Search

Introduction: While the associations of genetic, reproductive and environmental factors with the timing of natural menopause have been extensively investigated, few epidemiological studies have specifically examined their association with premature (<40 years) or early natural menopause (40-45 years)., Aim: The aim of this position statement is to provide evidence on the predictors of premature and early natural menopause, as well as recommendations for the management of premature and early menopause and future research., Materials and Methods: Literature review and consensus of expert opinion., Results and Conclusions: Strong genetic predictors of premature and early menopause include a family history of premature or early menopause, being a child of a multiple pregnancy and some specific genetic variants. Women with early menarche and nulliparity or low parity are also at a higher risk of experiencing premature or early menopause. Cigarette smoking (with a strong dose-response effect) and being underweight have been consistently associated with premature and early menopause. Current guidelines for the management of premature and early menopause mainly focus on early initiation of hormone therapy (HT) and continued treatment until the woman reaches the average age at menopause (50-52 years). We suggest that clinicians and health professionals consider the age at menopause of the relevant region or ethnic group as part of the assessment for the timing of HT cessation. In addition, there should be early monitoring of women with a family history of early menopause, who are a child of a multiple pregnancy, or who have had early menarche (especially those who have had no children). As part of preventive health strategies, women should be encouraged to quit smoking (preferably before the age of 30 years) and maintain optimal weight in order to reduce their risk of premature or early menopause., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Whether menopause increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) independently of ageing has been a matter of debate. Controversy also exists about the benefits and risks of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in women with T2DM., Aims: To summarise the evidence on 1) the effect of menopause on metabolic parameters and the risk of T2DM, 2) the effect of T2DM on age at menopause, 3) the effect of MHT on the risk of T2DM, and 4) the management of postmenopausal women with T2DM., Materials and Methods: Literature review and consensus of experts' opinions., Results and Conclusion: Metabolic changes during the menopausal transition include an increase in and the central redistribution of adipose tissue, as well as a decrease in energy expenditure. In addition, there is impairment of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity and an increase in the risk of T2DM. MHT has a favourable effect on glucose metabolism, both in women with and in women without T2DM, while it may delay the onset of T2DM. MHT in women with T2DM should be administered according to their risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In women with T2DM and low CVD risk, oral oestrogens may be preferred, while transdermal 17β-oestradiol is preferred for women with T2DM and coexistent CVD risk factors, such as obesity. In any case, a progestogen with neutral effects on glucose metabolism should be used, such as progesterone, dydrogesterone or transdermal norethisterone. Postmenopausal women with T2DM should be managed primarily with lifestyle intervention, including diet and exercise. Most of them will eventually require pharmacological therapy. The selection of antidiabetic medications should be based on the patient's specific characteristics and comorbidities, as well on the metabolic, cardiovascular and bone effects of the medications., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A vast majority of menopausal women suffer from vasomotor symptoms, such as hot flushes and night sweats, the mean duration of which may be up to 7-10 years. In addition to a decreased quality of life, vasomotor symptoms may have an impact on overall health. Vasomotor symptoms are associated with overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system, and sympathetic overdrive in turn is associated with metabolic syndrome, which is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Menopausal hot flushes have a complex relationship to different features of the metabolic syndrome and not all data point towards an association between vasomotor symptoms and metabolic syndrome. Thus, it is still unclear whether vasomotor symptoms are an independent risk factor for metabolic syndrome. Research in this area is constantly evolving and we present here the most recent data on the possible association between menopausal vasomotor symptoms and the metabolic syndrome., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Hormone therapy is the most effective treatment for sweating and hot flashes, which are the most common symptoms of the menopause. The initiation of therapy for a healthy female of 50 to 59 years usually entails more health benefits than adverse effects, and there is no absolute upper limit for the duration of the treatment. It remains to be evaluated yearly whether the need or prerequisites for continuation of the treatment still exist. If the use of hormone therapy is not desired, alleviation of hot flashes and sweating can be attempted with life style modifications and other remedies.

