yet been evaluated for MIPD. Eight PopPK models based on adult CRRT patients were identified in a systematic literature research and encoded in NONMEM 7.4. A data set of 73 CRRT patients from two different study centers was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models using simulation and prediction-based diagnostics for i) a priori dosing based on patient characteristics only and ii) Bayesian dosing by including the first measured trough concentration. Median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy within |20%| (95% confidence intervals including zero) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision ≤ 30% were considered clinically acceptable. For a priori dosing, most models (n = 5) showed accuracy and precision MPE within |20%| and MAPE

Meropenem is one of the most frequently used antibiotics to treat life-threatening infections in critically ill patients. This study aimed to develop a meropenem dosing algorithm for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on intensive care unit (ICU)-specific resistance data. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria obtained from critically ill patients was carried out from 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary care hospital. Based on the observed MIC distribution, stochastic simulations (n = 1,000) of an evaluated pharmacokinetic meropenem model, and a defined pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target (100%T(>4×MIC) while minimum concentrations were 90% was considered adequate. The observed MIC distribution significantly differed from the EUCAST database. Based on the 6,520 MIC values included, a three-level dosing algorithm was developed. If the pathogen causing the infection is unknown (level 1), known (level 2), known to be neither Pseudomonas aeruginosa nor Acinetobacter baumannii, or classified as susceptible (level 3), a continuous infusion of 1.5 g daily reached sufficient target attainment independent of renal function. In all other cases, dosing needs to be adjusted based on renal function. ICU-specific susceptibility data should be assessed regularly and integrated into dosing decisions. The presented workflow may serve as a blueprint for other antimicrobial settings.

Pneumonia is one of the most common infections in intensive care patients, and it is often treated with beta-lactam antibiotics. Even if therapeutic drug monitoring in blood is available, it is unclear whether sufficient concentrations are reached at the target site: the lung. The present study was initiated to fill this knowledge gap. Various compartments from 10 patients' explanted lungs were subjected to laboratory analysis. Meropenem was quantified in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, microdialysate, and homogenized lung tissue with isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS). BAL fluid represents diluted epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and microdialysate represents interstitial fluid (IF). Differences between target site and blood concentrations were investigated. The median meropenem concentration in blood, ELF, IF, and tissue were 26.8, 18.0, 12.1, and 9.1 mg/liter, respectively. A total of 37.5% of the target site ELF and IF meropenem concentrations were below the clinical EUCAST breakpoint of 8 mg/liter. The median ELF/serum quotient was 61.8% (interquartile range [IQR], 24.8% to 87.6%), the median IF/serum quotient was 35.4% (IQR, 23.8% to 54.3%), and the median tissue/serum quotient was 34.2% (IQR, 28.3% to 38.2%). We observed a substantial interindividual variability between the blood and the compartments (ELF and IF), whereas the intraindividual variability was relatively low. Target site measurement in different lung compartments was feasible and successfully applied in a clinical setting. A relevant amount of 37.5% of the target site concentrations were below the clinical EUCAST breakpoint, indicating subtherapeutic dosing in high-risk patients receiving perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in lung transplantation. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03970265.).

The aim of this study was to investigate optimal loading doses prior to continuous infusion of meropenem in critically ill patients. A previously published and successfully evaluated pharmacokinetic model of critically ill patients was used for stochastic simulations of virtual patients. Maintenance doses administered as continuous infusion of 1.5–6 g/24 h with preceding loading doses (administered as 30 min infusion) of 0.15–2 g were investigated. In addition to the examination of the influence of individual covariates, a best-case and worst-case scenario were simulated. Dosing regimens were considered adequate if the 5th percentile of the concentration–time profile did not drop at any time below four times the S/I breakpoint (= 2 mg/L) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa according to the EUCAST definition. Low albumin concentrations, high body weight and high creatinine clearances increased the required loading dose. A maximum loading dose of 0.33 g resulted in sufficient plasma concentrations when only one covariate showed extreme values. If all three covariates showed extreme values (= worst-case scenario), a loading dose of 0.5 g was necessary. Higher loading doses did not lead to further improvements of target attainment. We recommend the administration of a loading dose of 0.5 g meropenem over 30 min immediately followed by continuous infusion.

Several studies have addressed the poor stability of meropenem in aqueous solutions, though not considering the main degradation product, the open-ring metabolite (ORM) form. In the present work, we elucidate the metabolic fate of meropenem and ORM from continuous infusion to the human bloodstream. We performed in vitro infusate stability tests at ambient temperature with 2% meropenem reconstituted in 0.9% normal saline, and body temperature warmed buffered human serum with 2, 10, and 50 mg/L meropenem, covering the therapeutic range. We also examined meropenem and ORM levels over several days in six critically ill patients receiving continuous infusions. Meropenem exhibited a constant degradation rate of 0.006/h and 0.025/h in normal saline at 22 °C and serum at 37 °C, respectively. Given that 2% meropenem remains stable for 17.5 h in normal saline (≥90% of the initial concentration), we recommend replacement of the infusate every 12 h. Our patients showed inter-individually highly variable, but intra-individually constant molar ORM/(meropenem + ORM) ratios of 0.21–0.52. Applying a population pharmacokinetic approach using the degradation rate in serum, spontaneous degradation accounted for only 6% of the total clearance.

