Search

Objective: Recent data have indicated that menopausal hot flashes may be a determinant for cardiovascular health. Therefore, we studied the impact of hot flashes on insulin resistance, one of the most powerful markers of cardiovascular health, in recently postmenopausal women., Methods: We studied 143 recently postmenopausal (amenorrhea 6-36 mo) healthy and normal-weight women without previous hormone therapy use. The women prospectively recorded the number and severity of hot flashes for 2 weeks, and a validated total symptom score, the hot flash weekly weighted score, was calculated for each woman. Insulin resistance was assessed from fasting blood levels of glucose and insulin with the homeostasis model assessment., Results: In 12 women, the assessment of insulin (n = 11) or glucose (n = 1) failed, and they were excluded from further analysis. Thus, hot flashes were absent in 19, mild in 32, moderate in 27, and severe in 53 women. The levels of glucose or insulin, or HOMA showed no differences between these groups, nor was insulin resistance related to the number or severity of hot flashes or to the levels of C-reactive protein or sex hormone-binding globulin. Overall, insulin resistance showed a positive association with body mass index (mean difference, 0.058; 95% CI, 0.015-0.102; P = 0.009) and a negative association with level of estradiol (mean difference, -0.002; 95% CI, -0.003 to -0.001; P = 0.009)., Conclusions: Insulin resistance may not be involved in hot flash-related changes in cardiovascular health. However, because of the small sample size, these findings need to be interpreted with caution.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether aerobic training affects menopausal symptoms in recently postmenopausal sedentary women., Methods: Symptomatic women aged 45 to 63 years (N = 176; 3-36 months since last menstruation) were randomly assigned to an aerobic training or a control group. The intervention included unsupervised aerobic training for 50 minutes four times weekly for 24 weeks, whereas the control group attended health lectures twice a month. Symptoms were reported twice a day using a mobile phone. The perceived disturbance of menopausal symptoms (night sweats, mood swings, irritability, depressive mood, headache, vaginal dryness, and urinary symptoms) was evaluated on a scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high). Multilevel mixed-effect ordinal regression models were based on 17,000 responses during 24 weeks., Results: One hundred fifty-four women continued until the end of the study (88% compliance rate). Baseline prevalence was as follows: night sweats, 50% to 60%; irritability and depression, 20% to 25%; mood swings, 25% to 30%; headache and urinary problems, 15% to 20%; and vaginal dryness, 10% to 15%. The prevalence of all symptoms except vaginal dryness decreased among intervention groups. According to multilevel mixed-effect ordinal regression analysis, night sweats and mood swings (P < 0.001) and disturbance of the mood swings (P < 0.001) and irritability (P < 0.001) were reduced more among the women in the intervention group than in the control group., Conclusions: In sedentary women, aerobic training for 6 months may decrease the typical menopausal symptoms, especially night sweats, mood swings, and irritability.

Hot flushes are complained of by approximately 75% of all postmenopausal women, and hormone therapy (HT) is the most effective way to alleviate them. Hot flushes are characterized by altered vascular function and sympathetic nervous system activity. Hot flushes occurred more often in women attending large, non-randomized observational studies (e.g. Nurses' Health Study), where HT use protected against cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, they were absent (or mild) in randomized HT trials where HT use was accompanied with an elevated risk for CVD. Hot flushes, if a factor for cardiovascular health, could partly explain the conflict between observational and randomized trials. Several cross-sectional studies imply that hot flushes are detrimental to the cardiovascular system. However, the data are not uniform, and hot flushes were recalled retrospectively or during HT use. In our prospective study hot flushes were accompanied with a vasodilatory effect during endothelial testing, and this was related to the severity of hot flushes. Night-time hot flushes were followed with transient rises in ambulatory blood pressure (BP). However, no effect of hot flushes on diurnal BP was detected. The use of estradiol showed no harmful effects on endothelial function in women with hot flushes, but in non-flushing women oral, but not transdermal, estradiol led to vasoconstrictive changes. Estradiol complemented with medroxyprogesterone acetate eliminated the vasoconstrictive effect of sole oral estradiol. Thus, both oral and transdermal estradiol are applicable in flushing women, whereas a transdermal route should be favored in non-flushing women if used e.g. for bone protection.