Objective: Recent data have indicated that menopausal hot flashes may be a determinant for cardiovascular health. Therefore, we studied the impact of hot flashes on insulin resistance, one of the most powerful markers of cardiovascular health, in recently postmenopausal women., Methods: We studied 143 recently postmenopausal (amenorrhea 6-36 mo) healthy and normal-weight women without previous hormone therapy use. The women prospectively recorded the number and severity of hot flashes for 2 weeks, and a validated total symptom score, the hot flash weekly weighted score, was calculated for each woman. Insulin resistance was assessed from fasting blood levels of glucose and insulin with the homeostasis model assessment., Results: In 12 women, the assessment of insulin (n = 11) or glucose (n = 1) failed, and they were excluded from further analysis. Thus, hot flashes were absent in 19, mild in 32, moderate in 27, and severe in 53 women. The levels of glucose or insulin, or HOMA showed no differences between these groups, nor was insulin resistance related to the number or severity of hot flashes or to the levels of C-reactive protein or sex hormone-binding globulin. Overall, insulin resistance showed a positive association with body mass index (mean difference, 0.058; 95% CI, 0.015-0.102; P = 0.009) and a negative association with level of estradiol (mean difference, -0.002; 95% CI, -0.003 to -0.001; P = 0.009)., Conclusions: Insulin resistance may not be involved in hot flash-related changes in cardiovascular health. However, because of the small sample size, these findings need to be interpreted with caution.

Hot flushes are complained of by approximately 75% of all postmenopausal women, and hormone therapy (HT) is the most effective way to alleviate them. Hot flushes are characterized by altered vascular function and sympathetic nervous system activity. Hot flushes occurred more often in women attending large, non-randomized observational studies (e.g. Nurses' Health Study), where HT use protected against cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, they were absent (or mild) in randomized HT trials where HT use was accompanied with an elevated risk for CVD. Hot flushes, if a factor for cardiovascular health, could partly explain the conflict between observational and randomized trials. Several cross-sectional studies imply that hot flushes are detrimental to the cardiovascular system. However, the data are not uniform, and hot flushes were recalled retrospectively or during HT use. In our prospective study hot flushes were accompanied with a vasodilatory effect during endothelial testing, and this was related to the severity of hot flushes. Night-time hot flushes were followed with transient rises in ambulatory blood pressure (BP). However, no effect of hot flushes on diurnal BP was detected. The use of estradiol showed no harmful effects on endothelial function in women with hot flushes, but in non-flushing women oral, but not transdermal, estradiol led to vasoconstrictive changes. Estradiol complemented with medroxyprogesterone acetate eliminated the vasoconstrictive effect of sole oral estradiol. Thus, both oral and transdermal estradiol are applicable in flushing women, whereas a transdermal route should be favored in non-flushing women if used e.g. for bone protection.

Objective The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study clarified the indications and contraindications for postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We studied the impact of the WHI results on the risk of fatal stroke in HT users in Finland. Study design Retrospective analysis setting : Nationwide registers on postmenopausal HT use and causes of death between 1995 and 2009. Population Women ≥40 years ( n = 290,272) using systemic estradiol-based postmenopausal HT. Methods Follow-up started from the first HT purchase during the pre-WHI era (1995–2001) and post-WHI era (2002–2009). Main outcome measures Stroke deaths in HT users were compared with that in the age-matched background population and expressed as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Overall, 311 HT users died due to stroke. The exposure to HT ≤1 year was associated with a similarly reduced 22% (0.67–0.91) risk of stroke death in the pre-WHI era and in the post-WHI era 27% (0.55–0.94). The risk reductions for HT exposure of 1–8 years in the pre-WHI era (47%, 0.42–0.65) did not differ from that in the post-WHI era (32%, 0.48–0.94). The discontinuation of HT was accompanied by a significant 33% (1.02–1.72) increase in stroke death risk in the pre-WHI era and a non-significant 32% (0.84–1.99) increase in the post-WHI era within the first post-treatment year, but no longer after 1–8 years. Conclusions The change in prescribing policy after the WHI study did not affect the risk of fatal stroke in Finnish HT users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To study the possible association between menopausal hot flushes and bone mineral density. Design Observational study. Setting University clinic. Population Healthy women ( n = 143) with or without hot flushes, 6-36 months postmenopausal after participating in a 6-month hormone therapy trial. Methods The women prospectively recorded the number and severity of hot flushes for 2 weeks. Bone mineral density in lumbar and hip bones was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at recruitment and reassessed in 114 women approximately 6.2 years