Objectives Beta-lactam antibiotics are often subject to therapeutic drug monitoring, but breakpoints of target attainment are mostly based on expert opinions. Studies that show a correlation between target attainment and infection resolution are missing. This analysis investigated whether there is a difference in infection resolution based on two breakpoints of target attainment. Methods An outcome group out of 1392 critically ill patients treated with meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam was formed due to different selection criteria. Afterwards, three groups were created: group 1=free drug concentration (f) was < 100% of the time (T) above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (< 100% fT >MIC), group 2=100% fT >MIC<4xMIC, and group 3=100% fT >4xMIC. Parameters for infection control, renal and liver function, and estimated and observed in-hospital mortality were compared between those groups. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance, Tukey post hoc test, U test, and bivariate logistic regression. Results The outcome group consisted of 55 patients (groups 1–3, 17, 24, and 14 patients, respectively). Patients allocated to group 2 or 3 had a significantly faster reduction of the C-reactive protein in contrast to patients allocated to group 1 (p = 0.033 and p = 0.026). Patients allocated to group 3 had a worse renal function, a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, were older, and had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to group 1 (p = 0.017) and group 2 (p = 0.001). The higher mortality was significantly influenced by worse liver function, higher APACHE II, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and norepinephrine therapy. Conclusion Achieving the target 100% fT >MIC leads to faster infection resolution in the critically ill. However, there was no benefit for patients who reached the highest target of 100% fT >4xMIC, although the mortality rate was higher possibly due to confounding effects. In conclusion, we recommend the target 100% fT >MIC<4xMIC for critically ill patients. Trial registration NCT03985605

Purpose Optimization of antibiotic therapy is still urgently needed in critically ill patients. The aim of the ONTAI survey (online survey on the use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of antibiotics in intensive care units) was to evaluate which strategies intensive care physicians in Germany use to improve the quality of antibiotic therapy and what role a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) plays. Methods Among the members of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and the German Society for Medical Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, a national cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online questionnaire. Results The questionnaire was completely answered by 398 respondents. Without TDM, prolonged infusion was judged to be the most appropriate dosing regimen for beta lactams. A TDM for piperacillin, meropenem and vancomycin was performed in 17, 22 and 75% of respondents, respectively. For all beta lactams, a TDM was requested more often than it was available. There was great uncertainty as to the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index for beta-lactams. 86% of the respondents who received minimal inhibitory concentrations adapted the therapy accordingly. Conclusion German intensive care physicians are convinced of TDM for dose optimization. However, practical implementation, the determination of MICs and defined target values are still lacking.

Background: Infections with multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in immunocompromised patients are life-threatening. Therapeutic options are rare in this context, but patients are dependent on an effective antibiotic therapy. Thus, new antibiotic strategies are deemed necessary. Case presentation: This case report recounts the therapeutic drug monitoring-guided meropenem therapy of a 32 years old patient admitted with acute exacerbation of cystic fibrosis. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated on the first day of admission to the intensive care unit. The patient showed insufficient serum trough levels of meropenem despite the maximum approved dose (2g every 8h) was administered which was due to augmented renal clearance. Through continuous infusion of the same cumulative dose, target levels were reached. On day 17 of admission, the patient underwent successful double-lung-transplant surgery and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was ended. Unfortunately, the donor's lung was colonized with a multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii that was positive for OXA-23 carbapenemase. Hence a combination therapy of intravenous sulbactam, tigecycline, meropenem and inhalative colistin was established, with a known minimal inhibitory concentration for meropenem of 32 mg/l. Under continuous infusion of 8 g meropenem/day, serum levels exceeded 32 mg/l over 12 days. The patient was transferred from the intensive care unit to a general ward without any signs of infection. Conclusions: Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided meropenem may be a sound new therapeutic option in eradicating multidrug resistant Acinetobacter and offer a novel therapeutic option in the field of personalized medicine. Keywords: Meropenem, Acinetobacter baumannii, Bacterial resistance, Therapeutic drug monitoring, Augmented renal clearance, Lung transplantation

Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of beta-lactam antibiotics has become a valuable tool to guide dosing in critically ill patients. The main goal of the study was to compare two routinely used techniques for beta-lactam TDM in intensive care unit (ICU) patient samples, namely isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography combined with ultra-violet detection (HPLC-UV). Methods A set of 80 sera/plasma samples from ICU patients receiving therapeutic meropenem or piperacillin dosage was investigated. Sample duplicates and quality assessment samples were assayed in parallel with an in-house LC-MS/MS and a commercially available IVD HPLC-UV kit. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target with ≥ 22.5 mg/L for piperacillin and ≥ 8.0 mg/L for meropenem was used for medical assessment of trough sample (n = 40) antibiotic concentrations. Results There was no difference between serum and Li-heparin plasmas. Concentration deviations were found for 4% of meropenem and 17% of piperacillin samples. Eliminating the influence of the systemic bias of approximately 10% for piperacillin, measurement discrepancies ≥ 25% between LC-MS/MS and HPLC-UV analyses were only observed for ≈ 4 - 6% of all samples. In the same way, identical PK/PD target attainment rates of 50 - 60% could be obtained. Conclusions After correction of the analytical bias for piperacillin measurements, both methods showed comparable results, also with respect to clinical decision limits. HPLC-UV analysis is an adequate TDM methodology for testing of beta-lactam antibiotics in centers where no special knowledge in LC-MS/MS based TDM is present. However, potential matrix effects, interferences, and calibration issues for both methods must be taken into account.