Objective To study the possible association between menopausal hot flushes and bone mineral density. Design Observational study. Setting University clinic. Population Healthy women ( n = 143) with or without hot flushes, 6-36 months postmenopausal after participating in a 6-month hormone therapy trial. Methods The women prospectively recorded the number and severity of hot flushes for 2 weeks. Bone mineral density in lumbar and hip bones was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at recruitment and reassessed in 114 women approximately 6.2 years later. Main outcome measures Hot flushes and bone mineral density. Results At recruitment, hot flushes were absent in 22 women, mild in 32, moderate in 28, and severe in 61. Lumbar bone mineral densities in non-flushing women (1.130 ± 0.022 g/cm2; mean ± SEM), and in those with mild (1.088 ± 0.024 g/cm2), moderate (1.082 ± 0.030 g/cm2) or severe (1.102 ± 0.019 g/cm2) hot flushes did not differ, nor were there differences in hip bone mineral densities between the four study groups. During the follow-up, lumbar bone mineral density decreased by a mean of 0.4 ± 0.1% a year in women not using hormone therapy, and increased by 0.1 ± 0.2% a year in hormone therapy users ( p = 0.019). The respective non-significant changes in left and right total hip bone mineral densities were - −0.6 ± 0.01 and −1.0 ± 0.1 for the non-users, and −0.4 ± 0.1 and −0.6 ± 0.2 for hormone therapy users. These changes in bone mineral density bore no relation to the hot flush status at baseline. Conclusion In recently menopausal women, hot flushes do not appear to determine bone mass density. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In women, cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for about half of all deaths in Western countries. It is generally accepted that endogenous estrogen protects premenopausal women from CVD. However, whether postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) confers cardiovascular benefit or harm remains controversial. One of the most pronounced factors modifying the cardiovascular effects of HT is age or time since menopause at the initiation of HT. Recently also the impact of hot flushes on CVD risk and the outcomes of HT has gained attention. This review summarizes the newest data regarding HT and CVD in recently postmenopausal women aged 50-59 years in light of the results from older HT trials. The aim is to help clinicians counsel their patients regarding the individual risks and benefits associated with HT use in this age group, where HT use is most prevalent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare in controlled cardiovascular autonomic function tests the effects of hormone therapy ( HT) on heart rate variability ( HRV) responses in postmenopausal women with and without pretreatment hot flushes. Design A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Setting Finland, Helsinki University Central Hospital. Population A total of 150 recently postmenopausal and healthy women with prospectively evaluated hot flushes. Methods Women (72 with and 78 without hot flushes) were randomized to receive estradiol alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate or placebo for 6 months. Time and frequency domain measures of HRV were assessed at baseline and after HT with short-term recordings during paced quiet and deep breathing and with active orthostatic tests, both under carefully controlled laboratory conditions to avoid confounding factors present in long-term ambulatory HRV measurements. Main outcome measures Responses of time and frequency domain measures of HRV to HT. Results At baseline HRV was similar in women with and without hot flushes. Pretreatment hot flushes did not associate with changes in time domain parameters of HRV during controlled quiet or deep breathing or active orthostatic tests after different types of HT. However, HT reduced HRV in very low frequency power in women with pretreatment hot flushes (from 371 ± 40 to 258 ± 28 ms2, p = 0.018). HT did not have an effect on other frequency domain measures during quiet breathing or active orthostatic tests. Conclusions Hormone therapy did not significantly modify the HRV responses in women with or without hot flushes under controlled short-term measurements of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sex-related physiological differences result in different expressions of diseases for men and women. Data are contradicting regarding the increase in the female risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) at mid-life. Thus, we studied possible sex differences in age-adjusted mortality for CVD and non-vascular diseases stratifying our findings by specific age groups. Methods: Over one million deaths (1 080 910) reported to the Finnish nationwide Causes of Death Register in 1986–2009 were analyzed. A total of 247 942 male deaths and 278 752 female deaths were of CVD origin, the remaining deaths were non-vascular. The annual mortality rates were calculated per 100 000 mid-year