1. Pregnant Women’s Views on the Feasibility and Acceptability of Web-Based Mental Health E-Screening Versus Paper-Based Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Author
-
Kingston, Dawn, Austin, Marie-Paule, Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Sander, Harvalik, Paula, Giallo, Rebecca, McDonald, Sarah D, MacQueen, Glenda, Vermeyden, Lydia, Lasiuk, Gerri, Sword, Wendy, and Biringer, Anne
- Subjects
Adult ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Informatics ,Prenatal care ,Anxiety ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Pregnancy ,law ,computers ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Mass screening ,Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview ,Original Paper ,Internet ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,Depression ,business.industry ,screening ,Odds ratio ,Patient Acceptance of Health Care ,Mental health ,Telemedicine ,3. Good health ,Pregnancy Complications ,Mental Health ,Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ,Physical therapy ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,prenatal care ,business ,Psychosocial - Abstract
Background: Major international guidelines recommend mental health screening during the perinatal period. However, substantial barriers to screening have been reported by pregnant and postpartum women and perinatal care providers. E-screening offers benefits that may address implementation challenges. Objective: The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Web-based mental health e-screening compared with paper-based screening among pregnant women. A secondary objective was to identify factors associated with women’s preferences for e-screening and disclosure of mental health concerns. Methods: Pregnant women recruited from community and hospital-based antenatal clinics and hospital-based prenatal classes were computer-randomized to a fully automated Web-based e-screening intervention group or a paper-based control group. Women were eligible if they spoke or read English, were willing to be randomized to e-screening, and were willing to participate in a follow-up diagnostic interview. The intervention group completed the Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale on a tablet computer, while controls completed them on paper. All women completed self-report baseline questions and were telephoned 1 week after randomization by a blinded research assistant for a MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Renker and Tonkin’s tool of feasibility and acceptability of computerized screening was used to assess the feasibility and acceptability of e-screening compared with paper-based screening. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. To identify factors associated with preference for e-screening and disclosure, variables associated with each outcome at P
- Published
- 2017