Search

Objective: Implementation of the National Mental Health Strategy has important implications for education and training of the Australian mental health workforce. This paper discusses relevant developments in the United Kingdom that may provide some lessons for Australia., Method: A review was undertaken of a number of specific clinical education and training programs for mental health workers in the United Kingdom which have been subjected to published evaluation., Results and Conclusions: A finite mental health resource base dictates that education and training activity should: (i) be evaluated; (ii) target those clients most in need; (iii) include evidence-based approaches such as assertive community treatment, medication management, cognitive-behaviour therapy and family interventions; and (iv) prepare mental health workers in the core competencies needed to implement these approaches. Two programs, developed in the United Kingdom, which meet these criteria are presented as examples of best practice: the nurse therapy model established by Isaac Marks; and the Thorn initiative established in association with the Institute of Psychiatry, London and the University of Manchester.

Psychiatric nursing in prisons has received criticism from within and outside the profession in recent years. In England and Wales this amongst other issues has prompted a review of forensic health care by the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery & Health Visiting (UKCC). The status of forensic psychiatric nursing as a specialty has also been disputed in the literature and the role of nurses working in this field is seen by some to be more about social control than caring. These arguments are set in the present situation of increasing numbers of mentally ill individuals in the prison system and a crisis in the availability of beds in secure units, a situation that is paralleled throughout the western world. The standard expected of health care services in prisons is equivalence with the service the public receives from the National Health Service (NHS). The number of prisoners needing transfer to hospital has increased during the last decade, resulting in competition for a limited number of suitable beds. The effect on health care centres (HCCs) in English prisons is that they now must provide long-term care for seriously mentally ill prisoners. This paper outlines the development of British psychiatric services in prisons. It then describes the HCC in Her Majesty's prison (HMP) Belmarsh and reports on recent radical changes in the management structure of this service. The aim of these changes is to produce a clinical environment in which psychiatric nurses can deliver high quality care in an area beset with difficulties for clinicians and managers and to further progress towards the goal of equivalence. These advances have been achieved through a shift of emphasis in management structure that increases the number of clinical posts and minimizes administrative and security-based responsibilities held by clinical grades. We conclude that although external contracts are necessary, much can be achieved through internal review and changes in policy.

A clinical standards advisory group spent more than two years developing a protocol for assessing standards of care for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The results of its site visits have major implications for nursing practice. There is a clear need for attention to be paid to physical health, medication management and the greater involvement of users and carers. Training in psychosocial interventions needs to be developed as a matter of urgency.

BACKGROUND: NHS Direct, the United Kingdom's 24-hour nurse-led telephone advice service, was announced in December 1997. By November 2000 the service was available throughout England and Wales. Initial research had shown that people with mental health problems used the service and that, prior to its going live, this was one area about which nurses felt least confident. AIMS: The aim of the study was to measure confidence in dealing with mental health calls, knowledge of mental health issues, and attitudes to mental health before and after training. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all nurse advisers working in 17 NHS Direct sites in England before and after mental health training had been received. The questionnaire was designed to measure confidence, knowledge and attitudes. This was done through scenarios of real calls to NHS Direct, questions from the World Health Organization guide to Mental Health in Primary Care and the Depression Attitude Questionnaire. RESULTS: Confidence increased in nurses who received mental health training. Although there was no statistically significant increase in knowledge scores after training, those who had received training increased by on average one point. After training, attitudes towards depression had shifted in that nurses now felt more positive towards their role in treating depressed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Training in mental health can lead to increases in confidence and a change in attitudes and would be beneficial for all nurses working in NHS Direct and in other primary care fields. It would also be beneficial to repeat the study with a larger number of nurses and after a longer period of time to assess the long-term effects of training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is little empirical literature on observation as a psychiatric nursing procedure to prevent patients from harming themselves or others. National guidelines for this practice do not exist, with a consequence that local policies might be variable in content and quality. This paper reports a national survey of observation policies and usage based upon a stratified random sample of 27 psychiatric inpatient service providers in England and Wales. Extreme variation in terminology and practice was encountered. The terminological confusion is likely to reduce nurses' clarity about their responsibilities and increase risks to patients. Further variation exists from place to place as to whether, and to what extent, student nurses and family members should be entrusted with the responsibility to observe patients. More than one in 10 services of the sample still have no written observation policy, and four in 10 have no clinical recording system of the procedure in place. Nurses commonly amend the procedure and terminology on an ad hoc basis. The results of this survey confirm that the Department of Health should set national standards for the policies and procedures for patient observation and that as an interim step practice guidance should be issued to all nurses (and other mental health workers) involved in this procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous research has found comorbid severe mental illness and substance misuse (dual diagnosis) to be highly prevalent and to be associated with serious clinical and social problems, and increased service use in inner-city populations. The present study measures the prevalence of dual diagnosis, patterns of substance misuse, and associated in-patient use in a more demographically representative population in a suburban area of South London.Method: We identified representative prevalent cases with psychotic illnesses who had been in contact with services in a geographically defined catchment area in Croydon over the previous 6 months. Cases of alcohol or substance misuse and dependence were identified through standardised interviews with patients and keyworkers, and sociodemographic and in-patient psychiatric service use data were also recorded.Results: Sixty-one of the 124 cases identified were randomly selected for interview, of whom 66% responded (N = 40). The prevalence rates of dual diagnosis (DD) observed were 33% (95% CI 18-47%) for any substance misuse, 20% (95% CI 8-32%) for alcohol misuse only, 5% (95% CI-16 to 26%) for drug misuse only, and 8% (95% CI -0.7 to 16%) for both drug and alcohol misuse. A lifetime history of any illicit drug use was observed in 35% of the sample (95% CI 20-50%). Patients who misuse alcohol and drugs were not found to be more likely to have been admitted to hospital in the previous 2 years, with little difference being observed between DD and psychosis-only patients in the mean number of in-patient admissions in this period (mean difference 0.25, 95% CI for difference -1.5 to 2.0). However, the DD patients were found to have spent on average over twice as long in hospital as other psychotic in-patients over the previous 2 years (mean difference 67.3 days, 95% CI for difference -205.9 to 71.2 days). DD patients were also found to have a greater number of unmet areas of need than the psychosis-only patients, which included accommodation, daytime activity, and social life, as well as substance misuse.Conclusions: The prevalence of substance misuse in patients with severe mental disorders in a suburban area is about as high as that for similar patients in inner-city London. While DD patients are not admitted more often than patients with psychosis alone, they have double the length of in-patient stay, which may be attributable to higher levels of unmet need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]