later. Main outcome measures Hot flushes and bone mineral density. Results At recruitment, hot flushes were absent in 22 women, mild in 32, moderate in 28, and severe in 61. Lumbar bone mineral densities in non-flushing women (1.130 ± 0.022 g/cm2; mean ± SEM), and in those with mild (1.088 ± 0.024 g/cm2), moderate (1.082 ± 0.030 g/cm2) or severe (1.102 ± 0.019 g/cm2) hot flushes did not differ, nor were there differences in hip bone mineral densities between the four study groups. During the follow-up, lumbar bone mineral density decreased by a mean of 0.4 ± 0.1% a year in women not using hormone therapy, and increased by 0.1 ± 0.2% a year in hormone therapy users ( p = 0.019). The respective non-significant changes in left and right total hip bone mineral densities were - −0.6 ± 0.01 and −1.0 ± 0.1 for the non-users, and −0.4 ± 0.1 and −0.6 ± 0.2 for hormone therapy users. These changes in bone mineral density bore no relation to the hot flush status at baseline. Conclusion In recently menopausal women, hot flushes do not appear to determine bone mass density. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In women, cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for about half of all deaths in Western countries. It is generally accepted that endogenous estrogen protects premenopausal women from CVD. However, whether postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) confers cardiovascular benefit or harm remains controversial. One of the most pronounced factors modifying the cardiovascular effects of HT is age or time since menopause at the initiation of HT. Recently also the impact of hot flushes on CVD risk and the outcomes of HT has gained attention. This review summarizes the newest data regarding HT and CVD in recently postmenopausal women aged 50-59 years in light of the results from older HT trials. The aim is to help clinicians counsel their patients regarding the individual risks and benefits associated with HT use in this age group, where HT use is most prevalent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sex-related physiological differences result in different expressions of diseases for men and women. Data are contradicting regarding the increase in the female risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) at mid-life. Thus, we studied possible sex differences in age-adjusted mortality for CVD and non-vascular diseases stratifying our findings by specific age groups. Methods: Over one million deaths (1 080 910) reported to the Finnish nationwide Causes of Death Register in 1986–2009 were analyzed. A total of 247 942 male deaths and 278 752 female deaths were of CVD origin, the remaining deaths were non-vascular. The annual mortality rates were calculated per 100 000 mid-year population, separately for men and women in 5-year age categories. Results: The age-standardized risk of death from CVD was 80% higher for men (442/100 000) than for women (246/100 000). After age 45–54 the male CVD mortality rate elevated parallel to the non-vascular mortality, whereas in women the CVD mortality elevated considerably more rapidly than the non-vascular mortality from age 60 years onwards. Conclusions: Heart disease mortality in men accelerates at a relatively young age, but in women the risk shows a steep increase at approximately 60 years of age. These data emphasize the need to identify and prevent risk factors for CVD, especially in women in their mid-life years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most powerful determinants of cardiovascular risk in women. This risk may differ between post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor hot flushes, possibly indicating different vascular responses to hormone therapy (HT). Thus, we compared in a clinical trial the effect of HT on ambulatory BP in normotensive, recently post-menopausal women with or without severe hot flushes. Methods. A total of 147 women recorded prospectively their hot flushes for 2 weeks; 70 women were symptomatic (≥7 moderate/severe hot flush episodes/day), whereas 77 women were defined as asymptomatic (≤3 mild hot flush episodes/day). Women were treated for 6 months with either transdermal estradiol, oral estradiol with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate, or placebo. Results. In symptomatic women decreases in BPs were seen during estradiol use. In contrast, in asymptomatic women receiving oral but not transdermal estradiol, increases in 24-h and day-time systolic and diastolic BPs were encountered. Conclusion. Hot flushes modify the HT-mediated responses in ambulatory BP. In asymptomatic women oral but not transdermal estradiol show potentially harmful cardiovascular effect by increasing BP. Our results give additional justification to prescribing HT primarily for the treatment of troublesome hot flushes and avoiding HT in women without vasomotor symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Menopausal hot flushes may be a marker for a difference in vascular function. We studied the associations between hot flushes of varying severity and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Methods. A total of 147 women with onset of menopause within the preceding 6–36 months reported no hot flushes ( n = 23) or mild ( n = 33), moderate ( n = 30), or severe ( n = 61). Ambulatory BP and HR were registered for 24 hours. The variables, analyzed separately for day-time and night-time, were compared among the four study groups. Results. Hot