population, separately for men and women in 5-year age categories. Results: The age-standardized risk of death from CVD was 80% higher for men (442/100 000) than for women (246/100 000). After age 45–54 the male CVD mortality rate elevated parallel to the non-vascular mortality, whereas in women the CVD mortality elevated considerably more rapidly than the non-vascular mortality from age 60 years onwards. Conclusions: Heart disease mortality in men accelerates at a relatively young age, but in women the risk shows a steep increase at approximately 60 years of age. These data emphasize the need to identify and prevent risk factors for CVD, especially in women in their mid-life years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most powerful determinants of cardiovascular risk in women. This risk may differ between post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor hot flushes, possibly indicating different vascular responses to hormone therapy (HT). Thus, we compared in a clinical trial the effect of HT on ambulatory BP in normotensive, recently post-menopausal women with or without severe hot flushes. Methods. A total of 147 women recorded prospectively their hot flushes for 2 weeks; 70 women were symptomatic (≥7 moderate/severe hot flush episodes/day), whereas 77 women were defined as asymptomatic (≤3 mild hot flush episodes/day). Women were treated for 6 months with either transdermal estradiol, oral estradiol with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate, or placebo. Results. In symptomatic women decreases in BPs were seen during estradiol use. In contrast, in asymptomatic women receiving oral but not transdermal estradiol, increases in 24-h and day-time systolic and diastolic BPs were encountered. Conclusion. Hot flushes modify the HT-mediated responses in ambulatory BP. In asymptomatic women oral but not transdermal estradiol show potentially harmful cardiovascular effect by increasing BP. Our results give additional justification to prescribing HT primarily for the treatment of troublesome hot flushes and avoiding HT in women without vasomotor symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Menopausal hot flushes may be a marker for a difference in vascular function. We studied the associations between hot flushes of varying severity and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Methods. A total of 147 women with onset of menopause within the preceding 6–36 months reported no hot flushes ( n = 23) or mild ( n = 33), moderate ( n = 30), or severe ( n = 61). Ambulatory BP and HR were registered for 24 hours. The variables, analyzed separately for day-time and night-time, were compared among the four study groups. Results. Hot flushes failed to show any relationship to mean day- or night-time BP, nocturnal dipping of BP, or HR. However, severe night-time hot flushes were accompanied by elevations in systolic BP (4.1 ± 10.5 mmHg, P = 0.061), diastolic BP (3.1 ± 6.8 mmHg, P = 0.032), and heart rate (3.0 ± 7.2 beats/minute, P = 0.043). Conclusion. Hot flushes are not associated with ambulatory BP or heart rate in normotensive, recently post-menopausal women, although severe night-time hot flush episodes are followed by significant elevations in BP and heart rate. The latter may be of clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current guidelines recommend that hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women with a uterus include a progestin to protect against endometrial hyperplasia. However, many concerns relating to HT use appear to be related to the progestin component, including cardiovascular risk, breast stimulation, and irregular vaginal bleeding. Conjugated estrogens (CE) combined with the selective estrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene (BZA) is a new progestin-free HT option for alleviating estrogen deficiency symptoms in postmenopausal women with a uterus for whom treatment with progestin-containing therapy is not appropriate. Five double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, known as the Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART) trials have investigated the efficacy of CE/BZA for relieving vasomotor symptoms (VMS), and effect on bone mass, as well as endometrial and breast safety in postmenopausal women. In a 12-week study, CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg significantly reduced the number and severity of hot flushes compared with placebo at weeks 4 and 12. Unlike estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT), CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg did not increase breast density compared with placebo. In clinical trials up to 2 years, CE/BZA had a favorable tolerability profile, demonstrated by amenorrhea rates similar to placebo. Vascular disorders including venous thromboembolic events (pulmonary embolism, retinal vein thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, and thrombophlebitis) were rare events, occurring in less than 1 per 1000 patients. CE/BZA was associated with significantly