Search

Peptide docking can be perceived as a subproblem of protein–protein docking. However, due to the short length and flexible nature of peptides, many do not adopt one defined conformation prior to binding. Therefore, to tackle a peptide docking problem, not only the relative orientation, but also the bound conformation of the peptide needs to be modeled. Traditional peptide-centered approaches use information about peptide sequences to generate representative conformer ensembles, which can then be rigid-body docked to the receptor. Alternatively, one may look at this problem from the viewpoint of the receptor, namely, that the protein surface defines the peptide-bound conformation. Here, we present PatchMAN (Patch-Motif AligNments), a global peptide-docking approach that uses structural motifs to map the receptor surface with backbone scaffolds extracted from protein structures. On a nonredundant set of protein–peptide complexes, starting from free receptor structures, PatchMAN successfully models and identifies near-native peptide–protein complexes in 58%/84% within 2.5 Å/5 Å interface backbone RMSD, with corresponding sampling in 81%/100% of the cases, outperforming other approaches. PatchMAN leverages the observation that structural units of peptides with their binding pocket can be found not only within interfaces, but also within monomers. We show that the bound peptide conformation is sampled based on the structural context of the receptor only, without taking into account any sequence information. Beyond peptide docking, this approach opens exciting new avenues to study principles of peptide–protein association, and to the design of new peptide binders. PatchMAN is available as a server at https://furmanlab.cs.huji.ac.il/patchman/.

Motivation: Transmembrane proteins (TMPs) are crucial in the life of the cells. As they have special properties, their structure is hard to determine--the PDB database consists of 2% TMPs, despite the fact that they are predicted to make up to 25% of the human proteome. Crystallization prediction methods were developed to aid the target selection for structure determination, however, there is a need for a TMP specific service., Results: Here, we present TMCrys, a crystallization prediction method that surpasses existing prediction methods in performance thanks to its specialization for TMPs. We expect TMCrys to improve target selection of TMPs., Availability and Implementation: https://github.com/brgenzim/tmcrys., Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Motivation Due to their special properties, the structures of transmembrane proteins are extremely hard to determine. Several methods exist to predict the propensity of successful completion of the structure determination process. However, available predictors incorporate data of any kind of proteins, hence they can hardly differentiate between crystallizable and non-crystallizable membrane proteins. Results We implemented a web server to simplify running TMCrys prediction method that was developed specifically to separate crystallizable and non-crystallizable membrane proteins. Availability and implementation http://tmcrys.enzim.ttk.mta.hu Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]