flushes failed to show any relationship to mean day- or night-time BP, nocturnal dipping of BP, or HR. However, severe night-time hot flushes were accompanied by elevations in systolic BP (4.1 ± 10.5 mmHg, P = 0.061), diastolic BP (3.1 ± 6.8 mmHg, P = 0.032), and heart rate (3.0 ± 7.2 beats/minute, P = 0.043). Conclusion. Hot flushes are not associated with ambulatory BP or heart rate in normotensive, recently post-menopausal women, although severe night-time hot flush episodes are followed by significant elevations in BP and heart rate. The latter may be of clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common and challenging task. Nowadays older women are more active than they were in the past, and the development of POP disrupts quality of life and impairs social and personal activities. The menopausal transition is a time of vulnerability, during which many women start experiencing symptoms and signs of POP. The role of hormonal changes or of hormonal therapies in influencing the development or progression of POP has been explored extensively. The management of POP requires considerable clinical skills. Correct diagnosis and characterization of the prolapse and an identification of the individual woman's most bothersome symptoms are the hallmark of appropriate initial management. Therapy is multimodal and often multidisciplinary, and requires a competence in pelvic medicine and surgery. The integration of hormonal, non-hormonal and surgical strategies is important and needs to be adjusted to changing circumstances on an individualized basis. When surgery is required, optimal management requires clinicians who are familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of all the available strategies and who are able to use these strategies in a tailored manner. Complex cases should be sent to specialist referral centers. Management of POP should be integrated into the practice of healthcare professionals dealing in menopause. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To compare the responses of heart rate and blood pressure to various autonomic tests in women with and without pre-treatment hot flushes during estradiol and estradiol+medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) use. Study design and main outcome measures: Hundred and fifty recently postmenopausal women (72 with and 78 without hot flushes) were randomized to receive transdermal estradiol (1mg/day), oral estradiol (2mg/day) alone or in combination with MPA (5mg/day), or placebo for six months. Cardiovascular responsiveness was comprehensively assessed with controlled and deep breathing, active orthostatic test, Valsalva maneuver and handgrip test. Results: Hot flushes were accompanied with a significant reduction (−2.2±0.7 vs. 1.3±1.1beats/min, p =0.03) in resting heart rate during estradiol-only treatment; the route of estradiol administration was no factor in this regard. This effect was attenuated by the addition of MPA to oral estradiol. Hot flushes were also associated with reduced maximal heart rate in response to handgrip during the use of estradiol-only therapy (−2.2±1.3 vs. 2.8±1.5beats/min, p =0.038); again, the MPA addition eliminated this effect. Hot flushes were accompanied with lowered resting but augmented blood pressure responses to handgrip test during all hormone regimens, whereas in women without hot flushes estradiol-only regimen tended to elevate diastolic resting blood pressure. Conclusions: Hot flushes appear as determinants for cardiovascular responses to hormone therapy. Estradiol-only therapy causes beneficial changes in cardiovascular regulation in flushing women, and these are blunted, in part, by the addition of MPA. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: During menopausal transition autonomic balance is known to shift towards sympathetic dominance, but the role of vasomotor hot flushes in this phenomenon is not understood. We compared cardiovascular autonomic responsiveness between women with and without hot flushes. Study design and main outcome measures: One hundred fifty recently postmenopausal healthy women with varying degree of hot flushes (none, mild, moderate, severe) underwent comprehensive cardiovascular autonomic nervous testing (controlled and deep breathing, active orthostatic test, Valsalva manoeuvre and handgrip test) assessing both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. The responses of heart rate, heart rate variability and blood pressure in these tests were evaluated. Results: Responses in heart rate showed differences between the study groups only in the Valsalva manoeuvre where the tachycardia ratio in all symptomatic women was lower (p =0.041) than in women without hot flushes. Neither change in the heart rate variability analyses nor the blood pressure responses were affected by hot flush status. However, there was a non-significantly higher maximum systolic (140 (112–182)mmHg vs. 135 (102–208)mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (94 (72–112)mmHg vs. 90 (66–122)mmHg) following the handgrip test in women without hot flushes vs. all the symptomatic women. Conclusions: Menopausal hot flushes seem to be associated with a possibly increased sympathetic preponderance without an effect on parasympathetic activity in cardiovascular autonomic responses. This may imply a potentially negative impact on cardiovascular health in women experiencing hot flushes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]