higher incidences of amenorrhea and lower incidences of bleeding compared with CE/medroxyprogesterone acetate in 2 comparative trials. Therefore, CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg provides an effective, well-tolerated, progestin-free alternative to EPT for postmenopausal women with a uterus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Hormone therapy decreased cardiovascular disease risk in women with prior pre-eclampsia. • Ten years of hormone therapy reduced cardiovascular events with 5-8 in 1000 pre-eclamptic women. • Menopausal women with a history of pre-eclampsia should receive this information. Women with prior pre-eclampsia are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) may affect this risk. We evaluated the impact of MHT use on cardiovascular risk between women with and without prior pre-eclampsia. We assessed the occurrence of any CVD, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in MHT users (n = 9700) and non-users (n = 19,914) with prior pre-eclampsia, and likewise in MHT users (n = 27,764) and non-users (n = 58,248) without prior pre-eclampsia over the period 1994–2019. Follow-up started at MHT initiation (mean age 50.4 in pre-eclamptic women and 50.3 in non-pre-eclamptic women) and lasted for a mean of 13.3 years. The use of MHT in prior pre-eclamptic women was associated with significant risk reductions for any CVD (HR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.78–0.91), MI (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.55–0.78) and stroke events (HR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.63–0.81) in comparison with non-users with prior pre-eclampsia. The risk reductions for cardiovascular deaths were even more pronounced (HR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.31–0.59 for any CVD death; HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.30–0.80 for MI death; HR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.10–0.64 for stroke death). However, none of these risk reductions differed from those seen in MHT users without prior pre-eclampsia. The risk of any CVD decreased already within five years of MHT use in women with prior pre-eclampsia but not in those without prior pre-eclampsia. The use of MHT is associated with reduced CVD risk in women with prior pre-eclampsia. This is important to clinicians considering the initiation of MHT for recently menopausal women with prior pre-eclampsia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estrone is the most abundant estrogen after the menopause. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method (LC–MS/MS) for determination of estrone in adipose tissue. Subcutaneous adipose tissue from the breast was collected during elective surgery in postmenopausal women undergoing mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer ( n = 13) or reduction mammoplasty (controls, n = 11). Homogenized adipose tissue was extracted with organic solvents and the estrone fraction was purified by LH-20 column chromatography from the excess of lipids. The concentration of estrone was analyzed by LC–MS/MS. The method was accurate with an intra-assay variation of 8% and an interassay variation of 10%. The median concentration of estrone in subcutaneous adipose tissue from the breast did not differ between breast cancer and control women, 920 pmol/kg and 890 pmol/kg, respectively. In breast cancer patients but not in the controls, breast adipose tissue estrone levels correlated positively with the serum estrone concentration. In conclusion, the new method provides a reliable means to measure estrone concentrations in adipose tissue in postmenopausal women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study clarified the indications and contraindications for postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). We studied the impact of the WHI results on the risk of fatal stroke in HT users in Finland. Study design Retrospective analysis setting : Nationwide registers on postmenopausal HT use and causes of death between 1995 and 2009. Population Women ≥40 years ( n = 290,272) using systemic estradiol-based postmenopausal HT. Methods Follow-up started from the first HT purchase during the pre-WHI era (1995–2001) and post-WHI era (2002–2009). Main outcome measures Stroke deaths in HT users were compared with that in the age-matched background population and expressed as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Overall, 311 HT users died due to stroke. The exposure to HT ≤1 year was associated with a similarly reduced 22% (0.67–0.91) risk of stroke death in the pre-WHI era and in the post-WHI era 27% (0.55–0.94). The risk reductions for HT exposure of 1–8 years in the pre-WHI era (47%, 0.42–0.65) did not differ from that in the post-WHI era (32%, 0.48–0.94). The discontinuation of HT was accompanied by a significant 33% (1.02–1.72) increase in stroke death risk in the pre-WHI era and a non-significant 32% (0.84–1.99) increase in the post-WHI era within the first post-treatment year, but no longer after 1–8 years. Conclusions The change in prescribing policy after the WHI study did not affect the risk of fatal stroke in Finnish HT users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To compare the responses of heart rate and blood pressure to various autonomic tests in women with and without pre-treatment hot flushes during estradiol and estradiol+medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) use. Study design and main outcome measures: Hundred and fifty recently postmenopausal women (72 with and 78 without hot flushes) were randomized to receive transdermal estradiol (1mg/day), oral estradiol (2mg/day) alone or in combination with MPA (5mg/day), or placebo for six months. Cardiovascular responsiveness was comprehensively assessed with controlled and deep breathing, active orthostatic test, Valsalva maneuver and handgrip test. Results: Hot flushes were accompanied with a significant reduction (−2.2±0.7 vs. 1.3±1.1beats/min, p =0.03) in resting heart rate during estradiol-only treatment; the route of estradiol administration was no factor in this regard. This effect was attenuated by the addition of MPA to oral estradiol. Hot flushes were also associated with reduced maximal heart rate in response to handgrip during the use of estradiol-only therapy (−2.2±1.3 vs. 2.8±1.5beats/min, p =0.038); again, the MPA addition eliminated this effect. Hot flushes were accompanied with lowered resting but augmented blood pressure responses to handgrip test during all hormone regimens, whereas in women without hot flushes estradiol-only regimen tended to elevate diastolic resting blood pressure. Conclusions: Hot flushes appear as determinants for cardiovascular responses to hormone therapy. Estradiol-only therapy causes beneficial changes in cardiovascular regulation in flushing women, and these are blunted, in part, by the addition of MPA. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: During menopausal transition autonomic balance is known to shift towards sympathetic dominance, but the role of vasomotor hot flushes in this phenomenon is not understood. We compared cardiovascular autonomic responsiveness between women with and without hot flushes. Study design and main outcome measures: One hundred fifty recently postmenopausal healthy women with varying degree of hot flushes (none, mild, moderate, severe) underwent comprehensive cardiovascular autonomic nervous testing (controlled and deep breathing, active orthostatic test, Valsalva manoeuvre and handgrip test) assessing both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. The responses of heart rate, heart rate variability and blood pressure in these tests were evaluated. Results: Responses in heart rate showed differences between the study groups only in the Valsalva manoeuvre where the tachycardia ratio in all symptomatic women was lower (p =0.041) than in women without hot flushes. Neither change in the heart rate variability analyses nor the blood pressure responses were affected by hot flush status. However, there was a non-significantly higher maximum systolic (140 (112–182)mmHg vs. 135 (102–208)mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (94 (72–112)mmHg vs. 90 (66–122)mmHg) following the handgrip test in women without hot flushes vs. all the symptomatic women. Conclusions: Menopausal hot flushes seem to be associated with a possibly increased sympathetic preponderance without an effect on parasympathetic activity in cardiovascular autonomic responses. This may imply a potentially negative impact on cardiovascular health in women experiencing hot flushes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: To determine whether co-administration of soy during tibolone treatment would prevent tibolone-induced dyslipoproteinemia in postmenopausal monkeys and women. Methods: Surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus monkeys (n =18) were assigned randomly to one of four dietary regimens in a Latin Square crossover design, such that all animals received all diets for 14 weeks with a 4-week washout period: (1) casein/lactalbumin (CL); (2) tibolone (Tib, 1.25mg/day women''s equivalent); (3) soy (138mg isoflavones/day women''s equivalent); (4) Soy+Tib. Postmenopausal women on tibolone treatment were randomized to receive soy powder (52g of soy protein containing 112mg isoflavones) or placebo (containing 52g of milk protein) daily in a crossover trial for 8 weeks with a 4-week washout period. Results: Monkeys given Tib alone had ∼14% increase in plasma LDL+VLDL-C; whereas those given soy combined with tibolone had significant (∼22%) reductions. Tib treated monkeys had reductions in plasma HDL-C of about 48% vs. no reductions in Soy+Tib. In postmenopausal women using tibolone, soy reduced plasma LDL-C concentrations by ∼10% from baseline without a change in HDL-C. Conclusions: Co-administration of soy during tibolone treatment improved the lipoprotein profile in both monkeys and women; however, the effects were more robust in monkeys. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]